<table><tr><th>From: </th><th>Lawrence Krauss &lt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent: </td><td>Monday, February 26, 2018 4:53 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To: </td><td>jeffrey E.</td></tr><tr><td>Subject: </td><td>Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment by Lawrence
Krauss </td></tr></table>

ok.. = understand. My lawyer Adam said he would look over this stuff.. =nbsp;Here is what he said:

"Your instincts are right. Let me study all the things you =ent me.

A =awsuit, which should not be entered into lightly, has three special =dvantages which are 1. It is the reaction someone who is truly =nnocent would do; 2. It stops behavior in its tracks under advice of =ounsel; and 3. The factual background section can be viewed as a =ackgrounder for the media. "

thoughts?

Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director,=Cosmology Initiative
Foundation =rofessor
School of =arth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona=State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ
85287-1404 Research Office: I Assistant (Jessica): = Origins Office (Cynthia): =
<mailto > =nbsp;
origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl krauss.faculty.asu.edu

Project 10 Year =elebration-Be a part of something 10 years in the making! 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info

-Origins

April

=/div>

On =eb 26, 2018, at 8:49 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

and=i was right. in all instancees as if you in your nuttiness decide =o file this lawsuit you keep banging on about, that =entence will carry the day

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:47 AM, =awrence Krauss <███████████████████████████ <mailto:██████████████████████>>
wrote:

yes

but =ou did tell me to write him those words.. but you are correct about =any things..

Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The =rigins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology =nitiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space =xploration and Physics Department
Arizona State =niversity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office: I Assistant =Jessica):
Origins Office (Cynthia):
<mailto
origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu

Year Celebration-Be a part of something 10 years in the making! -Origins Project =0 April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more =nfo <https://www.originsl0year.com/>

<signature> <image002.png>

</=iv>

On Feb 26, 2018, at 8:46 AM, jeffrey E. =Itjeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» wrote:

you should wish in retrospect not to have responded at =11.

On Mon, =eb 26, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Lawrence Krauss <
<mailto > wrote:

Thanks... I am not replying =r egging them on.. I will speak to Nancy.. I wish in retrospect I =ad not sent him a note using the words "false with malicious =ntent" as you recommended.. I had a piece about that in =y long response, explaining that I explained to him it was my language =ot the Unversity's, because their investigations showed the =laim was false, and I argued that was malicious.. =nbsp;

thank you. =nbsp; And of course I was never banned from those institutions.. = should make that clear in my long response as well.. =nbsp;

I =elieve what you are seeing is from the usual suspects, but indeed, =robably not best to confront them any more directly.

## LMK

## LMK (cont.)

Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The =rigins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology =nitiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space =xploration and Physics Department
Arizona State =niversity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office: <u>=wbr</u> class="">Assistant (Jessica):
<u>Origins Office (Cynthia):</u>
<mailto
origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu

-Origins Project =0 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more =nfo Year Celebration-Be a part of something 10 years in the making! April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more =nfo <https://www.originsl0year.com/> April

<image002.png>

On Feb =6, 2018, at 8:37 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

LAWRENCE, Im not sure if you have =ecided to commit reputational hari kari. its ok with =e. but these consequences were discussed ad nauseum with =ou. if four or five ASU students decide together to complain = all bets off. . and you are egging them on.

## Melody =ensley

"A" (who wishes to remain =nonymous, though I'm almost positive I know who

<table><tr><th>it is)</th><th></th></tr><tr><td></td><td>Nora (a student at Case Western)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Melanie =homson (who witnessed him grab another woman's breast at a</td></tr><tr><td>=keptic's conference in Australia, along</td><td>with Michael Marshall =nd Jo Alabaster.</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Four former employees of Arizona =tate's Origins Project (anonymously). They</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">include a 19 year =ld undergrad with two witnesses confirming her story of his creepy =ehavior.</td></tr></table>

That's 13 separate people who either =ere the victims or the witnesses of their victimization. They come from =ultiple universities, three different countries, at a variety of events =ver a long period of time. As a result of some of those investigations, =wo institutions — Case Western Reserve University and the =erimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics — banned him from =heir campuses. And both Arizona State University and Australian =ational University said on the record that he lied about what their =nvestigation of those complaints concluded.

This is =ot a he said/she said. It's a he said/13 other people said and =hree major educational institutions said. And those aren't the =nly ones. I know of several other people with similar stories who are =fraid to talk about them in public for fear of being attacked just like =he accusers are now being attacked.

## Melody =ensley (cont.)

Krauss<l████████████████████████>wrote:

thanks.. I =on't know about others I will relay this to =ancy.

Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The =rigins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology =nitiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space =xploration and Physics Department
Arizona State =iversity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office:  <tel:  > | Assistant: 
Origins =ffice (Cynthia):  <tel:  >
 <mailto:  >
origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/lkrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu

(Jessica):

<tel:

Year Celebration-Be a part of something 10 years in the making! -Origins Project =0 April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more =nfo <https://www.originsl0year.com/>

<image002.png>

On Feb =6, 2018, at 8:28 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

## LAWRENCE !!

Since the story =roke late last week in Buzzfeed about the numerous allegations of sexual harassment and creepy behavior by Lawrence Krauss, we've =een treated to a litany of bad arguments in his defense, many by his =ife, who used asecondary Twitter =ccount <https://twitter.com/NancyMDahlPhD/With_replies> to engage people on the issue. The arguments are almost =niformly illogical and disingenuous.

l=propose you write an article debunking alien abductions using the =ame argument. these people didnt know one abother. =here are 100 of them. why should they lie. . =tc. TELL nancy to stop. you are getting =nto dangerous territory. . this is not a court of =aw. . facts DO NOT make a difference. . =s you can see there are now some others who have been too afraid to =ome forward in the article. . you are self =nflicting

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:48 AM, =awrence
Krauss<████████████████████>wrote:

The =orrespondence from Ron Lindsey to Peter Aldhous.

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

| Field | Extracted content |
|---|---|
| Document type | Email thread (forwarded messages) |
| Organization | Arizona State University — School of Earth & Space Exploration & Physics Department; Origins Project at ASU |
| Primary role shown | Director, The Origins Project; ASU professor (name redacted) |
| Contact details | Research office phone and assistant contact redacted; origins.asu.edu referenced |
| Attachment | <DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A50EC.png> |
| Sent from | "Sent from my iPhone" |
| Top forwarded message | From: [REDACTED] — Date: Feb 26, 2018 at 7:17:07 AM PST — Subject: "Fwd: Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment by [REDACTED]" |
| Earlier forwarded message | From: [REDACTED] — Date: Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:21 AM — Subject: "Re: =wd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment by [REDACTED]" — To: [REDACTED] |
| Visible body excerpts | "My correspondence with Aldhous. As usual, read from the bottom up." and a paragraph beginning "Adam Isaak resigned because I had a public spat with his girlfriend..." (names redacted) |
| Other visible items | Multiple email addresses and telephone numbers are redacted; a social handle was present but redacted |

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

Timing is important =ere. The email from Pat was in March. The dispute with Watson started =n mid-May, after which Adam stopped showing up for work. (He said he =as sick & then went on vacation, or vice versa). He then then left =ome time in June. If the Krauss matter "pushed [him) over the edge," =hen he was tenaciously hanging on to the ledge for a few =onths.

The =mail from Pat Beauchamp was in the first person and Pat indicated she =as speaking for herself. (I found the email exchange last night; I will =orward it to you.) Adam had never been shy about expressing his =oncerns to me -- he asked for raises, complained about the hosts on the =odcast he was producing etc. The notion that he and Pat were working =ogether but that he decided he could not reveal his participation is =ifficult to credit.

I will be traveling to my home this evening. Plan to reach my =ome by 7:45, but if I don't answer right away, please try a bit later. =y number is:  <tel:>.

Sincerely,

R. =indsay

=ldhous<

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Peter
>wrote:

Dear Mr. Lindsay,

Thank you =or your response, which we will consider in detail. Shall we speak at =.45pm Eastern tomorrow? Do let me know what number to call.

To answer your question, the CFI employee who resigned was =dam Isaak. He told us that he helped Patricia Beauchamp draft an email =o you outlining their concerns about inviting Lawrence Krauss on the =014 cruise.

He explained that his resignation had a =roader context, relating to his concerns about sexism and online =arassment in the skeptical movement. But he said that CFI's continued =mbrace of Krauss, in the face of concerns expressed by staff, was what =pushed me over the edge."

Sincerely,

Peter Aldhous

On 12/10/17 7:27 PM, Ronald Lindsay wrote:

Dear Mr. =Idhous,

Let me note a couple of =hings at the outset. First, I would <u>be happy to</u> speak to you regarding =he allegations in your email. You can reach me at my cell phone number, =hich is-

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

<tel:i > . However, I am unavailable =omorrow (Monday) because of prior commitments until approximately 7:45 =M.

Next, you should know that ='m not an employee of CFI nor do I have any authority to speak =n behalf of CFI. I'm writing to you from my personal email =ccount in part to underscore that point. I do retain a CFI email =ddress in part as a courtesy to me and in part because it serves a =usiness purpose (for example, I still receive occasional emails =ddressed to the president of the organization).

Turning to the substance of your allegations, first you =hould be aware that I in-house take the lawyer issue (a of position sexual harassment I held prior very to becoming =eriously. president This is confirmed =nd CEO) by I insisted the fact that that the after organization I was hired adopt by CFI a =s its comprehensive =ero-tolerance harassment policy covering workplace harassment. =oreover, during the time I was president and CEO we had three separate =tate trainings for the entire staff on sexual harassment issues. In =ddition, where necessary, we did not hesitate to expend significant =esources, including retaining outside investigators, to conduct =erious, detailed inquiries into harassment claims. One such inquiry =ost the organization over $40,000. Therefore, any suggestion that I do =ot personally take harassment claims seriously is amply disconfirmed by =y record.

Regarding the alleged =ncident on the 2011cruise, the first I became aware of it was when Pat =eauchamp, CFI's business manager and the employee responsible =or cruise logistics, wrote to me in 2013 indicating she objected to =nviting Lawrence Krauss on our upcoming Galapagos cruise. I found this =trange, and I responded to her almost immediately asking the reasons =or her objection. She gave two reasons. The first was that Krauss did =ot pay sufficient attention to the guests on the 2011 cruise. I had =eard this concern from one guest myself; on the other hand, I also =eard from several guests that they thought Krauss's =resentations were excellent and a highlight of the cruise. Accordingly, = did not give this concern much weight.

The second reason was that =rauss had allegedly asked a female guest on the cruise to join him and =is partner, apparently for some sort of sexual activity (I cannot =ecall whether Krauss was engaged or married or just seriously involved =ith his female companion at the time, although they were clearly =omantically involved and seemed very much in love). This is the first I =ad heard of this proposition. No complaint by the guest or anyone else =ad been made to me at the time of the cruise, although I was on the =ruise and clearly visible throughout the cruise.

I asked Ms. Beauchamp for contact information for this guest. = did call the guest and she substantially confirmed what Ms. Beauchamp =ad said. I apologized on behalf of the organization. The guest =ndicated although she was taken aback by Krauss's proposition =t the time, she did not want to pursue the matter further. I then got =n contact with Krauss. Krauss denied the allegation. In light of the =uest's reluctance to pursue the matter and Krauss's own =enial and, importantly, because between the time of the 2011 cruise and =he Galapagos cruise we had instituted a policy regarding harassment =tanyCFl event, which covers not just employees, but speakers =nd attendees, I decided to go ahead with my plan and have Krauss as a =peaker on the Galapagos cruise. Krauss was fully aware of our =arassment policy regarding CFI events because we had had a discussion =bout it. Therefore, I expected him to comply with that policy on the =alapagos cruise. As far as I know he did, because we received no =omplaints about his conduct. Nor have we received any complaints about =is conduct at other events.

Let me just =ake a moment to highlight the 2012 policy, which you can find in

full =ere,

http://www.centerforinquiry.net/blogs/entry/cfis new_poliry on hostile conduit harassment at conferences/ along with the announcement I made explaining the =ationale for the policy. This policy was, certainly at its time, =rguably the strongest any nonprofit organization had regarding conduct =t its events. Again, this policy shows that any suggestion that CFI, as =n organization, or that I personally took a lax attitude regarding =arassment is completely without factual foundation.

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

In your email you mentioned that one staffer resigned after I =nvited Krauss on the Galapagos cruise. I'm not aware of any =taffer resigning because of that. If you give me a name I could comment =n the reasons for the staffer leaving. Ms. Beauchamp remained an =mployee of CFI (and went on the Galapagos cruise with =rauss).

You mentioned also the =omments that were made to me in March 2012 by Melody Hensley. Let me =ive you the background for that. CFI was holding an event prior to the =012 Reason Rally in DC. Richard Dawkins, Jessica Alquist, Jamie Raskin, =nd Lawrence Krauss were scheduled to speak at the event. Melody Hensley =as heavily involved in the planning for the event and in fact was =apped to make introductions for the speakers, including Krauss. (At the =ime she was in charge of the DC local branch.) During the planning for =he event she gave no indication whatsoever that she had any hesitation =bout introducing or dealing with Krauss. (I will forward you some email =orrespondence confirming this.)

As I recall, Krauss's=schedule resulted in his planned arrival being a little later than the =thers. As it turned out, he was even further delayed. At some point =hen it became clear that Krauss was going to be late, Hensley turned to =e and said, "I know why Krauss isn't coming; he's=embarrassed to see me." I asked Hensley what she meant by this. =he said Krauss had made a pass at her several years earlier and she had rebuffed him. I asked for some details. She said she was in a hotel room =ith him (I can't recall whether she said it was Krauss's =otel room, but I think it was), and that Krauss tried to kiss her. She =ushed him away and said she wasn't interested. I asked if =rauss persisted; she said he did not. Thinking out loud, I believe I =aid something to the effect of 'well, if you want to make a =omplaint you probably can, although I'm not sure our policy at =hat time would cover that.' Ms. Hensley said she was not =nterested in making a formal complaint.

Ms. Hensley's statement that I "responded to =er with silence" is absolutely false and I categorically and =nqualifiedly deny it. We talked about her concern, as indicated. Ms. =ensley's recall must be failing her.

Given the passage of time (six years), the fact that Hensley =id not want to pursue the matter, the fact that Krauss desisted when =ensley indicated she wasn't interested, the fact that Hensley =idn't even seem very bothered by the incident (as indicated, =he had expressed no hesitation in seeing Krauss), and the fact that we =ad no policy covering conduct by nonemployees back in 2006 (in fact, =FI's zero-tolerance policy covering employees themselves was =ot implemented until 2007, I believe -- I was just hired as the =ttorney in July 2006), I decided not to do any further about this =articular incident. However, the incident, along with observations I =eard at the Women in Secularism conference which we held later in the =pring of 2012 (observations which didnotmention Krauss, but rather some speakers at non-CFI =vents), was a factor in my thinking about the need for a policy =overing conduct by invited speakers and guests at CFI =onferences.

Ms. Hensley made no other =omplaint to me about Krauss, nor did she ever express to me her belief =hat we should not invite Krauss to events.

In closing, let me state that any accusations stating that I =eglected to take harassment complaints seriously are false. =urthermore, I would regard them as a malicious attack on my character =nd my professional reputation.

Sincerely,

Ronald A. =indsay

---------- Forwarded message ----------

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

Email 1:

*   From: Ronald Lindsay
*   Date: Sun, Dec 10, 2017, 9:15 PM
*   Subject: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment by Lawrence Krauss

Email 2:

*   Forwarded message from Peter Aldhous
*   Date: Sun, Dec 10, 2017, 8:13 PM
*   Subject: RGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment by Lawrence Krauss

Mr. Lindsay:

I'm a =eporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct =negations against Lawrence Krauss.

The story concerns =rauss's actions towards students while a professor of physics =t Case Western Reserve University, as well as his conduct in =on-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I =m reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science =esk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes.

Our story is about =everal allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016. Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions Krauss has been =ffiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, the =ustralian National University, the New College of the Humanities and =he Center for Inquiry, for which you formerly served as president —=have handled complaints and concerns about his behavior during this =ime.

Our story is corroborated by emails, university =ocuments, official complaints, testimony from victims and witnesses, =nd interviews with more than two dozen of Krauss's current and =ormer academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics =ovement.

I am writing to you now because you are =ersonally named in the story, and because you had executive responsibility for CFI's actions during the time of some of the =lleged incidents.

I wanted to offer you the opportunity to =omment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish regarding =our involvement as the former head of CFI during this time. If you wish =o comment on any of these findings, we need to hear from you as soon as =ossible. We are planning on =ublishing our story Tuesday morning US Eastern Time.

Based on our =eporting so far, this is what we plan to publish that concerns =ou:

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

One incident involving Krauss =llegedly occurred in May 2011 on a CFI =ruise.
*
Attendees had =/span>paid several thousand dollars to join a cultural =our of the Greek islands, featuring lectures from scientists and =riters, including Krauss.
*
Krauss allegedly =ropositioned a female cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join =im and his female companion for sex in their cabin. =/span>
*
No complaint was made, but =he incident was reported to a CFI staffer at the time. =/span>
*
CFI's leadership =ontinued to embrace Krauss, making =im an honorary member of its =oard of directors in December 2011.
*
But at least two =taffers were sufficiently concerned about reports of Krauss's =ehavior that they urged you not to invite him on a 2014 cruise of the Galápagos Islands. =/span>
*
In June 2013, after you =ejected their advice and invited him on the cruise, one of those =taffers resigned.
*
At a conference in March =012, another woman, who at that point was also an employee of CFI, told =ou about an incident in 2006 in which Krauss forcibly kissed and groped =er in a hotel room. According to this woman, after she told you about =his in person, you responded to her with silence.
*
The woman later =old two other employees in CFI's management about the incident, =nd expressed her discomfort at having Krauss continue to speak at =vents.
*
CFI continued to book Krauss =s a speaker at its events.

CFI continued to book Krauss =s a speaker at its events.

Again, if you wish =o comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with =s as soon as possible. If I do not respond immediately it is because I =m on another call, so please leave the best phone number to reach =ou.

- Greeting: "Thanks,"
- Name: [REDACTED] (blacked out in image)
- Phone (inline): [REDACTED] <tel...> (blacked out)
- Signature separator: "--"
- Name line: [REDACTED], PhD (blacked out)
- Title / Employer: Science reporter | BuzzFeed News
- tel: [REDACTED] <tel...> (blacked out)
- cell: [REDACTED] <tel...> (blacked out)
- Additional blacked-out line (full-width)
- Social handle: @[REDACTED] (blacked out)
- Website: [REDACTED]

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

*   **Ronald A. Lindsay:** Senior Research Fellow, Center for Inquiry.
*   **Peter Aldhous, PhD:** Science reporter at BuzzFeed News.
*   Contact information (phone numbers and email address) for both individuals are present (redacted in the image).
*   Peter Aldhous's website and Twitter handle are listed.

please note

The information =ontained in this communication is confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may constitute inside =nformation, and is intended only for the use of the =ddressee. It is the property of TEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

return e-mail or by e-mail tojeevacation@gmail.com

<mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com>, and

destroy this =ommunication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please =ote

The information contained in this =ommunication is confidential, may be attorney-client =rivileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure =r copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail tojeevacation@gmail.com

<mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com>, and

destroy this =ommunication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights =eserved

please note

The information contained in this =ommunication is confidential, may be attorney-client =rivileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure =r copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this =ommunication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights =eserved

## LAWRENCE !! (cont.)

please =ote

The information contained in this =ommunication is confidential, may be attorney-client =rivileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure =r copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this =ommunication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights =eserved