<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Joscha Bach</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Saturday, August 6, 2016 6:12 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Jeffrey Epstein</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re:</td></tr></table>

How can we set physics on the right track? There are several =amps that seem to have stopped talking to each other (with Steven =rominently in one of them, seen as an outsider, even though his =pproach is very promising). Is it possible to get science work across =aradigms, or do we need to wait for a paradigm to die off?

The situation is perhaps = bit similar to Noam in linguistics (with the difference that Noam =retty much started the field, so he will always be recognized, even if =any linguists do not buy into what he does now)?

With respect to language:

Steven proposes to do =verything by exhaustive search of the problem space: automatically find =he smallest set of programs that can produce the observables. Noam =eems to believe that there are somewhat complex, irreducible circuits =hat we have to figure out to understand language?

The obvious question: can we solve language by exhaustive =earch over simple type3 grammars? Is this how the brain does =t?

Bests to =verybody!

Joscha

Am 06.08.2016 um 12:31 schrieb =effrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> >:

having steve wolfrm , come to martins with noam = what questions would you like posed on your =ehalf

please note

The information contained in this =ommunication is confidential, may be attorney-client =rivileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure =r copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this =ommunication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights reserved