Key email details:

*   **From:** \[Redacted]
*   **To:** \[Redacted]
*   **Cc:** \[Redacted]
*   **Subject:** RE: \[Redacted] - Following up re proffers
*   **Date:** Mon, 13 Jan 2020 19:30:14 +0000

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 19:30:14 +0000

Okay, we'll take it off our calendar. Understanding that you provided a preliminary response when we spoke on Friday, I expect that the final response to that particular account, as well as the issue ofMs. recollection (if any) of any other instances more generally in which she observed Jeffrey Epstein engaged in any sexual activity, or observed other women or girls in sexually-suggestive circumstances (nude or partially nude in the presence of Epstein, for example, or in connection with massages), other than what you and/or she has already discussed, is of particular importance and relevance in our and our supervisors' consideration, and we will immediately incorporate any such response into our ongoing discussions and briefings with them whenever we receive it.

thanks again,



Original Message
From: 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 14:25
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Following up re profers

Probably makes sense to do it another time. I'll get back to you. Thanks.



| Field | Content |
|---|---|
|Type|Original message header (redacted)|
|From|[redacted]|
|Sent|Monday, January 13, 2020 1:38 PM|
|To|[redacted]|
|Cc|[redacted]|
|Subject|RE: [redacted] - Following up re proffers|

Context sentence included with figure: "separately, we still have time blocked off tomorrow at 2:30 for a call. Does it make sense to talk then"

-- separately, we still have time blocked off tomorrow at 2:30 for a call. Does it make sense to talk then

EFTA00026865

so we can get the response to the complaint? Or is there a different time that would be better for that?

thanks again,



The image contains two email threads. Both emails were sent on Monday, January 13, 2020. The first email was sent at 12:22, and the second was sent at 12:32. Both emails have the subject "RE: - Following up re proffers". The content of the second email is "Sounds good, thanks.".


Thank you. We definitely want to have this discussion prior to your decision on bringing any charges and our understanding was that we share that goal with you. I will let you know if we work something out for next week as soon as possible. Thanks.



- Document type: Email header ("-----Original Message-----")
- Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 12:18 PM
- From: [redacted]
- To: [redacted]
- Cc: [redacted]
- Subject: RE: [redacted] - Following up re proffers
- Notes: From/To/Cc fields are blacked out (redacted) in the image.

Please let us know what days and time ranges would be even conceivably possible next week, and also if your schedule changes at for later this week. On our end, we need to coordinate at least 10 people's schedules so we'll need some ranges to make sure everyone who you will want to hear your presentation can attend.

EFTA00026866

As we mentioned on the phone, there is a strong view that there are offenses that can be charged now, so it is also possible to have this discussion post-charge, but we certainly would prefer to have the conversation before that, and while the issues are very fresh in everyone's minds here. Our supervisor's view is that the 30th/31st is a long way off.

thanks,

- Header: "-----Original Message-----"
- From: [redacted]
- Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 12:10
- To: [redacted]
- Cc: [redacted]
- Subject: "RE: [redacted] - Following up re proffers"
- Note: multiple names/email addresses are blacked out; some recipient entries show trailing ">" characters.

Understood. This week doesn't work at all. The 21st and 22nd also don't work, but if the 30th and 31st don't work on your end, I will see if I can move some things around in order to make next week work.

Ę

Key information from the email:

*   **From:** Obscured
*   **Sent:** Monday, January 13, 2020 12:05 PM
*   **To:** Obscured
*   **CC:** Obscured
*   **Subject:** RE: Obscured - Following up re proffers

We were asked to inquire regarding your availability later this week (15th to 17th) and early next (21st and 22nd), and I know the brass feels that the issues are teed up and they want to provide an opportunity to hear from you as soon as possible. Are you available on any of those days, of it not, some other time next week?

thanks,



| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Header | -----Original Message----- |
| From | [REDACTED] (black bar) |
| Sent | Monday, January 13, 2020 11:59 |
| To | [REDACTED] (black bar) |

EFTA00026867

- Cc: multiple recipients — all names/emails redacted (semicolons indicate several addresses)
- Additional recipient line: redacted
- Subject: "RE: [redacted] - Following up re proffers"
- Body/context (from surrounding text): Asks if January 30th or 31st works for scheduling, preference for January 31st.

All - Thank you for your time on the phone last week. We are following up with regard to scheduling the meeting referenced in your earlier email. Would January 30th or 31st work (with a preference for the 31st)?

The image appears to be a bar chart. I am unable to extract the precise data due to the limited resolution and the black fill masking the labels.


Email Header Information:

*   **From:** [Redacted]
*   **Sent:** Thursday, January 9, 2020 11:00 PM
*   **To:** [Redacted]
*   **Cc:** [Redacted]
*   **Subject:** RE: [Redacted] - Following up re proffers

Understood, thanks. We'll be reachable in the interim via email.

Key email details:

*   **From:** \[Redacted]
*   **Sent:** Thursday, January 09, 2020 22:57
*   **To:** \[Redacted]
*   **Cc:** \[Redacted]
*   **Subject:** Re: \[Redacted] - Following up re proffers

I'm trying to rearrange some things in order to call you at 11 am. Thanks.

EFTA00026868

On Jan 9, 2020, at 10:03 PM,

We are all available just slightly later, at 11:00 a.m. — we'll be reachable or we can call you at any number that would be convenient for you then. We'll plan to speak with you then, and no hard stop.

thanks,

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | (redacted) |
| Sent | Thursday, January 09, 2020 19:45 |
| To | (redacted; multiple recipients) |
| Cc | (redacted; multiple recipients) |
| Subject | RE: (redacted) - Following up re proffers |

Notes:
- Header is heavily redacted (black bars). Arrows (">") and semicolons visible in recipient lines.
- Surrounding message/context: "We can also do any time after 9 am, if that is better for you."

We can also do any time after 9 am, if that is better for you. Please let us know. Thanks.

- Document: Redacted email screenshot
- From: [redacted]
- Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 7:25 PM
- To: [redacted] (multiple recipients)
- Cc: [redacted] (multiple)
- Subject: RE: [redacted] - Following up re proffers
- Visible message snippets:
  - "We can also do any time after 9 am, if that is better for you. Please let us know. Thanks."
  - "Thank you for the update. Are you available to speak tomorrow at 10 am?"
- Note: Majority of names, addresses and body text are redacted.

Thank you for the update. Are you available to speak tomorrow at 10 am?

EFTA00026869

| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Document type | Email header/body (screenshot) — majority redacted |
| Sent | Thursday, January 9, 2020 6:09 PM |
| From | [redacted] |
| To | [redacted] (multiple recipients indicated) |
| Cc | [multiple redacted recipients] |
| Subject | RE: [redacted] - Following up re proffers |
| Visible details | Many black redactions across header and body; angle-bracket recipient separators (>>); no message body text visible beyond redactions |



As we flagged for you a week ago, and as ex we had a meeting with the office leadership today to discuss the status of the case in general and Ms. in particular. We continue to believe that it would be helpful to receive any clarifications, as well as any response to the complaint originally sent on December 4, as soon as possible; we are available tomorrow or over the weekend if there is a time that works for you. If it remains impossible to talk before Tuesday, we have 2:30 in our calendar for then, but with a hard stop at 3:30 so please let us know if you'd like to start the discussion earlier if you expect it might be useful to have additional time.

More generally, you had requested the opportunity to present to the ultimate decision-makers in the case if it appeared that charges were likely, and based on our meeting today, the Office would like to provide you that opportunity. If you could please let us know what dates and times you are available in the ranges of January 15- 17 and 21-22, we will figure out a time when all the relevant supervisors here are available. I expect that meeting will include at least the U.S. Attorney, the Deputy U.S. Attorney and the Chief of the Criminal Division ( M), and some combination of the Chief Counsel , the Counsel the two Public Corruption Unit chiefs , the line assistants, and/or FBI investigative and supervisory personnel. We will be prepared to discuss that meeting with you via phone when we speak as well, which is one reason I note that we can begin our discussion earlier than 2:30 on Tuesday (or block off significant time to talk before then) if that would be useful.

EFTA00026870

thank you,



Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York

Key information from the image:

*   **From:** [Redacted]
*   **Sent:** Sunday, January 05, 2020 18:15
*   **To:** [Redacted]
*   **Cc:** [Redacted]
*   **Subject:** RE: [Redacted] - Following up re proffers

We'll block off that time in the calendar and plan to talk with you then.

thanks,

Key information from the image:

*   **Type:** Email
*   **Sent:** Saturday, January 04, 2020 22:30
*   **Subject:** Re: \[redacted] - Following up re proffers
*   **From:** \[redacted]
*   **To:** \[redacted]
*   **Cc:** \[redacted]

EFTA00026871

Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, I won't be able to address this until my return to the office.
Apologies. Of course, I will consult with [REDACTED] and try to get back to you as quickly as possible following my return.
In anticipation of being able to do that, do you want to "pencil in" a call for Tuesday, January 14 at 2:30?

[REDACTED]

On Jan 2, 2020, at 3:07 PM,
[REDACTED] wrote:

EFTA00026872

Thanks very much for being in touch. We had actually planned to be in touch today—we expect that next week we'll be having meaningful conversations internally with supervisors about the possible / likely paths forward for aspects of the case including Ms. . In connection with that expectation, we wanted to ask if you were prepared (and willing) to convey to convey your client's recollection regarding the incident described in the complaint sent on December 4 (re-attaching here, specifically at page seven). To the extent you have additional information that would be helpful to convey, even minor, we would be available anytime in the coming days to do a call. If that isn't possible until you come back, obviously we understand the challenges of scheduling, but we had anticipated trying to see if we could schedule a call in the coming days. Please let us know?

thanks,

The image is an email.

*   **From:** Sender's email (redacted)
*   **Sent:** Wednesday, January 01, 2020 21:50
*   **To:** Recipient email(s) (redacted)
*   **Cc:** Carbon Copy email(s) (redacted)
*   **Subject:** Following up re proffers

All — Happy new year. Wishing you and your families a happy, healthy, and peaceful 2020. We wanted to let you know that there are a few minor clarifications/corrections we want to share with respect to proffers. I will be out of the country and not returning to the office until January 10<x-apple-data-detectors://0> (or possibly January 13<x-apple-data-detectors://1>). We will contact you then about scheduling a call to discuss. Many thanks.

Best,

EFTA00026873

די

EFTA00026874

The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.

EFTA00026875