<table><tr><th>From: </th><th></th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Wednesday, July 4, 2018 1:02 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>jeevacation@gmail.com</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re: Hello</td></tr></table>

Personal/Political bias is =ne thing (I still would exploit it any and every time on cross); this was =n obsession and directly relevant "Stop Trump." Also, the IG made cl=ar in his testimony Strzok told him McCabe was there. McCabe is anot=er real character. He denies this; but he also is irreconcilably at =dds with Comey on WSJ leak. Absolutely right that taking emails alon= is not fair; but I would point out that it is folks like Strzok and compa=y who have ruined many a businesman's life based exclusively on a twisted =eading of emails sold to a jury. Flynn is an interesting case. =1 believe I could have gotten his plea back for him in a second based on w=at has surfaced; but he decided to go a different way. But as to you= underlying point that there might well be something to go after with thes= guys, I hear you; but I have spent my whole career fighting bullies and c=ooked, unethical prosecutors. That will remain a guiding principle f=r me, whether the target is popular, hated, a complete jerk, guilty, etc.&=bsp; I am doing ok, thanks. I see you really follow this stuff. =

------riginal Message-----

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@ <u>mail.com></u>
To: David Schoen <
Sent: Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:51am
Subject: Re: Hello

we're on the same team. strzok. testimon= was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments. and not =ndicative of non professionalism. I believe he sai= nothing more than it referenced " andys office". . paig= says andy was there. how many other people were there ? =were strzok and paige. off in the corner talking to each other .&nbs=; was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails a=one is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to s=y that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with s=epticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had man= neg hillary opinions .. - michael cohen. michael flyn=. . are not fictions created by mueller ? how are you ?=/div>

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM, < > wrote:

Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents lo=ed him and some hated him); but I get your point. Couple of things:

1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as =ood as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy theorist= on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of politi=al bias as a lead investigator. But more importantly, he was not alo=e. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We d=n't yet know what his private emails showed. Strzok, however, says t=at he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office di=cussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just can=ot be tolerated. Plus, if I find any evidence of personal or other e=traneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, I view it as an op=n invitation for cross examination and any other exploitation possible as =t cannot be an accepted part of the process.

2. In this whole matter, I am most disturbed by the composition =f the Mueller team and it seems to me that if we are to learn anything fro= the IG's report it is the importance of having an investigation conducted=above-board without personal and political baggage. Mueller had a wh=le universe of lawyers from around the country to choose from to make up h=s team. He purposefully chose a murderer's row of the worst. l=can go one by one; but I will spare you. Here are a couple of exampl=s:

A. Andrew Weissmann was known in the EDNY as "The Patholo=ical Liar" after the SNL character. He literally would withhold excu=patory evidence throughout the case and then one day when defense counsel =ent to the bathroom or lunch, stick the documents under others on his tabl= and tell the judge the lawyer had it all along. I have been brought=into a case in which he lied from start to finish - and now his rats have =ome to me to admit their role in it - to get murder convictions in two cas=s. He has been cited by judges for his misconduct and he runined bot= Arthur Anderson and Enron through his work, all of which was rejected by =he higher courts. He also is a Trump hater and Clinton sycophant.&nb=p; Mueller knows Weissmann's conduct up close and personal. He chose=Weissmann for his chief counsel at the FBI years ago.

B. Jeannie Rhee, hand-picked by Mueller from Mueller's own firm,=was actually Clinton's lawyer in the email investigation. Now how do=s that look. She also is a bully and thinks she is a real tough guy =nd I don't want that kind of character around. I also have an ineffe=tive assistance of counsel case against her for a client in a $100 million=earnings management fraud case in which she was way over her head.

C. Greg Andres was another bully who replaced Weissmann in the E=NY. He withheld evidence terribly in his cases, regularly threatened=others, and accused a defendant of putting out a contract on him when he k=ew it was a completely bogus claim, but gave him the publicity he craved.&=bsp; He is 100% in the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump camp. President Obama=gave his wife a federal judgeship on the SDNY

and on and on.

I don't personally believe Russia affected the election at all; but I =ertainly am not qualified to say. I do know that we have meddled in =ther countries' elections as a matter of policy forever. But the bot=om line is, if there is to be an investigation, just play it straight up.&=bsp; I am friends for a long time with the IG. If they had picked hi= to head up the team, I would not be a weekly guest on Hannity tv and radi= (I never would have been asked), as I know he would pick a team of honest=folks from across the spectrum.

-----Original Message-----
From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
To: David Schoen <>
Sent: Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:10 am
Subject: Re: Hello

is it overblown. ? all=mob prosecutors have strong feelings towards their targets. &nb=p; I recall many that told stories of how they despised gotti =tc. why is stryok different ?

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:51 AM, < <mailto > > wrote:

I am obsessed with prosecutorial and FBI misconduct wherev=r it rears it ugly head and i am committed to doing what i can to fight it=whether for my death penalty clients or a klansman. Lots of wrongdoi=g here and we all lose when the system breaks down.

I assume you were just flipping the channels.

Hope you are doing well. I see they never miss an op=ortunity to try to drag you in - saw an article the other day asking how y=u missed the #metoo press and tying you to trump. Didn't mention muc= of all you have been put through already. I hope the cases are all =ehind you now. I would have liked to have helped; but i guess you an= your team decided on a different direction. Whatever works best.

=n Wednesday, July 4, 2018 jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gm=il.com> > wrote:

judge jeannie?

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM, <██████████████> wrote:

Just checking in to see how you are getting along these da=s. I hope all the litigation is well behind you and things are going=well Take care. David David I. Schoen

please note

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and

including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for

the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailtcrjeevacation@gmail.com> , and

including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and

including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

4