From: [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>

To: [redacted] <[redacted]>, [redacted] <[redacted]>, [redacted] (USANYS)

Cc: [redacted] <[redacted]>, [redacted] <[redacted]>

Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Context date (provided): Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:05:16 +0000

Notes: All names/emails in image are redacted.

Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:05:16 +0000

Just wanted to circle back on this are you signed off? Is this something we could get over to Part I today or tomorrow? Thanks

- From: [redacted]
- Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:56 PM
- To: [redacted] (USANYS); [redacted] (USANYS)
- Cc: [redacted]
- Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

M, is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer.

Key information from the image:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
*   **To:** (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> |
| Sent | Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM |
| To | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Cc | [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> |
| Subject | RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II |

Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.

thanks,



The image shows an email.

*   **From:** \[Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
*   **To:** \[Redacted] (USANYS) \[Redacted]; \[Redacted]
*   **Subject:** Epstein Sharing Order Part II

— I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can?

EFTA00016816

I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks. Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I've accurately described/characterized the new stuff we're looking to share?

Thanks,

[x]

EFTA00016817