<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Valeria Chomsky</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:
To:</td><td>Sunday, July 2, 2017 4:48 AM
Jeffrey E.</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Fwd: taxes</td></tr></table>

1) The money under discussio= is all Noam's. All the other assets were transferred to Noam's ch=ldren in trusts or directly. For example, the Wellfleet house became=a LLC under their names.

=) Carol had been working earlier. But almost all the money was from Noam8t0=9;s income and there were no distinction between the two income flows. =div>

Valeria

Forwarded messa=e
From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.c=m <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com»
Date: Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: tax=s
To: Valeria Chomsky

I personally =ill meet with speak with any one or all of them. so put your m=nd at ease. they are right in certain regards. how=ver it tells me little re the overall situation. The int=rest language is ok. it was designed to merely pas= through the same amount that the trust was paying , as they were bo=rowing the money themselves from pershing. and you were only r=quired to pay the same rate that they were paying. . however=C2 I have many questions re the overall. . =AO we can rectify this fairly quickly . but I want to make sur= we have all the documents first. 1 did the =hildren EARN any of the money under discussion or is this all noams.=C2 2 did his past wife earn this money. ? =1 suggest you tell them that you wish to collect all documents in one plac=. and then the moment that is complete you will have someone sit wit= them. . dont let on its me. . tell th=m as soon as you have all the docs you will straighten this all out.=C2 .

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Vale=ia Chomsky <valeria.chomsky@gmail.com <mailto:valeria.chomsky@gmail.c=m» wrote:

Jeffrey,

W= just received the following letter.

Noam would l=ke if you could take a look at this letter and let us know if it is accura=e or not on the interpretation of the promissory note. And if not, c=uld you please explain why it is not?

Valeria

-------- Forwarded message --------

F=om: Diana Chomsky

## Hi, thanks for your reply.

We are very, very concerned that y=u are not understanding and not getting help in understanding what is happeni=g with your finances. Your responses below only increase our concern. The three of us are not able to serve as financial advisors. We urge you strongly to speak directly with Max so that he can clarify what he says in the Memo and explain what the Promissory Note language means.

Just to give you one example of ou= concern: You focus on one phrase: that the interest will be "=t the highest rate in effect." But you are taking those words out of =ontext. We really don't think we should be trying to explain these d=tails to you, but to try to summarize: this phrase applied to the double nature of the loan—the Marital Trust had to borrow money from Persh=ng to make the loan to you, until the Lexington house was sold. The phrase you quote applies only to that brief period, and has no impact on the interest accruing now or in the future.

We can see why focusing on those s=x words would make you angry. But the six words mean nothing in and of themse=ves (i.e., what rate is "in effect"?). But instead of doi=g the logical thing—getting the full information—you are just so angry th=t you refuse to find out the truth.

Again, this is just one example of=where you are stating conclusions based on faulty or incomplete information. There are explanations for your other issues as well (how the DNI is paid to you, how the interest payments can be made, etc) but rather than us trying to summarize the information for you here, we think it would make more sense for you to discuss them with the people who set all of this up, in the context of a broader conversation. Reading your response only redoubles our sense that you are simply misreading important elements of your entire financial situation, and that you are making big decisions based on faulty information. We feel that you have painted yourself into a corner, in which you arrive at the worst possible interpretation of complex legal language, and then refuse to speak with the very people who could explain it to you, and just get angry at them based on your misin=erpretations.

We beg you once again to meet with=us and with the people who set up the Trust, the loan, etc., to clarify these issues.

love, Avi, Diane and Harry

From: =AO Noam Chomsky =br>To: =AO Diana Chomsky =AO

Cc: =C2 Avi Chomsky , Harry Chomsky , Valeria Chomsky

Date: 30/06/2017 19:41

Subject: =C2 Re: taxes

Noam Chomsky =br> To: =vi Chomsky , Diana Chomsky, Harry Chomsky, Valeria Chomsky Date: -=

=C2 please note

## Hi, thanks for your reply. (cont.)

The information contained in this communication =s confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute in=ide information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It =s the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thi= communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be=unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please noti=y us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jee=acation@gmail.com> , and des=roy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachment=. copyright -all rights reserved