- Subject: RE: Epstein
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:29:00 +0000
- Importance: Normal

- From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
- To: Multiple recipients (names/emails redacted). Visible role tags: (USANYS) and [Contractor]; recipients shown in angle-bracketed email format and redacted.

Subject: RE: Epstein
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:29:00 +0000
I mportance: Normal

Great

The image is an email header:

*   **From:** \[Name] (USANYS) [Contractor]
*   **Sent:** Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:17 AM
*   **To:** \[Name] (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** \[Name] (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein

OK sounds good. Should we say 1:30?

An email was sent on Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 11:03 AM.
*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **To:** (USANYS) \[Contractor]
*   **CC:** (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein

Why don't we start with Mn that window if we can grab 10 minutes. We can follow up with whole group tomorrow if necessary -- noon is middle of Cohen testimony.

-----Original Message-----
From: (USANYS) [Contractor]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 10:51 AM
To: |(USANYS)<
Cc: (USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein

Unfortunately because of interviews there aren't slots when full brass is available is around 1:30-3:30 if you want to bring him up to speed. The full group could meet tomorrow at noon or 5:30pm.

Key details from the email:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Tuesday, February 26, 2019 10:46 AM
*   **To:** (USANYS) [Contractor]
*   **Cc:** (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** Epstein

=asked that we set up a brass meet on Epstein — any time today? Should be 30 min.

Sent from my iPhone

EFTA00024723