| Date / Time (shown) | From | To / Cc | Subject | Short excerpt |
|---|---:|---|---|---|
| Fri, 07 Dec 2018 16:04:05 +0000 | [redacted] | [redacted] | RE: Epstein | "On my way" |
| Fri, Dec 07, 2018 11:03 AM | [redacted] | [redacted] | RE: Epstein | "[redacted] suggests going to [redacted] office because his speakerphone is good. Headed there now." |
| Fri, Dec 07, 2018 11:00 AM | [redacted] | [redacted] | RE: Epstein | "Meeting in my office? Or [redacted]?" |
| Thu, Dec 06, 2018 9:25 PM | [redacted] | [redacted] | Re: Epstein | "I can call in at 11:00." / "Sent from my iPhone" |
| Thu, Dec 06, 2018 7:08 PM | [redacted] | [redacted] | Re: Epstein | "Good for me." / "Ok for me." |

Other visible metadata: Importance: Normal. Multiple email addresses and names are redacted.

EFTA00014309

The image shows the header of an email.
*   To: [Redacted]
*   Cc: [Redacted]
*   Subject: Re: Epstein

How about 11:00?

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 6, 2018, at 7:04 PM, > wrote:

In case you haven't seen, various lawmakers are now calling on DOJ to explain the Epstein NPA. If you have a few minutes tomorrow, would be helpful to touch base.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/lawmakers-demand-probe-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein-s-sweetheart-
deal-n944516

EFTA00014310