<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>jeffrey E. &lt;jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Thursday, April 16, 2015 4:44 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Mike Sitrick</td></tr></table>

Inbox

<=iv class="" style>

<https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/profile_mask_2x.pn=>:

<=div>

Darren Indyke

11:33 AM (56 minutes ago)
<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/images/cleard=t.gif>
to me
<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/images/cleardot.g.f>
Please see below a prop=sed draft letter from you to Michael.

Settlement Discussions

Michael,

Thanks for your time yesterday . to hopefully w=rk towards a resolution to put this matter in the past I thoug=t it would be helpful to at least agree on the facts. so if not too much t=oublethere are a few points that I would like to understand

1. You told me that you won the arbitration, ? I unders=ood that after your lawyers sent an arbitration demand in March 2012, in J=ne 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was t=e source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye on a settlement, yours filed a complaint=20 confidentiality obligations, which was never served on me, and obtained what everyone understands to be a curr=ntly unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it your bills were never reviewed by any cou=t or arbitrator.

2. You told me yesterday that you received a paym=nt from me. Would you please send me the details of that payment. In=additoin you said you would provide me the sum of what roy had paid =ou. in 05.7

3. oddly Your email did not agree with the e=ail that my lawyers received only on April 3 from your lawyer, lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance off=red to accept $150,000.

4. If you were operating under the 2005 Agreement =were the invoices addressed to roy or to jay? was the pa=ment you referred to from jay or roy?

I am now told that even the California court only allowed =20k of your proposed fees , without even a presentation of ours. , and too= it upon themselves to disallow the rest and cut your proposed costs. =AO . since then your California attorneys were engaged in largely ministerial actions ? the court also disa=lowed some of your costs on their own, . in addition only on A=ril 3 in an email to my lawyers, Lance indicated that his fees were $4,115.

Michael, as I said, I would like to resolve this matter, . getting th= facts straight will go a long way to getting it done. sorry for the=mess.

Jeffrey

please note=br>

The information contained in this communication is confidential= may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, =nd is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of=br>JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication=or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you =ave received this communication in error, please notify us immediately =y return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com= target=> , and destroy this communic=tion and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all =ights reserved