Email details:
*   **To:** "Tomback, Andrew", "Weinstein, Marc A."
*   **Subject:** RE: \[redacted] follow-up question
*   **Date:** Tue, 19 May 2020 18:36:29 +0000
*   **From & CC:** Redacted

Inline-Images: image001.png

Thanks and understood re: both.

From: Tomback, Andrew <

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 08:28

To:

>; Weinstein, Marc A.

<

Cc:

Tomback, Andrew

Subject: RE:

follow-up question

Marc and/or I will respond to your email below soon — ideally later today.

Regarding my open issue, the Estate won't list any property before June 15.

Stay safe.

Andy

Andrew E. Tomback | Partner
T <empty> E <empty>
White & Case LLP | 1221 Avenue of the Americas | New York, NY 10020-1095
WHITE & CASE
From <empty>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 4:17 PM
To: Tombback, Andrew <<empty>>; Weinstein, Marc A. <empty>
Cc: <empty>
Subject: RE: <empty> follow-up question

Mark, Andy,

One question I had meant to ask in our call but forgot, on a separate subject — we had briefly discussed in late February our request for photographs and videos in the possession of the estate, and my recollection is that with respect to videos, the estate and trustees were not aware of being in possession of any historical surveillance-type videos (and in particular that any such surveillance video is regularly over-written, and so would not currently exist for any time before, for example, Epstein's suicide), and that separately the estate and trustees were not aware of being in possession of other physical video recordings.

My recollection is that with respect to photographs, that there were some photographs in the properties that had not been the subject of physical search warrants, i.e., the Florida and New Mexico residences. I think we had discussed that

EFTA00026530

the most efficient step, in the first instance, would be for us to receive digital photos of those physical photographs, to whatever extent they exist, but that doing so was not immediately possible at the time of our conversation in late February due to the estate's then-inability to retain or engage anyone to do that.

In the first instance, please let me know if I am getting any of that wrong, and second, understanding that the circumstances of the pandemic may have affected this in the interim, we've been asked to again check with you about whether there is anyone currently working at (or reasonably able to go to) those properties who could convey photographs of any physical photos at those locations? If you could please let us know any sense of possibility / timing on that last outstanding request.

thanks,
<empty>
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York

This email communication is confidential and is intended only for the individual(s) or entity named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication to others. Please notify the sender that you have received this email in error by replying to the email or by telephoning Please then delete the email and any copies of it. Thank you.

Our external privacy policy is available on https://www.whitecase.com/privacy-policy.

EFTA00026531