Key email metadata:

*   **From:** [Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **To:** [Redacted]
*   **Cc:** [Redacted] (USANYS), [Redacted]

Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:05:59 +0000

Yes, I think we should. Thanks for flagging.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 29, 2020, at 3:56 PM, "<empty>" <"<empty>"> wrote:

M, is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer.

Email Header Information:

| Field     | Value                                             |
| :-------- | :------------------------------------------------ |
| From      | (USANYS)                                |
| Sent      | Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55              |
| To        | ,  (USANYS)                                     |
| Cc        |                                                |
| Subject   | RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II                |


Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be

Email Header Information:

*   **From**: Blacked out
*   **Sent**: Wednesday, January 29, 2020, 3:22 PM
*   **To**: Blacked out (USANYS)
*   **Cc**: Blacked out
*   **Subject**: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.

thanks,



From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>; <empty> ) <<empty> >
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

MI— I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can?

EFTA00011147

I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks. Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I've accurately described/characterized the new stuff we're looking to share?

Thanks,



EFTA00011148