<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>jeffrey E. &lt;jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Saturday, October 10, 2015 3:47 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>G Maxwell</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re: FW: Attorney Privileged Communication - subject to mutual interest privilege
[IWOV- Matters.FID782702]</td></tr></table>

thecase said that hte state where the plaintiff resi=es is the issue. not new york

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:40 AM, G Maxw=ll > > wrote:

Received your communications.

I have done some research, and having read=the Judge's ruling in the Cosby case, and found what I though ma= be pertinent to mine

In the judge's ruling in the Cosby case states "The court recognizes that some=jurisdictions do apply a version of the conditional self-defense privilege, which allows individuals, in certain circumstances= to publish defamatory responsive statements necessary to defend their reprtation."

NY law differs from Mass law and hence I attache= a paper I found and read that I thought had valid arguments for my caseq=iv>

please =ote

The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved