Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:00:32 +0000

From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) — sender name and address redacted

To: multiple recipients (names/addresses redacted); at least one recipient marked "(USANYS)"

Cc: multiple recipients (names/addresses redacted)

Notes: All visible names and email addresses in the From/To/Cc lines are heavily redacted (black bars).

Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:00:32 +0000

I am also okay with those changes. Thanks

The image shows an email header.

*   **From:** \[Redacted]
*   **Sent:** Friday, January 31, 2020 1:50 PM
*   **To:** \[Redacted] (USANYS) <\[Redacted]>, \[Redacted] (USANYS) <\[Redacted]>
*   **Cc:** \[Redacted] <\[Redacted]>; \[Redacted] <\[Redacted]>
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Those highlights look okay to me, but I defer to on final approval. [x]

- From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
- Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 11:43
- To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
- Cc: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
- Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

All recipient names and email addresses are redacted in the image.

OK, I made some idiosyncratic changes, plus a few things highlighted in green for you to verify. I have one Q set forth in the footnote.

The image is an email.

Key details:
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
*   **Sent:** Friday, January 31, 2020 11:29 AM
*   **To:** (USANYS)
*   **Cc:**

is out, but the clerk's office says to use the same miscellaneous number because the applications are related. The prior mist number was: 19 Misc. 0586

And attached for reference in case that's helpful.

Key details from the image:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Friday, January 31, 2020 10:32
*   **To:** (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Working on it right now. please check with to see if we should use the same docket no as was assigned to the first 6e order.

EFTA00016818

Key information from the email:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Friday, January 31, 2020 9:54 AM
*   **To:** , (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** ,
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Great, thanks for catching. =, let us know if you have any comments/thoughts. Thanks

The image shows an email header.

*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
*   **Date:** Friday, January 31, 2020 9:53 AM
*   **To:** Multiple recipients, including recipients from (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** Multiple recipients

Sender details are redacted.

Yes, this looks good, thanks — I made one more typo correction in the attached (in the new Trust Two language, "and revocations" got repeated in the footnote and the order) but otherwise no changes.

Key Information:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Friday, January 31, 2020 09:48
*   **To:** ; (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** ;
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Thanks for flagging, M. I made a few small changes (which I highlighted since we've got a fair bit of track already) which I think should make this broad enough to cover the Trust II stuff. Can you take a quick look and if everyone is okay with this, perhaps we can plan to get this to CM on Monday morning? Thanks

The image is an email header:
*   **From:** [REDACTED]
*   **Sent:** Thursday, January 30, 2020 7:22 PM
*   **To:** [REDACTED] (USANYS), [REDACTED] (USANYS)
*   **CC:** [REDACTED], [REDACTED]
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

I apologize for the delay on this — I've added the relevant language about revocations to both the application and the
order, and corrected a stray typo, so that stuff is good to go. But two quick things to note, not to belabor this, but — it
doesn't look like there's any reference to the Trust Two documents — that may be because they're not referenced in any
will? At a glance I don't see Trust Two in any of the wills, but I'd want to go back and look more thoroughly unless
somebody already made the decision on that basis. And second, it references a 2019 Trust but I don't see any documents
on that? I have to run out tonight but can certainly circle up with and/or = tomorrow on any of this, or just ignore [ ]
it if I've misread.

thanks,



Email Header Details:

*   **From:** [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
*   **Sent:** Thursday, January 30, 2020 12:05
*   **To:** [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
*   **CC:** [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Just wanted to circle back on this —= are you signed off? Is this something we could get over to Part I today or tomorrow? Thanks

EFTA00016819

Key entities from email:

*   **Sender**: [Redacted]
*   **Date**: Wednesday, January 29, 2020, 3:56 PM
*   **Recipients**: [Redacted] (USANYS), [Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **CC**: [Redacted], [Redacted]
*   **Subject**: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

M, is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer.

| Field | Extracted content |
|---|---|
| From | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Sent | Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55 |
| To | Multiple recipients — entries redacted/blackboxed (one recipient shown with “(USANYS)”) |
| Cc | Multiple recipients — entries redacted/blackboxed |
| Subject | RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II |

- Names and email addresses are redacted in the image.

Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be

Here is the email header information:

*   **From:** redacted
*   **Sent:** Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
*   **To:** redacted (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** redacted
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.

thanks,



From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>; <empty> ) <<empty> >
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

— I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can?

I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks. Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I've accurately described/characterized the new stuff we're looking to share?

Thanks,

[x]

EFTA00016820