EXHIBIT P

EFTA00030009

<table><tr><th>Log
ID</th><th>Email Sent Date</th><th>Email From</th><th>Email To</th><th>CC Address</th><th>Subject Matter</th><th>Type of Privilege</th><th>Privilege
Action</th><th>Page Count</th><th>Doc
Type</th></tr><tr><td>153</td><td>Email and letter
communications re law
enforcement
investigation</td><td>The law enforcement
entity,
David Boles, Stan
Pottinger, Sigrid
McCawley, Paul Cassell,
Brad Edwards</td><td>The law enforcement entity,
David Boles,
Stan Pottinger, Sigrid
McCawley, Paul Cassell, Brad
Edwards</td><td></td><td>Plaintiff has objected that Defendant's requests are overly
broad and unduly burdensome, as individually logging all
privileged responsive documents would be overly
burdensome. Plaintiff contends that requests targeting
such privileged information are not reasonably calculated
to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, are not
important to resolving the issues, are not relevant to any
party's claim or defense, are not proportional to the needs
of the case, and creates a heavy burden on Plaintiff that
outweighs its benefit. Therefore, Plaintiff has employed
categorical logging pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26.2(c).
This categorical entry is regarding correspondence re the
currently ongoing criminal investigation of Defendant and
others.</td><td>Public Interest</td><td>Withheld</td><td>approx. 57
documents</td><td></td></tr></table>

EFTA00030010