Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn

From: "—redacted—" <—redacted—>

To: "—redacted—" <—redacted—>, "—redacted—" <—redacted—>, "—redacted—" <—redacted—>

Number of recipients: 3 (all display names and email addresses fully redacted)

Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn

Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:12:05 —0000

Attachments: 2020-07-22, GM,_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_Local_Rule_23.1.docx

Sorry guys, I'm having bad tech issues today. Attached is the draft letter re 23.1, which is far rougher than I'd hoped to get it. I should free back up in an hour or so, at which point I can turn back to this if there's still more to do on it.

- Message A
  - From: [REDACTED]
  - Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:57 PM
  - To: [REDACTED]; [REDACTED]; [REDACTED]
  - Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn
  - Body: "Looking at this now."

- Message B
  - From: [REDACTED]
  - Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:55 PM
  - To: [REDACTED]
  - Cc: [REDACTED]
  - Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn
  - Body: "No problem, totally understand."

- Message C
  - From: [REDACTED]
  - Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 13:55
  - To: [REDACTED]
  - Cc: [REDACTED]
  - Subject: Re: draft letter to Netburn

Sorry guys I can't. I keep getting kicked off the vpn, and I'm fighting with my computer, so I haven't been able to do nearly as much work as I had planned this afternoon.

On Jul 22, 2020, at 1:52 PM,
) <    > wrote:

So I obviously had to do this pretty quickly today, and it doesn't help that Westlaw has been down all afternoon, but one way or the other we gotta get something filed. Does either of you have a moment to take a look at this in the next hour or so? I'm sorry, I know you have something at 2:00! If the answer is no, totally understand, I can just pass it up to and . Thanks either way and talk soon.

<2020-07-22, JE, letter to Netburn re order on unsealing.docx>

EFTA00021917