| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Subject | RE: NPA (provided in surrounding text) |
| From | Redacted (single sender shown; name/address fully blacked out) |
| To | Redacted (appears to include multiple recipients; names/addresses blacked out) |
| Notes | Header shows quoted display names and angle-bracketed addresses behind redactions; heavy black bars conceal details |

Subject: RE: NPA

Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:13:50 +0000

Attachments: 2021-02-26_GM_Government_Opposition_(NPA)_(MC)_(AR)_(LP).docx

My comments layered on top in the attached. I think this is very strong and well written.

- Thread subject: "NPA" / "RE: NPA"
- Multiple senders/recipients redacted; all email addresses/names mostly blacked out.

1) Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:05 PM  
   Subject: RE: NPA  
   Body (key lines): "Hi all, My comments attached. I think we're in great shape too — we have a lot of convincing reasons her motion should be denied. I'm around to discuss anytime. Thanks,"  
   Attachment(s) referenced: comments

2) Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:54 PM  
   Subject: RE: NPA  
   Body (key line): "Thanks for the close read — can the three of us chat after [redacted] and [redacted] have also reviewed? Thanks."

3) Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:46 PM  
   Subject: RE: NPA  
   Body (key lines): "Thanks very much, [redacted]. I think this is in great shape and is very compelling. Some small edits and my responses to your comments attached. Happy to jump on a call if that would be useful."  
   Attachment(s) referenced: small edits and responses to comments

4) Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:02 AM  
   Subject: NPA  
   Body (opening): "All,"

- Overall: internal review of a document/brief related to opposing party's motion (mentions arguing motion should be denied), multiple rounds of edits/comments, requests to discuss by call/chat after additional review.

All,

EFTA00025509

Attached is the most recent draft of the NPA brief. Apologies for the delay, I really struggled with this one. I think our arguments in the first half are strong, but I'm really not wild about the second half. Would very much appreciate your comments/edits. I've also flagged a few issues for consideration/discussion. If you're able to review tomorrow morning, that would be great.

- Type: email signature (image of a signature block)
- Visible text:
  - "Thanks,"
  - "Assistant United States Attorney"
  - "Southern District of New York"
- Redactions: five blacked-out lines (one short line under "Thanks," one longer line below that, and three redacted lines beneath the title) — likely name and contact details (office, address, phone/email).

EFTA00025510