From: Deepak Chopra
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:54 AM
To: Jeff Epstein
Subject: Fw: thought

see below

2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Chopra Foundation=/a> <http://www.choprafoundation.org> Jiyo <http://jiyo.com> Chopra Center for Wellbeing
<http://chopra.com> =/div>

For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com <http://=adicalbeauty.com/> <http:=/radicalbeauty.com/>

<=span>

From: Deepak Chopra
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:52 AM
To: Rudolph Tanzi
Cc: ████████████████████████████████████████████████

Subject: Re: thought

DNA , bacteria, brain --anything humans have given names to are hu=an constructs --the entire universe including what we call "God"=-is human construct. Reality is awareness and its excitations experienced =s observer and observed - classification and description into form and phenomena are human constucts-products of language--linguist=c, mathematical, scientific --useful but not fundamental

For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com <http://=adicalbeauty.com/> <http:=/radicalbeauty.com/>

<=span>

From: Rudolph Tanzi
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:50:29 PM
To: <u>Deepak Chopra Cc:</u> 

Subject: Re: thought

Every universe of every being is their own construct. Those with simil=r DNA agree most on the construct. The universe of a bacterium in a dish i= much difference than ours, which is close to that of our dog while the ba=terium's is closer to a yeast. These are all valid universes changing with the DNA-encoded perception of =ach species.

On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Deepak Chopra > wro=e:

I cannot in all honesty

I believe that the universe we experience is totally a huma= construct

Deepak Chopra

2013 Costa Del Mar Road </=pan>
Carlsbad, CA 92013

New Book: </=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/>

On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:38 PM, █████████████████
████████████████████████ > wrote:

<table><tr><th></th><th>From: "Sperry Andrews" =It</th><th>&lt;=pan</th></tr><tr><td>class=""</td><td>style="font-size:12pt"&gt;&gt;</td><td></td></tr></table>

"Deepak, Sperry, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne"=/span> What makes mutual understanding "perfect" ? I find, the challeng= here on this list, and in life, appears precarious at times. Well, yes. Humans are not always stable, get easily frightened.

When we are, c=nsciously aware of our non-verbal sensory/emotional experience - which=reliably allows our verbal-analytic minds to integrate their abstract conc=pts with what is intimately being sensed and felt - we seem to agr=e. Yes, but (1) you describe an i=eal ego-free state. (2) It seem to be this is not yet 1 goal for the=whole group so we don't benefit from task unification as we did before the list mergings. Their makes it harder but a=so better. Otherwise, we go round and around in circles - as if=caught up in a dictionary of terms with different meanings for each of us - oft=n times becoming strident about what we wish to share more intelligently v=a mutual understanding. (3) That's the different, opposing agendas. I for one would love to see =s aspire to paradigm change. In the absence of sharing non-verbally - in a fully embodied wa= - as one single Self/Self aware consciousness, we learn from sufferin= - to un-learn these habits. I can see practice achievin= that with basic criteria met first. Sperry, you are an able mediato=. Love Suzanne

Key information from the image:

*   Email received on October 7, 2016, at 5:28 AM
*   Sender: Suzanne
*   Recipient: Deepak, Sperr
*   Subject: "This is PERFECT."
*   Original message was sent by Sperry Andrews

- Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 6:32 PM
- Subject: Re: thought
- To: Deepak Chopra <redacted>
- Cc: <redacted>
- Message body: fully redacted (large black block covering content)

Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 6:32 pm Subject: Re: thought

With every new instant of perceptual activity, I feel our m=rtal forms more closely approximating what is constant.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Deepak Chopra <████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████> wrote:

I find it existentially exhilarating =br class="">

Deepak Chopra

2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92013

New Book: </=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/>

<http://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty-

Book-Cover-1.png>

On Oct 6, 2016, at 5:36 PM,
> wrote:

Hugs, Sperry,=/font>

With your 1st 5 lines. I have problems with the res= of what you say here. I find

it existentially despairing.

Document: redacted email screenshot

Header
- From: Sperry Andrews (partially redacted)
- Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 2:36 pm
- Subject: Re: thought
- Signature visible: "Love, Suzanne"

Visible recipient/mentioned names (many lines redacted)
- Carlo Monsanto
- ELIZABE=H A. RAUSCHER
- Haramein
- Jim Beichler
- Karla Galdamez
- Rudy Tanzi
- Subhash Kak
- Glen Rein
- Menas Kafatos
- Millard / Wohl (partial)

Selected visible body text (verbatim)
- contemplating math symbolically,
- when we divide 1 by an infinitely large number
  we most closely approximate 0.
- 1/infinity = 0,
- This "I" experiences being a singular unity tha= is continuously being divided by
  infinite variations on a theme,
- re-creating what "I" AM BEing as an awakeness t=at is receiving and reflecting
- some sense of all that ever was, is and will be, as no body=going nowhere,
- unborn, deathless, immeasurable, indivisible, timeless cons=iousness.

That which is 'not a thing' cannot be divided--contributing=an essential,
indispensable, 'eternal' constant to all forms.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:05 AM, ██████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ > > wrote:

Hugs, Sperry,

Hooray! You acknowledge there is form.

Your last sentence, however, for me, does not deal with f=rm enough.

The point unfolded to make the ultimate case for in=ivisibility but even points are divisible.

Immortal is a theological concept whic= I believe applies (like eternal) only in the sense that atoms recycle.

Love,
Suzanne

-----Original Message-----
From: Sperry Andrews <sperry@andrews.com>
To: Deepak Chopra <deepak@chopra.com>

Cc:

Sent: Wed, Oct 5, 2016 2:06 pm

Subject: Re: thought

This - below - appears to be so to this " I. " =nbsp;Does any of 'this' make sense

to any of 'you' ?

Without both hydrogen and oxygen there would be no water--which makes trans=ent life possible.

The zen chant we all know, form is formlessness, formlessness is form, can =e experienced by humanity as whole.

Without formlessness form would not transform in space over=time. Without form formlessness would be nothing at all.

These two ingredients constantly mixing together, perpetuat= their characteristics. Formlessness uniting all as one,

while forms attempt to perfect their capacity to be like fo=mlessness-- indivisible, immortal, all knowing consciousness.

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM,=Deepak Chopra > wrote:

"I " is not person a The is no such thing as a person . You are never the same person as a child infant teen ager older man/

woman&=bsp;

"I" is the awareness in which the so called person arises and su=ides as an intermittent stream of sensations images feelings and thoughts=. These in turn arise in "I" are known in "I"= and are made out of "I"."I" is infinite being (=ormless') having a finite experience as form. The form is an illusion as it is phen=mena - an activity of the formless. All forms are phenomena. All phenome=a arise and subside in every moment of now .The formless is the only reali=y. It is timeless being. You cannot hold on to a time bound phenomenon. It is not a "thing =quot;. Even the "you" that you call "I" is a time=bound phenomenon.

Nothing to hold on to and no one doing the holding on = Freedom in Being =3D Yoga

Deepak Chopra

2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92013

New Book: </=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/>

<http://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty-

Book-Cover-1.png>

Hugs= Deepak:

A thought about <=ont color="#000080" class="">l Am The Universe:

There are millions o= people, IN THE MAINSTREAM, who buy, for example, Greg Braden's books abou= cyclical universes. If they feel, accurately, that the universe is =n an irreversibly downward spiral, I don't think they'll be calmed or comforted by a concept claiming what your title claim=.

Can you find some wa= to say what you must while adding to it?

Much=love,
Suza=ne

Dr. Rudolph E. Tanzi
Joseph. P. and=Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology
Harvard Medica= School
Vice•Chair, Ne=rology; Director, Genetics and Aging Research Unit
Massachusetts =eneral Hospital
114 16th Stree=
Charlestown, M=, 02129
c/=iv>
http://www.mghmind.org/facult=/Tanzi
http://dms.h=s.harvard.edu/neuroscience/fac/tanzi.php