| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Subject | It's AT&T! |
| From | "[redacted]" <redacted> |
| To | "[redacted]" <redacted> |
| Cc | "[redacted]" <redacted>, "[redacted]" (USANYS) <redacted> |
| Notes | Additional long redacted block present below header lines (likely another address or routing info) |

Subject: It's AT&T!

Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:19:14 +0000

Attachments: 2004-05-
05_AT&T WIRELESS_MONTHLY_STATEMENT_REGARDING_JEFFREY_E_EPSTEI
N_PHONE_NUMBER_ pdf

Hey

Following up on our call just now, I have corrected my prior misrecollection — the records reflecting calls from to are from AT&T, not Cingular. I've attached the relevant AT&T records for your reference. The specific calls to are on April 23, 2004 and May 2, 2004 and are located on pages 9 and12 of the attached records. number at that time was and it appears in the "Number Called" column for entries on those two dates.

I've updated the order of proofer to reflect that we need an AT&T custodian (instead of Cingular/T-Mobile).

Thanks!

EFTA00022488