This image shows an email header. 
*   **From:** Redacted (USANYS)
*   **To:** Redacted (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** FW: Redacted

Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:35:58 +0000

Attachments: 20cr330_Sealed_Order_4.23.21.pdf; 2021-04-21_Letter_to_Hon._Alison_J._Nathan.pdf

She just called to talk this over — I can fill you in later. Basically she's getting a draft later this afternoon that we can review then.

| Field | Extracted content |
|---|---|
| Document type | Email header (screenshot) |
| From | [redacted] <[redacted]> |
| Sent | Thursday, April 29, 2021 10:32 AM |
| To | Multiple recipients (names/emails largely redacted); several addresses labeled “(USANYS)” |
| Cc | Multiple recipients (redacted); at least one labeled “(USANYS)” |
| Subject | [redacted] |
| Visible notes | Angle-bracketed email addresses partially redacted; signature/closing line redacted |

Key points: multiple recipients and CCs with USANYS designation; most names/emails are blacked out.

We're working on drafting a letter in response to the attached, and wanted to give you a heads up. We hope to have a draft for you this afternoon, in the hopes of sending the draft to defense counsel tonight as part of the meet-and-confer directed by Judge Nathan. I think that leaves sufficient time for filing tomorrow.

Although we're mindful of third party privacy interests, for non-parties who are neither witnesses nor victims in the case, I do have concerns about entertaining redaction/intervention requests, given the high volume of people who may ask to be heard or assert a right to review and redact documents if this were entertained.

Thanks,

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007

EFTA00032018