- Subject: Letter to AJN
- From: sender name and email redacted (display name in quotes, email in <>)
- To: multiple recipients (names, parenthetical identifiers, and email addresses redacted; shown as quoted display names, parentheses, and <>; recipients separated by commas)
- Cc: multiple recipients (names and emails redacted; shown as quoted display names and <> separated by commas)

Visible formatting: display names in quotes, parenthetical identifiers, and email addresses in angle brackets; most content blacked out.

Subject:  Letter to AJN

Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 23:32:34 +0000

Attachments: 2021.08.13_AJN_opinion_-_supplemental_pretrial_motions.pdf; 2021-08-
17_GM_letter_to_AJN_re_co-conspirator_identities.docx

Hey

As you may have seen, on Friday, Judge Nathan denied all of Maxwell's supplemental motions. (She also denied an ex parte motion for some Rule 17 subpoenas, so it seems like our earlier motion was effective.)

Judge Nathan's order, however, says that we did not object to providing the defense with the identities of Maxwell's uncharged co-conspirators, and she presumes we intend to do so.

We've drafted the attached letter explaining that we do not, in fact, intend to do so. For convenience, Judge Nathan's opinion is attached, and the relevant passage is footnote 1 on page 12.

Thanks,

Andrew

Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York

New York, New York 10007

EFTA00024210