| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Subject | RE: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark |
| From | [Name redacted] (USANYS) — email redacted (shown in angle brackets) |
| To | 1) [Name redacted] (USANYS) — email redacted (shown in angle brackets) |
|  | 2) [Name redacted] (USANYS) — email redacted (shown in angle brackets) |
| Notes | All personal names and full email addresses are redacted; each address shown in the image is followed by "(USANYS)" and an angle-bracketed, redacted email. |

Subject: RE: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark

Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:36:15 +0000

Hi

We requested these from the BOP, and they provided a set of documents, which we then produced to defense counsel. We did not do a page by page comparison between the redacted setand the unredacted set, so we can't guarantee that they are "comprehensive." But we can provide you with what we have, assuming that there aren't any issues with us sharing in that way.

Best,

From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 12:27 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark

Nick and



I recall that at some point you requested a version of the Epstein FOIA documents from BOP without the translucent green watermark they put on the withheld documents. Do you have those saved down somewhere? Although the Court has not put in a specific order yet, I think it's likely that we'll need to produce documents without the translucent green marking to the Court. I have versions without the watermark for some of the does, but it looks like not all. Do you have a comprehensive set somewhere?

Thanks,
Assistant United States Attorney
300 Quarropas Street
White Plains, NY 10601
Telephone:

EFTA00027607