This video shows a static shot from a security camera, displaying an indoor corner of a basement-level area. Visible are gray metal doors with numbers '46' on them, one partially obscured by a white curtain. A 3-tiered black metal shelving unit on casters is against a wall, partially reflecting a view of an upper floor with stairs and furnishings. There is a wall-mounted telephone next to one of the doors, and a crumpled white object rests on the floor in the lower left corner of the frame. The timestamp "160 SW 2,80 - 07/06/2019 14:59:57" is visible at the bottom of the frame. The video continues for approximately 18 seconds with no changes to the scene. At 14:46:42 a man is seen approaching the grey metal door at 0/46. He proceeds to put a white bag inside and exits the shot. The timestamp at the bottom of the screen now reads "160 SW 2,80 - 07/06/2019 15:14:47". From this point the shot is static again until the end of the video. The video also contains the overlaid text “K UMERTY”. As the video continues, it appears to be a loop from this point forward. There is still a lot of background noise, including the consistent humming and buzzing of a refrigerator or similar appliance. At 07/06/2019 15:14:53, a new date appears: 07/06/2019-07/06/2018. The numbers appear to indicate a two year date range as the loop repeats with the 07/06/2019-07/06/2021 dates in sequence.
From:
To:

Subject: RE: Richardson
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:21:45 +0000

No worries. I'll swing by to be a fly on the wall for this one.

From:
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 12:19 PM
To:
Subject: RE: Richardson

Ugh, I have, I'm sorry I didn't advise. I spoke to Jeff on Sunday afternoon and I hadn't thought about it this week - I told

him that anyone we don't have reason to know has no exposure (witness), or believe does have exposure (target), would

be a subject, and that with respect to Richardson we didn't currently intend to subpoena or request to speak with him

and that there weren't specific allegations against him for which we were currently seeking a response, but that an

attorney proffer would be useful about any knowledge he has regarding the charged conduct. I further said that if we

wanted to speak with Richardson going forward we'd go through counsel. I have contemporaneous notes and just spoke

to



and I'm going to call | now to correct his apparent mis-recollection of our conversation.

From:
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 12:08
To:
Subject: FW: Richardson

I've never spoken to anyone who represents Bill Richardson. Have you guys? Am I missing something?

From: |(USANYS) <
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 12:05 PM
To:

Cc: (USANYS)<
Subject: FW: Richardson

Has anyone talked to Jeff Brown and is this accurate?

From: | (USANYS) <|
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 12:01 PM
To: |(USANYS)< (USANYS)<
Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] <|| (USANYS)

Subject: Richardson

Richardson has given the following statement to the press, true and accurate?:

Governor Bill Richardson offered his assistance in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation - through his lawyer, Jeff Brown of Dechert LLP - to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York. In response to this offer, Mr. Brown was informed

EFTA00033360

by the Assistant US Attorney responsible for the case that Governor Richardson is neither a target, subject, nor witness in the case and that there is no allegation against Governor Richardson that the government is actively investigating.

"It's fair to conclude that the federal prosecutors investigating this matter do not believe the Governor participated in or witnessed the criminal activity Jeffrey Epstein is alleged to have committed," said Mr. Brown.

Governor Richardson hopes that the investigation continues so that Epstein's victims can finally have their day in court and see the justice they deserve.



Public Affairs United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney's Office | Southern District of New York

EFTA00033361