<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Jeffrey Epstein &lt;jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:
To:</td><td>Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:03 PM
Richard Joslin</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re: FW: BFP 12/31/2012</td></tr></table>

has he explained the negative asset notation

On Thu, Mar 20, 2=14 at 7:32 AM, Richard Joslin > wrote=

There are screenshots =elow. In a nutshell, REM (Toms firm) summarizes all K-1activi=y on excel spreadsheet. It does not tie into the tax return.<=>

## </=pan>

Non Apollo partnership=K-1 capital account 12/31/2012 - Total $167MM. Tax return balance sh=et shows $145MM. Assets listed on excel summary not listed on tax return b=lance sheet. Assets on tax return balance sheet not listed on excel spreadsheet.

## </=pan>

There was a book-up in=2007 for Apollo entities — LBF Holdings shown at $851MM 12/31/2012.&=bsp; Aggregate K-1 12/31/2012 capital account per K-1is $234MM; per tax r=turn balance sheet $993MM. Some of the K-1's show tax basis capital vs GAAP (FMV) capital. <=p>

## </=pan>

Point of this is to ge= financial statements to have a value that is meaningful, eg GAAP and repo=t consistently going forward. Tom's financial's are a hodgepod=e of 2007 book-up and adjusted only by taxable income 2008 to present and some partnerships valued possibly at GAAP

</=pan>

Other "factually=challenged" items to follow

</=pan>

From: Richard Joslin
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:57 AM
To: 'Thomas Turrin'; 'Abel Goce'
Cc: Richard D'Agostino; 'Abel Goce'
Subject: RE: BFP 12/31/2012

## </=pan> (cont.)

I think the answer is =hat there is no correlation between the Sch L (Quiickbooks) balance sheet =nd the excel s/s that summarizes K-1 investments

</=pan>

Can you explain why th=re are partnerships listed on K-1summary that are not on Sch L (Quickbook=) - Millenium USA LP

There are entities lis=ed on Sch L (Quickbooks) for which there are no K-1's listed on exce= s/s AP SHL Investors — this appears not to be owned by BFP but is o=ned by LDB; Globe Opp Finc Srvcs.

</=pan>

Can you track down the=original inception values of the LP's (provided to you by us from valuations at inception). The LBF value of $851,690,121 sta=ds out.

</=pan>

I have not spent any t=me looking at the history.

</=pan>

Thanks</=pan>

</=pan>

</=pan>

From: Richard Joslin
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:34 PM
To: 'Thomas Turrin'; Abel Goce
Cc: Richard D'Agostino; Abel Goce
Subject: RE: BFP 12/31/2012

Is there a s/s that ties into the 1065 pro forma bal=nce sheet amount? The excel s/s I have does not tie out to Sch L.&nb=p; Please advise?

</=pan>

From: Thomas Turrin (mailto:TTurrin@rem-co.com <mailto:TTurri=@rem-co.com> j Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:31PM To: Richard Joslin; Abel Goce Cc: Richard D'Agostino; Abel Goce Subject: RE: BFP 12/31/2012

Rich,

</=pan>

## </=pan> (cont.)

The carrying value of =nvestments in Apollo entities shown on the pro-forma tax returns are deriv=d from the

original inception val=es of the LP's (provided to us by client from valuations at in=eption). We booked the opening values in G/L

at inception ...i=itial "book" values. We booked the annual ne= K-1 changes in total (all LP's) in accts 2702-10 and 2703-10.

&nbs=;

The non-Apollo investm=nt carrying values were based on original cost and

and were adjusted for =ax items as per K-1's and were adjusted through one account (2130.01=.

</=pan>

We did not make overal= adjustments in BFP, LP G/L for changes in estimated current year-end mark=t values.

</=pan>

Best,

</=pan>

Tom

</=pan>

THOMAS TURIN, CPA<=>>

Partner

Raich Ende Malter & =o. LLP

1375 Broadway

New York, New York =0018

The image is completely black. It's impossible to extract any data or information from it.

Website: www.rem-co.com <http://www.rem-co.com>

</=pan>

## </=pan> (cont.)

</=pan>

</=pan>

From: Richard =oslin
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 10:34 AM
To: Thomas Turrin; Abel Goce
Cc: Richard D'Agostino
Subject: BFP 12/31/2012

I am looking at the files posted to the portal and i= particular the file that summarize K-1 activity. Sch L has in=estments (Apollo) $993,724,702. The REM spreadsheet shows $234,172,1=6. Is there a s/s that ties into the 1065 pro forma balance sheet amount?

Same question for non-Apollo investments - $Sch L $1=5,546,984 vs REM s/s $167,115,711

Three screenshots below

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT=/strong>: The information c=ntained in this electronic communication, including any and all attachments and en=losures, may be privileged and is strictly confidential, intended solely f=r the use of the person(s) identified above to receive this communication.=If you are not the person(s) identified above to receive this communication, you are hereby notified that you may =ot disclose print, copy, disseminate, or otherwise use the information con=ained herein. If you are an employee or agent of the person(s) identified =bove to receive this communication and, as such, you have been authorized to deliver this communication to su=h person(s), you may disclose, print, copy, disseminate, or otherwise use =he information contained in this communication solely for the

## </=pan> (cont.)

purpose of s=ch delivery. Unauthorized interception and/or use of this communication are/is strictly prohibited and may be pun=shable by law. If you have received this communication in error, please re=Iy and notify the sender (only) of that fact and delete the communication,=including any and all attachments and enclosures, from your computer or other electronic device on which you=may have received this communication.

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE:<=strong> To insure compliance with requirements impos=d by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any tax advice contained =n this communication (including any and all attachments), unless expressly=stated otherwise, was not intended or written to be used and cannot be use= for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoti=g, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction(s) or tax-r=lated matter(s) addressed herein. This communication may not be forwarded =other than to the addressee(s) identified above) without our express written consent.

******

The information contained in this c=mmunication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, di=closure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, =nd destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved