| Field | Extracted content |
|---|---|
| Subject | FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo |
| From | [redacted] — shown as a quoted name and angle-bracketed address (fully redacted in image) |
| To | Multiple recipients (appears to be 4); all redacted. One recipient label includes “(USANYS)”. |
| Visible format details | Names/addresses shown in quotes and angle brackets, separated by commas; extensive black redactions. |

Subject: FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:11:46 +0000

Attachments: Maxwell_S2_Indictment_v1.docx

Wanted to get this to the chiefs today to expedite review, but obviously welcome any thoughts or comments from you guys. I based the new language primarily on the language from our past Epstein and Maxwell indictments, so hopefully nothing too controversial.

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [redacted] |
| Sent | Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:10 PM |
| To | Multiple recipients (names redacted); several labeled “(USANYS)” |
| Cc | Multiple recipients (names redacted); at least one labeled “(USANYS)” |
| Subject | RE: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo |

Attached is a draft superseding indictment.

Thanks,

Key information from the email:

*   **From:** [Redacted]
*   **Sent:** Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:29 AM
*   **To:** [Redacted], [Redacted], [Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** [Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

Sure thing, will aim to get you a draft today, thanks.

- Context (surrounding text): 
  - "Sure thing, will aim to get you a draft today, thanks."
  - "Hi team, we have asked what the Brass wants to do in terms of review/meeting, and will let you know. In the meantime and mindful of the Monday al date, do you mind putting together a draft indictment for us to review? Thanks!"

- Email header (from image):
  - From: [redacted] (USANYS)
  - Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 10:32 AM
  - To: [multiple recipients — redacted]; some recipients labeled (USANYS)
  - Cc: [redacted] (USANYS)
  - Subject: FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

- Notes: forwarded message; sender/recipient names are blacked out.

Hi team, we have asked what the Brass wants to do in terms of review/meeting, and will let you know. In the meantime and mindful of the Monday al date, do you mind putting together a draft indictment for us to review? Thanks!

The image is an email header.

*   **From:** \[REDACTED] (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Friday, March 19, 2021 3:34 PM
*   **To:** \[REDACTED], \[REDACTED] (USANYS), \[REDACTED] (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** \[REDACTED] (USANYS), \[REDACTED], \[REDACTED] (USANYS), \[REDACTED] (USANYS)

Subject: RE: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

EFTA00020331

Thanks,

- From: [redacted] <[redacted]>
- Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 3:24 PM
- To: multiple recipients (each redacted) — many labeled "(USANYS)"
- Cc: multiple recipients (each redacted) — several labeled "(USANYS)"
- Body snippet/greeting: "All," and "Thanks," visible
- Subject: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

All,

Attached please find a prosecution memorandum requesting authorization to seek a superseding indictment charging Maxwell with additional criminal offenses. For reference, I have also attached the two prior prosecution memos regarding the original indictment in this case. We have tentatively scheduled grand jury time for Monday, March 29th.

Thanks,

EFTA00020332