Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials

From:
- Single sender (name and email fully redacted). Labels visible: (USANYS) and [Contractor]. Email address shown in angle brackets and redacted.

To:
- Multiple recipients (all redacted). Visible labels on recipients include (USANYS) and [Contractor]. Two distinct recipient entries are visible; there may be more.

Cc:
- One Cc recipient (name and email redacted).

Notes:
- All personal names and addresses are blacked out.
- Labels present: (USANYS) and [Contractor] indicating U.S. Attorney’s Office (SDNY) and contractor affiliation.

Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials

Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:02:36 +0000

Attachments: 3521-003.pdf; 3521-004.pdf

[ ] the two re-stamped versions are attached. I'll call [REDACTED] chambers and set a time for me to bring over the thumb drive containing the supplemental 3500 production (with the correct 3521-003 and 3521-004 included). Thanks!

From: <empty> (USANYS) [Contractor]
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 9:48 AM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty> > <empty> (USANYS) [Contractor]
<<empty> >
Cc: <empty> )
Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials

Thanks so much for flagging, I just re-stamped the materials as 3521-003 and 3521-004, saved here. I've loaded the
two files to the thumb drive for that contains the supplemental 3500 production and swapped out the incorrect [ ]
versions. If that sounds good to go, I can bring it over to chambers later this morning.

Since I'm joining this production a bit late, do these two re-stamped files need to be sent out anywhere else? Thanks!

From: [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2021 5:59 PM
To: [redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[redacted]>
Cc: [redacted]
Subject: FW: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials

The index listed this correctly as 3521-003 and 3521-004, but we produced as 3521-004 and 3521-005 (I think). When you have a chance, can you please confirm? If so, I think let's reproduce as 3521-003 an 3521-004, but let me know if you think that will be more confusing/make more work.

Thanks,

Key information from the image:

*   **From:** Laura Menninger
*   **Sent:** Saturday, November 6, 2021 5:53 PM
*   **To:** [redacted], (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** Jeff Pagliuca
*   **Subject:** \[EXTERNAL] US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials

Counsel —

We were not provided 8521-003 material.

EFTA00009981

Can you please confirm whether that was intentional, and if not, provide it?

Thank you,
Laura

Laura A. Menninger | Partner
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.

EFTA00009982