The image shows an email header with the following information, with redactions:

*   **From**: Redacted (USANYS)
*   **To**: Redacted (USANYS), Redacted (USANYS)
*   **Cc**: Redacted, Redacted

Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:44:58 +0000

Attachments: 2021-10-15_GM_letter_re_MDC_legal_mail_Final.docx

<empty> and <empty> signed off on the letter. Attaching what we plan to file.

From: <empty> (USANYS) <
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:04 PM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <
Cc: <empty> (USANYS) <
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

Ah-I see the highlights now. Agree.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 15, 2021, at 1:49 PM, <empty> (USANYS) <
I think this is good but would delete the highlighted sentences. I agree with not engaging on footnote.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 15, 2021, at 1:29 PM, <empty> (USANYS) <



Attached is a draft response due today at 5 pm. We still need to send this letter to and at the MDC to review for accuracy. Do you think you will be able to review shortly or should I send them this draft simultaneously? We highlighted some language for your consideration about Judge Nathan's deadlines, happy to discuss. We haven't engaged with the defense's footnote 1 about the volume of the materials delivered because that is a little more complicated and we want to make sure any representations are fully accurate, but happy to discuss.

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Greeting | "Thanks," then [REDACTED] |
| From | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Sent | Friday, October 15, 2021 10:30 AM |
| To | Multiple recipients — [REDACTED]; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] |
| Cc | [REDACTED]; [REDACTED] |
| Subject | RE: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) |

EFTA00031519

Thanks. (We've really got to talk to Nathan about these deadlines!)

From: [redacted]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 10:30 AM
To: Multiple recipients (addresses redacted); some recipients labeled "(USANYS)"
Cc: [redacted]
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

Hi

Judge Nathan just ordered us to respond to this letter as soon as possible but no later than 5 pm today. We've reached out to BOP to set up a call.

Thanks,

Key details from the email header:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Thursday, October 14, 2021 8:31 PM
*   **To:** (USANYS); (USANYS)
*   **Cc:**
*   **Subject:** FW: \[EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

FYI, letter filed by Bobbi Sternheim tonight.

Key information from the image:

*   **From:** BOBBI C STERNHEIM <bcsternheim@mac.com>
*   **Sent:** Thursday, October 14, 2021 7:46 PM
*   **To:** Redacted
*   **Cc:** Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca, Redacted

Subject: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

Good eveningAttached is a courtesy copy of this evening's ECF filing. Bobbi

BOBBI C. STERNHEIM, ESQ.
[redacted — line]
New York, NY 10007
[redacted — line]
[redacted — line]
[redacted — long line]

EFTA00031520

This message and any attached documents contain information from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim that may be confidential and/or privileged.

If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. Thank you.

<2021-10-15 GM letter re MDC legal mail v2 Ito chiefs].docx>

<Ltr to Ct re Legal Mail 10-14-21.pdf>

EFTA00031521