- Subject: "RE: Epstein Call Tomorrow"
- Date(s): May 21, 2020 (messages stamped 9:30 AM, 9:33 AM, 9:59 AM, 10:04 AM, and 18:22:12 +0000)
- Purpose: Scheduling a call tomorrow between 2:30 and 4:00 PM
- Agreed time: 2:30 PM ("Thanks – let's say 230")
- Dial-in: "We can use my dial in:" (dial-in details redacted)
- Participant notes: multiple senders/cc recipients are redacted; at least one mailbox shows "(USANYS)"
- Key message excerpts:
  - "I can do any time in that range."
  - "Same, thanks." / "Same, thanks. Sent from my iPhone"
- Thread structure: chain of short confirmations agreeing on 2:30 PM for the call

Do some or all of you have a few minutes to chat between 230 and 4 today in advance of this call tomorrow? Just want to update you on what I expect.

EFTA00026606

Key information from the image:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Thursday, May 21, 2020 9:28 AM
*   **To:** ; (USANYS) [Contractor]
*   **Cc:** , (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Call Tomorrow

Me too.

| Field | Extracted text |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] <[redacted]> |
| Sent | Thursday, May 21, 2020 9:27 AM |
| To | [redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[redacted]> |
| Cc | [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Subject | Re: Epstein Call Tomorrow |
| Surrounding text | "Me too." / "Either works for me, thanks." |

Either works for me, thanks.

On May 21, 2020, at 09:17 (USANYS) < > wrote:

1 would be better for me but I can make 11 work if it's better for others.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 21, 2020, at 9:11 AM, < > wrote:

Both work for me, thanks.

- From: [redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <redacted>
- Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 9:10 AM
- To: multiple recipients (several redacted); some labeled “(USANYS)”; addresses separated by semicolons
- Subject: Epstein Call Tomorrow

All,

I've been asked to set up a call with all of you and the brass for tomorrow. 11am or 1pm would work best for them. Do either work for all of you?

Thanks,

EFTA00026607