- Document type: Email header snippet (From / To lines)
- Subject (provided): FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo
- From: "..." <...> — fully redacted (black bars)
- To: multiple recipients (at least 4) — each shown as "..." <...>, all redacted; one recipient annotated "(USANYS)"
- Format details: names shown in quotes, email addresses in angle brackets; heavy black redaction bars obscure names/addresses.

Subject: FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:11:46 +0000

Attachments: Maxwell_S2_Indictment_v1.docx

Wanted to get this to the chiefs today to expedite review, but obviously welcome any thoughts or comments from you guys. I based the new language primarily on the language from our past Epstein and Maxwell indictments, so hopefully nothing too controversial.

- From: [REDACTED]
- Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:10 PM
- To: [multiple recipients — all REDACTED]; several entries annotated "(USANYS)"
- Cc: [REDACTED] (includes at least one "(USANYS)")
- Subject: RE: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

Notes: multiple recipient lines separated by semicolons; most names/addresses blacked out.

Attached is a draft superseding indictment.

Thanks,

- From: [redacted]
- Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:29 AM
- To: multiple recipients (redacted) — several shown with "(USANYS)" tags and redacted addresses
- Cc: [redacted]
- Subject: RE: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo
- Body snippet (surrounding text): "Thanks, Sure thing, will aim to get you a draft today, thanks."

Sure thing, will aim to get you a draft today, thanks.

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Sender | [redacted] (USANYS) |
| Sent | Tuesday, March 23, 2021 10:32 AM |
| To | Multiple recipients (all redacted); some addresses labeled (USANYS) |
| Cc | One or more recipients (redacted; at least one labeled (USANYS)) |
| Subject | FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo |
| Visible body snippets (provided context) | "Sure thing, will aim to get you a draft today, thanks." / "Hi team, we have asked what the Brass wants to do in terms of review/meeting... do you mind putting together a draft indictment for us to review? Thanks!"

Hi team, we have asked what the Brass wants to do in terms of review/meeting, and will let you know. In the meantime and mindful of the Monday al date, do you mind putting together a draft indictment for us to review? Thanks!

Key information from the email:

*   **From:** `(USANYS) <[REDACTED]>`
*   **Sent:** Friday, March 19, 2021 3:34 PM
*   **To:** `[REDACTED]` , `(USANYS) <[REDACTED]>` , `(USANYS) <[REDACTED]>`
*   **Cc:** `(USANYS) <[REDACTED]>` , `[REDACTED]` , `[REDACTED]>` , `(USANYS) <[REDACTED]>`

Subject: RE: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

EFTA00020340

| Field | Extracted content |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] |
| Sent | Friday, March 19, 2021 3:24 PM |
| To | Multiple recipients (names/email addresses redacted); several labeled "(USANYS)" |
| Cc | Multiple recipients (names/email addresses redacted); several labeled "(USANYS)" |
| Subject | Maxwell superseder prosecution memo |
| Signature line | "Thanks, [redacted]" |

All,

Attached please find a prosecution memorandum requesting authorization to seek a superseding indictment charging Maxwell with additional criminal offenses. For reference, I have also attached the two prior prosecution memos regarding the original indictment in this case. We have tentatively scheduled grand jury time for Monday, March 29th.

Thanks,

EFTA00020341