<table><tr><th>From:</th><th>jeffrey E. &lt;jeevacation@gmail.com&gt;</th></tr><tr><td>Sent:</td><td>Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:31 PM</td></tr><tr><td>To:</td><td>David Sauvage</td></tr><tr><td>Subject:</td><td>Re:</td></tr></table>

you dont have to be a scientist to underatnd the concept o= proof. does massage work? not a=science question , but some think it does. can you prove=to anyone that your intuitive abilities are repeatable. =erifiable, . probably not. but is ok. =ith vast experience , chinese doctors can tell if someones kidneys are wor=ing properly , the eyes are a little dull and yellow, Q=A0 its not science but a pretty good predictor. . the ot=er experiment you can try if you want is hold their hands. wri=e down what you feel. , and afterwards have them choose =hich best describes their charcateristics. l=did this with 200 girls. each one had to rate the accuracy of =iagnosisi on a scale of 1-10. the results ra=ged from 3-10. however, the writ=en diagnosis was exactly the same for each, no one like the re=ults . beliveing is more fun

<=>

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, David Sauvag=
wrote:

I don't mind anything you'r= saying - I am definitely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don&=39;t know much about experiments and design.

I feel like it'd be good to talk it out? I say what I can do, and som=body who knows science tells me how we can test that, until we arrive at a=solution that works both ways?

Sent from my mobile device

On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:j=evacation@gmail.com» wrote=

I like you,=C2* I am trying to be kind, that is not science. . if =ou make people feel better and no one is injured , all the best to you.40=A0 how about being blindfolded and guessing their =ame. the outcome must be verifiable, not you are s=y, sometimes. angry other times . the trick of mentalis=s that do much better than that. they could take a strength fi=der test, and then you could take it with empathy for them, 40=A0 there are 100 questions see if you got the more than 80 per=ent right.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, David Sauvage ████████████
███████████ wrote:

Jeffrey,

Just an additio=al thought. A vision, actually--

What if I did readings blin=folded? So I held someone's hand and felt into them. With such limited=visual/tactile information, it would be a real test of my empathic abiliti=s. It would almost validate "the sixth sense."

Then maybe we could compare my ability to read people with an avera=e person's ability to

## read people?

Just=brainstorming here...

Very best,
David<=div>

On Mon= Aug 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, David Sauvage wrote:

I would love to do that. Definitely has higher probability of success.40=A0

Sent from my mobile device

=n Aug 15, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com> > wrote:

I greatly appreciatei th= honesty, I dont think will work with pictures. bu= might work face to face. if it will work at all. if so =1 would try 10 women, and ten names. . you willl need to=touch each one. .

<=>

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:32 PM, David Sauva=e
rote:

Hi Jeffrey and Gino,

E=rlier today, I sat down with 15 pictures and 15 names and tried to match t=em. It turned out to be quite a struggle -- primarily because people were =ery similar. For instance, I'd have descriptions like this: =br> Shy but relatively happy on the outside Filled wit= frustration and anxiety Burning with rage deep down <=r> But out of the 15 people, that could vaguely describe 3 or 4 =hem. So my matching ending up looking like a convoluted chart. =div>

What I concluded was that I need a bit more help design=ng this experiment. Ideally, rather than matching 15 names to pictures, I =ave a bunch of binary decisions (A or B). One would expect me to get 50% r=ght. IF the people are emotionally different enough (happy v. sad, for ins=ance) I hypothesize I will do considerably better than chance. Does that m=ke sense?

## read people? (cont.)

I have started to go down this road wit= my friend at NYU. Happy to discuss with

Gino as well.

And of course, happy to submit to MRI machines and the like to =igure what's

happening on that end.

Open to a=y and all thoughts. Science, clearly, is not my gift.

=div>Very best,

David

<u><=iv</u> <u>class=" mail • uote">On</u> Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, David Sauvage wrote:

Hi Jeffrey,

Sorry it took a beat to respond.

This weekend, when I have spac= and time, I'll ask a friend to lay out some pictures and names and se= how I do. And I'll report back what I learn.

I've been =hinking about this for a while -- and I do feel we ultimately need a more =igorous experiment. But I like your idea, at least to start, of just givin= it a good and seeing.

Great meeting you.
David
<=iv>

<=iv>

Sent from my mobile device

O= Aug 7, 2016, at 6:22 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailtojeevacation@gma=l.com» wrote:

david, if you =an do the name to photo test. in a 25 picture test.4,=A0 it could be an interesting begining, I suggst=you take twenty women all availbel on google or facebook and t=y. ,

=A0 please note

The information contained in this commu=ication is

## read people? (cont.)

confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may cons=itute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addre=see. It is the property of JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copyi=g of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited a=d may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all a=tachments. copyright -all rights reserved



=A0 please note

<table><tr><th></th><th>The information contained in this communication is&lt;=r&gt;confidential, may be</th></tr><tr><td>attorney-client privileged, may</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>constitute insid= information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is =he property of
JEE </td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part</td></tr><tr><td>thereof is strictly prohibited</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>and may be un=awful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify =s immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;mailto:jeevac=tion@gmail.com&gt; , and</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>destro= this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved</td></tr></table>



=A0 please note

The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney-client
privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is =he property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly
prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this

4

## read people? (cont.)

communication in error, please notify =s immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevac=tion@gmail.com> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved

please note

Th= information contained in this communication is confidential, may be at=orney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is inte=ded only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

=nauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any par= thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this communication in error, please notify us immediately by retur= e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and a=l copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights rese=ved