<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>Joscha Bach</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Monday, January 12, 2015 12:26 AM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>Jeffrey Epstein</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re:</td></tr></table>

Hehe. I did not expect any different.

Here are some more ideas:

- A shadow research planning academy, where scientific visionaries and =ome trustworthy funding administration folks project future research =gendas and new disciplines (independently of their own current efforts)

- A series of workshops focusing on neglected knowledge, such as Russian =sychopharmacology, Thai architecture, Buddhist psychology, Chinese =pinion control, ...

- A network of media people that can be used to efficiently place and =oordinate friendly items in our corrupt opinion market, or that may be =sed to keep opposing parties in check

- Use AI and machine learning for predicting macroeconomic and political =rends (your own climate and weather model of the global economy)

- Psychedelic retreats for groups of select individuals with the =xplicit goal to create a tightly knit, but disentrenched group of =ndividuals capable of radically rethinking and influencing global =ffairs

- A cryptographically secure social network for highly relevant =ndividuals

- A news agency specifically designed to amplify signal in the noise, =nd to eliminate opinion bias as far as possible (There are some more that I would not want to put into email.)

I am very curious for your own ideas, if you like to share some!

– J

> Forwarded message

> From: Michele Reilly

> Date: Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 6:33 PM

> Subject: Re:

> To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com>

>

>

> Thanks, Jeff - You asked for 'fun' projects. I think we're mostly =tarving for great conspiracies today; 10-12 person coordinated secrets. =hat about a New Rosicrucianism of sorts? A Jejune Institute -style =lurred reality/fiction negging of your enemies would be pretty damn =un. What are your thoughts on funding and constructing your own =ntelligence Agency?

>

>

• > I'd also like to do an exclusive science salon sort of thing at a =lace like Esalen; or maybe on little St. James (experimentation with =hilosophers/scientists examining physiological stuff; while considering =rtificial intelligence epistemology)?

>

> Outside of this I tend to think of my mate preferences as evidence of =entlemen to pay attention to. Caveat emptor. Like any decent trader you =hould estimate various lags/regime changes to seek relevant trends. =igh profile island orgies also independently come to mind; but I have a =trong suspicion that you may already have that covered.

>

- Opening line/sign-off:
  - "Fraternal regards from one Coney Island baby to another!"
  - "Michele"

- Quoted email header:
  - "On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:15 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:"

- Key excerpt (verbatim fragments visible):
  - "fun - thanks for taking the time, - I'd appreciate it if you both would take a moment and list what you thought I should pay attention to. people .etc. mathematicians . institute models. cures. ? I think the well intentioned effort to point out that the medical system is broken or that academic institutions sometimes hinder creativity, is not time best spent. Groundbreaking ideas. (ketamine aside). seems to cause you both to light up as opposed to the I can't believe gambling's goin on here reaction to the concerns of the c plusses."

- Confidentiality notice (repeated):
  - "The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright - all rights reserved"

- XML / plist fragment:
  - xml version/encoding line present (shows "TF-8" typo)
  - DOCTYPE plist and <plist> wrapper
  - dict entries shown:
    - conversation-id: 128670
    - date-last-viewed: 0
    - date-received: 1421022370
    - <key>flags</key> (value truncated/not shown)

<integer>8590195713</integer>
<key>gmail-label-ids</key>

<array>
<integer>6</integer>
<integer>2</integer>

</array>
<key>remote-id</key>
<string>472357</string>

</dict>
</plist>