| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Subject | RE: motions under seal? |
| From | [Redacted] (USANYS) — name and email address redacted (email shown in angle brackets) |
| To | Multiple recipients (names and emails redacted; at least one address shown in angle brackets) |
| Cc | Multiple recipients (names and emails redacted; several separate redaction blocks) |

Key points:
- Sender affiliation includes "USANYS".
- All names and email addresses are redacted/black-boxed.

Subject: RE: motions under seal?

Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:49:38 +0000



As you know, the protective order distinguishes between all discovery and that marked "sensitive," and it is the sensitive discovery that cannot be publicly filed. El statements to law enforcement do not fall into the sensitive category, so they should be publicly filed. We'd ask that, consistent with the protective order, any sensitive discovery and references to cooperators be redacted in your public filings. Along the same lines, we noticed that you publicly filed four documents that were marked sensitive (Exhibits A through D to your cell site motion) in violation of the protective order. We will be asking the Court to remove them from the docket and you will need to refile.



Assistant United States Attorney

Key information from the image:

*   Email sent Friday, August 2, 2019, 11:33 AM.
*   Sender and recipients are redacted.
*   CC: redacted, Michael Bachrach (michael@mbachlaw.com), bkoffsky@snet.net.
*   Subject: RE: motions under seal?

Subject: RE: motions under seal?

I don't think that will satisfy our concern about revealing the statements and certainly not something we can do today or easily. Nor do I want the extra work.

The image shows a contact address: Garden City, NY 11530. Other contact information is redacted.

This transmittal may be a confidential attorney client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email and immediately delete this message and all its attachments

Key information from the image:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Friday, August 02, 2019 11:26 AM
*   **To:**
*   **Cc:** , Michael Bachrach (michael@mbachlaw.com), bkoffsky@snet.net
*   **Subject:** RE: motions under seal?

EFTA00021532

It is a little difficult to know what needs to be sealed/redacted in the abstract. Out of an abundance of caution, can you file the documents with any reference to evidence/discovery and cooperators redacted? We can then review the unredacted version and discuss what, if anything, can be unredacted for the public version.

- Document type: screenshot of an email header (many redactions)
- Visible role: Assistant United States Attorney
- From: redacted
- Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019, 11:03 AM
- To: multiple recipients (names/emails redacted); one recipient labeled “(USANYS)”
- Cc: multiple recipients (redacted)
- Subject: motions under seal?
- Notes: large black redaction bars across names, addresses, and body text; several email addresses redacted inside angle brackets.



Our motions will be ready to go out in a few hours., One is straight forward legal argument about the cell tower data, which we don't have a problem filing. The other motion deals with the statements to the police and by necessity we discuss the statements in detail. We also discuss some of the discovery and the cooperating witnesses. What is the Government position about filing that motion under seal?

Also, affidavit hasn't been signed because the only regular access to a notary are members of his legal team and we [ ]
don't want to witness his signature. We will have him sign it through whatever the process is at MCC or in open court at
our next appearance.

- Image appears to be an address block with 6 horizontal lines.
- Redacted lines: 5 (lines 1, 2, 3, 5, 6) — varying lengths (short, long, medium, long, medium).
- Visible line (line 4): Garden City, NY 11530
- Likely content: name/street/other address details redacted; only city/state/ZIP exposed.

This transmittal may be a confidential attorney client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email and immediately delete this message and all its attachments

EFTA00021533