<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>jeffrey E. &lt;jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Monday, February 26, 2018 4:49 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Lawrence Krauss</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment by Lawrence
Krauss </td></tr></table>

and i was right. in all instancees as if you in your=nuttiness decide to file this lawsuit you keep banging on about,.=A0 that sentence will carry the day

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Lawrence Kra=ss < <mailto > > wrote:

y=s

but you did tell me to write him those words.. but yo= are correct about many things..

Lawrence M. Krauss
D=rector, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor <=b>
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
=esearch Office:  <tel:  > | Assistant (Jessica): 
Origins Office (Cynthia):  <tel:  >
 =/span> <mailto:  >
krauss.faculty.asu.edu

Celebration-Be -Origins a part Project of something 10 Year 10 yea=s in the making!

April S-9th 2018 i>=804, Visit for more info <https://www.originsl0year.com/>

=br>

On Feb 26, 2018, at 8:46 AM, jeffrey E. =Itjeevacation@=mail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» wrote:

you should wish in retrospect not t= have responded at all.

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Lawrence Krauss < <mailto > wrote:

Thanks... I am=not replying or egging them on.. I will speak to Nancy.. I wish in r=trospect I had not sent him a note using the words "false with mal=cious intent" as you recommended.. I had a piece about that =n my long response, explaining that I explained to him it was my language =ot the Unversity's, because their investigations showed the claim =as false, and I argued that was malicious..

<=div>

thank you. And of course I was never banned from th=se institutions.. I should make that clear in my long response as well.. =C24>

I believe what you are seeing is from=the usual suspects, but indeed, probably not best to confront them any mor= directly.

LMK

=b>Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Ori=ins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of=Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State Univ=rsity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office:=span class="m_-6189807211976031442Apple-converted-space">
<tel:  > =C2  | Assistant (Jessica):  <tel: >
Origins Offic= (Cynthia):  <tel: >
<=pan style="font-size:9pt;color:rgb(68,114,196)">  <mailto: >

=u>

origins.asu.edu

<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http=3A__origins.asu.edu__&d=DQMFAG&c=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQ=ZFk4A-

1ixfAU&r=DB9LvLOlQiaqWcFOihHC0LCntZCR8Xtq5BHKNVR5To&m=c=P97mEbO4349G8_Nf9I5Up33Th7MWHYf6uw7yU
BPZc&s=Gc-m4FUPqBmB-H8qg0HdYhSQ=_hZ8rHMdpPJHH3C6B0&e=> =/span>| lkrauss1
<https://urldefense.pro=fpaint.com/v2/url?u=http-

3A__twitter.com_1krauss1&d=DQMFAg&c=3DAGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1lxfAU&r=DB9LvLOlQiaqWcFOihHC=LZCnZCR8Xtq5BHKNVR5To&m=ciP97mEbO4349G8_Nf9I5Up33Th7MWHYf6uw7yUBPZc=amp;s=mspp0SBZaPjp5BOPRbD2xX1zHCi4LgzTZ8KNgjNBBKg&e=> | krauss.faculty.asu.edu<=span><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-

3A__=rauss.faculty.asu.edu_&d=DQMFAG&c=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41F=QuZFk4A-

1lxfAU&r=DB9LvLOlQiaqWcFOihHC0LZCntZCR8Xtq5BHKNVR5To&m=3DciP97mEbO4349G8_Nf9I5Up33Th7MWHYf6uw7yUBPZc&s=f7W9C_XvplQaElpZ3o8v=h0dM_e0hTXbMlVPaUviEt8&e=>

--<span style="font-size:11pt;color:white;background-color:black">Origins P=object 10 Year

Celebration-

Be a part of something 10 years in the making!
Apri= 5-9th 2018 – Visit for more info <https://www.origi=s10year.com/> =/span>
=/span>

<image002.png>

LAWRENCE, 4,=A0 Im not sure if you have decided to commit reputational hari kari.=C240 its ok with me. but these consequences were discussed ad=nauseum with you. if four or five ASU students decide together to co=plain , all bets off. . and you are egging them on.

<=p>

Melody Hensley "A" (who wishes to remai= anonymous, though I'm almost positive I know who it is) Nora (= student at Case Western) Melanie Thomson (who witnessed him grab anoth=r woman's breast at a skeptic's conference in Australia, a=ong with Michael Marshall and Jo Alabaster. Four former employees of Ar=zona State's Origins Project (anonymously). They include a 19 year=old undergrad with two witnesses confirming her story of his creepy behavi=r.

That's 13 separate people who either were the victims or =he witnesses of their victimization. They come from multiple universities,=three different countries, at a variety of events over a long period of ti=e. As a result of some of those investigations, two institutions —=Case Western Reserve University and the Perimeter Institute for Theoretica= Physics — banned him from their campuses. And both Arizona State =niversity and Australian National University said on the record that he li=d about what their investigation of those complaints concluded.

This=is not a he said/she said. It's a he said/13 other people said and=three major educational institutions said. And those aren't the on=y ones. I know of several other people with similar stories who are afraid=to talk about them in public for fear of being attacked just like the accu=ers are now being attacked.

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Lawrence Krauss< <mailto > > wrote:

thanks.. I don't know about others I =ill relay this to Nancy.

=b>Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Ori=ins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of=Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State Univ=rsity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office:=span class="m_-6189807211976031442m_-277658877943275076Apple-converted-s=ace">  <tel: > | Assistant =Jessica):  <tel: >
Origins Office (Cynthia):  <tel: >

=u>

origins.asu.edu <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttp-3A__origins.asu.edu_&d=DQMFAg&c=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ej=z41FqQuZFk4A-

1lxfAU&r=DB9LvLOlQiaqWcFOiHC0LCntZCR8Xtq5BHKNVR5To&am=;m=ciP97mEbO4349G8_Nf9I5Up33Th7MWHYf6u
w7yUBPZc&s=Gc-m4FUPqBmB-H8qg=HdYhSQN_hz8rHMdpPJHH3C6B0&e=> | twitter.com/lkrauss1
<https://urldefe=se.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-

3A__twitter.com__lkrauss1&d=DQMFAg&=mp;c=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1lxfAU&r=DB9LvLOlQiaqWcF=ihHC0LZCntZCR8Xtq5BHKNVR5To&m=ciP97mEbO4349G8_Nf9I5Up33Th7MWHYf6uw7y=B PZc&s=mspp0SBZaPjp5BOPRbD2xX1zHCi4LgzTZ8KNgjNBBKg&e=> | krauss.faculty.asu. <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=ht=p-

3A_krauss.faculty.asu.edu_d=DQMFAg&c=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2=jiz41FqQuZFk4A-1lxfAU&r=DB9LvLOlQiaqWcFOihHC0LZCntZCR8Xtq5BHKNVR5To&=mp;m=ciP97mEbO4349G8_Nf9I5Up33Th7MWHYf6uw7yUBPZc&s=f7W9C_XvplQaElp=3o8vlh0dM_e0hTXbMlVPaUviEt8&e=>

Celebration-Be -</=pan>Orig=ns a part of something Project 10 10 years Year in the making! A=ril 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info <https://www.or=ginsl0year.com/> <=i> 4>=A0

<=image002.png>
=/div>

## On =eb 26, 2018, at 8:28 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com

<mailto:jeevacation@gmai=.com> > wrote:

LAWRENCE !!

Since the s=ory broke late last week in Buzzfeed about the numerous allegations of sex=al harassment and creepy behavior by Lawrence Krauss, we've been t=eated to a litany of bad arguments in his defense, many by his wife, who u=ed a secondary T=itter account <https://twitter.com/NancyMDahlPhD/with_r=plies> to engage people on the issue. The arg=ments are almost uniformly illogical and disingenuous.

I prop=se you write an article debunking alien abductions using the same ar=ument. these people didnt know one abother. there are 10= of them. why should they lie. . etc. =C24) TELL nancy to stop. you are getting into dangerous territory.=C2*. this is not a court of law. . facts DO NOT=make a difference. . as you can see there are now some o=hers who have been too afraid to come forward in the article. .•=AO you are self inflicting

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:48 =M, Lawrence Krauss <

wrote:

The =orrespondence from Ron Lindsey to Peter Aldhous.

Lawrence M. Krauss

Director, The Origins Project =t ASU
Foundation Professor

## On =eb 26, 2018, at 8:28 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com (cont.)

| Field | Extracted text / value |
|---|---|
| Affiliation | School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department, Arizona State University |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 71404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 |
| Research office contact | [redacted] — tel: [redacted]; Assistant (Jessica): [redacted] |
| Origins Office (Cynthia) | [redacted] — tel: [redacted] |
| Other visible phone fragment | <tel:480.965.9=25> |
| Websites / social | http://origins.asu.edu/ | http://twitter.com/lkrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu |
| Notes / artifacts | Some encoding/artifact text present: "<=iv>", "�=A0" |

<DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E3=A50EC.png>

Sent from my iPhone
</=iv>

Begin forwarded message:

From: Ronald Lindsay < =t; Date: February 26, 2018 at 7:17:07 AM PSTTo:

<mailto

harassme=t by Lawrence Krauss

Subject: <=>Fwd: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual

My correspondence with Aldhous. As usual, rea= from the bottom up.

Forwarded message
From: Ronald Lindsay <

<mailto:

harassment by Lawrence Krauss

Date: Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:21=AM Subject: Re: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of se=ual

To: Peter Aldhous< =/a>>

Dear Mr. Aldhous,

<=div>
Adam Isaak resigned because I had a public spat with his girlfrie=d, Rebecca
Watson, who had issued a public call for CFI employees to quit.=(That dispute is a whole other story, tangential to your
Krauss piece, so = will not get into it here.)

Timing is important =ere. The email from Pat was in March. The dispute with Watson started in m=d-May, after which Adam stopped showing up for work. (He said he was sick =amp; then went on vacation, or vice versa). He then then left some time in=June. If the Krauss matter "pushed [him] over the edge," then he=was tenaciously hanging on to the ledge for a few months.

## On =eb 26, 2018, at 8:28 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com (cont.)

</=iv>

The email from Pat Beauchamp was in the first person and Pat indic=ted she was speaking for herself. (I found the email exchange last night; = will forward it to you.) Adam had never been shy about expressing his con=erns to me -- he asked for raises, complained about the hosts on the podca=t he was producing etc. The notion that he and Pat were working together b=t that he decided he could not reveal his participation is difficult to cr=dit.

I will be traveling to my <u>home this evening.=Plan</u> to reach <u>my</u> home by 7:45, but if I don't answer right away, pleas= try a bit later. My number is: | <tel 9> .

Sincerely,
R. Lindsay
=br>
<u>On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:45</u> PM, Peter Aldh=us

<mailto > > wrote:

Dear Mr. Lindsay,

Thank you for your response, wh=ch we will consider in detail. Shall we speak at 7.45pm Eastern tomorrow? =o let me know what number to call.

To answer your question, the CFI =mployee who resigned was Adam Isaak. He told us that he helped Patricia Be=uchamp draft an email to you outlining their concerns about inviting Lawre=ce Krauss on the 2014 cruise.

He explained that his resignation had = broader context, relating to his concerns about sexism and online harassm=nt in the skeptical movement. But he said that CFI's continued embrace=of Krauss, in the face of concerns expressed by staff, was what "push=d me over the edge."

Sincerely,

Peter Aldhous

## =n 12/10/17 7:27 PM, Ronald Lindsay wrote:

De=r Mr. Aldhous,

=font>Let me note a couple of things at the outset. First, I would <u>be happy=to speak to you regarding</u> the allegations in your email. You can reach me =t my cell phone number, which is <tel > . Howeve=, I am unavailable tomorrow (Monday) because of prior commitments until ap=roximately 7:45 PM.

<=pan>Next, you should know that I'm not an employee of CFI no= do I have any authority to speak on behalf of CFI. I'm writing to=you from my personal email account in part to underscore that

## =n 12/10/17 7:27 PM, Ronald Lindsay wrote: (cont.)

point. I do =etain a CFI email address in part as a courtesy to me and in part because =t serves a business purpose (for example, I still receive occasional email= addressed to the president of the organization).

Turning to the substance of your a=legations, first you should be aware that I in-house take the lawyer issue (a of position sexual haras=ment I held prior very to becoming seriously. presiden= This is confirmed and CEO) by I insisted the fact that that the after organization I was hired adopt =y CFI a as its comprehensive zero-tole=ance harassment policy covering workplace harassment. Moreover, during the=time I was president and CEO we had three separate state trainings for the=entire staff on sexual harassment issues. In addition, where necessary, we=did not hesitate to expend significant resources, including retaining outs=de investigators, to conduct serious, detailed inquiries into harassment c=aims. One such inquiry cost the organization over $40,000. Therefore, any =uggestion that I do not personally take harassment claims seriously is amp=y disconfirmed by my record.

Regarding the alleged incident on the 2011 cruise, the =irst I became aware of it was when Pat Beauchamp, CFI's business m=nager and the employee responsible for cruise logistics, wrote to me in 20=3 indicating she objected to inviting Lawrence Krauss on our upcoming Gala=agos cruise. I found this strange, and I responded to her almost immediate=y asking the reasons for her objection. She gave two reasons. The first wa= that Krauss did not pay sufficient attention to the guests on the 2011 cr=ise. I had heard this concern from one guest myself; on the other hand, I =Iso heard from several guests that they thought Krauss's presentat=ons were excellent and a highlight of the cruise. Accordingly, I did not g=ve this concern much weight.

The second reason was that Krauss h=d allegedly asked a female guest on the cruise to join him and his partner= apparently for some sort of sexual activity (I cannot recall whether Krau=s was engaged or married or just seriously involved with his female compan=on at the time, although they were clearly romantically involved and seeme= very much in love). This is the first I had heard of this proposition. No=complaint by the guest or anyone else had been made to me at the time of t=e cruise, although I was on the cruise and clearly visible throughout the =ruise.

I =sked Ms. Beauchamp for contact information for this guest. I did call the =uest and she substantially confirmed what Ms. Beauchamp had said. I apolog=zed on behalf of the organization. The guest indicated although she was ta=en aback by Krauss's proposition at the time, she did not want to =ursue the matter further. I then got in contact with Krauss. Krauss denied=the allegation. In light of the guest's reluctance to pursue the m=tter and Krauss's own denial and, importantly, because between the=time of the 2011cruise and the Galapagos cruise we had instituted a polic= regarding harassment at any CF= event, which covers not just employees, but speakers and attendees, I dec=ded to go ahead with my plan and have Krauss as a speaker on the Galapagos=cruise. Krauss was fully aware of our harassment policy regarding CFI even=s because we had had a discussion about it. Therefore, I expected him to c=mply with that policy on the Galapagos cruise. As far as I know he did, be=ause we received no complaints about his conduct. Nor have we received any=complaints about his conduct at other events.

Let me just take a moment to highlight=the 2012 policy, which you can find in

full here,

http://www.centerforinquiry.net/blogs/entry/cfis_new_policy_on_hostile_conduct_harassment_at=conferences/
<http:///=ww.centerforinquiry.net/blogs/entry/cfis_new_policy_on_hostile_conduct_har=ssment_at_conferences/>
along wi=h the announcement I made explaining the rationale for the policy. This po=icy was, certainly at its time, arguably the strongest any nonprofit organ=zation had regarding conduct at its events. Again, this policy shows that =ny suggestion that CFI, as an organization, or that I personally took a la= attitude regarding harassment is completely without factual foundation.</=ont>

In your ema=l you mentioned that one staffer resigned after I invited Krauss on the Ga=apagos cruise. I'm not aware of any staffer resigning because of t=at. If you give me a name I could comment on the reasons for the staffer l=aving. Ms. Beauchamp remained an employee of CFI (and went on the Galapago= cruise with Krauss).

## =n 12/10/17 7:27 PM, Ronald Lindsay wrote: (cont.)

You mentioned also the comments that were made to me in March =012 by Melody Hensley. let me give you the background for that. CFI was ho=ding an event prior to the 2012 Reason Rally in DC. Richard Dawkins, Jessi=a Alquist, Jamie Raskin, and Lawrence Krauss were scheduled to speak at th= event. Melody Hensley was heavily involved in the planning for the event =nd in fact was tapped to make introductions for the speakers, including Kr=uss. (At the time she was in charge of the DC local branch.) During the pl=nning for the event she gave no indication whatsoever that she had any hes=tation about introducing or dealing with Krauss. (I will forward you some =mail correspondence confirming this.)

=p style="margin:Opx 0px 10.66px">As I recall, Krauss4,=99s schedule resulted in his planned arrival being a little later than the=others. As it turned out, he was even further delayed. At some point when =t became clear that Krauss was going to be late, Hensley turned to me and =aid, "I know why Krauss isn't coming; he's embarra=sed to see me." I asked Hensley what she meant by this. She said K=auss had made a pass at her several years earlier and she had rebuffed him= I asked for some details. She said she was in a hotel room with him (I ca='t recall whether she said it was Krauss's hotel room, but=l think it was), and that Krauss tried to kiss her. She pushed him away an= said she wasn't interested. I asked if Krauss persisted; she said=he did not. Thinking out loud, I believe I said something to the effect of='well, if you want to make a complaint you probably can, although ='m not sure our policy at that time would cover that.' Ms.=Hensley said she was not interested in making a formal complaint.</=pan>

Ms. Hensley40=99s statement that I "responded to her with silence" is ab=olutely false and I categorically and unqualifiedly deny it. We talked abo=t her concern, as indicated. Ms. Hensley's recall must be failing =er.

Given=the passage of time (six years), the fact that Hensley did not want to pur=ue the matter, the fact that Krauss desisted when Hensley indicated she wa=n't interested, the fact that Hensley didn't even seem ver= bothered by the incident (as indicated, she had expressed no hesitation i= seeing Krauss), and the fact that we had no policy covering conduct by no=employees back in 2006 (in fact, CFI's zero-tolerance policy cover=ng employees themselves was not implemented until 2007, I believe -- I was=just hired as the attorney in July 2006), I decided not to do any further =bout this particular incident. However, the incident, along with observati=ns I heard at the Women in Secularism conference which we held later in th= spring of 2012 (observations which did not=C24emention Krauss, but rather some speakers at non-CFI events), w=s a factor in my thinking about the need for a policy covering conduct by =nvited speakers and guests at CFI conferences.

Ms. Hensley made no other complaint=to me about Krauss, nor did she ever express to me her belief that we shou=d not invite Krauss to events.

In closing, let me state that any accusations stating=that I neglected to take harassment complaints seriously are false. Furthe=more, I would regard them as a malicious attack on my character and my pro=essional reputation. </=pan>

Sinc=rel,

Ron=ld A. Lindsay

=div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message -

From:=span class="m_-6189807211976031442m_-277658877943275076Apple-

converted-s=ace"> Ronald Lindsay=C2<blackened out><mailto
Date: Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 9:15 PM

## =n 12/10/17 7:27 PM, Ronald Lindsay wrote: (cont.)

Subject: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed N=ws inquiry re allegations of sexual

## harassment by Lawrence Krauss

To: <mailto:

*   **From:** Peter Aldhous
*   **To:** Lawrence Krauss
*   **Date:** Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:13 PM
*   **Subject:** URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment

Mr. Lindsay:

I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed=News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against Lawr=nce Krauss.

The story =oncerns Krauss's actions towards students while a professor of phy=ics at Case Western Reserve University, as well as his conduct in non-acad=mic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I am reportin= this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Gho=ayshi and Virginia Hughes.

O=r story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006=to 2016. Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions Krauss =as been affiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, =he Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities and t=e Center for Inquiry, for which you formerly served as president —=have handled complaints and concerns about his behavior during this time. =/span>

Our story is corroborated by =mails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims a=d witnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of Krauss's c=rrent and former academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics =ovement.

I am writing to you =ow because you are personally named in the story, and because you had exec=tive responsibility for CFI's actions during the time of some of t=e alleged incidents.

I wante= to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts =e plan to publish regarding your involvement as the former head of CFI dur=ng this time. If you wish to comment on any of these findings, we need to =ear from you as soon as possible. We are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning US Eastern Ti=e.

Based on our reporting so=far, this is what we plan to publish that concerns you:

## harassment by Lawrence Krauss (cont.)

One incident involving Krau=s allegedly occurred in May 2011 on a CFI cruise <https://www.youtubr.com/watch?v=qnrP8B-IKxE> .

Attendees had Krauss allegedly propositioned a f=male cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join him and his female co=panion for sex in their cabin.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20100919014301/http://centerforin=uiry.net/cruise2011/reservations>
*
No complaint was made,=but the incident was reported to a CFI staffer at the time.
<=li>

No complaint was made,=but the incident was reported to a CFI staffer at the time.
<=li>
*
CFI’s leadership continued to embrace Krauss, making him an honorary member of its board of directors in December 2011. =/span>
*
But at least two staffers were sufficiently concerned =bout reports of Krauss’s behavior that they urged you not to invit= him on a 2014 cruise <http://action.centerforinquiry.net/site/M=ssageViewer?em_id=49328.0> of the Galápagos Islands.
<=li>

But at least two staffers were sufficiently concerned =bout reports of Krauss's behavior that they urged you not to invit= him on a 2014 cruise <http://action.centerforinquiry.net/site/M=ssageViewer?em_id=49328.0> of the Galápagos Islands. <=li>
*

of those staffers resigned.

In June 2013, after you rejected their advice and invited him on the=cruise, one

At a conferen=e in March 2012, another woman, who at that point was also an employee of =FI, told you about an incident in 2006 in which Krauss forcibly kissed and=groped her in a hotel room. According to this woman, after she told you ab=ut this in person, you responded to her with silence.

=he woman later told two other employees in CFI's management about =he incident, and expressed her discomfort at having Krauss continue to spe=k at events.

CFI continued to book Krauss as a speaker=at its events.

=gain, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get=in touch with us as soon as possible. If I do not respond immediately it i= because I am on another call, so please leave the best phone number to re=ch you.

Thanks,
<iv style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt">Peter Aldhous
<tel:%28415%29%20800-3471>
=415) 503-7323

</b>
--=span class="m_-6189807211976031442m_-277658877943275076Apple-

converted-s=ace">

converted-s=ace">

Peter Aldhous, PhD
Science reporter | BuzzFeed News
tel:=span class="m_2m_-277658877943275076Apple-
<tel:%28415%29%20800-3471>

cell:  <mailto: 
@paldhous <https://twitter.com/paldhous>
www.peteraldhous.com <http://www.peteraldhous.com/>

## harassment by Lawrence Krauss (cont.)

The image contains contact information for Ronald A. Lindsay and Peter Aldhous, Ph.D.

*   Ronald A. Lindsay: Senior Research Fellow, Center for Inquiry, email available
*   Peter Aldhous, PhD: Science Reporter | BuzzFeed News, telephone, cell, email and website available

There is a note stating that the information contained in the communication is confidential and attorney-client privileged. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

## harassment by Lawrence Krauss (cont.)

and may=be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please n=tify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and

destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments, copyright -all rights reserved

## please note

<=iv>The information contained in this communication is confidential, may=be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and i= intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of

J=E

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or a=y part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us immediately by jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacat=on@gmail.com> , and destroy =his communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. co=yright -all rights reserved

please not=

The information contained in this communication is confidentia=, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information,=and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property o=

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communicatio= or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you=have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately=by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> ,

and

destroy this communicat=on and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all ri=hts reserved

## please note (cont.)

=C2

please note

The information containe= in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileg=d, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the u=e of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disc=osure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly =rohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communicati=n in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail =o jeevacation@g=ail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, =ncluding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

</=iv>