<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Richard Joslin</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:10 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>jeffrey E.</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>FW: BBJ SN 30751 Offer</td></tr></table>

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon P. Conlon [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Richard Joslin
Subject: RE: BBJ SN 30751 Offer

Good Morning Richard,

We have sent your revised offer to the seller's board and I hope to hear ba=k from them.

With regard to SN 29173, I am not sure where you have attained the informat=on that it is under contract in the 22-23 range. I spoke to both the broke= representing the aircraft (Freestream UK) and also someone within the sel=er's inner circle over the weekend and they have categorically denied that=it is under contract to sell.

They did indicate they received an offer far below the asking price which t=ey countered near $25M. The buyer apparently has not raised his initial of=er.

Regardless, if and when I get feedback on your offer I will respond back.

Kind Regards,

Jon P. Conlon
Senior Market Analyst

Dulles International Airport

Jon:

I appreciate your efforts to bring your seller the most up to date view of =he market. We have now learned that the actual sales price of the older p=ane noted below may be closer to $22MM. The market continues to weaken. =ur offer is good until next Wednesday.

RJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon P. Conlon [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 3:48 PM
To: Richard Joslin
Subject: RE: BBJ SN 30751 Offer

Richard,

Good timing. I am in the process of putting together a recommendation for t=e seller's board of directors.

I am going to recommend they lower their expectations below $30,000,000.

If we are successful I should know by early next week.

I appreciate your patience and am optimistic we can reach some sort of midd=e road.

Thank you for the revised offer.

Kind Regards,

Jon P. Conlon
Senior Market Analyst

Dulles International Airport

From: Richard Joslin

Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 12:37 PM

To: Jon P. Conlon

Subject: RE: BBJ SN 30751 Offer

Jon:

The earlier model your note below is older and will sell for less. I und=rstand that it is now under contract to sell for $23M M. That said, we wou=d be willing to increase the offer for 30751 to $28MM Please advise

RJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon P. Conlon [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 7:17 PM
To: Richard Joslin
Subject: RE: BBJ SN 30751 Offer

Richard,

Thank you for reaching back out to me. I have been away on travels but have=been meaning to get back in touch with you but didn't want to call this la=e on a Friday evening so please excuse the lengthy email. We've done sever=l analyses for the seller to help them understand where the market lies in=relation to current data points (both sold aircraft and what is currently =vailable). I am in agreement to some extent that your valuation of SN 3075= below $30,000,000 based on recent sales is not unreasonable. From the sel=er's standpoint, they are trying to recoup some of their investment in the=interior and at the same time looking at what they are competing against. =everal months ago they were indeed competing against Mr. Wynn's aircraft b=t now that it has sold they don't see any BBJ that competes with them (at =east not below $30,000,000).

The aircraft you have referenced does compete to some extent with 30751 in =hat it is a similar vintage and we are well aware of 29273 and have seen i= in person. It has been for sale since late 2009 and has seen numerous pri=e reductions from it's original $49,000,000 ask price in 2009 to it's curr=nt ask price of under $26,000,000. You are correct that it has less total =ime but the layout and interior are the main obstacle that have kept it fr=m selling. The floorplan is very poor and estimates to reconfigure it, whi=h would require removal of multiple bulkheads and other dividing structure= have been estimated anywhere from $3,000,000 to well over $6,000,000 by r=putable BBJ completion centers such as Jetbasel and Lufthansa Technik. We'=e had several buyers that were clients of Avjet who were interested in the=aircraft a few years ago with a configuration change but ended up passing =ecause of the time and cost involved. Even without a configuration change,=the interior decor is less than stellar, some have referenced that it loo=s like something out of an 18th century castle with it's inlaid wooden pan=ling and bookcases.

I know it's splitting hairs but one must also consider that 29273 was one o= the first BBJ's built. It's was YGO6 (Boeing line designation) compared t= ours which was YG62. The bottom line is that we understand your position =hat the interiors are a mute point if you are going to redo them either wi=h new cosmetics or actual structural design changes such as removing bulkh=ads, chairs, tables and such.

In that regard your principle is somewhat unique in this segment (early mod=l) of the market. Of the past seven early model BBJ trades (2009 - to pres=nt) only two have redone softgoods (leather, carpet, etc) and/or woodwork.=The remaining five buyers operated their new BBJ's as is with regards to t=e interior save for some entertainment work.

None of the seven buyers made=wholesale floor plan changes. In that regard your principle is unique and =e are attempting to get our seller to understand his perspective.

With regard to your last email about other opportunities, we did in fact ma=e several calls through the marketplace for alternative options and came u= with two possibilities. The first was an early model close in production =ine number to YG06 (SN 29273 on Controller) based here in the US but the s=Iler was well north of $30,000,000. The second you may be aware of, it's a=so an early model owned by a head of state but it has a 33 passenger capac=ty and a terrible floor plan. Neither seemed like a candidate.

If you are available next week in your office perhaps we can further discus= over the phone. We would really like to find your principle the right air=raft. I've enclosed a recent BBJ client report for you to review as well, =hough it seems you are fully up to speed on the market place.

Kind Regards,

Jon P. Conlon
Senior Market Analyst

Dulles International Airport

<?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version=.0">

<dict>

<key>conversation-id</key>
<integer>125480</integer>
<key>date-last-viewed</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>date-received</key>
<integer>1423577399</integer>
<key>flags</key>
<integer>8590195717</integer>
<key>gmail-label-ids</key>
<array>
<integer>6</integer>
<integer>2</integer>

4

</array>
<key>remote-id</key>
<string>480283</string>
</dict>
</plist>