<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>jeffrey E. &lt;jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Friday, October 27, 2017 5:23 AM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Noam Chomsky</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re: trust</td></tr></table>

ok with me , but i would add , if you are not =oing to transfer the money this week , please detail for me the reasons be=ind your decision. thx

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Noam Cho=sk > wrote:

I almost never use the phone, and don't=really want to get into a discussion with him. I'd prefer to kee= to mail, which will be on the record, no opportunity for misrepresentatio=.

So, do you think that letter is ok?

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:32 PM,=jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailtoleevacation@gmail.com» wrote:

Why don't you call him=C2*

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:29 AM Noam Chomsky ,./g=; wrote:

Max may believe that= but I find it virtually impossible to believe. Max hasn't broug=t up anything of the sort in his letters to me. If he does, or I see=any other indication of it, I'll react at once.

My =eeling is that I should first respond to his letter, basically reiterating=what I said. Do you think I ought to send the letter I sent you, bef=re bringing Deborah into it? I'd like to see if I can work this =ut directly with Max before taking any further steps.

What d= you think?

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 a= 11:45 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> > wrote:

Max is s trustee afraid of being=sued by your children . It is the trust money not yours . If two of =hree of your children agree no issue, if not Deborah would have to take s=eps

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:36 PM Noam Chomsky wro=e:

This is the letter I recei=ed from Max, almost immediately after I sent him the letter below. H=re's what I was thinking of responding.

There seems to be some confusion. I was responding to y=ur letter of Oct. 16, in which you said you would be getting back to me th= next day. That was the last time we were in touch. Since I di=n't hear from you, I wrote again, last night.

I don't see what further explanation =s necessary, or why it is necessary to bring Deborah into this. I co=ld add that as I approach 90, having worked hard for 70 years and put away=a substantial some of money, I not only have the right to some peace and t=anquillity to go on with my life and work, but also to do so without facin= an inquisition.

could also add so=ething about the advice and practices of Max and Sam that led to a situati=n where for the first time in my life, I have to face financial problems.=C24> But maybe not]

Key information from the image:

*   Sender: Max Kohlenberg
*   Date: Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 1:55 AM
*   Subject: RE: trust
*   Recipient: Noam Chomsky
*   CC: Deborah Pechet Quinan

Good morning (from Scotland) Noam -<=>

When we were last in touch on this I replied=with a cc to Deborah (who I have copied again here) and I understood=that you, she and Valeria had discussed my need (as trustee) to know something more about the background for this req=est and your anticipated needs going forward. Deborah got back to me=and indicated that the call she and I had tentatively scheduled was being =ancelled.

If you would like me to reschedule a call wi=h Deborah, or a meeting, I'd be glad to do that. I'l= be back on Tuesday.

My best,

Max

From: Noam Chomsky (mailto

Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 6:43 AM
To: Max Kohlenberg
Subject: Re: trust

<=div>

I didn't hear from you about this, and would lik= to what is happening in this matter. I would like to get on with my=life and work without delay. I've worked hard for 70 years, put =way a substantial sum of money. I surely have the right to access it. Could you let me know where this stands.<=>

Noam

href="mailto

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Max Kohlenberg <=a target="_blank"> wrote:

Thanks for the quick reply Noam. I will get ba=k to you tomorrow.

Max

S=nt from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

-------- Original message --------

From: Noam Chomsky <████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████>

Date: 10/16/17 9:14 PM (GMT-05:00)

To: Max Kohlenberg

<mailto:

Subject: Re: trust

I meant $500,000.

Noam

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Max Kohlenberg <=a href="mailto:" target="_blank">  wrote:

Forgive me for asking Noam, but did you mean $500,00=, or $50,000?

Thanks,

Max

S=nt from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

Original message

From: Noam Chomsky

Date: 10/16/17 6:44 PM (GMT-05:00)

To:

<mailto

Subject: trust

Dear Max,<3=u>

=/span>

I would like to ask =or a distribution from one of the marital trusts, for $500,000, to deal wi=h current expenses of mine.

=/span>

Thanks for your cons=deration

=/span>

Noam</=pan>

=/span>

=/span>

</=iv>



=A0 please note

The information contained in this communicati=n is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute=inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. =t is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of =his communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may=be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please n=tify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:=eevacation@gmail.com>

, and

=estroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved

please =ote

The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved

�=AO

please note

The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged =may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com"

target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

--94eb2c0328a6d0dda7055c807b60-- conversation-id 27093 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1509081786 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 remote-id 762699