Email Communication:

*   **From:** \[Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **To:** \[Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** \[Redacted] (USANYS)

Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:58:13 +0000

Attachments: 2019-02-28, JE,_letter_re_all_writs_act_application,_15_Civ_7433_(RWS).pdf; 2019-02-
28, JE,_letter_re_all_writs_act_application,_17_Civ_0616_(SN).pdf

Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented [REDACTED], the plaintiff in the civil action.
The two letters we submitted in connection with our All Writs Application are attached.

From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:53 AM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Another Q: who's Stan Pottinger?

From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty> >
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:53 AM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <
Cc: <empty> (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re A/JN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Email details:
*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM
*   **To:** (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S?

From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Cc: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>; <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

In the spirit of completeness, I'm also attaching their replies.

From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Cc: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>; <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

EFTA00032757

Goodness!

Associate U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York



On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:

She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years.

| Field   | Content |
|---------|---------|
| From    | [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Sent    | Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM |
| To      | [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Cc      | [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Subject | RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing |

Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law?

Key details from the email:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM
*   **To:** (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** (USANYS), (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing



Per our discussion, I am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial. Thanks very much.

- From: [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
- Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021, 10:09 AM
- To: [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
- Cc: [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
- Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex

From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[redacted]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
Subject: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Body snippet above header: "Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex"

Hi

EFTA00032758

We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing (no date set yet, although we expect one) related to Rossmiller/Kramer that we'd like your thoughts on. Let us know a convenient time to stop by over the next few days, thanks.



Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York

EFTA00032759