From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>

Key details:
- Email header snippet for subject "RE: Epstein OIG Report" (provided).
- Three fields (From, To, Cc); each entry shows an individual/identifier redacted and the organization label "(USANYS)".
- Names and email addresses are obscured by black redaction blocks.

Subject: RE: Epstein OIG Report

Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:59:22 +0000

Great. Wil do. Thanks.

Email Metadata:

| Field     | Value                               |
| --------- | ----------------------------------- |
| From      | (USANYS)                            |
| Sent      | Tuesday, August 18, 2020 11:58 AM   |
| To        | (USANYS)                            |
| CC        | (USANYS)                            |
| Subject   | Epstein OIG Report                  |

I think putting comments in an email would be easier for OIG to consider

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Sent | Monday, August 17, 2020 6:48 PM |
| To | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Cc | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Subject | RE: OCR'd OPR Report |

ill— The team has a couple of small factual comments on the OPR draft report, none material to any of its conclusions. How would you like us to handle these — do you want me to just call =? Draft an email or a letter? They're sufficiently insignificant that I think a phone call would suffice, but let me know if you feel differently.

Thanks,

[x]

From: <empty> (USANYS) <
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 11:27 AM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <
Subject: OCR'd OPR Report

Thanks for clueing me in that it was not word-searchable—saved me a major embarrassment. I created a OCR'd version, and there are indeed several references to "global." The OCR'd version is 121 megs, so I'll USAFx it to you.

Associate U.S. Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
One St. Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
(desk) 
(mobile)

EFTA00017837