| Field | Extracted content |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] |
| To | [redacted] |
| Cc | [redacted], [redacted], [redacted] (one recipient labeled “USANYS”) |

Subject: RE: Follow Up Call Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 18:13:17 +0000

No worries. I just dialed in. I don't think anyone is on the line yet. Let me know if you are and I just am not using this properly.

Key information from the image:

*   **Subject:** RE: Follow Up Call
*   **Sender 1:** Email sent Friday, May 7, 2021, 12:03 PM.
*   **Sender 2:** Email sent Friday, May 7, 2021, 12:56 PM.
*   Sender 1 Apologizes and mentions being a few minutes behind, promising to dial in momentarily.
*   Recipient and CC information are redacted.

In advance of our call, attached is an article that recently ran locally on this issue:

Key details from the email:

*   **Date/Time:** Wednesday, May 5, 2021, 9:26 AM
*   **Subject:** RE: Follow Up Call
*   **Recipient (Cc):** (USANYS)

I have asked my PIO to find out if there is a deadline on this reporting that will necessitate moving up the timing of this call. I will let you know if that turns out to be the case.

Below are the details for the conference call in number and participant code:

EFTA00019183

Phone Number: 866-880-0098
Participant code: 8704649#

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> |
| Sent | Wednesday, May 5, 2021 8:29 AM |
| To | [REDACTED] |
| Cc | [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] |
| Subject | RE: Follow Up Call |

Thanks for the advanced notice, we should definitely discuss, particularly since there are rules about press contacts in our pending case that we're mindful of. 2:15 p.m. works for us. On timing, do you have a sense of when you anticipate this happening?

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] |
| Sent | Wednesday, May 5, 2021 10:21 AM |
| To | [redacted] <[redacted]> |
| Cc | [redacted] <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Subject | RE: Follow Up Call |

As an FYI, I am really calling to get the contact information for your PIO since there will be reporting in our local news and my USA wants to make a statement, but we want to run this by you all and your PIO first. As for time, does 2:15pm ET work for you all? If so, I can get a conference line set up for that time.

H

- Header artifact: "H" at top-left
- From: [redacted] <[redacted]>
- Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021, 8:13 AM
- To: [redacted]
- Cc: [redacted] <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
- Subject: RE: Follow Up Call

H

Since our whole team will join to keep everyone looped in, it would be helpful to schedule a call at a particular time, if possible. Could we pick a time on Friday afternoon and use a conference line?

Thanks,

| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] |
| Sent | Wednesday, May 5, 2021 10:03 AM |
| To | [redacted] <[redacted]> |
| Cc | [redacted] <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Subject | RE: Follow Up Call |



I will reach out on Friday shortly after 2pm ET. What number should I call?

Best,

EFTA00019184

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> |
| Sent | Tuesday, May 4, 2021 7:11 PM |
| To | [REDACTED] |
| Cc | [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Subject | Re: Follow Up Call |

Hi

Hope you're doing well. We're free for a call on Friday anytime after 2 p.m. ET.

Thanks,

On May 4, 2021, at 5:00 PM,

All-

Please let me know when one of you have a moment to chat briefly about this matter.

Thanks,

The image is an email header with the following information:
*   **From:** [redacted]
*   **Sent:** Monday, July 20, 2020 4:55 PM
*   **To:** [redacted]
*   **Cc:** [redacted]
*   **Subject:** RE: Follow Up Call

That's perfect, thanks very much. You can call my cellphone at as I will likely be working remotely.

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] |
| Sent | Monday, July 20, 2020 6:54 PM |
| To | [redacted — multiple recipients] |
| Cc | [redacted — multiple recipients] |
| Subject | RE: Follow Up Call |

- Several header fields and recipient addresses are redacted.
- Proposed call: Thursday at 1:00 PM MT / 3:00 PM ET.
- Sender: will likely be working remotely; prefers call to cellphone and asks whether to call the office number in the signature.

No worries about the delay. I know that it is especially difficult to keep all the balls in the air right now. I am fairly sure I am dropping some as I type this email. I can do a call on Thursday at 1pm MT/ 3Pm ET. Should I call the office number listed in your signature block below?

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] <[redacted]> |
| Sent | Monday, July 20, 2020 4:51 PM |
| To | [redacted] |
| Message body | Large black redaction bar (content redacted)

EFTA00019185

Cc: 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call

Apologies for the delay, and thank you for following up. I am available for a call any time after 1 p.m. Eastern on Thursday 7/23. Please let me know if there is a convenient time for a call that afternoon.

Key information from the image:

*   The sender is an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
*   The office address is 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, NY 10007.

This is an email.

*   **From:** \[Redacted]
*   **Sent:** Monday, July 20, 2020 6:40 PM
*   **To:** \[Redacted]
*   **Cc:** \[Redacted]
*   **Subject:** RE: Follow Up Call

All-

I am just following up on the below email request for a brief phone call. Please let me know when you have availability.

Key details from the email header:

*   **From:** [Redacted]
*   **Sent:** Wednesday, July 15, 2020 8:41 AM
*   **To:** [Redacted]
*   **Cc:** [Redacted]
*   **Subject:** RE: Follow Up Call

Greetings from DNM,

Well done on the new indictment against Ms. Maxwell. We were pleased to see that conduct in New Mexico formed the basis of one of your overt acts. I know that you all are very busy, but if you a moment for a brief call to discuss the impact, if any, of the new indictment on seizure/forfeiture of Epstein's NM property, I would appreciate it. As you are aware, this is an issue my US Attorney, John Anderson, has asked me to track.

Thanks,

From:

Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:59 PM.

To

EFTA00019186

Email with subject "RE: Follow Up Call". "Cc" field and sender/recipients' email addresses are redacted.

That works, thanks. You can reach me at my desk-212-637-2324.

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
I St. Andrew's Plaza
New York NY 10007 7

Key Information from the email:

*   **Date:** Tuesday, November 19, 2019, 3:58 PM
*   **To:** Redacted
*   **Cc:** Redacted, Fyffe
*   **From:** Redacted
*   **Subject:** RE: Follow Up Call
*   **Cc: Brandon (USANM)** Email address: bfyffe@usa.doj.gov

Could you do a call in 30 minutes -- 2:30pm MT/ 4:30 ET?

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] <[redacted]> |
| Sent | Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:03 PM |
| To | [redacted] |
| Cc | [redacted]; [redacted]; [redacted] |
| Subject | RE: Follow Up Call |
| Requested call (context) | "Could you do a call in 30 minutes -- 2:30pm MT / 4:30 ET?" |

Hi

I'm happy to chat today if you're available in the next few hours. Otherwise, I could do later in the day on Thursday.

Thanks,

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 St. Andrew's Plaza
New York NY 10007

EFTA00019187

From: 
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:33 AM
To: 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call

When you have a moment, can you let me know when we can conduct a call to discuss the reporting concerning Jane Doe 15?

Subject: 'Jane Doe 15' Alleges Jeffrey Epstein Raped Her As A Teen, Referenced 'Good Friend' Bill Clinton — CBS Los Angeles

https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2019/11/18/jeffrey-epstein-bill-clinton-gloria-allred/

Thanks,

From:
Sept: Friday October 11. 2019 2:46 PM.
To
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call

Received, thanks very mud You're correct that we cover these topics during interviews, but it is helpful to keep in mind the information you are interested in as well.

Best,

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
I St. Andrew's Plaza
New York NY 10007.

From:

Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 1:25 PM
To: 
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call

When we last spoke, you expressed a willingness to review New Mexico-specific questions that we would like to be included in future interviews of Epstein victims. While I am certain that you already cover the pertinent questions, we did not want to turn down the invitation to submit a set of proposed questions, which I have attached.

EFTA00019188

I hope all is well with you and the ongoing investigation. As we mentioned on the phone, we are here to assist with any investigation into New Mexico-related matters, including the submission of any application for a search warrant.

Best,

- Subject: "RE: Follow Up Call"
- Thread contains three emails (senders/recipients redacted); CC lines present.

Messages:
- Sep 9, 2019 — 10:49 AM: Respondent says "You can call my desk at" [phone number redacted]; signature block shows:
  - Assistant United States Attorney
  - Southern District of New York
  - 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, NY 10007
- Sep 9, 2019 — 11:27 AM: Sender thanks recipient for the response and additional information about the "NM AG's office," says "We look forward to speaking with you on Thursday," and asks "What number should we call?"
- Sep 8, 2019 — 3:15 PM: Earlier message initiating the "Follow Up Call" thread (content redacted).

Key entities/phrases visible:
- "NM AG's office"
- Office address (Southern District of New York)
- Multiple redacted phone/address/name fields.

EFTA00019189

Hi

## Yes, a call on 9/12 at 1:30 MT / 3:30 ET will work for us, thanks very much.

As a preview in response t email, we spoke with the New Mexico AG's office back in July 2019. In essence, they agreed to cease any i gau n nto sex trafficking and share whatever they had gathered to date regarding sex trafficking activity with our office. We agreed that they were free to proceed with whatever other investigations (unrelated to sex trafficking) they may have concerning Epstein and told them that at the conclusion of our case, we would pass along any information we may have gathered about state crimes that were committed in their jurisdiction. We have not communicated with anyone from the New Mexico AG's office since that conversation in July 2019.

Best,

- Sender role: Assistant United States Attorney (Southern District of New York)
- Office address: 1 St. Andrew’s Plaza, New York, NY 10007
- Email sent: Friday, September 6, 2019, 5:28 PM
- Subject: RE: Follow Up Call
- Proposed phone call: Thursday, September 12 — 1:30 MT / 3:30 ET
- Request: “Please let me know what number we should call.”
- Names/addresses in header and signature: redacted in image

I just wanted to confirm that you all are able to do the phone call next Thursday, September 12th at 1:30 MT / 3:30 ET? Please let me know what number we should call.

Thanks,

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] |
| Sent | Thursday, September 05, 2019 2:11 PM |
| To | [redacted] |
| Cc | [redacted] |
| Subject | RE: Follow Up Call |

Surrounding context (provided): "FYI: state authorities in New Mexico are moving forward with their own plans with respect to the Epstein property. Yesterday the state land commissioner revoked leases held by Cypress Inc."

FYI: state authorities in New Mexico are moving forward with their own plans with respect to the Epstein property. Yesterday the state land commissioner revoked leases held by Cypress Inc.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1362185/land-commissioner-voids-epsteins-nm-grazing-leases.html

The linked news coverage quotes the New Mexico Attorney General as saying that he is conducting a criminal investigation at the state level "in coordination with" the SDNY. Here are a few sentences from late in the article:

EFTA00019190

The [State] Attorney General's Office is investigating whether crimes took place on Zorro Ranch. [State Land Commissioner Stephanie] Garcia Richard said Wednesday her office had notified [State] Attorney General Hector Balderas to provide notice if any criminal activity was found to have occurred on the trust land leased by Epstein "because we were looking for a reason to cancel these leases and criminal activity would have given us the perfect reason."

Balderas did issue a statement saying he was pleased Garcia Richard was "taking back lands that should be managed to best serve the State and for the benefit of New Mexico school children." Public schools are one beneficiary of state trust land revenue. Balderas added: "We continue to investigate this matter at the state level in coordination with U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York."

Jonathon

Fraud and Public Corruption Section U.S. Attorney's Office - District of New Mexico

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Office/Header | Fraud and Public Corruption Section — U.S. Attorney's Office, District of New Mexico |
| From | [redacted] |
| Sent | Wednesday, September 4, 2019 4:12 PM |
| To | [redacted] <redacted@...> (one or more recipients) |
| Cc | [redacted] <redacted@...>; [redacted] <redacted@...>; [redacted] <redacted@...> |
| Subject | RE: Follow Up Call |

Thank you for the speedy response. Next week works for us. Can you all do the call next Thursday, September 12th at 1:30 MT / 3:30 ET?
From: <empty> ) < <empty> )
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2019 3:41 PM
To: <empty>
Cc: <empty>
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call
Hi <empty>

Hope you're doing well. This week is a bit tough for us. Are there dates next week that would work for you? We are traveling Monday through Wednesday, but could talk Thursday or Friday.

Thanks,

EFTA00019191

Email Information:

*   **From:** (Redacted)
*   **Sent:** Wednesday, September 4, 2019, 4:28 PM
*   **To:** (Redacted)
*   **Cc:** (Redacted)
*   **Subject:** RE: Follow Up Call

nd I were hoping to schedule a follow up call with you concerning Epstein's New Mexico conduct and proper y sometime this week. We are both available tomorrow morning (9-12 MT / 11-2 ET) or Friday any time after 12pm MT / 2pm ET. Do you all have availability for a follow up call on either of these days?

Thanks,

From: <empty> ) < <empty> >
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 12:46 PM
To: Kastrin, Holland S. (USANM) < HKastrin@usa.doj.gov>
Cc: <empty> ) < <empty> >; <empty> ) < <empty> >
Subject: RE: Follow Up Call



We certainly can be in touch. I'm copying my colleagues on the case, Alison and Maurene, because I have a trial starting August 26 so I'll be mostly unavailable next week, but it should be possible to find a time for one or both of them to chat. If you send a couple possible times for next week we can figure it out.

thanks,

From: K
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 14:01
To:
Subject: Follow Up Call



Would you have a couple of minutes to chat with me and one of my colleagues about some NM-related Epstein matters this afternoon or early next week? If today works for you, I am available any time after 1:30 MT/ 3:30 ET today. It is nothing urgent.

Thanks,

EFTA00019192