<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Valeria Chomsky &lt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Thursday, November 2, 2017 3:31 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>jeffrey E.</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Fwd: trust</td></tr></table>

for the letter Noam has requested to Deborah or for the accounting: nothing=

Do you understand what is going on?

Forwarded message
From: Noam Chomsky
Date: Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: trust
To: Deborah Pechet Quinan <
Cc: Valeria Chomsky <

That sounds right to us.

Noam

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Deborah Pechet Quinan <███████████> wrote:
>
> Dear Noam,
> I will do so. Do you want me to hold off regarding the memo I was plannin= to prepare for you, pending the discussion with your children? The memo m=y not be necessary yet.
> Best,
> Deborah
>
> Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity and typos.
>
> On Oct 29, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Noam Chomsky <████████████████████> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the informative letter. I would appreciate it if you could cr=ft a letter, as you suggest, which I will use to contact all three childre=.
>
> Thanks
>
> Noam
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Deborah Pechet Quinan <███████████>
> Date: Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:56 PM
> Subject: Fwd: trust
> To: Noam Chomsky <██████████████████████>
> Cc: "██████████████████████████████████████████ Gene Landy <█████████████>
>
>

> Dear Noam,

>

> You are waiting for me to provide guidance as to how you can regain contr=l of the trust funds. My plan is to prepare a memo for you outlining your=options in light of the trust terms. I anticipate being able to spend som= time on this over the weekend, along with reviewing the drafts of your es=ate planning documents. Once I have sent the memo to you we can discuss y=ur thoughts and we can then respond to Max. Unfortunately this is a diffic=lt situation, not simple and straightforward, because of the terms of the =rust and fiduciary law applicable to trusts. Please see my email of 10/17=for an explanation of some of the issues.

>

> In some situations a trust is drafted so that you would have the right to=remove and replace the trustee, and in doing so perhaps find a trustee tha= would not inquire so diligently as to your personal financial circumstanc=s before making a principal distribution to you. In this regard, please r=fer to my email of 10/17 where I summarize the trustee removal, resignatio= and appointment provisions. The trustees can both resign at any time. The= appoint successors subject to your approval. If they agree to resign you =an find a new independent trustee whom they can appoint. If not, you can r=move them but only with the approval of a majority of your children. Do yo= think your daughters would agree to remove Max and Harry? If so you could=then appoint a successor. You would need to find an independent trustee. = can help you craft a letter to your daughters if you think they might agr=e to do this.

>

> My one additional thought right now that I need to review more closely is=that Harry, not being the independent trustee, should not have a say in th= distribution decision. If there is nothing in the trust to contradict thi= interpretation (I need to review the trust again) then Max alone has the =ower. However this would likely not change the analysis that Max believes =e needs to go through since he is accountable to all beneficiaries. He be=ieves he needs some level of financial information from you but in my view=that does not need to be detailed. I can discuss with him what level of d=tail would satisfy him; however, if my understanding is correct that you d= not wish to provide him with any backup for his distribution decision, th=n we should evaluate the removal option and any other strategies I may be =ble to come up with.

>

> Unfortunately this is not a simple situation and I will do my best to out=ine some additional options for you. In the meantime please let me know yo=r thoughts regarding the above. I am available for a call as well, at you= convenience.

>

> Best,

> Deborah

>

> Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity and typos.

>

> Begin forwarded message:

> From: Max Kohlenberg < 
> Date: October 27, 2017 at 1:21:50 PM EDT
> To: Noam Chomsky < 
> Cc: "Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq." < 
> Subject: Re: trust

>

> Hello Noam -

>

• > I'm afraid I cannot send the money you have requested without further dis=ussion with you and I also feel I cannot have such a discussion with you w=thout Deborah's knowledge and participation, as she is your attorney. Ple=se also note that any distributions from the trusts would also involve Har=y, who is the co-trustee of the trusts.

>

> As you will see, I have again copied Deborah on my reply. I will be glad=to follow up with a meeting or a call when I return, next week.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Max

>

>

>

> Sent from myVerizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

>

>

> Original message --------

> From: Noam Chomsky <chomsky5@gmail.com>
> Date: 10/27/17 5:14 PM (GMT+00:00)
> To: Max Kohlenberg
> Subject: Fwd: trust

>

> There seems to be some confusion. I was responding to your letter of Oct= 16, in which you said you would be getting back to me the next day. That=was the last time we were in touch. Since I didn't hear from you, I wrote=again, last night.

>

> My letter to you explained the reasons for my request for a distribution =rom the marital trust. To repeat, "I would like to get on with my life an= work without delay. I've worked hard for 70 years, put away a substantia= sum of money. I surely have the right to access it."

>

> I don't see what further explanation is necessary, or why it is necessary=to bring Deborah into this. I could add that as I approach 90, having wor=ed hard for 70 years and put away a substantial sum of money, I not only h=ve the right to some peace and tranquillity to go on with my life and work= but also to do so without facing an inquisition.

>

> If you are unable to transfer the money this week , could you please deta=l for me the reasons behind the decision.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Noam

>

> Forwarded message

> From: Max Kohlenberg <

- Date: Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:55 PM

> Subject: RE: trust

> To: Noam Chomsky

> Cc: Deborah Pechet Quinan <

>

>

> Good morning (from Scotland) Noam —

>

>

>

> When we were last in touch on this I replied with a cc to Deborah (who I=have copied again here) and I understood that you, she and Valeria had dis=ussed my need (as trustee) to know something more about the background for=this request and your anticipated needs going forward. Deborah got back t= me and indicated that the call she and I had tentatively scheduled was be=ng cancelled.

>

>

>

> If you would like me to reschedule a call with Deborah, or a meeting, I=E2404kd be glad to do that. I'll be back on Tuesday.

>

>

>

> My best,

>

>

>

> Max

>

>

>

> From: Noam Chomsky [mailto: ]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 6:43 AM
> To: Max Kohlenberg
> Subject: Re: trust

>

> I didn't hear from you about this, and would like to what is happening in=this matter. I would like to get on with my life and work without delay. =I've worked hard for 70 years, put away a substantial sum of money. I sur=ly have the right to access it. Could you let me know where this stands.

>

> Noam

> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Max Kohlenberg c

> Thanks for the quick reply Noam. I will get back to you tomorrow.

> Max

> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

Original message

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

4

> From: Noam Chomsky <nchomsky3@gmail.com>
> Date: 10/16/17 9:14 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Max Kohlenberg <mkohlenberg@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: trust
> I meant $500,000.
> Noam

> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Max Kohlenberg <mkohlenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Forgive me for asking Noam, but did you mean $500,000, or $50,000?
> Thanks,
> Max

> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

> Original message

> From: Noam Chomsky <nchomsky3@gmail.com>
> Date: 10/16/17 6:44 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Max Kohlenberg <mkohlenberg@gmail.com>

wrote:

> Subject: trust
>
>
>
> Dear Max,
>
>
>
> I would like to ask for a distribution from one of the marital trusts, fo= $500,000, to deal with current expenses of
mine.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your consideration
>
>
>
> Noam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for p=rmitted use by authorized recipients. If you are
not an authorized recipie=t of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this =mail is prohibited. If
you received this email in error, please notify the=sender and delete this email and its attachments from your devices
and sys=ems.
>
> NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for p=rmitted use by authorized recipients. If you are
not an authorized recipie=t of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this =mail is prohibited. If
you received this email in error, please notify the=sender and delete this email and its attachments from your devices
and sys=ems.
<?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version=.0">
<dict>
<key>conversation-id</key>
<integer>27093</integer>
<key>date-last-viewed</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>date-received</key>
<integer>1509636658</integer>
<key>flags</key>
<integer>8590195717</integer>
<key>gmail-label-ids</key>

</dict>
</plist>

<array>
<integer>6</integer>
<integer>2</integer>
</array>
<key>remote-id</key>
<string>764508</string>