The image shows an email header.

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | "(USANYS)"|
| To | "(USANYS)" |
| Cc | "(USANYS)" |


Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:58:13 +0000

Attachments: 2019-02-28, JE,_letter_re_all_writs_act_application,_15_Civ_7433_(RWS).pdf; 2019-02-
28, JE,_letter_re_all_writs_act_application,_17_Civ_0616_(SN).pdf

Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented [REDACTED], the plaintiff in the civil action.
The two letters we submitted in connection with our All Writs Application are attached.

From: <empty> (USANYS) <
<empty> >
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:53 AM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <
<empty> >
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Another Q: who's Stan Pottinger?

From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:53 AM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <
Cc: <empty> (USANYS) <
Subject: RE: Question re AIN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| From | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Sent | Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM |
| To | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Cc | [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
| Subject | RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing |

Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S?

From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Cc: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>; <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

In the spirit of completeness, I'm also attaching their replies.

From: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM
To: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Cc: <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>; <empty> (USANYS) <<empty>>
Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

EFTA00033074

Goodness!

Associate U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York

On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:

She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years.

The image is an email header.

Key details:
*   **From:** [Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM
*   **To:** [Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** [Redacted] (USANYS); [Redacted] (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing

Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law?

Key Details:

*   **From:** (USANYS)
*   **Sent:** Tuesday, June 15, 2021, 2:19 PM
*   **To:** (USANYS)
*   **Cc:** (USANYS), (USANYS)
*   **Subject:** RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing



Per our discussion, I am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial. Thanks very much.

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
|From| [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
|Sent| Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM |
|To| [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
|Cc| [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> |
|Subject| RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing |

Other key text in image:
- Sender attached: (1) Maxwell's two suppression briefs; (2) transcript of McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (pp. 59–115); (4) exhibits to our motion (Ex 4–7). Judge Nathan will resolve suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial.
- Reply line: "Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex."

Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Context (surrounding text) | "Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex" |
| From | [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Sent | Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM |
| To | [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Cc | [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]>; [redacted] (USANYS) <[redacted]> |
| Subject | Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing |

Hi

EFTA00033075

We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing (no date set yet, although we expect one) related to Rossmiller/Kramer that we'd like your thoughts on. Let us know a convenient time to stop by over the next few days, thanks.



Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York

EFTA00033076