- Subject: Re: Cooperator info re Epstein
- Headers visible: From, To, Cc
- From: single sender (display name and address redacted), organization tag "(USANYS)"
- To: single primary recipient (display name and address redacted), "(USANYS)"
- Cc: multiple recipients (several entries), each shown with "(USANYS)"; all display names and addresses redacted
- Email addresses shown in angle brackets are redacted/black-boxed
- Key detail: all visible participants are affiliated/labelled "USANYS"; individual identities are redacted.

Subject: Re: Cooperator info re Epstein

Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:54:01 +0000

He did, but is the one who spoke directly with him, so he can give you the most detail. (I took off [ ] [ ]
this, so he doesn't respond with the substance and create needless 3500.) The most significant takeaway I recall
from summary was that 'a said he gave Epstein the sheets he used. But again, this is second-hand,
and  hashis own issues we can discuss separately. [ ]

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 24, 2019, at 2:38 PM, [REDACTED] (USANY) <[REDACTED]> wrote:

Thanks. Did he provide more substance beyond he heard information relating to Epstein? If so, let's talk Monday.

| Field | Extracted content |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] (USANYS) |
| Sent | Saturday, August 24, 2019 — 1:52 AM |
| To | [redacted] (USANYS) |
| Cc | Multiple recipients (redacted) — all shown as (USANYS) |
| Subject | Re: Cooperator info re Epstein |
| Notes | Internal USANYS email thread; most names/addresses redacted.

Subject: Re: Cooperator info re Epstein

Let me know if you want to meet with and we haven't yet decided whether to extend him a cooperation agreement.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 23, 2019, at 6:12 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:

Hi and

I just spoke with [REDACTED], who got a call from an aspiring cooperater at MCC named [REDACTED], [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. [REDACTED] reported that another MCC inmate known as “[REDACTED]” — [REDACTED]

gave him information relating to Epstein. For

several months, has been desperately trying to figure out how he can cooperate, often relying on second- and third-hand information that's not actionable unless another inmate also cooperates. We can also talk in person next week about the relative quality of his information.

I leave it to you guys to follow up with as you see fit. I'm sure someone on this email can make available [ ]
to  you, if you want, once you get a sense of what he's about. I just don't want to unilaterally sit on this.

Have a nice weekend!

EFTA00018857

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York

EFTA00018858