- Subject: "RE: Epstein Call Tomorrow"
- Thread date: Thu, 21 May 2020 (top timestamp 18:22:12 +0000)
- Context: scheduling a brief chat "between 2:30 and 4 today" ahead of a call the next day
- Dial-in: "We can use my dial in:" (number(s) shown but redacted)
- Agreed meeting time: 2:30 PM ("Thanks – let's say 230")
- Confirmations:
  - Sent Thu, May 21, 2020 10:04 AM — "Thanks – let's say 230"
  - Sent Thu, May 21, 2020 9:59 AM — "Same, thanks"
  - Sent Thu, May 21, 2020 9:33 AM — "Same, thanks. Sent from my iPhone"
  - Quoted at 9:30 AM — "I can do any time in that range."
- Participants: multiple senders/recipients shown but all names/emails redacted in image

Do some or all of you have a few minutes to chat between 230 and 4 today in advance of this call tomorrow? Just want to update you on what I expect.

EFTA00026922

Context text: "Me too."

- From: [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>
- Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 9:28 AM
- To: [multiple recipients, redacted] including [redacted] (USANYS) and [redacted] [Contractor]
- Cc: [multiple recipients, redacted] including [redacted] (USANYS)
- Subject: RE: Epstein Call Tomorrow

Me too.

- From: [redacted]
- Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 9:27 AM
- To: [redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[redacted]>
- Cc: multiple recipients (several redacted; some labeled USANYS)
- Subject: Re: Epstein Call Tomorrow
- Message snippet (surrounding text): "Me too. Either works for me, thanks."

Either works for me, thanks.

On May 21, 2020, at 09:17 (USANYS) < > wrote:

1 would be better for me but I can make 11 work if it's better for others.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 21, 2020, at 9:11 AM, < > wrote:

Both work for me, thanks.

The image is an email. 

Key details:
*   **From:** (USANYS) [Contractor]
*   **Sent:** Thursday, May 21, 2020 9:10 AM
*   **To:** (USANYS), 
*   **Subject:** Epstein Call Tomorrow

All,

I've been asked to set up a call with all of you and the brass for tomorrow. 11am or 1pm would work best for them. Do either work for all of you?

Thanks,

EFTA00026923