## EXHIBIT N

EFTA00009873

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] |
| To | [redacted] |
| Cc | [redacted / blank] |
| Subject | [partially redacted] (blue underlined, begins with "R") |
| Date | Thursday, December 6, 2018 1:38:24 PM |
| Message text (surrounding) | "Thanks! I'll stop by now." |

Thanks! I'll stop by now.

From: <empty>
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 1:36 PM
To: <empty>
Cc: <empty>
Subject: RE: <empty>

Just went through my files and found a folder w/ the notes I took and the documents they brought me. Want to come by?

From: <empty>
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 12:36 PM
To: <empty>
Cc: <empty>
Subject: RE: <empty>

Just quickly following up on this — we're trying to get a complete handle on the landscape — thanks!

- From: [redacted]
- Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 21:11
- To: [redacted]
- Cc: [redacted]
- Subject: Fwd (appears truncated)
- Several large redaction blocks obscure sender/recipient details and other content

Do you have any notes and/or records from your meeting with:<empty> If so can you please send them our way? Also did you meet again with him or anyone else relating to Epstein?

Thanks,
<empty>

Sent from my iPhone

From

SDNY_GM_02742760

EFTA00009874

Key email details:

*   Email 1: Sent Friday, November 30, 2018, 4:02 PM, Subject FW
*   Email 2: Sent Tuesday, March 8, 2016, 12:28 PM, Subject RE: Mentions Jeffrey Epstein and a link to a Post article.
*   Email 3: Sent Monday, February 29, 2016, 10:13 PM, Subject Re: Adds Sigrid to the email chain, noting she is one of the lead attorneys on the case.

SDNY_GM_02742761

EFTA00009875

- From: [redacted]
- Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:03 PM
- To: [redacted]
- Cc: [redacted]
- Subject: [redacted]
- Visible: header screenshot with multiple redactions; small redacted block at lower-left (likely signature or avatar)

Thank you again for meeting with us today. We very much appreciate your time. I am attaching the following documents for your review:

1. Complaint in the defamation case against Ghislaine Maxwell (just today, Judge Sweet denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss today);

2. Declarations tha=filed in the CVRA case;

3. The Rule 56.1 statement recently filed in the CVRA case;

4. The redacted 302

Please let us know what other information we can provide or if you have any further questions.

Best,

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that. among other protections, is the subject of attomey-client privilege. attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. II the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient. or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient. you are hereby notified that any dissemination. distribution. copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error. please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]

SDNY_GM_02742762

EFTA00009876