From: Kathy Ruemmler
Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2015 9:11 PM
To: Jeffrey E.
Subject: Re:

This was always what Rahm advised too.= I think there may be some Latham restrictions because of conflicts, e=c.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 5, 2015, at 5:09 P=, Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail=com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» wrote:

female competent board members are few and far , it would b= a great learing exp

<u>On Sat,</u> Sep 5, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Kathy Ruemmler
> wrote:

Meant t= mention that you don't get any credit on the "token" scale for being a sin=le woman. Being a woman, yes, but not being a single woman. I t=ink you get token demerits for that.

Sent from my iPhone

&nbs=; please note

The information contained in this communication=is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute in=ide information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It i= the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thisar>communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify u= immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacat=on@gmail.com> , and destroy t=is communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copy=ight -all rights reserved