Case 19-2221, Document 1-1, 07/23/2019, 2614667, Page1 of 2

# United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007

ROBERT A. KATZMANN
CHIEF JUDGE

Date: July 23, 2019 Docket #: 19-2221 Short Title: United States of America v. Epstein

CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
DC Docket #: 1:19-cr-490-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)
DC Judge: Berman

## DOCKETING NOTICE

An appeal in the above-referenced case has been docketed under number: 19-2221. This number must appear on all documents related to this case that are filed in this Court. Appellate counsel of record either represented the appellant before the district court, filed the notice of appeal, or acted as counsel for appellee in the district court. For pro se parties the docket sheet with the caption page, and an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form are enclosed. In counseled cases the docket sheet is available on PACER. Counsel must access the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form from this Court's website http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov.

The form must be completed and returned within 14 days of the date of this notice. The form requires the following information:

YOUR CORRECT CONTACT INFORMATION: Review the party information on the docket sheet and note any incorrect information in writing on the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form.

The Court will contact one counsel per party or group of collectively represented parties when serving notice or issuing our order. Counsel must designate on the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance a lead attorney to accept all notices from this Court who, in turn will, be responsible for notifying any associated counsel.

CHANGE IN CONTACT INFORMATION: An attorney or pro se party who does not immediately notify the Court when contact information changes will not receive notices, documents and orders filed in the case.

Case 19-2221, Document 1-1, 07/23/2019, 2614667, Page2 of 2

An attorney and any pro se party who is permitted to file documents electronically in CM/ECF must notify the Court of a change to the user's mailing address, business address, telephone number, or e-mail. To update contact information, a Filing User must access PACER's Manage My Appellate Filer Account, https://www.pacer.gov/psco/cgi-bin/cmecf/ea-login.pl. The Court's records will be updated within 1 business day of a user entering the change in PACER.

A pro se party who is not permitted to file documents electronically must notify the Court of a change in mailing address or telephone number by filing a letter with the Clerk of Court.

CAPTION: In an appeal, the Court uses the district court caption pursuant to FRAP 12(a), 32(a). For a petition for review or original proceeding the Court uses a caption pursuant to FRAP 15(a) or 21(a), respectively. Please review the caption carefully and promptly advise this Court of any improper or inaccurate designations in writing on the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form. If a party has been terminated from the case the caption may reflect that change only if the district court judge ordered that the caption be amended.

APPELLATE DESIGNATIONS: Please review whether petitioner is listed correctly on the party listing page of the docket sheet and in the caption. If there is an error, please note on the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form. Timely submission of the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form will constitute compliance with the requirement to file a Representation Statement required by FRAP 12(b).

For additional information consult the Court's instructions posted on the website.

Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to 212-857-8528.

Mеcumen² 34°2271ġeƒ‰ƒ 1

Criminal Notice of Appeal - Form A

FILED
U.S. DISTRICT COURT

2019 JUL 22 PM 4:47

S.D. OF N.Y.

NOTICE OF APPEAL
United States District Court
Southern District of New York

Caption:
United States v.
Jeffrey Epstein

Docket No.: 19-cr-00490 (RMB)
Hon. Richard M. Berman
(District Court Judge)

Notice is hereby given that Defendant Jeffrey Epstein appeals to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit from the judgment [ ] , other [x] Decision & Order Remanding Defendant
(specify)
entered in this action on July 18, 2019
(date)

This appeal concerns:
Conviction only [ ]
Sentence only [ ]
Conviction & Sentence [ ]
Other [x]

Defendant found guilty by plea | trial | N/A [x].

Offense occurred after November 1, 1987?
Yes [x]
No [ ]
N/A [

Date of sentence: <empty>
N/A [x]

Bail/Jail Disposition:
Committed [x]
Not committed |
N/A [

Appellant is represented by counsel? [x] Yes | [ ] No |
If yes, provide the following information:
Defendant's Counsel: Reid Weingarten
Counsel's Address: 1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Counsel's Phone: (212) 506-3900
Assistant U.S. Attorney: Alex Rossmiller
AUSA's Address: 1 Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
AUSA's Phone: (212) 637-2415
<signature>
Signature

7/22/19
715
00505$
465401240399

1

Case 19-2221, Document 1-2, 07/23/2019, 2614667, Page2 of 7

APPEAL,ECF

# U.S. District Court U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:19−cr−00490−RMB All Defendants

Case title: USA v. Epstein

Date Filed: 07/02/2019

Assigned to: Judge Richard M.
Berman

## Defendant (1)

Jeffrey Epstein
also known as
Sealed Defendant 1

represented by

James L. Brochin
Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC)
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
212−378−7503
Email: jbrochin@brochinlawpllc.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Marc Allan Fernich
Law Office of Marc Fernich
810 Seveth Ave
Suite 620
New York, NY 10019
(212) 446−2346
Fax: (212) 446 2330
Email: maf@fernichlaw.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Martin Gary Weinberg
Martin G. Weinberg, PC
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
617−227−3700
Fax: 617−338−9538
Email: owlmgw@att.net
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Michael Campion Miller Michael Campion Miller
Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC)
1114 Avenue of the Americas 1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
(212) 506-3900 (212) 506−3900
Fax: (212) 506−3950
Email: mmiller@steptoe.com
LEAD ATTORNEY LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Michael Gerard Scavelli
Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC)
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
212−378−7538
Fax: 212−506−3950

Case 19-2221, Document 1-2, 07/23/2019, 2614667, Page3 of 7

Email: mscavelli@steptoe.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Reid Weingarten
Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC)
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
(202)−506−3900
Fax: (212)−506−3950
Email: rweingarten@steptoe.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Pending Counts

18:371.F SEX TRAFFICKING
CONSPIRACY
(1)

18:1591.F SEX TRAFFICKING
OF CHILDREN OR BY FORCE,
FRAUD OR COERCION
(2)

## Disposition

Highest Offense Level (Opening)
Felony

Terminated Counts

None

None

Highest Offense Level
(Terminated)
None

Complaints

Disposition

Disposition

| Plaintiff   |                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-|-|-|
| USA         | represented by | Alex Rossmiller<br />U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of<br />New York<br />1 St. Andrew's Plaza<br />New York, NY 10007<br />(212)−637−2415<br />Email: alexander.rossmiller@usdoj.gov<br />LEAD ATTORNEY<br />PRO HAC VICE<br />ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED<br />Designation: Assistant US Attorney |
|             |                | Alison Gainfort Moe<br />United States Attorney's Office, SDNY<br />One Saint Andrew's Plaza<br />New York, NY 10007<br />(212)−637−2225                                                                                                                                                                  |

Case 19-2221, Document 1-2, 07/23/2019, 2614667, Page4 of 7

Email: alison.moe@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Assistant US Attorney

Maurene Ryan Comey
United States Attorney's Office, SDNY
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
(212)−637−2324
Email: maurene.comey@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Assistant US Attorney

<table><tr><th>Date Filed</th><th>#</th><th>Docket Text</th></tr><tr><td>07/02/2019</td><td>2</td><td>SEALED INDICTMENT as to Sealed Defendant 1 (1) count(s) 1, 2. (jm) (Entered:
07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/03/2019</td><td>1</td><td>SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (mhe) (Entered: 07/03/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td>3</td><td>Order to Unseal Indictment as to Sealed Defendant 1. (Signed by Magistrate Judge
Henry B. Pitman on 7/8/19)(jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>INDICTMENT UNSEALED as to Jeffrey Epstein. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Case Designated ECF as to Jeffrey Epstein. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Case as to Jeffrey Epstein ASSIGNED to Judge Richard M. Berman. (jm) (Entered:
07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Attorney update in case as to Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Alex Rossmiller,Maurene Ryan
Comey,Alison Gainfort Moe for USA added. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. (Actual arrest date is 7/6/19 − Defendant arrested while
matter under seal) (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td>5</td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman:Initial
Appearance as to Jeffrey Epstein held on 7/8/2019. Defendant is present with attorney
Martin Weinberg; AUSA Rossmiller is also present. Defendant id detained until
continuation of detention hearing which is scheduled for 7/11/19 at 2:00 PM. (jm)
(Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman: As to
Jeffrey Epstein Detention Hearing set for 7/11/2019 at 02:00 PM before Judge Richard
M. Berman. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman:
Defendant is present with attorney Martin Weinberg; AUSA Rossmiller is also
present.Arraignment as to Jeffrey Epstein (1) Count 1,2 Jeffrey Epstein (1) Count 1,2
held on 7/8/2019., Plea entered by Jeffrey Epstein (1) Count 1,2 Jeffrey Epstein (1)
Count 1,2 Not Guilty. Conference before USDJ on 7/8/19. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard M. Berman: Status
Conference as to Jeffrey Epstein held on 7/8/2019. AUSAs Alex Rossmiller, Maurene
Comey and Alison Moe present; Also present is Special Agent Amanda Young and
Task Force Officer Paul Byrne; Defendant present with attorneys Martin Weinberg,
Reid Weingarten and Marc Fernich; US Pretrial Officers Keyana Pompey and Lea
Harmon present; initial conference held; defense bail submission is due on 7/11/19 at
12:00 noon; government reply by 7/12/19 at 5:00 pm; Bail hearing is scheduled for
7/15/19 at 10:00 am; See transcript of proceedings held for a complete record; Speedy
trial time is excluded for the reasons set forth on the record from 7/8/19 to 7/15/19
pursuant to 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B). (Bond Hearing set for 7/15/2019 at 10:00
AM before Judge Richard M. Berman) (Court Reporter Tom Murray) (ap) (Entered:
07/08/2019)</td></tr></table>

## Case 19-2221, Document 1-2, 07/23/2019, 2614667, Page5 of 7

<table><tr><th>07/08/2019</th><th></th><th>Attorney update in case as to Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Martin R. Weinberg, Reid
Weingarten, Marc Allan Fernich for Jeffrey Epstein added. (ap) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</th></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Attorney update in case as to Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Martin Gary Weinberg for
Jeffrey Epstein added. (bw) (Entered: 07/11/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/11/2019</td><td>6</td><td>LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid Weingarten
dated July 11, 2019 re: Pretrial Release . Document filed by Jeffrey Epstein.
| (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Weingarten, Reid) (Entered: 07/11/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/11/2019</td><td>7</td><td>MOTION to Seal Document . Document filed by Jeffrey Epstein. (Weingarten, Reid)
(Entered: 07/11/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/11/2019</td><td>8</td><td>LETTER RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge
Richard M. Berman from Alex Rossmiller dated July 11, 2019 re: 7 MOTION to Seal
Document .. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/11/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/11/2019</td><td>9</td><td>ORDER granting 7 Motion to Seal Document as to Jeffrey Epstein (1). Defense
motion granted. Materials to be hand delivered to Chambers (and opposing counsel) by
9:00 AM, July 12, 2019. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 7/11/2019) (clt)
(Entered: 07/12/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/12/2019</td><td>10</td><td>MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Jeffrey Epstein on re: 8 Response to Motion filed by
USA. ENDORSEMENT: Application for extension of time denied. (Hard to imagine it
would take the Govt extra time to review submission.) (Signed by Judge Richard M.
Berman on 7/12/2019)(clt) (Entered: 07/12/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/12/2019</td><td>11</td><td>LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge
Richard M. Berman from Alex Rossmiller dated July 12, 2019 re: 6 LETTER
MOTION addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid Weingarten dated July
11, 2019 re: Pretrial Release .. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit
3)(Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/12/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td>12 </td><td>FILING ERROR − DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY − MOTION for Martin G.
Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number
ANYSDC−17240904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's
Office staff. Document filed by Jeffrey Epstein. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1.
Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Exhibit 2. Proposed Text Order)(Weinberg, Martin)
Modified on 7/15/2019 (wb). (Entered: 07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td></td><td>&gt;&gt;&gt;NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC
VICE. Notice as to Jeffrey Epstein to RE−FILE Document No. 12 MOTION for
Martin G. Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number
ANYSDC−17240904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's
Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Pursuant to Rule
1.3. the Attorney Affidavit missing the language of disciplinary.;. Re−file the
motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice − attach the correct signed PDF −
select the correct named filer/filers − attach valid Certificates of Good Standing
issued within the past 30 days − attach Proposed Order.. (wb)(Entered:
07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td>13</td><td>MOTION for Martin G. Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting
papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jeffrey Epstein.
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Exhibit 2. Proposed
Text Order, # 3 Exhibit 3. Affidavit of Martin G. Weinberg)(Weinberg, Martin)
(Entered: 07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td></td><td>&gt;&gt;&gt;NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document
No. 13 MOTION for Martin G. Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and
supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been
reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) (Entered: 07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td>14</td><td>ORDER as to Jeffrey Epstein. The Clerk is respectfully requested to docket the
enclosed documents which were discussed at today's bail hearing. (Signed by Judge
Richard M. Berman on 7/15/19)(jw) (Entered: 07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard M. Berman:Bail Hearing as
to Jeffrey Epstein held on 7/15/2019. AUSA Rossmiller, AUSA Moe, and AUSA</td></tr></table>

Case 19-2221, Document 1-2, 07/23/2019, 2614667, Page6 of 7

|            |    | Comey present;Also present is FBI Special Agent Amanda Young and NYPD<br />Detective Paul Byrne present;Defendant present with attorneys Martin Weinberg, Reid<br />Weingarten, Marc Fernich, James Brochin; and Joseph Jaffe; USPO Pretrial Services<br />Officers Francesca Tessier−Miller, Bernisa Mejia and Dennis Khilkevich present; Also<br />present Court Reporter Kelly Surina present; supplemental submission(s) to be filed by<br />7/16/19 5:00 pm; ruling on bail hearing scheduled for 7/18/19 at 9:30 am. (jw)<br />(Entered: 07/15/2019)                                                      |
|-|-|-|
| 07/15/2019 | 15 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Alex Rossmiller<br />dated July 15, 2019 re: speedy trial time exclusion . Document filed by USA as to<br />Jeffrey Epstein. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/15/2019)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 07/16/2019 | 16 | MEMO ENDORSED granting 15 LETTER MOTION speedy trial time exclusion as to<br />Jeffrey Epstein (1)...ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed<br />by Judge Richard M. Berman on 7/16/19) (jbo) (Entered: 07/16/2019)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| 07/16/2019 | 17 | ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting 13 Motion for Martin G.<br />Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Jeffrey Epstein (1). IT IS HEREBY<br />ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hae Vice in the<br />above−captioned matter in the United States District Court for the Southern District of<br />New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of<br />this Court, including the rules governing discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge<br />Richard M. Berman on 7/16/19) (jbo) (Entered: 07/16/2019)                                          |
| 07/16/2019 | 18 | TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Jeffrey Epstein re: Conference held on 7/8/19<br />before Judge Richard M. Berman. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Thomas Murray, (212)<br />805−0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through<br />the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript<br />Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due<br />8/6/2019. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/16/2019. Release of Transcript<br />Restriction set for 10/15/2019. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 07/16/2019)      |
| 07/16/2019 | 19 | NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Jeffrey Epstein. Notice is<br />hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/8/19 has<br />been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above−captioned matter. The parties<br />have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request<br />Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made<br />remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar<br />days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 07/16/2019)                |
| 07/16/2019 | 20 | TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Jeffrey Epstein re: Conference held on 7/8/19<br />before Judge Richard M. Berman. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante,<br />(212) 805−0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased<br />through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript<br />Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due<br />8/6/2019. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/16/2019. Release of Transcript<br />Restriction set for 10/15/2019. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 07/16/2019) |
| 07/16/2019 | 21 | NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Jeffrey Epstein. Notice is<br />hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/8/19 has<br />been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above−captioned matter. The parties<br />have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request<br />Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made<br />remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar<br />days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 07/16/2019)                |
| 07/16/2019 | 22 | FILING ERROR − DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY − RESPONSE in Support of<br />Motion by Jeffrey Epstein re: 6 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Richard M.<br />Berman from Reid Weingarten dated July 11, 2019 re: Pretrial Release ..Letter<br />Supplementing Bail Motion (Fernich, Marc) Modified on 7/17/2019 (ka). (Entered:<br />07/16/2019)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 07/16/2019 | 23 | LETTER by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from<br />Alison G. Moe dated July 16, 2019 re: Supplement to Detention Memorandum<br />Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Moe, Alison) (Entered:<br />07/16/2019)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

Case 19-2221, Document 1-2, 07/23/2019, 2614667, Page7 of 7

<table><tr><th>07/16/2019</th><th>24</th><th>LETTER RESPONSE in Support of Motion by Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge
Richard M. Berman from Marc Fernich dated 7/16/2019 re: 6 LETTER MOTION
addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid Weingarten dated July 11, 2019 re:
Pretrial Release .. Corrected Letter Supplementing Bail Motion (Fixes Formatting &amp;
Typographical Errors) (Fernich, Marc) (Entered: 07/16/2019)</th></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>25</td><td>LETTER by Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid
Weingarten dated July 17, 2019 re: Supplemental Bail Submission (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Weingarten, Reid) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>26</td><td>ORDER as to Jeffrey Epstein. The conference in this matter is rescheduled from 9:30
am on July 18, 2019 to 11:30 am on July 18, 2019. (Signed by Judge Richard M.
Berman on 7/17/19)(jbo) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td></td><td>Set/Reset Hearings as to Jeffrey Epstein: Bond Hearing set for 7/18/2019 at 11:30 AM
before Judge Richard M. Berman. (jbo) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>27</td><td>NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michael Campion Miller appearing for
Jeffrey Epstein. Appearance Type: Retained. (Miller, Michael) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>28</td><td>NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: James L. Brochin appearing for Jeffrey
Epstein. Appearance Type: Retained. (Brochin, James) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>29</td><td>NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michael Gerard Scavelli appearing for
Jeffrey Epstein. Appearance Type: Retained. (Scavelli, Michael) (Entered:
07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>30</td><td>LETTER by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from
Alison Moe dated July 17, 2019 re: the defendant's foreign passport. Document filed
by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/18/2019</td><td>31</td><td>LETTER RESPONSE in Support of Motion by Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge
Richard M. Berman from Marc Fernich dated 7/18/2019 re: 6 LETTER MOTION
addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid Weingarten dated July 11, 2019 re:
Pretrial Release .. (Fernich, Marc) (Entered: 07/18/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/18/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard M. Berman: Bond Hearing as
to Jeffrey Epstein held on 7/18/2019. AUSA Rossmiller, AUSA Moe and AUSA
Comey present; Also present is FBI Special Agent Amanda Young and NYPD
Detective Paul Byrne present; Defendant present with attorneys Martin Weinberg,
Marc Fernich, James Brochin and Michael Miller present; USPO Pretrial Services
Officer John Moscato present; Court Reporter Tom Murray present; Court denies bail;
Written order to follow; next conference is scheduled for July 31, 2019 at 11:00 am;
speedy trial time is excluded for the reasons set forth on the record from 7/18/19 to
7/31/19 pursuant to 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B). (jbo) (Entered: 07/18/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/18/2019</td><td>32</td><td>DECISION &amp; ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT as to Jeffrey Epstein. Based
upon the forgoing, the Government's motion for remand (detention) is granted and the
Defense motion for pretrial release is denied. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on
7/18/2019)(clt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/18/2019: # 1 Exhibit 1) (clt).
(Entered: 07/18/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/22/2019</td><td>33</td><td>SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (rz) (Entered: 07/22/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/22/2019</td><td>34</td><td>NOTICE OF APPEAL by Jeffrey Epstein from 32 Decision &amp; Order,. Filing fee $
505.00, receipt number 465401240399. (nd) (Entered: 07/23/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/23/2019</td><td></td><td>Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Jeffrey
Epstein to US Court of Appeals re: 34 Notice of Appeal. (nd) (Entered: 07/23/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/23/2019</td><td></td><td>Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal
Electronic Files as to Jeffrey Epstein re: 34 Notice of Appeal were transmitted to the
U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (Entered: 07/23/2019)</td></tr></table>

Case 159100490 RMBDb2umen3201 Pl eqraget for

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: <empty>
DATE FILED: 7/18/19

# UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Government,

- against -
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
X

19 CR. 490 (RMB)

DECISION & ORDER
REMANDING DEFENDANT

## A. Background

This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July 15, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter, this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. Transcript, dated July 8, 2019 ("7/8/19 Tr."), at 2-3; Transcript, dated July 15, 2019 ("7/15/19 Tr."), at 40. It should also be borne in mind that the Court has not (yet) been presented with a motion to dismiss the Indictment.

This is a federal as opposed to a state case. We proceed under federal law and federal rules. The key federal statute that applies here is 18 U.S.C. § 1591 which sets forth the crime of sex trafficking with which Mr. Epstein is charged. Mr. Epstein is also charged ,vith conspiring with others to commit sex trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 371.

With respect to the issue of remand versus release, 18 U.S.C. § 3142 applies. It sets forth a presumption in favor of remand, an exception to the presumption in most cases which favors

Case 591-00490 PRM32012491813 2 of 33

pretrial release. § 3142 states that: "if there is probable cause to believe that the person committed ... an offense involving a minor victim under section ... 1591," then "it shall be presumed that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant committed the crimes of sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy. See United States v. Contreras, 776 F.2d 51, 55 (2d Cir. 1985) ("[A]n indictment returned by a duly constituted grand jury conclusively establishes the existence of probable cause for the purpose of triggering the rebuttable presumptions set forth in § 3142(e)"). In most federal cases the rebuttable presumption that applies favors pretrial release, not remand.

There is another very important issue to be considered in this case. It has to do with "victims" of the crimes charged in the Indictment. Victims refer to the "minor" girls who are alleged to have been sexually trafficked by the Defendant. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3771, victims are entitled to be heard in court, including on the question of whether the defendant is to be released or remanded. Victims have, among other things, been given the opportunity to testify at the bail hearing.

## B. Counsels' Submissions

The Government's letter application, dated July 8, 2019, requests that the Court remand Mr. Epstein. It argues that Mr. Epstein "poses [] an acute danger to the community" and, grounded in past experience with this Defendant, that "if [Mr. Epstein is] allowed to remain out on bail, the defendant could attempt to pressure and intimidate witnesses and potential witnesses in this case, including victims and their families, and otherwise attempt to obstruct justice." Dkt.

2

Case 591-00490 RMB build 97813aage 3 of 33

11, Ex. I at 1. The Government also contends that "[i]n light of the strength of the Government's evidence and the substantial incarceratory term the defendant would face upon conviction [45 years], there is an extraordinary risk of flight, particularly given the defendant's exorbitant wealth, his ownership of and access to private planes capable of international travel, and his significant international ties." Id.

The Government also provides the following background information: "In or about 2005, the defendant was investigated by local police in Palm Beach, Florida, in connection with allegations that he had committed similar sex offenses against minor girls. The investigation ultimately also involved federal authorities, namely the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the FBI' s Miami Office, and included interviews with victims based in the Palm Beach area, including some of the alleged victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations into the defendant's abuse of minor girls in the Palm Beach area." Id. at 3. "In June 2008, the defendant pied guilty in [Florida] state court to one count of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a felony, and one count of solicitation of prostitution, [also] a felony. As a result, the defendant was designated as a sex offender with registration requirements under the national Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act." Id.

The Defense moved on July 11, 2019, for pretrial release of Mr. Epstein, arguing that "Mr. Epstein's strict compliance with the various monitoring requirements associated with his sex-offender registration actually decrease[s] any danger that he might otherwise pose" and also that "Mr. Epstein has never once attempted to flee the United States." Dkt. 6 at 1, 12. The

3

Case 159100490 RMBDb2ume21b4918/19age 4 of 33

Defense proposes what they describe as "a stringent set of [14] conditions that will effectively guarantee [Mr. Epstein's] appearance and abate any conceivable danger he's claimed to present." Id. at 1. The 14 conditions do not include private security guards 24/7. The 14 conditions do include: (1) "Home detention in Mr. Epstein's Manhattan residence, with permission to leave only for medical appointments as approved by Pretrial Services, including (at the Court's discretion) the installation of surveillance cameras at the front and rear entrances to ensure compliance"; (2) "Electronic monitoring with a Global Positioning System"; (3) "An agreement not to seek or obtain any new passport during the pendency of this matter"; (4) "Consent to U.S. extradition from any country and waiver of all rights against such [e]xtradition"; (5) "A substantial [unspecified] personal recognizance bond in an an1ount set by the Court after reviewing additional information regarding Mr. Epstein's finances ...."; (6) "The bond shall be secured by a mortgage on the Manhattan residence, valued at roughly $77 million. Mr. Epstein's private jet can be pledged as further collateral"; (7) "Mr. Epstein's brother Mark will serve as a co-surety of the bond, which shall be further secured by a mortgage on Mark's home in West Palm Beach, Florida. Mr. Epstein's friend David Mitchell will also serve as a co-surety and pledge his investment interests in two properties to secure the bond"; (8) "Mr. Epstein shall deregister or otherwise ground his private jet"; (9) Mr. Epstein "shall demobilize, ground, and/or deregister all vehicles or any other means of transportation in the New York area, providing particularized information as to each vehicle's location;" (10) "Mr. Epstein will provide Pretrial Services and/or the government random access to his residence"; (11) "No person shall enter the residence, other than Mr. Epstein and his attorneys, without prior approval from Pretrial Services and/or the Court"; (12) "Mr. Epstein will report daily by telephone to Pretrial Services (or on any other schedule the Court deems appropriate)"; (13) "A Trustee or Trustees will be appointed to

4

Case 159100490 RMB DumeR3201 64978/19age 5 of 33

live in Mr. Epstein's residence and report any violation to Pretrial Services and/or the Court"; (14) "Any other condition the Court deems necessary to reasonably assure Mr. Epstein's appearance." Id. at 3-4. The Defense also proposes as a "fallback" "round-the-clock, privately funded security guards [which] will virtually guarantee - not just reasonably assure - Mr. Epstein's presence in the circumstances of this case." Id. at 10. The bail package originally was not accompanied by a financial statement reflecting Mr. Epstein's finances. However, on July 12, 2019, the Defense filed a one-page document which includes five groups of assets owned by Mr. Epstein totaling $559,120,954. Dkt. 14 at 18.

The Government responded to the Defense motion on July 12, 2019, arguing, among other things, that Mr. Epstein "has a history of obstruction and manipulation of witnesses, including ... as recently as within the past year, when media reports about his conduct [in Florida] reemerged." Dkt. 11 at 1. The Government filing was made against a "backdrop of significant-and rapidly-expanding--evidence, serious charges, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence." Id. It contends that the defendant's proposed conditions of release are "woefully inadequate."

The Court also received a letter from the Government, dated July 16, 2019, providing, among other things, details about allegedly suspicious payments made by the Defendant in 2018; a Palm Beach, Florida police report; Mr. Epstein's expired Austrian passport in another name but with Mr. Epstein's photo; and a pile of cash and diamonds found in Mr. Epstein's safe. For example, the Government says: "[R]ecords from Institution-I show that on or about November 30, 2018, or two days after the series in the Miami Herald began, the defendant wired $100,000 from a trust account he controlled to ... , an individual named as a potential co-conspirator." Dkt. 23 at 1. And, "on or about December 3, 2018, the defendant wired $250,000 from the same

5

Case 9100490 RMB Deume3201 Piled 64918/13age 6 of 33

trust account to ... , [an individual] who was also named as a potential co-conspirator." Id. at 1- 2. According to the Government, the second individual "is also one of the employees identified in the Indictment, which alleges that she and two other identified employees facilitated the defendant's trafficking of minors by, among other things, contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with the defendant at his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida." Id. at 2.

By letter, dated July 16, 2019, Defense counsel states, among other things, that the Court should reject the idea that "there's literally nothing a person of Epstein's means could say, do or pledge to rebut the operative presumption and make himself eligible for release." Dkt. 24 at 2. "Epstein contends that§ 1591 and the concomitant remand presumption do not contemplate or cover the core conduct at issue here: performing sexual massages for money." Id. at 1-2 n.l. Defense counsel also states that "Epstein certainly recognizes the Court's request for further transparency and is committed to providing a complete and accurate disclosure. Accordingly, we propose that the Court preliminarily accept the initial [financial] disclosure proffered last Friday and, if intending to grant bail, include a release condition directing Epstein to tender a comprehensive forensic accounting of his finances as expeditiously as practicable." Id. at 4. By letters, dated July 16 and July 17, 2019, Defense counsel also submitted information regarding Epstein's New Mexico sex offender registration status. Defense counsel also stated that Epstein traveled extensively over the last eight months and "invariably returned to the to the United States. That inescapable reality emphatically proves he won't flee and entitles him to release - on any and all conditions the Court deems appropriate." Id. at 8.

6

Case 159100490 RMB bume³3201 0918/19age 7 of 33

## C. Indictment

A grand jury voted to indict Mr. Epstein on or about July 2, 2019. The Indictment charges Mr. Epstein with two felonies involving minor girls some as young as 14. Count I includes conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minor girls, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and Count II includes sex trafficking of minor girls, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591. It states: "[F]rom at least in or about 2002, up to and including at least in or about 2005, Jeffrey Epstein, . . . enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and recruited, minor girls to visit his mansion in Manhattan, New York ... and his estate in Palm Beach, Florida, ... to engage in sex acts with him, after which he would give the victims hundreds of dollars in cash." Indictment, dated July 2, 2019 ("Indictment"), , 2. "Moreover, and in order to maintain, and increase his supply of victims, Epstein also paid certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly abused by Epstein. In this way, Epstein created a vast network of underage victims for him to sexually exploit in locations including New York and Palm Beach."

The Indictment also charges that "the victims . . . were as young as 14 years old at the time they were abused by [Mr. Epstein] . . . and were, for various reasons, often particularly vulnerable to exploitation." Id. ¶ 3. "Mr. Epstein intentionally sought out minors and knew that many of his victims were in fact under the age of 18, [] because, in some instances, minor victims expressly told him their age.” Id.

Following his arrest, on Monday, July 8, 2019, Mr. Epstein was arraigned and presented with the Indictment by Magistrate Judge Henry Pittman.

## D. Legal Principles Governing Release Versus Remand

Under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142, a Court can order a defendant's detention if it determines that the defendant is either ( 1) a danger to the community or (2) a risk of flight.

7

Case 591-00490 RMB DumeR01 Piled 64978/19age 8 of 33

18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). A Court does not need to find both bases are proven to order a defendant's detention. See id.; United States v. Blanco, 570 F. App'x 76, 78 (2d Cir. 2014). Dangerousness means that the defendant is a "danger to the safety of any other person or the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142. A finding of dangerousness must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. See. e.g., United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540,542 (2d Cir. 1995). "Where there is a strong probability that a person will commit additional crimes if released, the need to protect the community becomes sufficiently compelling that detention is, on balance, appropriate." United States v. Chimurenga, 760 F .2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering ... [ may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F .3d at 134.

To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no conditions could reasonably assure the defendant's presence at trial." See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 5 (2d Cir. 1987); 18 U.S.C. § 3142. "[T]he constitutional limits on a detention period based on dangerousness to the community may be looser than the limits on a detention period based solely on risk of flight. In the former case, release risks injury to others, while in the latter case, release risks only the loss of a conviction." United States v. Millan, 4 F.3d 1038, 1048 (2d Cir. 1993) (quoting United States v. Orena, 986 F.2d 628, 631 (2d Cir. 1993)). A bail package that "may reasonably assure the appearance of [the defendant] at trial will not [necessarily] assure the safety of the community." United States v. Rodriguez, 950 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir. 1991).

The Bail Reform Act sets forth the following four factors to be considered in the release/remand analysis: (1) the nature and circumstances of the crime(s) charged; (2) the weight of the evidence against the person; (3) the history and characteristics of the defendant, including the person's character and financial resources; and (4) the seriousness of the danger posed by the

8

Case 159100490 RMBеbumeẞ32º¹Pile 64918/19age of 33

defendant's release. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). "The weight afforded to each factor under section 3142(g) is within the 'special province' of the district court." United States v. Paulino, 335 F. Supp. 3d 600,610 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Shakur, 817 F.2d 189, 196 (2d Cir. 1987)).

"The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do notapply to the presentation and consideration of information at the [release/remand] hearing." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(£)(2) (emphasis added). For example, the Government is entitled to present evidence supporting remand by way of proffer, among other means. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(£)(2); see also United States v. Lafontaine, 210 F.3d 125,131 (2d Cir. 2000) ("bail hearings are typically informal affairs, not substitutes for trial or even for discovery"). 18 U.S.C. § 3 l 42(f)(2)(B) expressly states that the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply at bail hearings; thus, courts often base detention decisions on hearsay evidence. United States v. Abuhamra, 389 F.3d 309, 321 n. 7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [ are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United States v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012).

## E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases

A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization of a minor is unusual in that it includes a presumption in favor of pretrial detention, reflecting the significant harm caused by such a crime. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption is that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure against flight or danger to the community. United States v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319 (2d Cir. 2011 )(quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E)). Mr. Epstein may rebut the presumption by "coming forward with evidence that he does not pose a danger to the community or a risk of flight." United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433,436 (2d Cir. 2001). The Government retains the "ultimate burden of persuasion" that Mr. Epstein presents a danger to the

9

Case 191000RMB32º¹Piled b¥978/13ª of 33

community (by clear and convincing evidence) and that Mr. Epstein presents a risk of flight (by a preponderance of the evidence). Id. Even ifrebuttal evidence is presented, "the presumption favoring detention does not disappear entirely." Id. at 436. "[It]remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court." Id.

## F. Mr. Epstein Poses a Danger To Others And To the Community

The Court begins with "dangerousness" because that concept is at the heart of this case. It finds that the Government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Epstein threatens the safety of another person and of the community, as follows on pages 10-21:

• Victims Have Advised The Court That They Would Fear For Their Safety If Mr. Epstein Were Released

Victims have "specifically conveyed" to the Government that any form ofrelease of the Defendant, including home detention with full-time private guards, could "result in [their] harassment and abuse." Dkt. 11 at 4. At the bail hearing on July 15, 2019, two victims movingly testified about their past sexual encounters with Mr. Epstein when they were minors aged 14 and 16, respectively. 7/15/19 Tr. at 72; see also S. REP. 108-191 ("CVRA Legislative History"), at 22 (In enacting the CVRA, Congress stated that "[V]ictims deserve the right to be heard at specific points in the criminal justice process," including bail hearings. "Giving victims a voice not only improves the quality of the process but can also be expected to often provide important benefits to victims."). Ms. Annie Farmer was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the misfortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms. Farmer said that Mr. Epstein "flew [her] to New Mexico" and was "inappropriate" with her. Id. She was reluctant to go into details about her experience with Mr. Epstein. Id. at 73. Ms. Farmer opposes Mr. Epstein's pretrial release because she believes other

10

Case 15910049020164918/1ªde of of 33

Epstein victims would "continu[e] to be victimized" and that Mr. Epstein's wealth and privilege and notoriety would make it difficult for "[other] victims to come forward." Id. at 72.

Ms. Courtney Wild was introduced by her counsel, Brad Edwards, and said she was "sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein starting at the age of 14." Id. at 73-74. She asked the Court to "keep [Mr. Epstein] in detention[] for the safety of any other girls out there that are going through what [she's] going through." Id. at 74. Ms. Wild said that Mr. Epstein is a "scary person to have walking the streets." Id.

• Mr. Epstein Poses A Threat to Additional Young Girls If He Is Released At the remand/release hearing on Monday, July 15, 2019, as noted, the Court heard poignant testimony from two of Mr. Epstein's alleged victims about their fears and anxiety over his potential release, even if under strict conditions of home confinement. The Court is also concerned for new victims.

Mr. Epstein's alleged excessive attraction to sexual conduct with or in the presence of minor girls - which is said to include his soliciting and receiving massages from young girls and young women perhaps as many as four times a day appears likely to be uncontrollable. See United States v. Minnici, 128 F. App'x 827, 829-30 (2d Cir. 2005) (defendant's alleged sex crimes were "of an addictive sexual nature that cannot be suppressed simply by a restrictive set of bail conditions"). Accordingly, Mr. Epstein's past sexual conduct is not likely to have abated or been successfully suppressed by fierce determination, as his Defense Counsel suggests. Defense Counsel contends that: "[H]e wasn't a predator that couldn't control his conduct. He disciplined himself." 7 /15/19 Tr. at 31-32. Defense Counsel also argues that "appreciating the gravity of these charges ... putting aside the age of these witnesses and putting the consent issue aside, it's not like [Epstein is] an out-of-control rapist." 7 /15/19 Tr. at 36. It seems fair to say that

11

Case 910090320167978/13ªº12 of 33

Mr. Epstein's future behavior will be consistent with past behavior, including the trove of "lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls," which were recently uncovered during the July 6-7, 2019, search of Mr. Epstein's East 71st Street mansion. See Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 9. The search results suggest the "possibility that defendant could target another vulnerable victim." See United States v. Baker, 349 F. Supp. 3d 1113, 1135 (D.N.M. 2018) (where the defendant was alleged to specifically target "vulnerable women" and where he attempted to contact an alleged victim, the court was persuaded that the defendant "would be a danger to society if released").

Despite having been convicted of the above mentioned (two) Florida sex crimes (in 2008) involving an underage girl, Mr. Epstein, as noted, maintained at his New York residence a "vast trove" of sexually suggestive photographs of nude underage and adult girls. Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 9. That is, during the July 6-7, 2019 authorized search of Mr. Epstein's NYC residence, the FBI found a "substantial collection of photographic trophies of his victims and other young females." Dkt. 11 at 10. This evidence includes compact discs labeled "Young [Redacted Name]+ [Redacted Name]," "Misc nudes l," and Girl pies nude." Id. The Government contends that this evidence includes hundreds or perhaps thousands of "sexually suggestive photographs" of nude underage girls and women, and that it is corroborative in nature. Id. And, it is consistent with victim recollections of the inside of Mr. Epstein's residence. Dkt. 11,Ex. 1 at 9. This newly discovered evidence also suggests that Mr. Epstein poses "ongoing and forward-looking danger." See Dkt. 11 at 10; see also Baker, 349 F. Supp. 3d at 1135; United States v. Goodwin, 2015 WL 6386568, at *3 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 21, 2015).

• The§1591 Presumption Of Pretrial Remand Reflects The Seriousness Of Mr. Epstein's Alleged Crimes

The significant harms and dangers of sex crimes involving minors "animated [] Congress to create the statutory presumption of detention." United States v. Hardy, 2019 WL 2211210, at

12

Case 59100490 RMB 32º1Piled 64978/13ª 13 of 33 07/23+

*10 (D.D.C. May 22, 2019). The presumption ofremand "reflects Congress's substantive judgment that particular classes of offenders should ordinarily be detained prior to trial." United States v. Stone, 608 F.3d 939,945 (6th Cir. 2010). Other serious offenses that are accompanied by the presumption ofremand are: Kidnapping (18 U.S.C. § 1201); Aggravated Sexual Abuse (18 U.S.C. § 2241); Sexual Abuse (18 U.S.C. § 2242); Offenses Resulting in Death (18 U.S.C. § 2245); Sexual Exploitation of Children (18 U.S.C. § 2251); Selling or Buying of Children (18 U.S.C. § 2251 ); Production of Sexually Explicit Depictions of a Minor for importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use oflnterstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E).

The presumption ofremand does not disappear even when rebutted. Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144. If the defendant comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weighted along with other evidence." United States v. Hir, 517 F.3d 1081, 1086 (9th Cir. 2008); see also Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144 ("The concern underlying the presumption applies to the general class of defendants charged with one of the specified offenses-not merely to defendants who fail to produce rebuttal evidence. Were the presumption ... to vanish upon anyshowing ... , courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original).

• The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Services' interview of Mr. Epstein, that "[t]here is no condition or combination of conditions that [can]

13

Case 910090320167978/13ªgageº14 of 33

reasonably assure ... the safety of the community" if Mr. Epstein is released. Pretrial Services Report, dated July 8, 2019, at 4. Pretrial Services also concluded that Mr. Epstein is a flight risk and recommends that he be detained for that reason as well. Id.

In support of its assessment of Mr. Epstein's dangerousness, Pretrial Services cites the following: the "Nature of [Mr. Epstein's currently charged] Instant Offence," i.e., sex trafficking and conspiracy involving minor girls; Mr. Epstein's "Prior Arrests," u.,., in Florida in 2006; Mr. Epstein's "History [and] Conviction Involving [a] Sex [Offense]," which principally refers to Defendant's 2008 conviction(s) for procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution (a felony) and for solicitation of prostitution (also a felony); Mr. Epstein's status as a registered sex offender in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands; and Mr. Epstein's "Pattern of Similar Criminal Activity History." Id.

• The Seriousness Of The Crimes That Mr. Epstein Has Been Charged With Is Also Reflected In The Fact That The Crimes Involve Minor Children

Mr. Epstein is said by the Government to be ''a serial sexual predator" who allegedly victimized dozens (or more) of minor girls, including a 14 year old. 1 He was involved in and undertook the alleged sexual activity in several locations, including, his mansion in Manhattan and his estate in Palm Beach, Florida. Indictment -i 2. By "actively encourage[ing] certain of his [minor] victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly sexually abused," Mr. Epstein is said to have "created a vast network of underage victims for him to exploit." Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 2.

The Government alleges that Mr. Epstein "intentionally sought out-and knew that he was abusing-minors. Indeed, in some instances, his victims expressly told him they were

1 Mr. Epstein is reported to have remarked that: "I'm not a 'sexual predator,' I'm an 'offender' . . . It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel." Amber Southerland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator, New York Post, Feb. 25, 2011.

14

Case 59100490 RMB 32º1Piled 64978/13ª of 33 07/23+

underage before or during the period in which he abused them." Id. The crimes with which Mr. Epstein is charged carry a maximum sentence of 45 years of incarceration. Id. at 5. "[T]he deprivation of liberty imposed by imprisonment makes that penalty the best indicator of whether the legislature considered an offense to be ... 'serious."' United States v. Dugan, 667 F.3d 84, 86 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting Lewis v. United States, 518 U.S. 322,326 (1996)).

And, the crimes Mr. Epstein has been charged with are among the most heinous in the law principally, in the Court's view, because they involve minor girls. 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (e)(3)(E); see also Roger Przybylski, Chapter 5: Adult Sex Offender Recidivism, Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative ("[R]esearchers widely agree that observed recidivism rates are underestimates of the true reoffense rates of sex offenders. Hidden offending presents significant challenges for professionals working in sex offender management as it is difficult to know whether offenders who appear to be nonrecidivists based on official records are truly offense free.") (emphasis in original).

• Mr. Epstein Or His Representatives Have Intimidated, Threatened, And/Or Made Payments To Potential Witnesses

The Government's evidence includes: (i) Florida police reports describing harassment and intimidation of witnesses involved in the Florida state criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein in 2006, and (ii) emails, dated September 13, 2007 and September 19, 2007 (attached hereto), from Mr. Epstein's former counsel to Federal prosecutors in Florida discussing the "option" of Mr. Epstein pleading guilty to witness tampering, harassment, and/or obstruction of justice.

A Palm Beach Police Incident Report, dated July 19, 2006, states that one of Mr. Epstein's victims reported that Mr. Epstein's representative said to her: "Those who help [Mr. Epstein] will be compensated and those who hurt [Mr. Epstein] will be dealt with." Dkt. 11, Ex. 3 at 2 (emphasis added.) The Report also states: "[Mr. Epstein's representative] assured [the

15

Case 59100490 RMBDb2umen³32º1Pile&64918/1916 of 33

victim that] she would receive monetary compensation for her assistance in not cooperating with law enforcement." Another (undated) Palm Beach Police Incident Report states that the parent of one of Mr. Epstein's alleged victims contacted the Palm Beach Police to report that Mr. Epstein's private investigator had aggressively driven the parent's car off the road. Dkt. 11, 2 at 1. This same Report states that the parent of another victim reported being "followed aggressively" by Mr. Epstein's private investigator. Id.

The Government contends that these reports together "suggest that an associate of Epstein's was offering to buy victims' silence during the course of the prior investigation," and demonstrate Mr. Epstein's "willingness to use intimidation and aggressive tactics in connection with a criminal investigation." Dkt. 11 at 11.

The Government also submits e-mail evidence (attached to this Order as Exhibit 1) of plea discussions in 2007 between Florida federal prosecutors and Mr. Epstein's attorneys that confirm that Mr. Epstein considered pleading guilty to witness tampering, harassment and/or obstruction of justice in a case involving alleged sex crimes with minor girls. On September 13, 2007, prosecutors wrote to Mr. Epstein's counsel that they have been "spending some quality time ... looking for misdemeanors [that Mr. Epstein could plead guilty to]," including 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d), a Federal witness tampering statute (a felony) and 18 U.S.C. § 403, a Federal statute criminalizing the violation of the privacy protection of child victims and child witnesses (a misdemeanor). Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80756, (S.D. Fla.), Dkt. 361-11. Epstein's counsel replied: "Already thinking about the same statutes." Id. On September 18, 2007, a Federal prosecutor told Mr. Epstein's counsel that if Mr. Epstein pied guilty to obstruction of justice, the factual proffer "could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [a victim's] father, forcing [him] off the road." Id., Dkt. 361-10; see also supra p. 15. On September

16

Case 59100490 RMB 32º1Piled 64978/13ª of 33 17/23+

19, 2007, Mr. Epstein's counsel proposed that Mr. Epstein admit that he verbally harassed victims or the family of victims in connection with his "attempt to delay their voluntary receipt of process" in a civil action against Mr. Epstein, in violation of a Federal witness tampering statute. Doe, Dkt. 361-9.

And, the Government has recently contended that, on November 28, 2018 and on December 3, 2018 - very soon after the publication of a 3-part investigative report in the Miami Herald (authored by Julie K. Brown) relating to Mr. Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007 - Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at 1. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator-[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in [] the NP A." Id. Individual I was named and featured prominently in the Miami Herald. See, ~, Julie K. Brown, "Even From Jail, Sex Abuser Manipulated The System. His Victims Were Kept in The Dark, Miami Herald, Nov. 28, 2018.

The Government states that Individual II was also "a potential co-conspirator-[] for whom Epstein also obtained protection in[] the NPA." Dkt. 23 at 2. She is "one of the employees identified in the Indictment, which alleges that she and two other identified employees facilitated the defendant's trafficking of minors by, among other things, contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with the defendant at his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida." Id. at 2. Individual II was also named and featured prominently in the Miami Herald report.

The Government states there is good reason to infer that Mr. Epstein was attempting to "influence [these two] individuals who were close to him during the time period charged in this case and who might be witnesses against him at a trial." Dkt. 11 at 11. "Neither of these

17

Case 59100490 RMBDb2umen³32º1Pile&64918/19agage 18 of 33

payments appears to be recurring or repeating during the approximately five years of bank records presently available to the Government. This course of action, and in particular its timing, suggests the defendant was attempting to further influence co-conspirators who might provide information against him in light of the recently re-emerging allegations." Id.

A court may order detention if there is a serious risk that the defendant will attempt to threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror. 18 U.S.C. § 3 l42(f)(2)(B). Even a single incident of witness tampering has been a "traditional ground for pretrial detention by the courts." Lafontaine. 210 F.3d at 132-34 (affirming then-U.S. District Judge Michael B. Mukasey's denial of bail to a defendant who had met with a prospective witness in an effort to persuade the witness to give untruthful testimony and where there was "no evidence of influence, harassment or intimidation"); see also United States v. Singh, 2012 WL 3260232, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2012).

• Mr. Epstein Has Not Always Been Compliant With His Legal Obligations As A Registered Sex Off ender

Defense counsel has contended that Mr. Epstein has been "scrupulously fulfill[ing] his obligations in every jurisdiction in which he was required to register [ as a sex offender]," since his 2008 Florida convictions. Counsel argues that this shows that he "is no longer a danger to anyone and will faithfully obey all conditions of release if ordered." Dkt. 6 at 3.

The record shows that Mr. Epstein has challenged his sex offender "level" in at least one jurisdiction since 2008 in an effort to minimize his reporting obligations. And, one recent press account states that Epstein is not in compliance in New York State. See Elizabeth Rosner, Tina Moore, Larry Celona, and Bruce Golding, NYPD let convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein skip judge-ordered check-in, New York Post, July 10, 2019 ("July 10, 2019 NY Post Article")

18

Case 19130490 RMB 32º1Pile& 64978/13ª 33 17/23+

("Jeffrey Epstein never once checked in with City cops in eight-plus years since a Manhattan judge ordered him to do so every 90 days").

Mr. Epstein is a Level III sex offender in New York State which is the highest category of risk to reoffend. This designation requires that Mr. Epstein report his presence in New York to law enforcement authorities every 90 days. As discussed at the July 15, 2019 bail hearing, counsel for Mr. Epstein made an application in New York State Supreme Court in 2011 to reduce Epstein's sex offender registration status from Level III to Level I. If granted, this reduction would have allowed Mr. Epstein to avoid his reporting obligations. In a Sex Offender Registration Act Hearing on January 11, 2018, held before the Honorable Ruth Pickholz, Mr. Epstein's application was (firmly) denied, principally because it had been established by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders. See People v. Epstein, Indict.# 30129/2010, (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), SORA Hearing Transcript, dated Jan. 18, 2011.

At the hearing, N cw York County Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Gaffney joined in Defense Counsel's appeal to review and overturn the decision of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders and achieve a do\\nward modification of Mr. Epstein's sex offender status. Id. at 2-15. Judge Pickholz appeared to be stunned by the joint Defense Counsel/District Attorney application, stating: "I am just a little overwhelmed that the People are making this application.. . . I have done many SORAs much less troubling than this one where the People would never make a downward [adjustment] argument like this.... I have never seen the prosecutor's office do this. I have to tell you, I am shocked." Id. at 4-5. Judge Pickholz also ordered Mr. Epstein to report as a Level III sex offender every 90 days in N cw York. Id. at 12. "I am sorry [Mr. Epstein] may have to come here every 90 days. He can give up his New York home [on East 71st. St.] if he does not want to come every 90 days." Id. Epstein appealed but Judge Pickholz's decision

19

Case 59100490 PRM3201 Pile&67978/19ª of 33

was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570,933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011).

Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 investigative report by the New York Post, as noted, Mr. Epstein has never reported as a sex offender to New York law enforcement. See July 10, 2019 NY Post Article. "The NYPD cop assigned to monitor Epstein has repeatedly complained to [the New York County District Attorney's] Sex Crimes Unit that Epstein wasn't in compliance, according to a source familiar with the matter." Id. Mr. Epstein's alleged failure to comply with his New York sex offender obligations would appear to undermine defense counsel's premise that Mr. Epstein's "perfect compliance" and "meticulous obedience," Dkt. 6 at 1, 5, to his sex offender registration obligations should lead to his release. See Lafontaine, 210 F.3d at 135 n.6 (where the Court ordered detention noting that the defendant "had previously disregarded court orders").

The Court has also read the story in the July 17, 2019, New York Post in which attorney Brad Edwards contends that while Epstein was serving his Florida state sentence ( after pleading guilty to procuring a minor under 18 for prostitution and solicitation of prostitution), Epstein was allowed to leave the jail on work release. While on work release "[h]e was having ... female visitors ... and continuing to engage in ... [sexual] conduct ... while he was in 'jail'." Mr. Edwards is counsel to one of Mr. Epstein's victims. See Reuven Fenton and Kate Sheehy, Jeffrev Epstein had sex den while serving time: lmvver, New York Post, July 16, 2019. The Court is also aware of an article published by Palm Beach CBS local news which reports that the Palm Beach County Sherriffs Office "disputes [the] claim that Jeffrey Epstein had sex on work release." A spokeswoman for the sheriffs office is quoted as saying "If he violated any conditions of his

20

Case 1591004903201104978/13 33

release he would have been brought back to the Stockade and work release would have been terminated." Chuck Weber, PBSO disputes claim that Jeffrey Epstein had sex on work release, CBS 12 News, July 17, 2019.

## • New Mexieo, Florida And The Virgin Islands

With respect to Mr. Epstein's sex offender status in New Mexico, Defense Counsel has submitted a letter, dated August 19, 2010, from Regina Chacon, Assistant Bureau Chief, Law Enforcement Record Bureau of the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, which states that Mr. Epstein "is not required to register [as a sex offender] with the State of New Mexico at this time for [his] 2008 Florida conviction of Procuring [a] Person Under 18 for Prostitution." 0kt. 25, Ex. A. The Court requested from the Defense all application materials that Mr. Epstein may have submitted to the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, believing that the Department would not initiate the waiver of Mr. Epstein's sex offense registration on its own. No such materials have been received by the Court as of this date.

The Court understands that Mr. Epstein is also registered as a sex offender in the Virgin Islands (Level I) and in Florida (Level I). It has received no materials from the Defense regarding sex offender applications or proceedings in those two jurisdictions.

In sum, based upon all of the proffers and evidence set forth at pp. 10-21 above, the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Epstein poses a danger to other persons and to the community.

## G. Mr. Epstein Also Poses A Risk Of Flight

In the section that follows, the Court considers ''risk of flight" even though it has already determined that Mr. Epstein presents a danger to the community. "[A] finding of either danger to the community or risk of flight will be sufficient to detain the defendant pending trial."

21

Case 1591004902016497813ª 22 of 33

United States v. King, 849 F.2d 485,488 (11th Cir. 1988) (quoting United States v. Portes, 786 F.2d 765 (7th Cir. 1985)). The Court finds that the Government has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Epstein is a flight risk.

The factors to be considered in analyzing risk of flight are the same factors that apply when analyzing dangerousness. They are: ( 1) the nature and circumstances of the crimes charged; (2) the weight of the evidence against the defendant; (3) the history and characteristics of the defendant, including the person's character and financial resources; and (4) "the seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant's release." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). "The weight afforded to each factor under section 3142(g) is within the 'special province' of the district court." Paulino, 335 F. Supp. at 610.

At the outset, it should be noted that the Pretrial Services Report, dated July 12, 2019, concludes that: "The defendant poses a risk of nonappearance for the following reasons:

		1. [Mr. Epstein's] Extensive foreign travel and possession of travel documents

	2. [Mr. Epstein's] Residential and Financial Ties outside this District and Country

		3. [Mr. Epstein's] Employment ties outside this country

	4. [Mr. Epstein's] Unexplained assets

		5. [Mr. Epstein's] Criminal History including [his] conviction for a[] sex offense [with minors in Florida in 2008]." Pretrial Services Report, dated July 12, 2019 at 4.

• The Crimes Charged Against Mr. Epstein

Mr. Epstein has been charged with among the most serious crimes recognized by U.S. Federal law. The Government has alleged that Mr. Epstein intentionally sought out and sexually abused minor girls, including those "particularly vulnerable to exploitation." Dkt. 11, Ex. 1, at 2. He did this in multiple locations, including New York and Palm Beach. Id. And, Mr. Epstein allegedly "worked and conspired with others, including employees and associates who facilitated

22 22 22

Case 15910049032011049781323 of 33

his [unlawful] conduct, by ... contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters." Indictment ,I 4. These crimes, as already noted, carry a maximum sentence of 45 years of incarceration and give rise to a presumption of pre-trial remand. 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (e)(3)(E); see United States v. Hardy. 2019 WL 2211210, at* 10 (D.D.C. May 22, 2019) (''The significant harms and dangers of these crimes animated the Congress to create the statutory presumption of detention."). The nature and circumstances of the crimes charged and the severity of the potential punishment support a finding that Defendant poses "a serious flight risk and that no conditions can be set to reasonably assure his appearance for trial." United States v. Cilins, 2013 WL 3802012, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2013).

• Weight Of The Evidence

The Government's evidence against Mr. Epstein appears strong. The evidence includes testimony of victims, some of whom were minor girls when they were allegedly sexually abused by Mr. Epstein; other witnesses, including potential coconspirators; physical evidence, including passports reflecting extensive foreign travel; sexually suggestive photographs of nude underage girls; plea discussions; and police reports describing witness tampering and intimidation. ~, United States v. Fama, 2013 WL 2467985, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 7, 2013) ("the Court recognizes the difficulty inherent in assessing the Government's case before trial, and is mindful not to reach any conclusions about [the Defendant's] guilt or innocence. Indeed, some courts have described the weight of the evidence factor as the 'least important' of the§ 3142(g) factors for these reasons."); see also Hir, 517 F.3d at 1090.

• History And Characteristics Of The Defendant Including His Financial Resources Mr. Epstein pied guilty to two state felonies involving minor girls in Florida. He also held plea discussions regarding witness tampering in Florida in 2008. He is a registered Level III

23

Case 1591000RMB23201 Piled 64978/13ª 24 of 33

sex offender in New York and a registered sex offender in Florida (Level I) and the Virgin Islands (Level I). Mr. Epstein is 66 and is reported to be a self made multi-millionaire. He did not graduate from college. Mr. Epstein's vast wealth, including substantial liquid assets, multiple residences, private plane(s), a $8,672,823 residence in Paris, France, and relatively limited family ties to the United States in the sense that he is single with no children and his parents are deceased. He has a brother who Defense counsel asserts has offered to serve as a guarantor for Mr. Epstein by pledging his home in West Palm Beach, Florida. (The Court notes that the Pretrial Services Report, dated July 12, 2019, states that "[t]he defendant stated he maintains minimal contact with his brother, Mark Epstein, and that his exact location is unknown at this time." Pretrial Services Report at 2.)

Mr. Epstein engages in extensive overseas travel often relying on his own plane(s). The Government argues persuasively that "there is an extraordinary risk of flight, particularly given the defendant's exorbitant wealth, his ovvnership of and access to private planes capable of international travel, and his significant international ties. Indeed, the arrest of the defendant occurred when he arrived in the United States on his private jet after having returned from a multi-week stay abroad." Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 1. "[I]n the past 18 months alone, the defendant has traveled abroad, via private jet, either into or out of the country on approximately more than 20 occasions." at 3.

In a recent search of Defendant's New York City home, law enforcement seized an expired Austrian passport bearing Mr. Epstein's photo but not his name. (The passport is in another name.) The Austrian passport lists residence in Saudi Arabia. According to the Government, Defense counsel declined to respond when asked by the Government if the

24

Case 1591004903201104978125 of 33

"Defendant is currently, or has been in the past, a citizen or legal permanent resident of a country other than the United States." Dkt. 23 at 2.

Defense counsel contends that Defendant has one active passport that was surrendered and that "Mr. Epstein has no foreign passports." Dkt. 6 at 3 n. 3. With regard to the Austrian passport, the Defense explains that "Epstein ... acquired the passport in the 1980s, when hijackings were prevalent, in connection to Middle East travel. The passport was for personal protection in the event of travel to dangerous areas, only to be presented to potential kidnapers, hijackers or terrorists should violent episodes occur." Dkt. 24 at 8. Details about how the passport was procured by Mr. Epstein in the name of another individual were not provided and are not known to the Government. See Dkt. 23 at 2 ("The Government is attempting to obtain additional information about the Foreign Passport, including how it was obtained and whether the passport is genuine or fabricated. But the defendant's possession of what purports to be a foreign passport issued under an alias gives rise to the inference the defendant knows how to obtain false travel documents and/or assume other, foreign identities. This adds to the serious risk of flight posed by the defendant."). The Government also argues that "the passport contains numerous ingress and egress stamps, including stamps that reflect use of the passport to enter France, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s." Dkt. 30. By submission dated July 18, 2019, the Defense explains: "Epstein was given the passport at issue by a friend .. . He never used the document to travel internationally and never presented it to any immigration or customs authority. The passport stamps, predating his receipt of the document, do not reflect Mr. Epstein's entries or exits." Dkt. 31.

Defense counsel has submitted a one page document called "Asset Summary - June 30, 2019." It indicates that Epstein has cash in the amount of $56,547,773; fixed income valued at

25

Case 15910049032011049781326 of 33

$14,304,679; equities valued at $112,679,138; hedge funds and private equity valued at $194,986,301; properties located at 9 East 71st Street NY, NY 10021 valued at $55,931,000, 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico 87056 valued at $17,246,208, 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida 33480 valued at $12,380,209, 22 Avenue Foch, Paris France 75116 valued at $8,672,823, Great St. James Island No. 6A USVI 00802 (parcels A, B, and C) valued at $22,498,600 and Little St. James Island No. 6B USVI 00802 (parcels A, B, and C). Dkt. 14 at 18. The Court has advised Defense counsel that this "cursory" asset statement is insufficient to support a bail package for the reasons, among others, that it is not verified and does not show expenses, indebtedness, or liabilities.

Law enforcement has informed the Government that a safe in the Defendant's New York home very recently contained "more than $70,000 in cash ... 48 loose diamond stones, ranging in size from approximately 1 carat to 2.38 carats, as well as a large diamond ring. The Government is currently unaware of whether the Defendant maintains similar [amounts] of cash and/or jewels at his multiple properties, or in other locations. Such ready cash and loose diamonds are consistent with the capability to leave the jurisdiction at a moment's notice." Dkt. 23 at 3.

The Defendant's vast wealth and influential contacts have provided him with the means to pay individuals to assist him in unlawful endeavors, including potentially fleeing the jurisdiction. In the past, "the Defendant worked with others, including employees and associates who facilitated his exploitation of minors, by among other things, contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with the defendant, both in New York and in Florida." Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 2.

26

Case 159100490201649781327 of 33

David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in this case, advised the Court that while a civil case was proceeding against the Defendant "we had situations in which we had witnesses who were cooperating with us and then were contacted by either Mr. Epstein or his lawyers and who then stopped cooperating with us." 7/15/19 Tr. at 71; see also United States v. Boustani, 356 F.Supp.3d 246 (E.D.N.Y. 2019) ("[T]he combination of Defendant's alleged deceptive actions, access to substantial financial resources, frequent international travel, complete lack of ties to the United States, and extensive ties to foreign countries without extradition demonstrates Defendant poses a serious risk of flight"); United States v. Epstein, 155 F.Supp.2d 323,326 (E.D. Penn. 2001) ("The crucial factor, however, is defendant's lack of ties to the United States and his extensive ties to Brazil with which no extradition treaty exists. In our view, his forfeiture of $1 million worth of assets in the United States would not deter him from flight when in Brazil he has significant wealth, a lucrative job, the presence of his family, and insulation from ever being forced to stand trial.").

Viewing the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that the Government has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant is a serious risk of flight and that no conditions can be set that will reasonably assure his appearance at trial. "While other judges in this district have found that an armed security guard may be sufficient to assure a defendant's appearance, even when he is a serious risk of flight ... this Court does not believe that that condition, even coupled with the additional conditions proposed, would be sufficient." United Cilins, 2013 WL 3802012, at *3.

## • The Danger Posed By The Defendant's Release

As demonstrated infra, Mr. Epstein's dangerousness is considerable and includes sex crimes with minor girls and tampering with potential \Vitnesses. The discussion at pp 10-21 is

27

Case 19100490 RMB 32º¹Piled b4978/13ªgage 28 of 33 07/236

incorporated here by reference. See MinnicL 128 F. App'x at 829-30 ("the alleged activities [ we]re of an addictive sexual nature that cannot be suppressed simply by a restrictive set of bail conditions"); see also Millan, 4 F.3d at 1049 ("[T]he protection of the community can be assured only by continued detention.").

The Court has carefully considered the issue of Defendant's ability and motivation for fleeing U.S. jurisdiction. The Court finds that the Government has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that, among other things, the Defendant's limited family ties to the United States, his residence in Paris, his extensive overseas travel, his significant wealth and his substantial resources (including private planes), and the potential 45 year term of imprisonment that may be imposed should there be a conviction in this case, provide incentive, motive and wherewithal to flee. Indeed, these factors render him a "classic" flight risk. See, e.g., United States v. Abdullahu, 488 F.Supp.2d 433,445 (D.N.J. 2007) ("After reviewing the totality of the evidence, the Court has reached the inescapable conclusion that the government has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions exist that will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance at trial. The defendant faces serious criminal charges ... The defendant faces a potential ten year prison sentence and involuntary deportation. The defendant does not have permanent and longstanding ties to this area, he has the means and incentive to flee and he has family ties and a place to live in an overseas country that will not extradite him to the United States.").

## H. Defendant's Proposed Bail Package

Having determined that Mr. Epstein is a flight risk (and also a danger to the community), the Court next examines the Defendant's proposed bail package. See 18 U.S.C. §3142(b)-(f)(2).

28

Case 191000 RMB Dume3201 Pile 64918/13agage 29 of 33 07/236

The Court finds that the Defendant's proposed bail package is inadequate. Among its deficiencies are these:

(1) The bail package is not accompanied or supported by audited or certified financial statements, including details of income and expenses and debt obligations. There is no affidavit from Mr. Epstein. As noted, Defense counsel submitted a cursory one page "Asset Summary - June 30, 2019" on Mr. Epstein's behalf in which he discloses several categories of assets totaling $559,120,954. The Defense states that it"would be impossible for Epstein given, among other impediments, his detention, inability to quickly access pertinent records, and inability to quickly make a precise valuation of particular assets - to provide a sufficient financial statement by the Court's 5 pm deadline." Dkt. 23 at 4.

The absence of accurate and comprehensive financials, sworn to by the Defendant, does not allow the Court meaningfully to assess Defendants' own proposed bail package nor would it enable the Court to fashion a bail package on its own. The Court would not be able to determine what level of bail - in relation to Epstein's finances - would reasonably assure the Defendant's appearance. Defense counsel proposed at the bail hearing on July 15, 2019 that it would take a few days to prepare accurate financials for Mr. Epstein. He also suggested that he would do so (only) if the Court were agreeable to granting bail. This "offer" appears disingenuous for a person as wealthy and experienced in financial matters as Mr. Epstein. See Tr. 7/15/19 at 50 (Court: "There needs to be a fuller financial picture to know what would be appropriate." Defense Counsel: "Let me be blunt. It was our first effort ...."). That Mr. Epstein does not have a financial statement, including liabilities and expenses, readily available is difficult to understand.

29 29 29

Case as9100490 PRMBDb2ume 3201 Pile 0918/1930 of 33

(2) The defense bail package proposes excessive involvement of the Court in routine aspects of Mr. Epstein's proposed home confinement. This is not the Court's function. See United States v. Zarrab, 2016 WL 3681423, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2016) ("The [bail package] ... proposed by the defense is not reasonable because, in too many respects, it substitutes judicial oversight and management for (more appropriate) reliance upon trained, experienced, and qualified professionals from the U.S. Bureau of Prisons and the U.S. Marshals Service."). The Defense package components would embroil the Court in issues, among others, relating to the level of force that may be used to secure the Defendant, who may enter the residence, daily reporting by Mr. Epstein, and reporting by so-called Trustee(s) designated to live with and supervise Mr. Epstein. United States v. Valerio, 9 F. Supp. 3d 283,295 (E.D.N.Y. 2014) ("The questions about the legal authorization for the private security firm to use force against defendant should he violate the terms of his release, and the questions over whether the guards can or should be armed, underscore the legal and practical uncertainties - indeed, the imperfections - of the private jail-like concept envisioned by defendant, as compared to the more secure option of an actual jail.").

(3) The Defense proposal to give advance consent to extradition and waiver of extradition rights is, in the Court's view, an empty gesture. And, it comes into pay only after Mr. Epstein has fled the Court's jurisdiction. According to the Government, "The Department of Justice's Office of International Affairs is unaware of any country anywhere in the world that would consider an anticipatory extradition waiver binding. And, of course, the defendant could choose to flee to a jurisdiction with which the United States does not have an extradition treaty." Dkt. 11 at 7.

(4) Although the Defense has stated that Mr. Epstein would be agreeable to putting up "any amount" of collateral or signing "any bond" the Court would require, there has, to date,

30

Case 891830490 RMB bume201 Pile 0918/19 of 33

been no concrete pledge of any real assets or any concrete proposal to turnover deeds to real property, or to provide a specific amount of cash. See 7/15/19 Tr. at 50 ("I am authorized to say to the Court that whatever bond you want Mr. Epstein to sign, whether it's $100 million or an amount close to the amount of the assets that we have provided, Mr. Epstein is prepared to sign it.").

The Court, as noted, has no detailed information regarding the extent of the Defendant's assets, including the nature, value and location of all of his assets. There is no mention of any expenses, liabilities, or indebtedness. And, there has been no persuasive Defense counter to the Government's argument that "even were the defendant to sacrifice literally all of his current assets, there is every indication that he would immediately be able to resume making millions or tens of millions of dollars per year outside of the United States. He already earns at least $10,000,000 per year, according to records from Institution-I, while living in the U.S. Virgin Islands, traveling extensively abroad, and residing in part in Paris, France; there would be little to stop the defendant from fleeing, transferring his unknown assets abroad, and then continuing to do whatever it is he does to earn his vast wealth from a computer terminal beyond the reach of extradition." Dkt. 11 at 5 (emphasis omitted). The Defendant, it should also be noted, is already at risk of losing some of his real property because the Indictment contains a forfeiture allegation regarding any property that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the sex trafficking offenses and that includes, but it is not limited to, the property located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York.

(5) The appointment and role of "trustees" who will presumably live with Mr. Epstein and monitor his compliance with bail conditions are unacceptably vague. They do not, for example, address the conflict that is created by the salary the "trustees" are earning from the

31

Case 59100490 RMB 32º1Piled 64978/13ª 2 of 33 07/236

Defendant and their purported role as independent monitors. (The same problem arises in relation to private 24/7 security guards.) This is especially problematic where, as here, it is alleged that employees of the Defendant may have engaged in unlawful acts with and on behalf of the Defendant. According to the Government, "the defendant worked with others, including employees and associates who facilitated his exploitation of minors, by among other things, contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with the defendant, both in New York and in Florida." Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 2.

(6) "As a fall back," the Defense suggests the utilization of and the funding of a private security guard agency to "virtually guarantee" Mr. Epstein's presence in court and, presumably, also to supervise his behavior. This contingency plan is not a part of Mr. Epstein's 14 point proposal. Nevertheless, the Court is asked by the defense to "revisit" its legal viewpoint as expressed in an earlier decision concerning 24/7 private home security guards.

Each bail package in each case is considered and evaluated on its individual merits by the Court. And, in view of the Comi's finding of dangerousness, a new bail proposal likely would be futile. See, e.g., United Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 544 ("No conceivable conditions could ensure the safety of the community."); Orena, 986 F.2d at 632 ("We do not agree that the bail conditions set by the district court eliminate the danger to the community or are superior to detention for purposes of the Bail Reform Act."); United States v. Colombo, 777 F.2d 96, 100 (2d Cir. 1985) ("These conditions are clearly inadequate to protect the public from one found for bail purposes to be a danger to the community.").

32 32 22

Case 159100490 RMB 201Piled 04978/19ª³age 33 of 33 7/23

## Conclusion & Order

Based upon the forgoing, the Government's motion for remand (detention) is granted and the Defense motion for pretrial release is denied.

Dated: New York, New York
July 18,2019

RICHARD M. BERMAN, U.S.D.J.

33

Case 19-2221, Document 4-1, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page1 of 1

# United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007

ROBERT A. KATZMANN
CHIEF JUDGE

Date: July 23, 2019 Docket #: 19-2221 Short Title: United States of America v. Epstein

CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
DC Docket #: 1:19-cr-490-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)
DC Judge: Berman

## NOTICE OF RECORD ON APPEAL FILED

In the above referenced case the document indicated below has been filed in the Court.
[ ] Record on Appeal - Certified List
[ ] Record on Appeal - CD ROM
[ ] Record on Appeal - Paper Documents
[x] Record on Appeal - Electronic Index
[ ] Record on Appeal - Paper Index

Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to 212-857-8528.

Case 19-2221, Document 4-2, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page1 of 8

## CA02db Intake

| From:    | NYSD_ECF_Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov                                                                |
|-|-|
| Sent:    | Tuesday, July 23, 2019 9:05 AM                                                                 |
| To:      | NYSD CourtMail                                                                                 |
| Subject: | Activity in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB USA v. Epstein Appeal Record Sent to USCA - Electronic File |

## This is an automatic e‐mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e‐mail because the mail box is unattended.

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

## U.S. District Court

## Southern District of New York

## Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 7/23/2019 at 9:04 AM EDT and filed on 7/23/2019

Case Name: USA v. Epstein
Case Number: 1:19‐cr‐00490‐RMB
Filer:
Document Number: No document attached

## Docket Text:

Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files as to Jeffrey Epstein re: [34] Notice of Appeal were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd)

1:19-cr-00490-RMB-1 Notice has been electronically mailed to:

James L. Brochin jbrochin@brochinlawpllc.com

Marc Allan Fernich maf@fernichlaw.com, ggraham@fernichlaw.com

Michael Campion Miller mmiller@steptoe.com, bhamerschlag@steptoe.com, ehartman@steptoe.com,
ocorn@Steptoe.com

Reid Weingarten rweingarten@steptoe.com

Martin Gary Weinberg owlmgw@att.net, owlmcb@att.net

Alison Gainfort Moe alison.moe@usdoj.gov, CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, USANYS.ECF@USDOJ.GOV

Michael Gerard Scavelli mscavelli@steptoe.com, ehartman@steptoe.com, ocorn@steptoe.com

1

Case 19-2221, Document 4-2, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page2 of 8

Alex Rossmiller alexander.rossmiller@usdoj.gov, CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, USANYS.ECF@USDOJ.GOV Maurene Ryan Comey maurene.comey@usdoj.gov, CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, USANYS.ECF@USDOJ.GOV 1:19-cr-00490-RMB-1 Notice has been delivered by other means to:

2

Case 19-2221, Document 4-2, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page3 of 8

APPEAL,ECF

# U.S. District Court U.S. District Court

# Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:19−cr−00490−RMB All Defendants

Case title: USA v. Epstein

Date Filed: 07/02/2019

Assigned to: Judge Richard M.
Berman

## Defendant (1)

Jeffrey Epstein
also known as
Sealed Defendant 1

represented by

James L. Brochin
Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC)
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
212−378−7503
Email: jbrochin@brochinlawpllc.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Marc Allan Fernich
Law Office of Marc Fernich
810 Seveth Ave
Suite 620
New York, NY 10019
(212) 446−2346
Fax: (212) 446 2330
Email: maf@fernichlaw.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Martin Gary Weinberg
Martin G. Weinberg, PC
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
617−227−3700
Fax: 617−338−9538
Email: owlmgw@att.net
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Michael Campion Miller
Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC)
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
(212) 506−3900
Fax: (212) 506−3950
Email: mmiller@steptoe.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Michael Gerard Scavelli
Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC)
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
212−378−7538
Fax: 212−506−3950

Case 19-2221, Document 4-2, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page4 of 8

Email: mscavelli@steptoe.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Reid Weingarten
Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC)
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
(202)−506−3900
Fax: (212)−506−3950
Email: rweingarten@steptoe.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Retained

Pending Counts

18:371.F SEX TRAFFICKING
CONSPIRACY
(1)

18:1591.F SEX TRAFFICKING
OF CHILDREN OR BY FORCE,
FRAUD OR COERCION
(2)

## Disposition

Highest Offense Level (Opening)
Felony

Terminated Counts

None

None

Highest Offense Level
(Terminated)
None

Complaints

Disposition

Disposition

| Plaintiff   |                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-|-|-|
| USA         | represented by | Alex Rossmiller<br />U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of<br />New York<br />1 St. Andrew's Plaza<br />New York, NY 10007<br />(212)−637−2415<br />Email: alexander.rossmiller@usdoj.gov<br />LEAD ATTORNEY<br />PRO HAC VICE<br />ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED<br />Designation: Assistant US Attorney |
|             |                | Alison Gainfort Moe<br />United States Attorney's Office, SDNY<br />One Saint Andrew's Plaza<br />New York, NY 10007<br />(212)−637−2225                                                                                                                                                                  |

Case 19-2221, Document 4-2, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page5 of 8

Email: alison.moe@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Assistant US Attorney

Maurene Ryan Comey
United States Attorney's Office, SDNY
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
(212)−637−2324
Email: maurene.comey@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Designation: Assistant US Attorney

<table><tr><th>Date Filed</th><th>#</th><th>Docket Text</th></tr><tr><td>07/02/2019</td><td>2</td><td>SEALED INDICTMENT as to Sealed Defendant 1 (1) count(s) 1, 2. (jm) (Entered:
07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/03/2019</td><td>1</td><td>SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (mhe) (Entered: 07/03/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td>3</td><td>Order to Unseal Indictment as to Sealed Defendant 1. (Signed by Magistrate Judge
Henry B. Pitman on 7/8/19)(jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>INDICTMENT UNSEALED as to Jeffrey Epstein. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Case Designated ECF as to Jeffrey Epstein. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Case as to Jeffrey Epstein ASSIGNED to Judge Richard M. Berman. (jm) (Entered:
07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Attorney update in case as to Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Alex Rossmiller,Maurene Ryan
Comey,Alison Gainfort Moe for USA added. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. (Actual arrest date is 7/6/19 − Defendant arrested while
matter under seal) (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td>5</td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman:Initial
Appearance as to Jeffrey Epstein held on 7/8/2019. Defendant is present with attorney
Martin Weinberg; AUSA Rossmiller is also present. Defendant id detained until
continuation of detention hearing which is scheduled for 7/11/19 at 2:00 PM. (jm)
(Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman: As to
Jeffrey Epstein Detention Hearing set for 7/11/2019 at 02:00 PM before Judge Richard
M. Berman. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman:
Defendant is present with attorney Martin Weinberg; AUSA Rossmiller is also
present.Arraignment as to Jeffrey Epstein (1) Count 1,2 Jeffrey Epstein (1) Count 1,2
held on 7/8/2019., Plea entered by Jeffrey Epstein (1) Count 1,2 Jeffrey Epstein (1)
Count 1,2 Not Guilty. Conference before USDJ on 7/8/19. (jm) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard M. Berman: Status
Conference as to Jeffrey Epstein held on 7/8/2019. AUSAs Alex Rossmiller, Maurene
Comey and Alison Moe present; Also present is Special Agent Amanda Young and
Task Force Officer Paul Byrne; Defendant present with attorneys Martin Weinberg,
Reid Weingarten and Marc Fernich; US Pretrial Officers Keyana Pompey and Lea
Harmon present; initial conference held; defense bail submission is due on 7/11/19 at
12:00 noon; government reply by 7/12/19 at 5:00 pm; Bail hearing is scheduled for
7/15/19 at 10:00 am; See transcript of proceedings held for a complete record; Speedy
trial time is excluded for the reasons set forth on the record from 7/8/19 to 7/15/19
pursuant to 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B). (Bond Hearing set for 7/15/2019 at 10:00
AM before Judge Richard M. Berman) (Court Reporter Tom Murray) (ap) (Entered:
07/08/2019)</td></tr></table>

Case 19-2221, Document 4-2, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page6 of 8

<table><tr><th>07/08/2019</th><th></th><th>Attorney update in case as to Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Martin R. Weinberg, Reid
Weingarten, Marc Allan Fernich for Jeffrey Epstein added. (ap) (Entered: 07/08/2019)</th></tr><tr><td>07/08/2019</td><td></td><td>Attorney update in case as to Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Martin Gary Weinberg for
Jeffrey Epstein added. (bw) (Entered: 07/11/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/11/2019</td><td>6</td><td>LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid Weingarten
dated July 11, 2019 re: Pretrial Release . Document filed by Jeffrey Epstein.
| (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Weingarten, Reid) (Entered: 07/11/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/11/2019</td><td>7</td><td>MOTION to Seal Document . Document filed by Jeffrey Epstein. (Weingarten, Reid)
(Entered: 07/11/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/11/2019</td><td>8</td><td>LETTER RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge
Richard M. Berman from Alex Rossmiller dated July 11, 2019 re: 7 MOTION to Seal
Document .. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/11/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/11/2019</td><td>9</td><td>ORDER granting 7 Motion to Seal Document as to Jeffrey Epstein (1). Defense
motion granted. Materials to be hand delivered to Chambers (and opposing counsel) by
9:00 AM, July 12, 2019. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 7/11/2019) (clt)
(Entered: 07/12/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/12/2019</td><td>10</td><td>MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Jeffrey Epstein on re: 8 Response to Motion filed by
USA. ENDORSEMENT: Application for extension of time denied. (Hard to imagine it
would take the Govt extra time to review submission.) (Signed by Judge Richard M.
Berman on 7/12/2019)(clt) (Entered: 07/12/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/12/2019</td><td>11</td><td>LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge
Richard M. Berman from Alex Rossmiller dated July 12, 2019 re: 6 LETTER
MOTION addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid Weingarten dated July
11, 2019 re: Pretrial Release .. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit
3)(Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/12/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td>12 </td><td>FILING ERROR − DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY − MOTION for Martin G.
Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number
ANYSDC−17240904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's
Office staff. Document filed by Jeffrey Epstein. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1.
Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Exhibit 2. Proposed Text Order)(Weinberg, Martin)
Modified on 7/15/2019 (wb). (Entered: 07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td></td><td>&gt;&gt;&gt;NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC
VICE. Notice as to Jeffrey Epstein to RE−FILE Document No. 12 MOTION for
Martin G. Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number
ANYSDC−17240904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's
Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Pursuant to Rule
1.3. the Attorney Affidavit missing the language of disciplinary.;. Re−file the
motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice − attach the correct signed PDF −
select the correct named filer/filers − attach valid Certificates of Good Standing
issued within the past 30 days − attach Proposed Order.. (wb)(Entered:
07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td>13</td><td>MOTION for Martin G. Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting
papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jeffrey Epstein.
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Exhibit 2. Proposed
Text Order, # 3 Exhibit 3. Affidavit of Martin G. Weinberg)(Weinberg, Martin)
(Entered: 07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td></td><td>&gt;&gt;&gt;NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document
No. 13 MOTION for Martin G. Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and
supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been
reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) (Entered: 07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td>14</td><td>ORDER as to Jeffrey Epstein. The Clerk is respectfully requested to docket the
enclosed documents which were discussed at today's bail hearing. (Signed by Judge
Richard M. Berman on 7/15/19)(jw) (Entered: 07/15/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/15/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard M. Berman:Bail Hearing as
to Jeffrey Epstein held on 7/15/2019. AUSA Rossmiller, AUSA Moe, and AUSA</td></tr></table>

Case 19-2221, Document 4-2, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page7 of 8

|            |    | Comey present;Also present is FBI Special Agent Amanda Young and NYPD<br />Detective Paul Byrne present;Defendant present with attorneys Martin Weinberg, Reid<br />Weingarten, Marc Fernich, James Brochin; and Joseph Jaffe; USPO Pretrial Services<br />Officers Francesca Tessier−Miller, Bernisa Mejia and Dennis Khilkevich present; Also<br />present Court Reporter Kelly Surina present; supplemental submission(s) to be filed by<br />7/16/19 5:00 pm; ruling on bail hearing scheduled for 7/18/19 at 9:30 am. (jw)<br />(Entered: 07/15/2019)                                                      |
|-|-|-|
| 07/15/2019 | 15 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Alex Rossmiller<br />dated July 15, 2019 re: speedy trial time exclusion . Document filed by USA as to<br />Jeffrey Epstein. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/15/2019)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 07/16/2019 | 16 | MEMO ENDORSED granting 15 LETTER MOTION speedy trial time exclusion as to<br />Jeffrey Epstein (1)...ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed<br />by Judge Richard M. Berman on 7/16/19) (jbo) (Entered: 07/16/2019)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| 07/16/2019 | 17 | ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting 13 Motion for Martin G.<br />Weinberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Jeffrey Epstein (1). IT IS HEREBY<br />ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hae Vice in the<br />above−captioned matter in the United States District Court for the Southern District of<br />New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of<br />this Court, including the rules governing discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge<br />Richard M. Berman on 7/16/19) (jbo) (Entered: 07/16/2019)                                          |
| 07/16/2019 | 18 | TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Jeffrey Epstein re: Conference held on 7/8/19<br />before Judge Richard M. Berman. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Thomas Murray, (212)<br />805−0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through<br />the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript<br />Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due<br />8/6/2019. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/16/2019. Release of Transcript<br />Restriction set for 10/15/2019. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 07/16/2019)      |
| 07/16/2019 | 19 | NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Jeffrey Epstein. Notice is<br />hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/8/19 has<br />been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above−captioned matter. The parties<br />have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request<br />Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made<br />remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar<br />days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 07/16/2019)                |
| 07/16/2019 | 20 | TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Jeffrey Epstein re: Conference held on 7/8/19<br />before Judge Richard M. Berman. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante,<br />(212) 805−0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased<br />through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript<br />Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due<br />8/6/2019. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/16/2019. Release of Transcript<br />Restriction set for 10/15/2019. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 07/16/2019) |
| 07/16/2019 | 21 | NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Jeffrey Epstein. Notice is<br />hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/8/19 has<br />been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above−captioned matter. The parties<br />have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request<br />Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made<br />remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar<br />days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 07/16/2019)                |
| 07/16/2019 | 22 | FILING ERROR − DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY − RESPONSE in Support of<br />Motion by Jeffrey Epstein re: 6 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Richard M.<br />Berman from Reid Weingarten dated July 11, 2019 re: Pretrial Release ..Letter<br />Supplementing Bail Motion (Fernich, Marc) Modified on 7/17/2019 (ka). (Entered:<br />07/16/2019)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 07/16/2019 | 23 | LETTER by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from<br />Alison G. Moe dated July 16, 2019 re: Supplement to Detention Memorandum<br />Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Moe, Alison) (Entered:<br />07/16/2019)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

Case 19-2221, Document 4-2, 07/23/2019, 2614681, Page8 of 8

<table><tr><th>07/16/2019</th><th>24</th><th>LETTER RESPONSE in Support of Motion by Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge
Richard M. Berman from Marc Fernich dated 7/16/2019 re: 6 LETTER MOTION
addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid Weingarten dated July 11, 2019 re:
Pretrial Release .. Corrected Letter Supplementing Bail Motion (Fixes Formatting &amp;
Typographical Errors) (Fernich, Marc) (Entered: 07/16/2019)</th></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>25</td><td>LETTER by Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid
Weingarten dated July 17, 2019 re: Supplemental Bail Submission (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Weingarten, Reid) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>26</td><td>ORDER as to Jeffrey Epstein. The conference in this matter is rescheduled from 9:30
am on July 18, 2019 to 11:30 am on July 18, 2019. (Signed by Judge Richard M.
Berman on 7/17/19)(jbo) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td></td><td>Set/Reset Hearings as to Jeffrey Epstein: Bond Hearing set for 7/18/2019 at 11:30 AM
before Judge Richard M. Berman. (jbo) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>27</td><td>NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michael Campion Miller appearing for
Jeffrey Epstein. Appearance Type: Retained. (Miller, Michael) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>28</td><td>NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: James L. Brochin appearing for Jeffrey
Epstein. Appearance Type: Retained. (Brochin, James) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>29</td><td>NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michael Gerard Scavelli appearing for
Jeffrey Epstein. Appearance Type: Retained. (Scavelli, Michael) (Entered:
07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/17/2019</td><td>30</td><td>LETTER by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from
Alison Moe dated July 17, 2019 re: the defendant's foreign passport. Document filed
by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 07/17/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/18/2019</td><td>31</td><td>LETTER RESPONSE in Support of Motion by Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Judge
Richard M. Berman from Marc Fernich dated 7/18/2019 re: 6 LETTER MOTION
addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from Reid Weingarten dated July 11, 2019 re:
Pretrial Release .. (Fernich, Marc) (Entered: 07/18/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/18/2019</td><td></td><td>Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard M. Berman: Bond Hearing as
to Jeffrey Epstein held on 7/18/2019. AUSA Rossmiller, AUSA Moe and AUSA
Comey present; Also present is FBI Special Agent Amanda Young and NYPD
Detective Paul Byrne present; Defendant present with attorneys Martin Weinberg,
Marc Fernich, James Brochin and Michael Miller present; USPO Pretrial Services
Officer John Moscato present; Court Reporter Tom Murray present; Court denies bail;
Written order to follow; next conference is scheduled for July 31, 2019 at 11:00 am;
speedy trial time is excluded for the reasons set forth on the record from 7/18/19 to
7/31/19 pursuant to 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B). (jbo) (Entered: 07/18/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/18/2019</td><td>32</td><td>DECISION &amp; ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT as to Jeffrey Epstein. Based
upon the forgoing, the Government's motion for remand (detention) is granted and the
Defense motion for pretrial release is denied. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on
7/18/2019)(clt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/18/2019: # 1 Exhibit 1) (clt).
(Entered: 07/18/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/22/2019</td><td>33</td><td>SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (rz) (Entered: 07/22/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/22/2019</td><td>34</td><td>NOTICE OF APPEAL by Jeffrey Epstein from 32 Decision &amp; Order,. Filing fee $
505.00, receipt number 465401240399. (nd) (Entered: 07/23/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/23/2019</td><td></td><td>Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Jeffrey
Epstein to US Court of Appeals re: 34 Notice of Appeal. (nd) (Entered: 07/23/2019)</td></tr><tr><td>07/23/2019</td><td></td><td>Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal
Electronic Files as to Jeffrey Epstein re: 34 Notice of Appeal were transmitted to the
U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (Entered: 07/23/2019)</td></tr></table>

# Case 19-2221, Document 5, 07/24/2019, 2616528, Page1 of 1

## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL

Short Title: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein
Docket No.: 19-2221

Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel's Contact Information is as follows:

Name: Maureen Comey
Firm: United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Address: One St. Andrew's Plaza
Telephone: (212) 637-2324
Fax: (212) 637-2387
E-mail: maureen.comey@usdoj.gov

Appearance for: United States of America/Appellee
(party/designation)

Select One:
[ ] Substitute counsel (replacing lead counsel:<empty>)
(name/firm)

[ ] Substitute counsel (replacing other counsel:<empty>)
(name/firm)

[x] Additional counsel (co-counsel with: Sarah K. Eddy/U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York)
(name/firm)

[ ] Amicus (in support of :<empty>)
(party/designation)

## CERTIFICATION

I certify that:
[x] I am admitted to practice in this Court and, if required by Interim Local Rule 46.1(a)(2), have renewed my admission on N/A OR 
[ ] I applied for admission on <empty>.
Signature of Counsel: /s/Maureen Comey
Type or Print Name: Maureen Comey

# Case 19-2221, Document 6, 07/24/2019, 2616568, Page1 of 1

# NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL

Short Title: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein
Docket No.: 19-2221

Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel's Contact Information is as follows:

Name: Alison G. Moe
Firm: United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Address: One St. Andrew's Plaza
Telephone: (212) 637-2225 
Fax: <empty>
E-mail: alison.moe@usdoj.gov

Appearance for:
United States of America/Appellee (party/designation)

Select One:
[ ] Substitute counsel (replacing lead counsel: <empty>)
(name/firm)

[ ] Substitute counsel (replacing other counsel: <empty>)
(name/firm)

[x] Additional counsel (co-counsel with: Sarah K. Eddy/U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York)
(name/firm)

[ ] Amicus (in support of : <empty>)
(party/designation)

## CERTIFICATION

I certify that:
[x] I am admitted to practice in this Court and, if required by Interim Local Rule 46.1(a)(2), have renewed my admission on:<empty> OR 
[ ] I applied for admission on:<empty>.

Signature of Counsel: /s/ Alison G. Moe
Type or Print Name: Alison G. Moe

Case 19-2221, Document 9, 08/05/2019, 2624202, Page1 of 1

## ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Short Title: United States of America v. Epstein
Docket No.: 19-2221

Lead Counsel of Record (name/firm) or Pro se Party (name): Reid Weingarten / Steptoe & Johnson LLP

Appearance for (party/designation): Defendant - Appellant Jeffrey Epstein

## DOCKET SHEET ACKNOWLEDGMENT/AMENDMENTS

Caption as indicated is:
[x] Correct
[ ] Incorrect. See attached caption page with corrections.

Appellate Designation is:
[x] Correct
[ ] Incorrect. The following parties do not wish to participate in this appeal:
Parties: <empty>

[ ] Incorrect. Please change the following parties' designations:
Party: <empty>
Correct Designation: <empty>

Contact Information for Lead Counsel/Pro Se Party is:
[x] Correct
[ ] Incorrect or Incomplete. As an e-filer, I have updated my contact information in the PACER "Manage My Account" screen.

Name:<empty>
Firm:<empty>
Address:<empty>
Telephone:<empty> 
Fax:<empty>
Email:<empty>

## RELATED CASES

[x] This case has not been before this Court previously.
[ ] This case has been before this Court previously. The short title, docket number, and citation are:<empty>

[ ] Matters related to this appeal or involving the same issue have been or presently are before this Court. The short titles, docket numbers, and citations are:<empty>

## CERTIFICATION

I certify that 
[x] I am admitted to practice in this Court and, if required by LR 46.1(a)(2), have renewed my admission on <empty> OR that 
[ ] I applied for admission on <empty> or renewal on <empty> . If the Court has not yet admitted me or approved my renewal, I have completed Addendum A.
Signature of Lead Counsel of Record: /s/ Reid Weingarten
Type or Print Name: Reid Weingarten

OR

Signature of pro se litigant: <empty>
Type or Print Name: <empty>

[ ] I am a pro se litigant who is not an attorney.
[ ] I am an incarcerated pro se litigant.

Case 19-2221, Document 10, 08/05/2019, 2624204, Page1 of 1

# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

CRIMINAL APPEAL TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION - FORM B

## TO BE COMPLETED BY ATTORNEY:

TO BE COMPLETED BY ATTORNEY.
CASE NAME: United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein
DOCKET NUMBER: 19-2221
COUNSEL'S NAME: Reid Weingarten
COUNSEL'S ADDRESS: Steptoe & Johnson LLP
1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036
COUNSEL'S PHONE: 212-506-3900

## QUESTIONNAIRE

[ ] I am ordering a transcript.
[x] I am not ordering a transcript. Reason:
[x] Daily copy available 
[ ] U.S. Atty. placed order
[ ] Other (attach explanation)

## TRANSCRIPT ORDER

Prepare transcript of:
[ ] Pre-trial proceedings: <empty> (Description & Dates)
[ ] Trial: <empty> (Description & Dates)
[ ] Sentencing: <empty> (Description & Dates)
[ ] Post-trial proceedings: <empty> (Description & Dates)

I, <empty>, hereby certify that I will make satisfactory arrangements with (counsel's name)

the court reporter for payment of the costs of the transcript in accordance with FRAP 10(b).
Method of payment:
[ ] Funds
[ ] CJA Form 24
Counsel's Signature:<empty>
Date:<empty>

## TO BE COMPLETED BY COURT REPORTER AND FORWARDED TO COURT OF APPEALS:

## ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Date order received: <empty>
Estimated Number of Pages: <empty>

Estimated completion date: <empty>

Court Reporter's Signature: <empty>
Date: <empty>

Attorney(s): Send completed form to the U.S. District Court as that court may require and send copies to the Court of Appeals, U.S. Attorney’s Office, and Court Reporter.

Court Reporter(s): Send completed acknowledgement to the Court of Appeals Clerk.

Case 19-2221, Document 12, 08/05/2019, 2624335, Page1 of 2

# United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

# Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse

# 40 Foley Square

# New York, NY 10007

ROBERT A. KATZMANN
CHIEF JUDGE

Date: August 05, 2019 Docket #: 19-2221 Short Title: United States of America v. Epstein

CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
DC Docket #: 1:19-cr-490-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)
DC Judge: Berman

## NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING

On August 5, 2019 the notice of additional counsel, on behalf of the appellant, was submitted in the above referenced case. The document does not comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules for the following reason(s):

[ ] Failure to submit acknowledgment and notice of appearance (Local Rule 12.3)
[ ] Failure to file the Record on Appeal (FRAP 10, FRAP 11)
[ ] Missing motion information statement (T-1080 - Local Rule 27.1)
[ ] Missing supporting papers for motion (e.g., affidavit/affirmation/declaration) (FRAP 27)
Insufficient number of copies (Local Rules: 21.1, 27.1, 30.1, 31.1)
[ ] Improper proof of service (FRAP 25)
Missing proof of service
[ ] Served to an incorrect address
[ ] Incomplete service (Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738 (1967))
Failure to submit document in digital format (Local Rule 25.1)
[x] Not Text-Searchable (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2), click here for instructions on how to make PDFs text searchable
[ ] Failure to file appendix on CD-ROM (Local Rule 25.1, Local Rules 25.2)
[ ] Failure to file special appendix (Local Rule 32.1)
[ ] Defective cover (FRAP 32)
[ ] Incorrect caption (FRAP 32)
Wrong color cover (FRAP 32)
[ ] Docket number font too small (Local Rule 32.1)
[ ] Incorrect pagination, click here for instructions on how to paginate PDFs (Local Rule 32.1)
[ ] Incorrect font (FRAP 32)
[ ] Oversized filing (FRAP 27 (motion), FRAP 32 (brief))
[ ] Missing Amicus Curiae filing or motion (Local Rule 29.1)
[ ] Untimely filing

Case 19-2221, Document 12, 08/05/2019, 2624335, Page2 of 2

[ ] Incorrect Filing Event
[ ] Other: <empty>

Please cure the defect(s) and resubmit the document, with the required copies if necessary, no later than August 7, 2019. The resubmitted documents, if compliant with FRAP and the Local Rules, will be deemed timely filed.

Failure to cure the defect(s) by the date set forth above will result in the document being stricken. An appellant's failure to cure a defective filing may result in the dismissal of the appeal.

Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to 212-857-8528.

Case 19-2221, Document 13, 08/05/2019, 2624379, Page1 of 1

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL

Short Title: United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein
Docket No.: 19-2221

Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel’s Contact Information is as follows:
Name: Martin G. Weinberg
Firm: Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.
Address: 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000, Boston, MA 02116
Telephone: (617) 227-3700 
Fax: (617) 338-9538
E-mail: owlmgw@att.net

Appearence for: Jeffrey Epstein / Defendant-Appellant
(party/designation)
Select One:
[ ] Substitute counsel (replacing lead counsel:<empty> )
(name/firm)
[ ] Substitute counsel (replacing other counsel:<empty> )
(name/firm)
[x] Additional counsel (co-counsel with: Reid Weingarten / Steptoe & Johnson LLP )
(name/firm)
[ ] Amicus (in support of:<empty> )
(party/designation)

## CERTIFICATION

I certify that:
[x] I am admitted to practice in this Court and, if required by Interim Local Rule 46.1(a)(2), have renewed my admission on 07/29/2019 OR 
[ ] I applied for admission on <empty>.
Signature of Counsel: /s/ Martin G. Weinberg
Type or Print Name: Martin G. Weinberg

# Case 19-2221, Document 16, 08/05/2019, 2624675, Page1 of 1

# NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL

Short Title: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein
Docket No.: 19-2221

Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel’s Contact Information is as follows:
Name: Alex Rossmiller
Firm: United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Address: One St. Andrew's Plaza
Telephone: (212) 637-2415
Fax: (212) 637-2443
E-mail: Alexander.Rossmiller@usdoj.gov
Appearance for: United States of America/Appellee
(party/designation)
Select One:
[ ] Substitute counsel (replacing lead counsel: <empty> )
(name/firm)
[ ] Substitute counsel (replacing other counsel: <empty> )
(name/firm)
[x] Additional counsel (co-counsel with: Sarah K. Eddy/U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York )
(name/firm)
[ ] Amicus (in support of : <empty> )
(party/designation)

## CERTIFICATION

I certify that:
[x] I am admitted to practice in this Court and, if required by Interim Local Rule 46.1(a)(2), have renewed my admission on:<empty> OR 
[ ] I applied for admission on:<empty>.

Signature of Counsel: /s/ Alex Rossmiller
Type or Print Name: Alex Rossmiller

Case 19-2221, Document 18, 08/20/2019, 2637473, Page1 of 1

# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

Appeal No. 19-2221-cr

V.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN

Defendant-Appellant

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by counsel for Jeffery Epstein, Defendant

Appellant, and the United States of America, Appellee, that, pursuant to Federal

Rule of Appellate Procedure 42, this appeal shall be dismissed with prejudice. The

parties understand and agree that, once dismissed, the appeal may not be reinstated.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that neither party shall be entitled to recover costs, expenses or fees from the other party.

EXECUTED on August 20, 2019.

Isl  Reid Weingarten
Reid Weingarten
Martin G. Weinberg
Counsel to Defendant- Appellant 
Jeffrey Epstein

<signature>
Alex Rossmiller
Counsel to Appellee
United States of America

Case 19-2221, Document 22, 08/21/2019, 2637824, Page1 of 1

# United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse

40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007

ROBERT A. KATZMANN
CHIEF JUDGE

Date: August 21, 2019 Docket #: 19-2221cr Short Title: United States of America v. Epstein

CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CLERK OF COURT
DC Docket #: 1:19-cr-490-1
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK
CITY)
DC Judge: Berman

## NOTICE OF CASE MANAGER CHANGE

The case manager assigned to this matter has been changed.

Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to 212-857-8534.

Case 19-2221, Document 23, 08/21/2019, 2637827, Page1 of 1

# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT

At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 21st day of August, two thousand and nineteen,

United States of America,

ORDER
Docket No.: 19-2221

Appellee,

V.

Jeffrey Epstein, AKA Sealed defendant 1,
Defendant - Appellant.

The parties in the above-referenced case have filed a stipulation withdrawing this appeal pursuant to FRAP 42.

The stipulation is hereby "So Ordered".

For The Court:
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe,
Clerk of Court

<signature>

Case 19-2221, Document 24, 08/21/2019, 2637838, Page1 of 1

## MANDATE

# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT

At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 21st day of August, two thousand and nineteen,

United States of America,

ORDER
Docket No.: 19-2221

Appellee,

V.

Jeffrey Epstein, AKA Sealed defendant 1,
Defendant - Appellant.

The parties in the above-referenced case have filed a stipulation withdrawing this appeal pursuant to FRAP 42.

The stipulation is hereby "So Ordered".

For The Court:
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe,
Clerk of Court

SECOND
Catherinepan Wolfe CIRCUIT

A True Copy

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe-Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Mandate issued on 08/21/2019.
documents/doj-ff665d9bdb1ffbb2.pdf
{}