<table><tr><th>From: </th><th></th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:55 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>jeffrey epstein; Richard Kahn</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>moving forward</td></tr></table>

Hi Jeffrey and =ich,

I received Rich's email to Tyler. My reactio= is the following:

I think you should certainly c=ntinue for 60 days and then stop definitively (good or bad). Here's why:</=iv>

--There is 1 neg now on the first page. It's in 7th=position.

--Unlike Reputation Mgmt, I see real mo=entum in the links that Tyler's firm boosted. (Facebook, Healthgrades and =uffington are continually on the 1st page).

--Unl=ke Reputation Mgmt, Tyler's firm has proven leverage with major publicatio=s like Forbes, Huffington, Ntl. Geographic. (we have been published in For=es and Huffington, which as said is on the 1st page).

-- Tyler is about to place me as a co=tributing writer with Ntl. Geographic: this will be a powerful platfo=m moving forward. I can draft a featured article when needed, I'll have th= liberty of using Jeffrey's name in the title and I'll have the lever=ge to publish elsewhere. With Ntl Review for example, I published an artic=e but was not allowed to use Jeffrey's name-- a contributing writer positi=n gives you that freedom.

If I didn't see momentu= in the links boosted and if there was no guaranteed connection with&=bsp;national press, I would suggest stopping. But that is not the cas=.

Progress has been extremely frustrating, b=t I do believe that Tyler is capable of finishing the task and t=at he is hard working and sincere.

He will also b= a great back-up ally moving forward--if you ever need tech advice/ strategy.

cell
=
email:
=/html