From: Deepak Chopra <  >
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 1:23 PM
To: Robert Addinall; 'Brian Josephson'
Cc: 'JACK SARFATTI'; 'Stanley A. KLEIN'; 'Ruth Kastner'; 'nick herbert';  'George Knapp';  'Anthony Gantner'; 'David Kaiser'; 'Saul-Paul Sirag'; 'fred alan wolf'
Subject: Re: Entanglement Made Simple

Time present and time past Are both perhaps present in time future And time future contained in time past. If all time is eternally present All time is unredeemable. What might have been is an abstraction Remaining a perpetual possibility Only in a world of speculation. What might have been and what has been Point to one end, which is always present.=/span> Footfalls echo in the memory Down the passage which we did not take Towards the door we never opened Into the rose-garden. My words echo=br style=""> Thus, in your mind. =nbsp; &n=sp; &nb=p;But to what purpose Disturbing the dust on a bowl of rose•leav=s I do not know. =nbsp; &n=sp; &nb=p;Other echoes Inhabit the garden. Shall we follow?

2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009
The C=opra Foundation <http://www.choprafoundation.org/> <http://www.choprafoundation.=rg/>

<http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/l/51ryZ4SaSrL._S=500_SS115_.jpg>

<http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being-dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07-20>

<http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07-20> Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNA for Optimum Health and Wel=being

<http://www.am=zon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being/dp/0804140138/deepakchc=m07-20>

<=span>

From: Robert Addinall <
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 9:14:52 AM
To: 'Brian Josephson'

Cc: Dee ak Cho ra; 'JACK SARFATIT; 'Stanley A. KLEIN'; 'Ruth Kastne='; 'nick herbert'; 'George Knapp ;='Anthony Gantner; 'David Kaiser'; 'Saul-Paul Sirag'; 'fred alan wolf' Subject: RE: Entanglement Made Simple

Interesting way of putting it Brian. It seem=, a bit, to incorporate your ideas about signs being important. It w=uld also seem that it could overlap with Ruth's theory - Ruth also seems t= be saying that at any decision point there are a number of possible futures out there and you can choose which one to=go to through a process.

I tend towards the block universe view myself but there's a lot of good dis=ussion to be had here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Josephson [mailto: ]
Sent: August-15-16 4:33 AM
To: Robert Addinall
Cc: Deepak Chopra; JACK SARFATTI; Stanley A. KLEIN; Ruth Kastner; nick herb=rt: ; George Knapp;  Anthony Gantner;=David Kaiser; Saul-Paul Sirag; fred alan wolf
Subject: Re: Entanglement Made Simple

> On 15 Aug 2016, at 03:25, Robert Addinall a= >= wrote:

>

> Deepak's statement is very broad, however, being in an outside of ti=e transcendental state where the universe appears to be spontaneous simult=neous emergence of space time events would not contradict the block univer=e model. You would see past, present and future coming into being together and there would be no problem with c=usality running both ways.

The future is not here now: what is here now is the process that will lead =o the future. Think of it being like a bus with a destination on it:=that sign indicates where it will be, but currently it is somewhere else.&=bsp; And by getting on a particular bus we can determine our own future, but we are not there at the moment.

Brian

## Brian D. Josephson

Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Cambridge Director, Mind—Mat=er Unification Project Cavendish Laboratory, JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge CB3=0HE, UK

<u>WWW: htt www.tcm. h .cam=ac.ukrbdj10</u> chttp://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uktbdj10>

Tel

## Brian D. Josephson (cont.)