<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Lawrence Kraus</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Tuesday, February 27, 2018 11:44 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>jeffrey E.</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.</td></tr></table>

yes..=you are correct.. but even without the attorney I wanted to try =nd assert my rights.. I got shot down.. I expected to get shot =own, but nothing has changed in that regard. =nbsp;l have now dealt with this office twice, and they are aware of the =ngoing thing with Buzzfeed, and as I told you =efore, the University attorney actually warned me this was likely to =appen.

So, I think all is as it was with that office and they are =oing to do what they would have done anyway, which is to interview my =taff.. they asked me on Friday before they =ot my note to send them the name of those who worked for Origins from =015 -2016 and I gave them the contact info for my business office =anager at origins, and they thanked me..

On Feb =7, 2018, at 4:38 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

heres what this =ays. i lawrence krauss will tell you how i thinkyou =hould conduct your investigation , if at all. and I =ould like to participate in it. repsonse. go tuck yourself. we will not share the file , all =omplaints are proteced from defamation and you must continue to =ooperate.

I wanted to add to his letter, to reiterate =ur concern about how your office was planning to follow up on the false and defamatory third-party allegations from Buzzfeed. Because this was initiated by an =nline entertainment news outlet with a clear agenda and established record of =propagating false allegations about me, rather than by any of the individuals they refer to as sources, this should not be considered a credible allegation worthy of investigation. I believe that our initial discussion was sufficient to settle this matter. =hether or not you agree with this, there are =font size="4" class="">two things I think are important to establish. =nbsp;

Firstly, that the University should not propagate what can be false allegations from =such a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their =ibelous agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard, I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to =urrent or former employees about this in the process of carrying out and concluding your investigation.

your client, Lawrence =rauss, copied me on his February 23rd em=il communication to the Office of Equity and Inclusion. I am writing =o convey the University's position on its responsibility to =onduct administrative investigations into allegations of conduct that would violate institutional policy, if true. Because Dr. Krauss has =font size="4" class="">retained legal counsel, I am writing directly to you. You may =orward my communication on to your client. Without having =irst secured your permission, I did not think it was proper for me to copying =im on this reply.

Our policy on the Prohibition Against Discrimination, =arassment, and Retaliation (ACD 401 https://www.asu.edu/aad/manuals/acd/acd401.html) and its accompanying procedures (P20 — link to the procedures =s embedded in the policy document) directs the Office of Equity and Inclusion to conduct prompt and equitable

investigations. Among =he points stated are that the Office accepts =nonymous complaints as well as direct complaints. University employees are required to =ooperate with any investigation or allegations of violations of this =olicy. Providing false or misleading information or failing to cooperate may result in disciplinary action. Individuals making a complaint or =participating as a witness in an investigation cannot be retaliated against. Any employee who engages in retaliation will be =isciplined. The Office of Equity and Inclusion does not make any findings until such time as it determines that it has completed its fact =athering.

Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a =rivilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 14= Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 17= Ariz. at 520, 851P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the existence of a conditional privilege for employees to report perceived acts of sexual harassment as public policy dictated that employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 20=9 WL 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros an= Miller we=e cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. =n addition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must also operate its educational programs and activities to be free from gender =discrimination under Title IX.

The Office of Equity and Inclusion will proceed with its investigation as =outlined in ACD 401and P20. The Office will =ot provide your client with its investigative file. We look forward to Dr. =rauss's continuing cooperation. Regards,

Dear Naimah et al:

Attached you will find a letter from my attorney, along with a letter he sent to Buzzfeed earlier in this week regarding the defamatory and false story =they were planning on printing. The story was then published =esterday morning. I wanted to add to his letter, to reiterate our concern about how your office was planning to follow up on the false and defamatory third-party allegations from Buzzfeed. Because this was initiated by an =nline entertainment news outlet with a clear agenda and established record of =propagating false allegations about me, rather than by any of the individuals they refer to as sources, this should not be considered = credible allegation worthy of investigation. I believe that our initial =discussion was sufficient to settle this matter. Whether or =ot you agree with this, there are =wo things I think are important to =stablish.

Firstly, that the University should not propagate what can be false allegations from =such a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their =ibelous agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard, I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to current or former employees about this in the process of carrying out and concluding your investigation.

Secondly, I reiterate once again that the Origins Project environment is supportive, candid, frank, honest, and productive, with all employees being treated with respect, as well as being supported and mentored. I =am proud of our team, and I believe they feel the same =ay.

Thanks for your attention to these letters.

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Lawrence Krauss =span dir="ltr" class=""
<mailto:  > wrote:

## Hi =ll:

I just wanted =o clarify this further, in case it wasn't completely =tear. I am not being represented by Adam vis a vis the University =nvestigation. He is advising me regarding buzzfeed issues in case =here is litigation required regarding Buzzfeed. So I haven'= retained legal counsel for the University Investigation. Just =o you know. You should continue to contact me if there any further =uestions, developments, etc. Thanks again.

## Hi =ll: (cont.)

- Document type: email header / forwarded message screenshot with heavy redactions (black bars).
- Dates/times: "On Feb 27, 2018, at 1:58 PM" and "Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 1:55 PM".
- Visible short text: "wrote:", "Thank you."
- Headers present: "From:", "To:", "Cc:", "Subject:" (most names/addresses redacted).
- Visible subject text: "Subject: Fwd: =rivate and Confidential, in response to our meeting."
- Several recipient/name lines partially visible but obscured by black redaction bars.
- One partially visible token: "Naimah =aadiq" (mostly redacted/garbled).

Dear Cynthia et al:

Adam forwarded me your note while on a plane. I wanted =o let you know that you can feel free to cc me on all communication or =mail me and cc Adam, as you wish. . Adam is advising me on =atters related to Buzzfeed, and so it is appropriate to communicate to =oth of us in this regard. I expect he will be writing to =ou. In any case, I wanted to assure you that I will continue to =ooperate with all your offices, as I have done thus far. I value the =ollegial relationship I have with all of my colleagues at ASU. I =o hope Naimah's group has taken all of our concerns about =uzzfeed under advisement, but I also understand the requirements on the =niversity as well.

Thanks for your attention to this.

Best

Lawrence Krauss

Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins =roject at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology =nitiative
Foundation Professor
School =f Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, =Z 85287-1404
Research Offic Assistant (Jessica):
Origins Office <u>(Cynthia)</u>
mailto
origins.asu.edu I twitter.comAkraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu

Celebration-Be -Origins a part Project of something 10 =ear 10 years in the making! April =-9th 2018 — Visit for more info

<image001.png>

## Hi =ll: (cont.)

Begin forwarded message:

Key information from the image:

*   **Email 1**
    *   From: Adam Waldman
    *   Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.
    *   Date: February 7, 2018, at 12:28:21 PM PST
    *   To: Lawrence Rauss

*   **Email 2**
    *   From: Cynthia Jewett
    *   Date: Tuesday, February 27, 2018, at 3:21 PM
    *   To: Ada Waldman
    *   Cc: Nai'ah Saadiq, Erin Ellison
    *   Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.

Mr. Waldman,

Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on his February =3rd email =ommunication to the Office of Equity and Inclusion. I am writing =o convey the University's position on its responsibility to =onduct administrative investigations into allegations of conduct that =ould violate institutional policy, if true. Because Dr. Krauss =as retained legal counsel, I am writing directly to you. You may =orward my communication on to your client. Without having first =ecured your permission, I did not think it was proper for me to copying =im on this reply.

Our policy on the Prohibition Against Discrimination, =arassment, and Retaliation (ACD 401https://www.asu.edukad/manuals/acd/acd401.html) and its accompanying =rocedures (P20 — link to the procedures is embedded in the =olicy document) directs the Office of Equity and Inclusion to conduct =rompt and equitable investigations. Among the points stated are =hat the Office accepts anonymous complaints as well as direct =omplaints. University employees are required to cooperate with =ny investigation or allegations of violations of this policy. =roviding false or misleading information or failing to cooperate may =esult in disciplinary action. Individuals making a complaint or =articipating as a witness in an investigation cannot be retaliated =gainst. Any employee who engages in retaliation will be =isciplined. The Office of Equity and Inclusion does not make any =indings until such time as it determines that it has completed its fact =athering.

Our courts recognize that participants in an =dministrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation =harge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 =riz. 335, 681P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized =hat the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission =as absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 =riz. at 520, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court =ecognized the existence of a conditional privilege for employees to =eport perceived acts of sexual harassment as public policy dictated =hat employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited =pprovingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 =L 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were =ases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In =ddition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must also =perate its educational programs and activities to be free from gender =iscrimination under Title IX.

## Hi =ll: (cont.)

The Office of Equity and Inclusion will proceed with its =nvestigation as outlined in ACD 401 and P20. The Office will not =rovide your client with its investigative file. We look forward =o Dr. Krauss's continuing cooperation. Regards,

- Header: Cynthia L. Jewett — Senior Associate General Counsel, Arizona State University (telephone and email redacted)
- From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto: redacted]
- Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018, 4:19 PM
- To: Naimah =aadiq [mailto: redacted]
- Cc: Adam =aldman (additional recipients redacted; multiple mailto: entries blacked out)
- Subject: Private=and Confidential, in response to our meeting.
- Notes: Several phone numbers and email addresses are redacted with black bars; some equal signs (“=”) appear in place of spaces/characters in the visible text.

Dear Naimah et al:

Attached you will =ind a letter from my attorney, along with a letter he sent to Buzzfeed =arlier in this week regarding the defamatory and false story they were =lanning on printing. The story was then published yesterday =orning. I wanted =o add to his letter, to reiterate our concern about how your office was =tanning to follow up on the false and defamatory third-party =llegations from Buzzfeed. Because this was initiated by an =nline entertainment news outlet with a clear agenda and established record of propagating false allegations about me, rather than by any of =he individuals they refer to as sources, this should not be =onsidered a credible allegation worthy of investigation. I believe that =ur initial discussion was sufficient to settle this matter. =hether or not you agree with this, there are two things I think are important to establish.

Firstly, that the University should =ot propagate what can be false allegations from such a source by =resenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to =thers. To do so would be to further their libelous agenda, as Mr =aldman has emphasized. In this regard, I would appreciate seeing =opies of the correspondence you might send to current or former =mployees about this in the process of carrying out and concluding your =nvestigation.

Secondly, I reiterate once again that the Origins Project =nvironment is supportive, candid, frank, honest, and productive, with =11 employees being treated with respect, as well as being supported and =entored. I am proud of our team, and I believe they feel the same =ay.

Thanks for your attention to these letters.

Lawrence Krauss

Dear Ms. Saadiq:

My name is Adam Waldman, and I am Professor Lawrence =rauss' litigation counsel. Earlier this week, I sent the =ttached letter to Buzzfeed via one of their reporters named Peter =Idhous.

I am also in receipt of Mr. Aldhous' letter to ASU, =hich is a variation on defamation — both libel and slander =93 that Mr. Aldhous and his colleagues have been manufacturing for at =east 6 months (notably without any reporting) in a campaign with a =urpose known only to them. Buzzfeed's first method is to =all or write third parties, posit a list of fake, anonymous, recklessly raise and malicious "allegations," and ask if the third =arty has anything to add. Buzzfeed's second method is to =eek tortious interference with Professor Krauss' professional

## Hi =ll: (cont.)

=ontracts, by writing third parties with whom Professor Krauss is in =rivity, present a similarly inflammatory series of anonymous, =ecklessly false and malicious accusations, and then question: how can =he email's recipient allow such a person to serve on their =oard, or speak at their conference? The letter from Buzzfeed to =he University falls into both categories. There will be appropriate =egal consequences for Buzzfeed's actions.

It =s my understanding that your office believes it is compelled by the =bove to investigate false, defamatory, anonymous accusations posited by =he online tabloid Buzzfeed by contacting third parties and potentially =ebroadcasting the tabloid Buzzfeed's accusations. To be =tear, these accusations were not made to the University by actual human =eings who are alleging they were victims. There is no evidence =hey were presented to Buzzfeed by actual human beings. Moreover, no =resent or former employees of ASU have made any such allegations to =our office, or to any office at ASU, to our knowledge. They are simply =lleged by a tabloid, and one that had yet published a "story" =n the topic when they forwarded these to you. You may propose to =ebroadcast this tabloid's libel to other third parties who have also =ade no accusation against Professor Krauss. I suggest that you =onsult with the University's counsel before taking so rash a =tep as re-broadcasting hearsay defamation that came to you via an =nline tabloid under these circumstances.

Professor Krauss and I both recognize the absolute need to =nvestigate real allegations. Some of the women who have bravely =ome forward with personal harassment allegations against Harvey =einstein are my clients and friends. Some of these victims have =een advised by me. Those actual allegations are entirely distinct =rom a tabloid attempting to manufacture allegations to create harm. =nbsp;

Sincerely,
Adam Waldman
DISCLAIMER

Confidentiality Notice: This email, including any attachments, is being sent by =r on behalf of the Endeavor Group or Endeavor Law Firm; it is =onfidential and may contain information protected by the =ttorney-client and/or the attorney work-product privileges. If you are =ot the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, =isclosure, copying, or distribution of this information is unauthorized =nd prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please =dvise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message and =ny attachments without retaining a copy.

IRS =ircular 230 Disclosure: Any statements regarding Federal tax law contained in =his e-mail are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, =or the purposes of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal =ax law or to market any entity, investment plan or =rrangement.

Begin forwarded message:

<mailto:

<u>From: Adam</u> -aldmar

a e: uesday, February 20, 2018 at =:42 PM

To: Peter Aldou
Subject: Cease and Desist/Professor Lawrence =rauss

Dear Mr. Aldous:

I =m writing as litigation counsel to Professor Lawrence Krauss. It =as come to my attention that you and Buzzfeed have engaged in an =utrageous and protracted defamation campaign against Professor Krauss, =ncluding both libel and slander. Buzzfeed's campaign has =een malicious, undertaken with absolute reckless disregard for the =ruth, and despite repeated disprovals of the falsehoods you continue to =armfully disseminate. Your defamatory efforts have also been =ndertaken, for reasons known only to you and your colleagues, with the =ntention of tortiously interfering with the contracts of Professor =rauss, and Buzzfeed has unfortunately

## Hi =ll: (cont.)

succeeded in this malignant =urpose. We have both testimony and documents from a litany of =ell respected third parties that provide overwhelming evidence of your =nd Buzzfeed's malfeasant attacks on Professor Krauss. We =re still tallying the damage.

You =nd Buzzfeed will immediately cease and desist from further defamatory =tatements regarding Professor Krauss, and you and Buzzfeed will =mmediately cease and desist from any further efforts to tortiously =nterfere with Professor Krauss' contracts. If you and =uzzfeed are unwise enough to ignore this notice to cease and desist =rom the actions described above, the appropriate legal response will be =wift. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all legal rights are =eserved.

If =ou have more harassing emails or any prospective communication you wish =o transmit to Professor Krauss, you are instructed to send them to me =s he is now represented by counsel. If your or Buzzfeed's =ounsel, whomever they may be, wish to send me a letter in response to =he above, be aware that I may, depending on its contents and because I =ould be obligated to forward it to my client, consider such letter to =Iso constitute a trigger of the above and react accordingly. =rofessor Krauss has suffered enough abuse at your hands without =ommensurate consequences.

Sincerely,

Adam =aldman

## DISCLAIMER

Confidentiality Notice: This email, including any attachments, is being sent by =r on behalf of the Endeavor Group or Endeavor Law Firm; it is =onfidential and may contain information protected by the =ttorney-client and/or the attorney work-product privileges. If you are =ot the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, =isclosure, copying, or distribution of this information is unauthorized =nd prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please =dvise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message and =ny attachments without retaining a copy.

IRS =ircular 230 Disclosure: Any statements regarding Federal tax law contained in =his e-mail are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, =or the purposes of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal =ax law or to market any entity, investment plan or =rrangement.

Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins =roject at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology =nitiative
Foundation Professor
School =f Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, =Z 85287-1404
Research Office: 
Assistant (Jessica): 
Origins Office (Cynthia): 
Email: 
origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/lkrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu

Celebration-Be -Origins a =art =roject of something 10 Year 10 years in the making! April =-9th 2018 — Visit for more =nfo

<image001.png>

## DISCLAIMER (cont.)

Lawrence M. Krauss

Director, The Origins Project at ASU

Co-Director,=Cosmology Initiative

Foundation =rofessor

School of =arth & Space Exploration and Physics Department

Arizona=State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe AZ 85287-1404

<tel:

Research Office: 
tel: 
Assistant (Jessica): 

Origins Office (Cynthia): 
<tel:

origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/lkrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu

Year Celebration-Be a part of something 10 years in the making! -Origins Project 10 April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more =nfo <https://www.originsl0year.com/>

<image002.png>

please note

The information contained in this =ommunication is confidential, may be attorney-client =rivileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure =r copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this =ommunication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Lawrence M. =rauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics =epartment

## DISCLAIMER (cont.)

Arizona State University, P.O. Box =71404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office:  | Assistant (Jessica): 
Origins Office (Cynthia): 
<mailto: >
origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/lkrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu

Celebration-Be -Origins a part Project of =omething =0 Year 10 years in the making! April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info <https://www.originsl0year.com/>