From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:57 PM
To: Richard Kahn
Subject: Re: update

i thouught so also

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 =t 9:54 AM, Richard Kah wro=e:

could re=utation changer be promoting negative articles to make it appear that we n=ed them...

Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor,
New York, New York 100=2

tel

fax
cell

</=>

Begin forwarded message:

<iv style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:=px">From:  &t;

Date: February 22, 2013 8:54:55 AM EST

To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:=eevacation@gmail.com> >

Cc: Richard Kahn

Subject: Re: update

Hi Jeffrey,

</=iv>

I think reputation worked for the national but not the local at al=. I'll let you know what they say after I call them today.



On Feb 22, 2013, a= 6:13 AM, Jeffrey Epstein cjeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» wrote:

i am confused by how backward things have gone. do you think repuation worke= . ?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:00=PM, ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
<mailto:██████████████████████████████> >= wrote:

Hi Jeffrey and Rich,

Summary of my work for the last month: Jan 15 - Feb 15:

• created a new international website. Fully optimized.

• published 5 press articles

	- edited 11 articles for Reputation.

• updated 7 websites with 14 more pages of content in to=al.

	- updated google's search optimization for all 8 websites4=i>

	- general correspondence and monitoring of Reputation's work.

R=sults:

national: 1 negative listing in 3rd pla=e. local: 3 negative listings: 4th, 5th, 6th.

I've seen no improvement in the local results in the last month. 1= fact, it's worse in the last week. I'm doing everything I can to =oost the websites but the local press easily dominates.

Moving forward:

I'm finishin= up with content for the forum that Jeffrey sent me. After that, I don't think it makes sense for me to continue as is. The=progress on the national front is good. But not the local. </=iv> So,

1. I either stop entirely. 2. Or continue to boost all websites regularly at 1/2 salary-- concentratin= on directory listings. Press releases are expensive. 3. Supplem=nt the above with a proposal that I have to present on deciphering signal =ell intelligence.

- "Thank you for your thoughts,"
- [REDACTED name/block]
- "=A0"
- "</=iv>"
- "=span>"
- "<=iv>" [REDACTED block]
- "cell" (partial visible)
- [long REDACTED line] (likely contact/email)

Context: appears to be an email sign-off/signature with several corrupted HTML-like tags and multiple redacted personal/contact fields.

***********

**********

The informat=on contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-cli=nt privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only =or the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unau=horized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part th=reof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received t=is communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or=by e-mail to je=vacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com>

, and

destroy this communication and all copies t=ereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

</=iv>

******************************************************************_**********************************
The information contained in this communication is=br> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,

may

constitute inside i=formation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the=property of Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying=of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unla=ful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us=immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacat=on@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved