The image shows email headers:

*   **From:** \[redacted]
*   **To:** \[redacted] (USANYS) \[Contractor]
*   **Cc:** \[redacted] (USANYS)

Subject: RE: Discovery Issues
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:30:19 +0000
Inline-Images: irnage001.jpg; image002.jpg

Yes, thank you. I will send a calendar invite.

Key information from the email:

*   **From:** (USANYS) [Contractor]
*   **Sent:** Tuesday, March 30, 2021 10:26 AM
*   **To:**
*   **Cc:** (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Discovery Issues

Hello

Can we meet tomorrow morning at 10:00 am tomorrow to discuss the below production?

Thank you.



The image is of an email header.

*   **From:** \[Redacted]
*   **Sent:** Monday, March 29, 2021 4:00 PM
*   **To:** \[Redacted] (USANYS) \[Contractor] \[Redacted]
*   **Cc:** \[Redacted], \[Redacted] (USANYS) \[Redacted]
*   **Subject:** RE: Discovery Issues

Thanks very much.

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[redacted]> |
| Sent | Monday, March 29, 2021 3:04 PM |
| To | [redacted] <[redacted]> |
| Cc | [redacted]; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Subject | RE: Discovery Issues |

Hello

I will send this information to PAE and set up a time for a phone call.

Thank you.

From: 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 20212:59 PM
To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < >

EFTA00019092

Cc: (USANYS)<
Subject: FW: Discovery Issues

Hi

We just received the below and attached regarding discovery in the Maxwell case. Many of these questions relate to productions that PAE prepared. Would you please take a look and let me know when would be a good time this week for a call to discuss?

Thanks,

- Type: Email header screenshot (multiple heavy redactions)
- From: [sender name redacted] <[email redacted]>
- Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021, 2:40 PM
- To: multiple recipients (addresses redacted); one recipient labeled “(USANYS)”
- Cc: multiple recipients (names/emails redacted)
- Subject: Discovery Issues
- Body preview (first line): “[redacted], [redacted] and [redacted] -”
- Visual: several black redaction blocks covering names/email addresses throughout the header.

We write to raise a few issues concerning the discovery. Below is the list of items. Please let me know if you are free for a call to discuss.

1. On our last call, we asked you if we could send our client a hard drive containing the discovery that we had created (without the highly confidential items). You had said you would check to see if you could facilitate this. We have not heard back from you. Are you able to send Ms. Maxwell the hard drive?

2. The last two productions you sent to Ms. Maxwell on disks. As you know, she cannot read disks on her laptop and must use the prison computer. But the prison computer cannot read some of the files. We can include these files on our hard drive to send to Ms. Maxwell. Otherwise, you will need to produce them on a hard drive. Please advise which way you would like to proceed.

3. A number of the emails in the discovery — over 109,000 — were produced without their attachments (see tab 1 of the attached Excel file). Instead, the attachments appear as slip-sheets (see example attached). Please provide the missing attachments, if they exist.

4. A number of electronic documents — over 110,000 — that were extracted from one of Epstein's devices, as identified by a CART number, have metadata that indicates a "date created" or "date last modified" date in July 2020 or afterwards (see tab 2 of the attached Excel file). We request that you produce a metadata overlay with the original metadata for these files.

5. A number of photographs — over 6500 — were produced in native format, but do not have a CART number and have "date created" and/or "date last modified" dates after July 2019 (see tab 3 of the attached Excel file). Please provide the CART number for these photographs or specify which device they came from. Also, we request that you produce a metadata overlay with the original metadata for these files.

6. A number of the audio/visual files — over 460 — have similar metadata issues (see tab 4 of the attached Excel file). These fall into the following buckets:

	a. SDNY GM SUPP: these have CART numbers, but were produced without metadata load files and have "date created" and "date last modified" dates in September-November 2020, after the date the device was seized. We request that you produce a metadata overlay with the original metadata for these files.

EFTA00019093

	b. SDNY005 (October 20 2020 production): these are a few videos from the SDFL or PBPD investigations that were produced in native form without metadata load files. They have Sept-Oct 2020 dates. We request that you produce a metadata overlay with the original metadata for these files.

	c. SDNY011 (November 9 2020 production): these were produced in native form with load files, but do not reference a CART number and have Sept 2020 dates. We request that you provide a CART number for these files or indicate their source. Also, we request that you produce a metadata overlay with the original metadata for these files.

7. There is a gap between 11/18 and 12/18 production numbers (SDNY_GM_02742044 to 2742183). Was that intentional or are we missing those documents?

Please let us know your responses as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Chris

Christian R Everdell

# COHEN & GRESSER LLP

I view bio
www.cohengresser.com 
New York I Paris I Washington DC I London

CG

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed initially by only the individualnamed above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient. you are hereby notified that any review. dissemination or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error. please immediately notify the sender by telephone and permanently delete this e-mail. Thank you.

PRIVACY: A complete copy of our privacy policy can be viewed at: https://www.cohengresser.com/privacy-policy.

EFTA00019094