- Image type: email header (screenshot)
- Subject (context): "FW: RE:"
- From: single entry — fully redacted (quoted, followed by >)
- To: multiple recipients — all fully redacted (several quoted names/addresses separated by commas)
- Formatting cues: names/addresses shown in quotation marks with angle-bracket characters; black bars used for redaction

Subject: FW: RE:

Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:40:32 +0000

Importance: Normal

I unfortunately am in another meeting at 3:30 today, but feel free to go ahead without me.

Not sure if you had talked toI= about this, but after the news reports, and I were trying to do some [ ]
additional digging to see if there was a way that we could reopen this investigation given that some of the conduct seems
to have touched on New York.

Thanks,



From:

The image shows an email communication with the following characteristics:
- The email was sent on Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:39 PM.
- The email's 'To:' and 'Cc:' fields are redacted.


Subject: Re: RE:

Either of those times work for me. [ ] and I have a meeting at 2 so 3:30 would be better if possible.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 30, 2018, at 1:35 PM, > wrote:

All,

We've been able to gather some information on the Jeff Epstein matter and I'd suggest we have a call to determine the way forward. Does 3:00 or 3:30 today work?

From: <empty>)
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 4:40 PM
To: <empty>
Subject: FW:

From: <empty> ) [mailto:<empty> ]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:36 PM
To: <empty>
Cc: Kim, <empty> (USANYS) 4 <
Subject:

EFTA00023491

Have you seen this article?

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html

Have any insight? From the article is sounds like he cooperated in a financial fraud case and was non-prosd.



and I can chat whenever.

- "Thanks,"
- [Name — redacted]
- [Additional name/affiliation — redacted]
- Assistant United States Attorney
- Human Trafficking Co‑Coordinator
- Violent & Organized Crime
- Southern District of New York
- [Contact info — redacted]

EFTA00023492