From:
To: |(USANYS)"

Subject: RE: Cooperator info re Epstein

Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 22:20:33 +0000

I’d be willing to bet some money that today will not be the last time you’ll be hearing about [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]

From: <empty> (USANYS) <
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 6:07 PM
To: <empty>,
Subject: FW: Cooperator info re Epstein

All roads lead to you. FYI.

The image shows an email header with the following information:

*   **From:** \[Name Removed] (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Saturday, August 24, 2019, 2:54 PM
*   **To:** \[Name Removed] (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** \[Name Removed] (USANYS), \[Name Removed] (USANYS), \[Name Removed] (USANYS), \[Name Removed] (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** Re: Cooperator info re Epstein

He did, but is the one who spoke directly with him, so he can give you the most detail. (I took off this, so he [ ]
doesn't respond with the substance and create needless 3500.) The most significant takeaway I recall from
summary was that "_" said he gave Epstein the sheets he used. But again, this is second-hand, and has his own
issues we can discuss separately.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 24, 2019, at 2:38 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:

Thanks. Did he provide more substance beyond he heard information relating to Epstein? If so, let's talk Monday.

- Subject (from surrounding text): Re: Cooperator info re Epstein
- Quote (from surrounding text): "Thanks. Did he provide more substance beyond he heard information relating to Epstein? If so, let's talk Monday."
- From: [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
- Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2019 1:52 AM
- To: [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
- Cc: multiple recipients (most redacted); includes Stefano (USANYS) <SBraccini@usa.doj.gov>

Subject: Re: Cooperator info re Epstein

Let me know if you want to meet with <empty> . He's <empty> nd we haven't yet
decided whether to extend him a cooperation agreement.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 23, 2019, at 6:12 PM, <empty> (USANYYS) <<empty> > wrote:

Hi <empty> and <empty> ,

I just spoke with <empty> , who got a call from an aspiring cooperater at MCC named <empty> , <empty>
<empty> reported that another MCC inmate known as " <empty>

EFTA00019708

—gave him information relating to Epstein. For
several months, has been desperately trying to figure out how he can cooperate, often relying on second- and [ ]
third-hand information that's not actionable unless another inmate also cooperates. We can also talk in person next
week about the relative quality of his information.

I leave it to you guys to follow up with [REDACTED] as you see fit. I'm sure someone on this email can make [REDACTED] available to you, if you want, once you get a sense of what he's about. I just don't want to unilaterally sit on this.

Have a nice weekend!

[x]

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York

EFTA00019709