<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Peter Attia &lt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:05 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Jeffrey E.</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>No way!</td></tr></table>

Ok, I did the following experiment&g=230;

Stood mid-plane on one foot and clos=d my eyes... no problem. Perfectly still! Easy

Tried the same stunt at the rear. Co=ldn't do it! Too much movement.

You were right. How the hell do I fl= so many miles on that equipment and not know that!?

I went up the very front of the plan= and the effect was present, but not as much as the rear.

I told the flight attendants, both o= whom had flown on 27s long ago. They agreed with the observation (though =idn't appreciate the physics).

They did also note that the 57 and 6=, in turbulence are smoother than the 37.

So here is question for you... h=ve you looked at Airbus?

Peter Attia | Nutrition Science Initiative (NuSI) <http://www.nusi.or=/> I President | 4=pan>650=465-4504 (m) I 858- 914-54=5 (o) I www.nusi.org <http://ww=.nusi.org/>

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mai= is confidential and intended only for the recipients listed above. If you=have received this e-mail in error, please delete it immediately and inform the sender of the error or contact <= href="mailto:info@nusi.org">info@nusi.orggspan>