<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>jeffrey E. &lt;jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Monday, August 15, 2016 12:53 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>David Sauvage</td></tr><tr><td>Cc:</td><td>gino yu</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re:</td></tr></table>

I greatly appreciatei the honesty, I don= think will work with pictures. but might work face to face. if it w=11 work at all. if so I would try 10 women, and t=n names. . you with need to touch each one. ..=A0

On =un, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:32 PM, David Sauvage | wrote:

Earlier today, I sat down with 15 =ictures and 15 names and tried to match them. It turned out to be quite a =truggle -- primarily because people were very similar. For instance, I'=d have descriptions like this:

Shy but relatively=happy on the outside Filled with frustration and anxiety Burning with rage deep down

But out of the 15 p=ople, that could vaguely describe 3 or 4 them. So my matching ending up lo=king like a convoluted chart.

What I conclu=ed was that I need a bit more help designing this experiment. Ideally, rat=er than matching 15 names to pictures, I have a bunch of binary decisions =A or B). One would expect me to get 50% right. IF the people are emotional=y different enough (happy v. sad, for instance) I hypothesize I will do co=siderably better than chance. Does that make sense?

I have started to go down this road with my friend at NYU. Happy to disc=ss with Gino as well.

And of course, happy =o submit to MRI machines and the like to figure what's happening on th=t end.

Open to any and all thoughts. Science, cle=rly, is not my gift.

Very best,
David</=iv>

On Tue,=Aug 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, David Sauvage wrote:

Hi Jeffrey,

Sorry it took a beat to respond=

This weekend, when I have space and time, I'll ask a friend=to lay out some pictures and names and see how I do. And I'll report b=ck what I learn.

I've been thinking about this for a while -= and I do feel we ultimately need a more rigorous experiment.
But I like y=ur idea, at least to start, of just giving it a good and seeing.

Great=meeting you.
David

Sent from =y mobile device

On Aug 7, 2016, at 6:22 AM, jeffre= E. <jeevaca=ion@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacaction@gmail.com> >
wrote:

<=iv dir="ltr">david, if you can do the name to photo test.40=A0 in a 25 picture test. it could be an interestin= begining, I suggst you take twenty women =11 availbel on google or facebook and try. ,

please note

T=e information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be a=torney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is int=nded only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE

communication or any pa=t thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have recei=ed this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
retu=n e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and
destroy this communication an= all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights r=served

=AO

please note

The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may

constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of TEE

Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com"

target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved