<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Gregory L Poe &lt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Sunday, November 29, 2015 2:18 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Kathy Ruemmler; Jeffrey E.</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>RE:</td></tr></table>

Sure, will do.

Gregory L. Poe

Poe & Burton PLIC

The Executive Building

1030 15th Street, N.W.

Suite 580 West

- Not a chart.
- Visible text: "Washington, D.C. 20005" (top-left).
- Main visual: large solid black rectangle centered, thin light border — appears as a redaction or placeholder.
- No other readable text, legend, or data present.

This communication is intended solely for the use of the addressee. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential, exempt from disclosure under applicable law, and/or attorney work product. Any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited except by the addressee and employees or agents responsible for delivering it to the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and by telephone at (202) 583-2500.

From: Kathy Ruemmler
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 9:17 AM
To: jeffrey E.
Cc: Gregory L. Poe
Subject: Re:

Needs further analysis, and we need to understand exactly what the government is saying. Greg, can you look at the recent pleadings and the 11th circuit opinion and give us your thoughts?

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:33 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> > wrote:

It appears that the govt will now take the position that the girls that filed the cvra case , were not victims - in the true sense of the word. they got paid money and in addition recruited their friends and got paid for doing so. This is solely at the govts initiative. . I wondered after they file their motion, what potential ramifications it might have for my case. I was required to pay money to each on a list of girls whose names i would only be allowed to see AFTER i was already in jail. and now it turns out that those girls , under a theory of an eleventh circuit case, that victims that are complicit in the crime are not eligible for restitution. . I guess the argument regarding inability to consent. will play a role. but if a 17 year old . gets paid for bringing her 3 friends. . can she be a victim and a co conspirator entitiled to victim restitution.

please note

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved