- Subject: Re: Cooperator info re Epstein
- Header fields visible: From, To, Cc
- All names/addresses redacted (black boxes)
- Several entries include the label “(USANYS)”
- Cc line contains multiple redacted recipients (several people copied)

Subject: Re: Cooperator info re Epstein

Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:54:01 +0000

He did, but [ ] is the one who spoke directly with him, so he can give you the most detail. (I took | [ ] off
this, so he doesn't respond with the substance and create needless 3500.) The most significant takeaway I recall
from summary was that " said he gave Epstein the sheets he used. But again, this is second-hand,
and [ ] has his own issues we can discuss separately.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 24, 2019, at 2:38 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:

Thanks. Did he provide more substance beyond he heard information relating to Epstein? If so, let's talk Monday.

| Field | Extracted content |
|---|---|
|Context line above image| "Thanks. Did he provide more substance beyond he heard information relating to Epstein? If so, let's talk Monday." |
|Subject| Re: Cooperator info re Epstein |
|From| [redacted] (USANYS) <redacted> |
|Sent| Saturday, August 24, 2019 1:52 AM |
|To| [redacted] (USANYS) <redacted> |
|Cc| Multiple recipients, all redacted; several shown with "(USANYS)" labels |
|Visible notes| Names and email addresses in header are heavily redacted (black bars) |

Subject: Re: Cooperator info re Epstein

Let me know if you want to meet with | and we haven't yet decided whether to extend him a cooperation agreement.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 23, 2019, at 6:12 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:

Hi and

I just spoke with [REDACTED], who got a call from an aspiring cooperater at MCC named [REDACTED], [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. [REDACTED] reported that another MCC inmate known as “[REDACTED]” — [REDACTED]

-gave him information relating to Epstein. For

several months, has been desperately trying to figure out how he can cooperate, often relying on second- and third-hand information that's not actionable unless another inmate also cooperates. We can also talk in person next week about the relative quality of his information.

I leave it to you guys to follow up with as you see fit. I'm sure someone on this email can make | [ ] available
to you, if you want, once you get a sense of what he's about. I just don't want to unilaterally sit on this.

Have a nice weekend!

EFTA00018857

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York

EFTA00018858