The image is a cropped email header.

*   **From:** redacted (USANYS)
*   **To:** redacted
*   **Cc:** redacted, redacted

Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos

Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 00:59:01 +0000

Attachments: 2021.05.XX Letter to AJN re Requests 9-11 v2 (MC) (LP).docx

- General: Email thread about "Diary, boots, photos." Multiple senders/recipients heavily redacted; "USANYS" appears as a recipient/affiliation in several entries. Several attachments referenced (one message: "Forgot to attach. Here you go.").

- Fri, Apr 30, 2021 1:26 PM
  - Subject: Diary, boots, photos
  - From/To: redacted
  - Body: not shown

- Sun, May 2, 2021 6:11 PM (two messages)
  1. From: [redacted]
     To: [redacted] (including USANYS)
     Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos
     Body: "Forgot to attach. Here you go."
  2. From: [redacted]
     To: [redacted] (including USANYS)
     Subject: RE: Diary, boots, photos
     Body: "Thanks so much, [redacted]. My proposed edits and responses to your questions in track. [redacted], do you want to review before this goes to the chiefs?"

- Sun, May 2, 2021 7:48 PM
  - From: [redacted] (USANYS)
  - Body (quoted): "I will circulate some additional suggestions in a bit. Thank you both!"

- Sun, May 2, 2021 8:53 PM
  - From: [redacted]
  - To/Cc: redacted
  - Subject: Re: Diary, boots, photos
  - Body: "I've read through and looks great — will do another pass first thing and add any stuff on top of [redacted]"

- Notes:
  - Multiple messages reference proposed edits, tracked changes, and circulating additional suggestions.
  - Significant portions of sender/recipient names and some text are redacted.

Hi all,

EFTA00020246

Attached is a draft response to Judge Nathan's order on Rule 17 subpoenas. I've also attached her order and the three briefs by BSF/GM, in case they are helpful.

This is due Tuesday, but I'm trying to get this to the chiefs early in case they have strong (and different) views about this.

Happy to discuss, too!

Thanks,

EFTA00020247