- Document type: Email thread (multiple messages; many names/email addresses redacted)
- Subject (thread): RE: photos
- Attachment (top message): 2019-07-16,_JE,_detention_submission.docx
- Importance: Normal

Top message (most recent)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:01:38 +0000
- From/To/Cc: [REDACTED] / [REDACTED] (USANYS) / [REDACTED] (many redacted)
- Body (visible): "The letter is attached for your review—the team has discussed. Thanks."

Earlier messages (chronological excerpts)
- Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 1:46 PM
  - Body: "I can look now too" / "Sent from my iPhone"
  - Quoted line: "Just finished reviewing and discussing my thoughts with [REDACTED] now."
- Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 1:39 PM
  - Body: "Are [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] able to look now? If it will be a while, we will review the interim version."
  - Sender includes "[REDACTED] (USANYS)"
- Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 1:32 PM
  - Body: "Just sent to [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] for a first look, and will circulate shortly after I input their comments. Thanks."
- Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 1:19 PM
  - (headers present; body redacted/hidden)

Key entities noted
- Attachment filename: 2019-07-16,_JE,_detention_submission.docx
- Organization tag visible in addresses: (USANYS)
- Multiple participants and email addresses are redacted throughout the thread.

EFTA00014471

Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>

Subject: Re: photos

Okay. What is timing on a draft?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 16, 2019, at 12:07 PM, > wrote:

FYI, I spoke with Judge Berman's chambers and the clerk told me the Judge does not want to see photographs (he did not explain), so we are not going to bring them to chambers.

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York

New York, NY 10007

EFTA00014472