<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>jeffrey E. &lt;jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Monday, August 15, 2016 12:21 AM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Kathy Ruemmler</td></tr></table>

tried to call

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Kathy =uemmler <kathyruemmler@gma=l.com <javascript:_e(%76%7D;cvml ');> > wrote:

Let's discuss this. It is an advocacy piece, not a fac=ual declaration. It won't be effective as currently drafted.

=AO

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 14, 2016, at 9:52 AM, jef=rey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <javascript:_e("%7B%7D",'cvml','jeevacation=gmail.com');>> wrote:

could i have yo=r views whetther you think this type of expostions ( ignore typos an= grammar ) is useful for a -sarnoff complaint

Q=A0 Over the past 10 years, Jeffrey Epstein has been the subject of a repetitive streamthe<=ins> punching bag of tablo=d publicly publicity,Q=A0 improperly released police reports, wildly exaggerated (ans datetime="2016-08-14T06:38">and if not contained in court procdedings they would be defamatory) </=pan> litigation pleadings and vile media stories relating =o his payment to young women aspan>,each that came to his home, to perform erotic massages. fema=es, some of whom unbeknow=st towhom later were= h=m were reported to be underage, for sexually charged massages Most of whom came nack time and gain. Including calling asking for a time to ret=rn. In a community where<=pan> 50 massage parlors offered the same service=span>. , and where many of the girls actually wo=ked. However Fl=rida has a statute , (3) IGNORANCE OR BELIEF OF VICTIM'S A=E.—The perpetrator's ignorance of the victim's age, the victim4,=804,s misrepresentation of his or her age, or the perpetrator's bona fide belief of the victim=E2444$ age cannot be raised as a defense in a prosecution under this section.

that says misreprepresentation of age is NOT a defense. Puttirg the in some cases impossible burden on a defendant. Being shown driviers licenses from a women with piercing ( 18 years old required ). who works in a strip club=/ins>, or bar </=pan>(the two plaintiffs currently suing the govt. after taking advantage of the very sam= agreement that they now want to overturn , having received hundreds of thousands of dollars as a direct compulsory term of that very same agreemen= they now seek to overturn.

Turning local prostitution into the heinous crime of SEX TRAFFICKING was the goal of Sarnoffs book. Sex trafficking gets attention , local prostitution . a state crime , would not have gotten her TV interviews .

From the very =eginning, Due to Mr Epsteins wealth and prominence these reports, pleadings and stories have been tabloid fodder rife with exaggeratio=, omission, and outright falsehoods. Though over a decade has passed With the passage of time, as the story they told, which is and only ever really was a story about a wealthy Palm Beach =E2$4john" who frequenty solicited local prostitution a legitimate reason for a =/ins>quite colorful who got caug=t up in a local scandal and would have quickly for frequently soliciting local pr=stitution, becoame old news,had not some <=pan> financially and politically motivated private individuals, lawyers and journalists have kept the story alive in a financially motivated attempted time and againstrategy to br=athe new life into it.. They have fed and continue to feed a public accustomed to tabloid hyperbole with ever more salacious and conspiratorial allegations about all=ged sex trafficking, power brokering and political corruption. One of the most agrecious=C20 examples in book form seprate and apart fr=m allegations of underage sex with princes academics biz people world leaders </=pan> new book, TrafficKing, =irst published on July 6, 2016, irresponsibly assembles the worst of these allegations and fabricates even more inflammatory ones of her own in order to create a false and wildly =xaggerated tale, sold as non fiction about Mr. Epstein and the Plaintiffs,. S=e creates a delusion of and=ispan> their <=el datetime="2016-08-14106:59"> participa=ion in <=span>SEX trafficking and other detestable criminal behavior, that bears absolutely no resemblance whatsoever to the in order to sell books . nothing more =span> truth.

4,=A0 So much so that in January 2015, Jean Luc Brunel, a modeling agent,=long time friend of Mr Epstein, who is also unfairly and falsely reviled <=pan>portrayed , without any evidence whatsoever, as a sex trafficker in Sarnoff's abhorrent creation, sued Epstein for =ailing to publicly renounce these false allegations leveled against Epstein and him, including those perpetuated by Sarnoff.ln her book She makes wild accusations against an industry that legitimately hires young women to model. And through her distorted lens turn evey modeling agent into a criminal. <=h1>

=C* With Epstein's silence<=el datetime="2016.08-14T07:04"> and, for obvious reasons, a dearth of individuals willing to risk their own reputations to defend persons and offensive events depicted with ever increasing severity<=del>, a vacuum has been created to allow Sarnoff, a shameless and delusional self-promoter, to peddle to a voracious but unsuspecting public an infantil= distortion in the name of human rights. Sarnoff's "TrafficKing" is a frighteningly irresponsible compilation =f untested fantastical allegations, unsupportable assumptions, shoddily pieced togethe= circumstantial evidence and paranoid speculation. It is =oorly researched, carelessly sourced and alarmingly inaccurate. Though presented in s tyle that includes fake footnotes in most chapters. Many <=span>of which upon researching do not exist.

=C* Pages 94 through 108 of TrafficKing <=pan>clearly establish that Sarnoff, tells a=tale of her having r=cently been terrified during an investigation in Mexico into true sex t=afficking and government corruption, was already=primed to accept as given a link between sex trafficking and government corruption. =She says she =ead a few articles in which the lawyers representing a few women prosecuting in </=ns>civil cases against Epstein where were try=ng to create public pressure on Epstein. What is clear from her narrative is that from the beginning she assumed the truth of every negativ= statement asserted against Epstein All the research she conducted thereafter was clearly informed by this pre-conceivedand her and completely erroneous notion that Epstein's wealth and power were us=d to insulate him and his associates from the consequences of a serious criminal activity.

=C* Sarnoff's bias has made her r=cklessly indifferent to the truth in the Epstein case and singularly unwilling to exercise even a modic=m of critical analysis or objectivity. She draws her "facts" and conclusions from very obviously biase= and unreliable sources without any scrutiny, due diligence or professional journalistic objectivity, choosing to accept without question any and all negative allegations against Mr. Epstein and his associates and to fully discard any=and all evidence that demonstrates an absence of credibility of her sources or =he implausibility of the information they provide.

=C* Consequently, in TrafficKing, Ms. Sar=off has published a fabrication riddled with blatant defamation, particularly relating to the P=aintiffs, their relationships with Epstein and their involvement in the matters givin= rise to Mr. Epstein's legal problems. In fact, Sarnoff ignored clear warnings about the problems with her book,

conc=ding at page xii-xiv that "publishers were afraid to print my book for f=ar of" libel and legal action and that 6 different publishers rejected her manuscr=pt. Acting wit= full knowledge of her publishers skepticism and warnings and with clear malice i= the face of so many voices saying your story is inaccurate, Sa=noff should have heeded those warnings as the numerous defamatory statements in TrafficKing have severely and irreparably damaged the reputations of Plaintiffs, two innocents unfairly caught in its destructive wake.

[Background]

[Background]=/p>

Fa=tual Background

Investigation by Palm Beach Police Department

4>=A0 As has been reported over and over for the past 10 years. In March 2005, t=e Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein when the father and stepmother of Saige Gonzales complained to police about=a visit by their 14-year old daughter to Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach hom=. What has not=been reported is that ;Mr. and Mrs. Gonzales informed police that they believed inappropriate conduct =ay have occurred between Mr. Epstein and their daughter. The police interviewe= Saige Gonzales, who had visited Mr. Epstein's home only once, but ought no charges after interviewing her, though monitored activity at Mr. Epstein4)=804,s home through sporadic surveillance and occasional trash pulls.

=C2. There are several reasons that ex lain this result.=C24, Saige told the Palm Beach Police on more than one occasion that she was instructed by = the woman who brought her to Mr. Epstein's home, that Saige had to =ell Mr. Epstein she was 18 years old because, if she was not 18, he would not let h=r into his house. Saige also informed the Police that she did in fact tell Mr. Epstein that she was 18 years old. She also informed police that Mr. Epstein had no sexual contact with her. Mr. Epstein took a lie detector test, the results of which confirmed that Saige told hi= she was 18, that he believed Saige when she told him her age, that he never threatened Saige in any way and that no sexual contact occurred with Saige. In addition, Saige, who had previous run-ins with the Police, maintained a "MySpace page at the=time of the investigation on which she stated that she was 18 years old, posted naked a=d provocative photographs, admitted =o having sex . that she was not a virgin, to using drugs, and =o having beaten someone up, and to having shoplifted and claimed=to earn $250,000 or more.

=C240 In addition, the persons who filed the police report, Saige4>=99s father and stepmother, both had criminal records. The father had served 21 months in federal prison for bank fraud, an= the stepmother had a state conviction for identity fraud. Moreover, Mr. and Mrs. Gonzales's true motivation for going to the police later becam= apparent when they held a press conference on the courthouse steps announcing their civil lawsuit seeking substantial monetary damages from Mr. Epstein.=C2* They commenced that lawsuit without authorization from Saige Gonzales =hough she was now an adult. and it was ultimately dismissed. Ms. Gonzales did eventually file her own lawsuit in order to profit from these events, despi=e the fact that she had already confirmed to the police that she lied to Mr. Epstein, specifically telling him that she was 18 years old, and that no se=ual contact with him occurred [need to

confirm this from <u>transcripts]</u> on the on= occasion that she went to his house. See March 13= 2005 Transcript of Interview with at 38:21-39:4, 39:9-18.

=AO

* Saige Gonzales

=AO

Q: <=span>At any time, did he speak to you and does know how old you are? Did he know how old

you were?

A: =C24),...As a matter of fact, I told me to say I was 18 because Haley said tell him you're=18 because if you're not, then he won't really let you in his house. So I said I was 18. As I was giving hi= a massage, he's like, how old are you? And then I was like 18. =ut I kind of said it really fast because I didn't want to make it sound like I was lying or anything. (Sworn P=lice Statement of 3/15/05).

<=iv dir="ltr"> please note <=iv>The information contained in this communication is confidential, may=be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and i= intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of J=E

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or a=y part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us immediately by jeevacation@gmail.c=m <javascript:_e(%7B%7D/cvml destroy this communication and all copies thereof, includ=ng all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

');>, and

=AO

please note

The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="javascript:_e(%7IPA7D,tcvmlVjeevacation@gmail.com&P=9;);"

target="_blank">jeevacation@gmail.com, and

destroy this com=unication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright =all rights reserved

=lease note

The information contained in this communication is c=nfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside in=ormation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this co=munication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawf=l. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us i=mediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto > , and destroy th=s communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copy=ight -all rights reserved