<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>David Sauvage &lt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:40 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Jeffrey E.</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re:</td></tr></table>

I'm confused. You did an experiment with 200 girls whe=e you held their hands and rating them? Or that's what you're sugg=sting for me?

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:30 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com=ta» wrote:

y=u dont have to be a scientist to underatnd the concept of proof. ..A0 does massage work? not a science question=, but some think it does. can you prove to anyone that y=ur intuitive abilities are repeatable. verifiable, =. probably not. but is ok. with vast experie=ce , chinese doctors can tell if someones kidneys are working properly ,=C240 the eyes are a little dull and yellow, its not sci=nce but a pretty good predictor. . the other experiment =ou can try if you want is hold their hands. write down what yo= feel. , and afterwards have them choose which bes= describes their charcateristics. I did this with =00 girls. each one had to rate the accuracy of diagnosisi on a=scale of 1.10. the results ranged from 3.10.=C2Q however, the written diagnosis w=s exactly the same for each, no one like the results . =eliveing is more fun

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, David Sauvage
<mailto: > > w=ote:

I don't =ind anything you're saying - I am definitely not a scientist, don'= claim to be, and don't know much about experiments and design. <=div>

I feel like it'd be good to talk it out? I say=what I can do, and somebody who knows science tells me how we can test tha=, until we arrive at a solution that works both ways?

Sent fr=m my mobile device

On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, jeffrey E. =lt;jeevacation@=mail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» wrote:

I like you, I am trying to be kind, that is not scie=ce. . if you make people feel better and no one is injured , a=l the best to you. how about being blindfold=d and guessing their name. the outcome must be verifiable, 4>=AO not you are shy, sometimes. angry other times .40=AO the trick of mentalists that do much better than that. they=could take a strength finder test, and then you could take it with a=pathy for them, there are 100 questions see if you=got the more than 80 percent right.

<u>On</u> Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, =avid Sauvage
<mailtoa > wrote:

Jeffrey,

Just an additional thought. A vision, actually--

What=if I did readings blindfolded? So I held someone's hand and felt into =hem. With such limited visual/tactile information, it would be a real test=of my empathic abilities. It would almost validate "the sixth sense.&=uot;

Then maybe we could compare my ability to re=d people with an average person's ability to

## read people?

<=iv>

Just brainstorming here...

Very=best,

David

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, David Sauvage
<mailto > > wrote:

I would love to do that. Definitely has higher p=obability of success.

Sent from my mobile device=/div>

On Aug 15, 2016, at 8:52 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com<=a» wrote:

On Sun, Aug 14, 201= at 10:32 PM, David Sauvage <████████████████████████
<mailto:████████████████████> >=wrote:

Hi Jeffrey and G=no,

Earlier today, I sat down with 15 pictures and 15 n=mes and tried to match them. It turned out to be quite a struggle -- prima=ily because people were very similar. For instance, I'd have descripti=ns like this:

Shy but relatively happy on the out=ide Filled with frustration and anxiety Burning with r=ge deep down

But out of the 15 people, that could=vaguely describe 3 or 4 them. So my matching ending up looking like a conv=luted chart.

What I concluded was that I ne=d a bit more help designing this experiment. Ideally, rather than matching=15 names to pictures, I have a bunch of binary decisions (A or B). One wou=d expect me to get 50% right. IF the people are emotionally different enou=h (happy v. sad, for instance) I hypothesize I will do considerably better=than chance. Does that make sense?

## read people? (cont.)

with Gino as =ell.

happening on that end.

I have started=to go down this road with my friend at NYU. Happy to discuss

And of course, happy to submit to MRI =achines and the like to figure what's

Open to any and all thoughts. Science, clearly, is not my g=ft.

Very best,
David

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1=49 PM, David Sauvage <

=span style="font-size:12.8px">Hi Jeffrey,

Sorry it took a beat to respond.

This =eekend, when I have space and time, I'll ask a friend to lay out some =ictures and names and see how I do. And I'll report back what I learn.=C24)

I've been thinking about this for a while -- and I do feel w= ultimately need a more rigorous experiment. But I like your idea, at leas= to start, of just giving it a good and seeing.

Great meeting you.

David

<=r>

Sent from my mobile deviceadiv>

On Aug 7, 2016, at 6:22 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com</=» wrote:

=avid, if you can do the name to photo test. in a 2= picture test. it could be an interesting begining,4>=A0 , I suggst you take twenty women all availbel o= google or facebook and try. , <=iv>

=A0

please note

The information=contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client=privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for=br>the use of the

addressee. It is the property of

## read people? (cont.)

<table><tr><th>&lt;mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;, and</th><th>JEE
Unauthorized =se, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
co=munication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or b= e-mail to jeev=cation@gmail.com

destroy this communication and all copies the=eof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved</th></tr><tr><td>attorney-client privileged, may

thereof is strictly prohibited

&lt;mailto:jeevac=tion@gmail.com&gt; , and

�=AO</td><td>=AO please note

The information contained in this communication is&lt;=r&gt;confidential, may be

constitute insid= information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is =he property of
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part

and may be un=awful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify =s immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com

destro= this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved

please note</td></tr><tr><td>The
privileged, may
constitute
the use
JEE 
Unauthorized
strictly prohibited
and may</td><td>attorney-client information contained in this communication is&lt;=r&gt;confidential, may be

insid= information, and is intended only for
of the addressee. It is =he property of

use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is

be un=awful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify =s immediately by</td></tr></table>

4

## read people? (cont.)

and

destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved

=AO

please note

The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of

## JEE

Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com"

target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved