document_description: Financial statements for Scarborough Group of Companies Corp for the year ended December 31, 2010, including statements of revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, and equity on a cash basis.


source: doj

document_description: The document contains a detailed investor redemption schedule for D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P. and Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, LP. It includes investor types, investment vehicles, current capital balances, fund ownership percentages, and potential redemptions over various dates. The document is marked confidential and includes multiple tables with financial data.


document_description: The document is a development permit application for a project on Little St. James Island, St. Thomas, USVI. The application is submitted by Jaredian Design Group on behalf of Nautilus Inc., with Jeffrey Epstein as the president. The project involves the replacement of an existing maintenance building and the construction of a new building for equipment and storage. The application includes zoning requirements, proof of legal interest, and certifications of good standing and tax clearance.


document_description: DP World, a major container terminal operator, reported strong interim results for H1 2012, with increases in turnover, operating income, and net profit. The company attributed its success to handling larger containerships efficiently, focusing on emerging markets, and improving productivity. Despite global economic challenges, DP World outperformed industry volume growth and maintained a strong balance sheet, allowing for future investments. The company handled 28.2 million TEU, a 7.5% increase from the previous year, and saw a 14% rise in non-container revenue. EBITDA income rose by 11% to USD672 million, and profit before tax increased by 12% to USD310 million. DP World remains optimistic about its diverse portfolio's ability to continue outperforming the market.


document_description: Invoice from Christie's to J Epstein & Co for the purchase of a diamond ring. The total purchase price is $1,216,000.00 with a sales tax applicable. Payment is due within seven calendar days after the sale.


document_description: This guide provides information for businesses and individuals regarding the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). It is prepared by the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Enforcement Division of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The guide is non-binding, informal, and summary in nature, and does not constitute rules or regulations. It covers topics such as anti-bribery and accounting provisions, the definition of a 'foreign official', proper and improper gifts, travel and entertainment expenses, facilitating payments, successor liability, corporate compliance programs, and types of civil and criminal resolutions available in the FCPA context.


document_description: The Virgin Islands Port Authority approved Thomas World Air, LLC's request to lease space at Cyril E. King Airport, St. Thomas, VI. The lease includes the middle bay of the General Aviation Hangar and unimproved land for a fuel truck. Conditions for self-fueling and construction costs are outlined.


document_description: An event at Joel Pashcow's residence featuring the USA Olympic Synchronized Swimming team members Mary Killman and Maria Koroleva, with a performance and meet-and-greet.


document_description: This document is a legal request from Jeffrey Epstein to Bradley J. Edwards for the production of documents related to Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards. It includes definitions, instructions, and specific requests for documents supporting Edwards' counterclaims, including damages to reputation, interference in professional relationships, and financial losses.


document_description: This document is the Sixth Amended and Restated Voting Agreement for ALIPHCOM, a California corporation, involving key holders and investors. It outlines the voting rights and obligations of the parties, including the election of directors, drag-along rights, and other governance matters. The agreement includes provisions for the appointment of directors by various preferred stockholders and the conditions under which shares can be transferred or sold. It also addresses the rights of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. as a purchaser of Series 6-A Preferred Stock.


document_description: A letter from Darren K. Indyke, PLLC, notifying the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services about the creation of a new website related to Jeffrey Epstein by a third-party Internet reputation management service. The letter also mentions the purchase of a 2013 Ford Expedition EL for use by Epstein in New Mexico.


document_description: The Federal Election Commission (FEC) notified Jeffrey Epstein of a complaint received against him, indicating potential violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. The complaint is numbered MUR 6921. Epstein is given the opportunity to respond within 15 days to demonstrate why no action should be taken. The letter outlines the confidentiality of the matter and the process for responding, including the option to designate legal counsel.


document_description: A letter from Darren K. Indyke to the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services regarding the registration of Jeffrey Epstein as a sex offender. It informs about a new Yelp account created by a third-party internet reputation management service for Epstein.


document_description: A letter from Darren K. Indyke to the United States Department of Homeland Security regarding a misunderstanding with the Teterboro, New Jersey office of United States Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) concerning the arrival of Aircraft N212JE. The letter details the incident, the procedures followed by the pilot Lawrence Visoski, and requests clarification on federal statutes and regulations applicable to private aircraft traveling between the United States Virgin Islands and the continental United States.


document_description: This document is a preliminary invoice from Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation to Hyperion Air, Inc. for maintenance and repair services performed on a Gulfstream GIIB aircraft with tail number N909JE. The invoice details labor, parts, and services provided, along with associated costs. The work order includes various inspections, repairs, and compliance with maintenance procedures as per FAA regulations.


document_description: This document is a submission by Kenneth W. Starr to the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It argues against federal prosecution of Epstein, citing new evidence from alleged victims that undermines the federal case. The submission discusses the Petite Policy, relevant federal statutes, and the lack of federal interest in the case. It also highlights procedural issues and prosecutorial misconduct by federal authorities.


document_description: A proposal prepared by Pure Logic Clean Energy Systems for Jeffrey Epstein for a solar PV system on Little Saint James Island. The proposal outlines the benefits, system details, cost analysis, and environmental impact of installing a solar energy system. It includes financial analysis, project schedule, and a letter of intent for the solar installation agreement.


document_description: This agreement between Partners Management Group, Inc. (PMG) and an unnamed Owner outlines the terms for PMG to act as a purchasing agent for the renovation of the Residences at 301 East 66th Street. PMG will source and procure Furnishings, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E) for the project, manage contracts, and oversee installation. The agreement details the scope of work, fees, termination conditions, and general provisions.


document_description: The document is a diagram of a cable's cross-section, detailing its components and specifications. It includes information on the overall diameter, outer layer, armor, bedding, core, fillers, inner conductors/elements, insulation layers, and shields. The document also provides approximate weights in air and salt water.


document_description: A detailed schedule outlining the daily duties of a Certified Household Manager from 9:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday to Friday. Tasks include delivering newspapers, checking emails, feeding pets, administrative duties, household errands, and supporting meal preparation.


document_description: The court order re-schedules a hearing on motions related to discovery and privilege issues in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, et al. The hearing is set for July 13, 2011, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse.


document_description: The deposition of Elise Hubsher covers her work history, her role in the Zwirn fund, and interactions with investors, including Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses the fund's redemption policies, investor communications, and specific disputes with investors like Jeffrey Epstein and the Fine family.


document_description: This document is a plat map showing the boundary survey of Lot 51 and parts of Lot 52 and Lot 53. It includes details of structures and features on the lots, boundaries, measurements, and survey notes. The survey was certified by Clyde O. McNeal, Professional Surveyor and Mapper.


document_description: A sample daily schedule for a housekeeper, detailing tasks from morning to evening, including pet care, cleaning, and meetings with the CHM.


document_description: A letter from David J. Mitchell of Park Partners to a partner, discussing the finalization of plans for a building permit, filing an Offering Plan with the Attorney General of New York, and updates on the construction progress at 320 East 82nd Street. The letter includes information about the kitchen designs from Arcliner and mentions a sidewalk wrap advertisement for the building.


document_description: A letter from David J. Mitchell to a partner informing about the closure of a property at 320 East 82 Street, New York. The letter discusses the delays due to the seller's not-for-profit status, the future plans for the property as a residential condominium, and the upcoming demolition and construction plans. Preliminary floor plans and pricing are included, along with a mention of the Second Avenue Subway completion.


document_description: Invoice for a 6-week film and high-definition course in Paris, France, starting on July 13, 2014. The total tuition balance due by June 13, 2014, is $4,950.00, with an initial payment of $50.00 received. Additional fees include application, tuition, equipment, and international student fees. Payment instructions provided for checks, money orders, and bank transfers.


document_description: Receipt for a registered class at New York Film Academy in Paris, France, for July 2014. Total cost is $5,000.00 with a $50.00 payment made via credit card, leaving a balance of $4,950.00.


document_description: Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. requests Jack Scarola to cancel a hearing scheduled for June 9, 2011, and suggests it be heard on July 13, 2011, along with other pending discovery and privilege issues.


document_description: Re-notice of hearing for the case involving Jeffrey Epstein as the plaintiff and Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. as defendants. The hearing is scheduled for July 13, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. before Judge David F. Crow at the Palm Beach County Courthouse. The specific matter to be heard is Epstein's response to Edwards' request for production served on April 15, 2011. The document includes a certification of an attempt to resolve the discovery dispute without a hearing.


document_description: A legal request for production of documents directed to Jeffrey Epstein by Bradley J. Edwards, seeking documents related to claims against Edwards and any knowledge of Scott Rothstein's fraudulent activities.


document_description: The document contains a reference number EFTA01080973 but lacks additional context or content to classify it into a specific category or extract further details.


document_description: This document is a re-notice for the video deposition of AJ DiScala in the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. The deposition is scheduled for May 12, 2011, at Dewey LeBoeuf in New York. The deponent is instructed to bring all documents listed in Schedule A, which includes correspondence, contracts, and notes related to investment opportunities in claims or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein. The deposition is for discovery and potential use at trial.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein requests Bradley J. Edwards to produce documents related to public statements about Epstein's criminal activity, and documents supporting Edwards's position on Epstein's Fifth Amendment rights.


document_description: Bradley J. Edwards, a defendant, provides notice that answers to interrogatories from Jeffrey Epstein have been furnished. The document includes details of alleged abuse of process by Epstein and the damages claimed by Edwards.


document_description: This document is a specification and quotation for a 34' PackMan Landing Craft for HBRK Associates Inc. It includes detailed specifications of the craft's design, construction, and equipment, as well as pricing and warranty information.


document_description: This document is a transcript of a court hearing in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. The hearing took place on September 28, 2011, before the Honorable David F. Crow at the Palm Beach County Courthouse. The primary focus of the hearing was on a Motion to Dismiss and a Motion for Punitive Damages. The transcript includes arguments from both sides regarding the alleged misconduct of Scott Rothstein in a Ponzi scheme and the involvement of Bradley J. Edwards. The discussion also covers the abuse of process claims and the litigation privilege.


document_description: This document is a transcript of a hearing in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. The hearing took place on September 28, 2011, at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, presided over by Circuit Judge David Crow. The proceedings involved discussions on amending complaints, malicious prosecution claims, and the potential for punitive damages. Attorneys Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Christopher E. Knight, and Jack Scarola were present representing the parties.


document_description: This document is a transcript of a court hearing in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. The hearing, presided over by Judge David F. Crow, addresses motions including a Motion to Dismiss and a Motion for Punitive Damages. The discussion involves allegations of a Ponzi scheme, abuse of process, and the litigation privilege. The court examines the legitimacy of claims and the potential for punitive damages, with arguments presented by attorneys Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Christopher E. Knight, and Jack Scarola.


document_description: This document is an 'AS IS' Residential Contract for Sale and Purchase approved by the Florida Realtors and the Florida Bar. It outlines the agreement between Florence M. McNiff (Seller) and a redacted Buyer for the sale of a property located in Palm Beach County, Florida. The purchase price is $130,000 with specific terms for deposits, closing costs, and other conditions. The contract includes a condominium rider and provisions for financing, inspections, and dispute resolution.


document_description: This document is a legal notice for the deposition of Donnie Ingram, scheduled for July 6, 2011, at Atlantic Reporting. The deposition requires the deponent to bring documents related to services rendered at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL, or for the benefit of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger. The notice is part of a case involving Jeffrey Epstein as the plaintiff against Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. as defendants.


document_description: A 35-year-old woman describes her daily routine, her family, and her professional life. She is married to a man who runs a big investment bank and they live in a penthouse in Soho. She works as the chairperson of the United Nations Social, Humanitarian Cultural Affairs Committee and is also involved in modeling and writing. The narrative includes details about her upcoming travel plans, including a visit to an island for Jeffrey's 67th birthday and a trip to Italy for a second honeymoon. The document mentions several public figures and celebrities, as well as flight and travel information.


document_description: An estimate from T & P Pavers Inc. for a project in Palm Beach, FL, involving concrete removal and installation, with a total estimated cost of $186,960.00. The document includes terms and conditions related to permits, deviations from plans, and responsibilities.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, the plaintiff, through his counsel, serves answers to expert interrogatories and requests to produce expert reports to defendant Bradley J. Edwards. The document includes a certificate of service and responses to the expert interrogatories, indicating no experts have been retained at this time.


document_description: This document is a legal notice for the deposition of Christopher J. Schmidt, scheduled for July 7, 2011, at 10:00 AM. The deposition is related to services rendered at or near 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL, for the benefit of Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger. The notice includes a subpoena duces tecum, requiring the deponent to bring specific documents to the deposition.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, the plaintiff, filed a motion for a protective order to reschedule the deposition of Robert Critton due to scheduling conflicts of his counsel. The deposition was initially set for January 10, 2011, but Epstein's counsel is unavailable due to other trials. The motion requests the court to prevent the deposition from occurring on the scheduled date and to reschedule it at a mutually convenient time.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, the plaintiff, files a motion to take judicial notice of certain court records in response to a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Bradley J. Edwards. Epstein argues that the court should take notice of records from related cases to support his opposition to the summary judgment. The motion includes a request for the court to access records via PACER and offers to provide certified copies if necessary.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein opposes Bradley J. Edwards' motion for summary judgment and moves to strike unauthenticated exhibits and attachments. Epstein argues that discovery has been stalled due to the inability to obtain documents from the trustee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler, which is in bankruptcy. The document discusses the legal standards for summary judgment, the premature nature of the motion due to incomplete discovery, and the inapplicability of the 'sword and shield' doctrine. It also addresses the issue of adverse inferences from Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment.


document_description: The court grants Jeffrey Epstein's motion to appoint commissioners in New York and Illinois for depositions in the case against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards.


document_description: The document provides detailed specifications, leasing information, and cost evaluations for a 1990 Gulfstream G-IV aircraft. It includes technical specifications, avionics, special features, interior and exterior details, and cost evaluations for variable and fixed costs associated with operating the aircraft. The document also includes performance comparisons and technical drawings of the aircraft.


document_description: The court addresses Jeffrey Epstein's motion for a protective order regarding the disclosure of certain documents. The motion is granted in part and denied in part. The court requires that any correspondence intended for public disclosure be filed under seal and a ruling obtained before disclosure. The court denies Epstein's request to declare the correspondence privileged and prohibit its disclosure in two proceedings.


document_description: The United States of America, as the respondent, filed a motion requesting a seven-day extension to complete responses to a request for production. The motion cites the need to review a large volume of documents and potential privileges. The motion was filed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter A. Lee.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 respond to the Government's motion to dismiss their case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. They argue that the Government and Epstein conspired to enter into a secret non-prosecution agreement violating their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). They seek to invalidate the agreement and request various remedies, including a declaration of the agreement's illegality, an order for the Government to confer with them, and an investigation into the CVRA violations.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 filed a protective motion to compel the Government to comply with their discovery requests. They request the Government to produce initial disclosures, answers to requests for admission, and all relevant documents not subject to privilege within 14 days. A privilege log is also requested for documents claimed as privileged.


document_description: The court addressed various motions in the case involving Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 against the United States. The petitioners' protective motion was denied without prejudice, the intervenors' motion to strike was denied as moot, and the petitioners' sealed motion was also denied as moot. The petitioners' motion to compel discovery from the government was granted, with specific instructions for the government to file answers, produce documents, and handle privilege claims within specified timeframes.


document_description: The document is a legal response from the United States to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's request for admissions regarding the Crime Victims Rights Act in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. It details the government's admissions and denials to various requests, including the handling of victim notifications and the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 oppose Jeffrey Epstein's third motion for limited intervention regarding grand jury materials, arguing it is untimely and unsupported by facts. They highlight Epstein's history of delayed interventions and the potential prejudice and delay his intervention could cause.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 filed a protective petition for the release of grand jury materials relevant to their petition for enforcement of their CVRA rights. The petition is made to ensure proper procedure under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(F) and addresses a discovery dispute regarding the release of grand jury materials. The victims argue they have established particularized needs and compelling reasons for the release through various pleadings.


document_description: The U.S. government requests an additional two weeks to file a declaration supporting the deliberative process privilege due to the federal government shutdown and furloughs affecting key officials. The motion is unopposed by the petitioners' counsel.


document_description: This document is a declaration by Robin C. Ashton, Counsel of the Office of Professional Responsibility, U.S. Department of Justice, regarding the invocation of the deliberative process privilege for certain documents related to the case Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States. The declaration describes the nature of the documents withheld and the basis for asserting the privilege.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 filed a reply supporting their motion for an order directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to withhold relevant evidence. They argue that the Government's privilege log is inadequate, the CVRA requires the production of withheld documents, and they have a right to access documents supporting their position. The reply addresses the Government's response and highlights inadequacies in the privilege log, the CVRA's best efforts requirement, and the victims' right to fairness under the CVRA.


document_description: Petitioners Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, along with movants Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, oppose Alan Dershowitz's motion for limited intervention in a Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) action. Dershowitz seeks to intervene to strike allegations made by Jane Doe #3, claiming they are false and harm his reputation. The response argues that Dershowitz has no direct interest in the case that would justify intervention, as he has other forums to address reputational concerns, such as a pending defamation action. The document also details the background of the case, including the Government's handling of the non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and the involvement of other notable figures.


document_description: The United States, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña, filed a notice of its Privilege Log in compliance with a court order. The documents are submitted for in camera review by Judge Kenneth A. Marra.


document_description: This document is a supplemental privilege log related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, detailing various documents, emails, and notes that are protected under attorney-client privilege, work product, and other legal privileges. It includes communications between attorneys and other legal professionals regarding plea agreements, non-prosecution agreements, and other legal strategies. Notable figures mentioned include A. Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, J. Lefkowitz, and others involved in the legal proceedings.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, through their counsel, request the court to allow a standard briefing schedule and page limits to respond to the Government's privilege assertions. They argue for a 20-page motion to compel, a 20-page response from the Government, and a reply from the victims, due to the complexity and volume of the documents involved. The Government has asserted multiple privileges over 13,000 pages of documents, and the victims need more than the currently allowed seven pages to address these issues. The motion also discusses the need for a reply brief due to the lack of detailed privilege logs from the Government.


document_description: The document is a legal opposition filed by the United States government against a motion by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 to compel the production of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The government argues that the documents are protected by various privileges, including attorney-client privilege, work-product doctrine, law enforcement investigative privilege, and deliberative process privilege. The document also discusses the applicability of the Privacy Act in the context of court-compelled disclosures.


document_description: Declaration by FBI Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, known as Operation Leap Year. The document details the investigation process, the sensitive nature of the information collected, and the potential harm of disclosing personal information of victims and investigative methods.


document_description: Declaration by FBI Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, known as Operation Leap Year. The document details the investigation process, the sensitive nature of the information collected, and the potential harm of disclosing personal information of victims.


document_description: The document is a legal filing by the United States Attorney's Office opposing a motion by petitioners Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. The motion seeks an order directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to withhold relevant evidence. The opposition argues that the government has properly invoked applicable privileges, including attorney-client and work product privileges, and that there is no fiduciary exception or due process right under the CVRA that would compel the government to disclose the documents. The filing includes references to privilege logs and specific requests for production of documents.


document_description: The document is a notice of filing by the United States of America, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter A. Lee, submitting the Declaration of United States Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer in support of the government's assertion of the deliberative process privilege.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, through their counsel, reply to the Government's opposition to their motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Government. They argue that the protective order lacks good cause, the Government has provided inaccurate information with Epstein's attorneys' aid, and the order burdens their legal consultations.


document_description: The court addresses multiple motions related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the case involving Jeffrey Epstein. The court grants in part the motion for finding violations of the CVRA, determining that the CVRA can apply before formal charges are filed. The court denies the motion to have plaintiffs' facts accepted and reserves ruling on the motion to direct the U.S. Attorney's Office not to withhold evidence. Bruce E. Reinhart's motion to intervene is denied.


document_description: The court addresses several motions related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the case involving Jeffrey Epstein. The court grants in part the motion for finding violations of the CVRA, determining that the CVRA can apply before formal charges are filed. The court denies the motion to have plaintiffs' facts accepted and reserves ruling on the motion to direct the U.S. Attorney's Office not to withhold evidence. Bruce E. Reinhart's motion to intervene is denied.


document_description: The court denies the government's motion to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lifts the stay of discovery. The case involves petitioners Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 seeking to vacate a non-prosecution agreement between the USAO/SDFL and Jeffrey Epstein under the CVRA. The court finds that the CVRA authorizes the setting aside of a non-prosecution agreement if entered in violation of the CVRA conferral rights. The court also rejects the government's arguments regarding standing and ripeness, allowing the case to proceed.


document_description: Alan M. Dershowitz seeks to intervene in the case to strike allegations made against him in a Joinder Motion by Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, which he claims are false and defamatory. The motion argues that the allegations are irrelevant to the case's main issue regarding the U.S. government's duty to confer with plaintiffs before entering a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. Dershowitz seeks intervention to protect his reputation and requests a show cause order against the attorneys who made the allegations.


document_description: Alan M. Dershowitz declares under penalty of perjury that he never had any sexual contact with Jane Doe #3, refuting allegations made against him. He provides details of his visits to Epstein's properties and flights, asserting the impossibility of the alleged encounters. Dershowitz accuses Jane Doe #3 and her lawyers of making false claims and questions their investigation into her credibility.


document_description: This document is a declaration by an anonymous victim of Jeffrey Epstein, detailing her experiences of being trafficked for sexual purposes by Epstein and his associates. It includes descriptions of her recruitment, the abuse she suffered, and her fear of Epstein and his powerful connections. The declaration also mentions Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and the victim's interactions with the FBI.


document_description: Jane Doe 3 provides a detailed account of her experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, including sexual abuse, fear of powerful connections, and attempts to escape. She describes Epstein's connections with influential figures, his use of blackmail, and her eventual escape to Thailand and Australia. The declaration also covers her interactions with law enforcement and her desire to join a legal case against Epstein.


document_description: Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 filed a reply in support of their motion to join an existing action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21. They argue that the Government's objections based on statutes of limitations are unfounded and that their joinder would not duplicate efforts but rather consolidate the pursuit of justice for all victims involved. The document discusses the applicability of the CVRA and other legal statutes, and counters the Government's technical objections to the motion for joinder.


document_description: The United States opposes the motion by Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 to amend their petition to add Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 as petitioners in the CVRA proceedings. The opposition argues that the CVRA does not allow for the addition of new parties, and that the motion is untimely and would prejudice the government. The document discusses the legal framework of the CVRA, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the implications of adding new petitioners. It also addresses the statute of limitations and the specific circumstances of Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4.


document_description: The respondent, represented by Wilfredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney, filed a motion to seal their opposition to the petitioners' motion to compel answers to supplemental requests for admission and requests for production. The motion involves a non-party, and the respondent requests it be filed under seal pending the court's decision on the petitioners' motion to temporarily seal.


document_description: The Respondent filed an unopposed motion to amend the scheduling order due to the absence of co-counsel, requesting new dates for filing motions and responses related to summary judgment.


document_description: The United States opposes the petitioners' motion for depositions of government witnesses in the case involving Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 against the United States. The opposition argues that the petitioners have already engaged in extensive discovery and that there is no authority for conducting depositions in this CVRA litigation. The document discusses the background of the case, the lack of authority for depositions, and specific reasons why depositions of certain government officials should not be permitted.


document_description: Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, through their counsel, withdraw their motion for depositions of government witnesses with the agreement of the Government. The withdrawal is without prejudice to re-filing after the Government responds to a forthcoming summary judgment motion.


document_description: This memorandum opinion addresses the scope and applicability of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) of 2004, specifically whether the rights it guarantees are available before formal charges are filed and after charges are dismissed. It concludes that the rights are guaranteed from the initiation of criminal proceedings and cease if charges are dismissed or declined. The opinion discusses the statutory definition of 'crime victim,' the nature of the rights, and the legislative history, emphasizing that the rights are intended to apply during pending criminal proceedings. It also addresses the enforcement mechanisms and the role of the Attorney General in promulgating regulations to enforce these rights.


document_description: The court denied the government's motion to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lifted the stay of discovery. The case involves petitioners Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 seeking to vacate a non-prosecution agreement between the USAO/SDFL and Jeffrey Epstein under the CVRA. The court found that the CVRA authorizes the setting aside of a non-prosecution agreement if entered in violation of the CVRA conferral rights. The court also rejected the government's arguments on standing and ripeness, allowing the case to proceed.


document_description: Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 filed a motion to compel the U.S. Government to provide answers to discovery requests related to Alan Dershowitz, one of Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys. The motion argues that the discovery requests are relevant to proving the Government's motive for concealing a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) from the victims and that Dershowitz's involvement could demonstrate a conflict of interest and unfair treatment of the victims. The motion also discusses the potential for Dershowitz to have been a co-conspirator in Epstein's crimes, which would be relevant to the case.


document_description: A. Marie Villafana, an Assistant United States Attorney, provides a declaration regarding the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein by the FBI, detailing the victim notification process, the plea agreement with Epstein, and the rights of the victims under federal law. The declaration addresses the involvement of victims C.W., T.M., and S.R., and the legal proceedings related to Epstein's offenses.


document_description: Jane Doe 3 provides a declaration detailing her experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, including abuse and interactions with powerful individuals. She describes her fear of Epstein and his connections, her escape to Thailand, and subsequent life in Australia. She also discusses her interactions with the FBI and her desire to join a legal case to enforce her rights as a victim.


document_description: This document is a legal response filed by Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 opposing Alan M. Dershowitz's motion for limited intervention. The response argues that Dershowitz has not provided evidence to refute allegations made by Jane Doe No. 3 that he sexually molested her. Despite Dershowitz's public claims of having proof, he has not submitted any documents to the court. The response also addresses Dershowitz's claims of prejudice due to the timing of the allegations and his failure to produce evidence in a related defamation case.


document_description: The United States opposes Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's motion to supplement authorities, arguing that a letter from the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility does not constitute authority to compel the U.S. Attorney's Office to provide evidence in their CVRA lawsuit. The letter from OPR declined to investigate claims of improper influences in the non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, stating that such issues should be addressed in court. The opposition argues that the court is not the platform to review the Executive Branch's discretion in the agreement.


document_description: The document is a legal reply from the United States government, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter A. Lee, addressing the petitioners' response to the government's motion for leave to file relevance objections to the petitioners' first request for production of documents. The government argues that its relevance objections are timely and categorical, asserting that the requested documents are irrelevant to the case. The document emphasizes the government's position on the irrelevance of certain categories of documents and requests the court to allow the filing of these objections.


document_description: Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 file a notice of intent to comply with a court order directing them to file an unredacted motion and correspondence in the public court file. The notice addresses Jeffrey Epstein's motion for a protective order and recounts the legal background leading to the court's directive.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 filed a motion alleging violations of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The motion argues that the victims were not informed about a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein and were denied their rights to confer with prosecutors and to be treated with fairness. The motion seeks a court finding of these violations and a hearing on appropriate remedies. The document includes detailed factual assertions about Epstein's criminal activities and the government's handling of the case.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 filed a motion to compel the U.S. Government to produce court-ordered discovery related to their case alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The motion highlights the Government's delay tactics and refusal to comply with discovery obligations, which have hindered the victims' ability to proceed with their case. The victims request a prompt court ruling to enforce discovery compliance.


document_description: The court denied the government's motion to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The case involves petitioners Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 seeking to vacate a non-prosecution agreement between the USAO/SDFL and Jeffrey Epstein under the CVRA. The court found that the CVRA authorizes the setting aside of a non-prosecution agreement if entered in violation of the CVRA. The stay of discovery was lifted.


document_description: The court grants the petitioners' motion requiring the government to file redacted pleadings in the public court file, with exceptions for grand jury materials and victim information. The government must redact and re-file documents within ten days. The Clerk is directed to unseal the government's opposition to the motion.


document_description: Bruce E. Reinhart replies to the plaintiffs' response to his motion to intervene or for a sua sponte Rule 11 order. He argues that the plaintiffs' allegations against him are irrelevant and seeks sanctions for these claims. Reinhart asserts that his intervention is justified under Rule 24(b) due to the attack on his reputation and that the plaintiffs' arguments against his standing are incorrect. He also addresses the plaintiffs' claims of untimeliness and their request for his deposition as premature.


document_description: The United States, as the respondent, requests a one-week extension to comply with a court order to file redacted copies of sealed pleadings in the public portion of the court file. The motion is unopposed by the petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. The extension is sought to avoid contravening a sealed order by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 respond to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for limited intervention at the remedy stage of the proceedings. They do not oppose the intervention but note three consequences: Epstein would be subject to the law of the case, potential discovery requests, and his intervention would be limited to the rescission of the non-prosecution agreement. The response also references previous interventions by Epstein and the court's siding with the victims on the rescission of the non-prosecution agreement as a remedy for CVRA violations.


document_description: This document is a legal filing by the United States requesting a dismissal of petitioners' claims due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The United States argues that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the petitioners lack Article III standing and the claims are not constitutionally ripe. The document discusses the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and the petitioners' inability to seek rescission of the agreement or civil remedies under the CVRA.


document_description: The United States of America, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter A. Lee, moves to seal its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The motion contains information from West Palm Beach Federal Grand Jury proceedings, which are protected under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6. The court had previously allowed limited disclosure of this information but required filings to be sealed.


document_description: The United States moves to seal its Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling upon Respondent's Motion to Dismiss due to the inclusion of information from grand jury proceedings, which are protected under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6. The court had previously allowed limited disclosure of such information under seal.


document_description: The United States moves to seal its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction due to the inclusion of information from grand jury proceedings, which are protected under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6. The court had previously allowed limited disclosure of such information but required filings to be sealed.


document_description: The United States, as the respondent, filed an unopposed motion seeking permission to file a 24-page opposition to the petitioners' motion to amend their petition and add additional petitioners, exceeding the standard 20-page limit.


document_description: The document is a legal motion filed by the United States, requesting the court to stay discovery in the case involving Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 against the United States. The motion argues that the petitioners' requests for documents exceed the scope of the court's authorization for limited discovery related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) claim. The motion also seeks to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, arguing that the petitioners lack standing and that the claims are not ripe. The document includes a detailed list of discovery requests made by the petitioners, which the respondent claims are overbroad and burdensome.


document_description: Jane Doe, a victim of federal crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein, petitions for enforcement of her rights under the Crime Victim's Rights Act (CVRA). The petition argues that her rights to confer with prosecutors and be informed of proceedings have been denied, and seeks court intervention to ensure these rights are respected before any plea agreement is reached.


document_description: The Respondent, represented by Dexter A. Lee, Assistant U.S. Attorney, filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file a declaration supporting the invocation of the deliberative process privilege. The motion seeks an additional seven days, until September 20, 2013, for the U.S. Attorney to complete the review and file the declaration. The petitioners do not oppose this motion, and the government also requests an extension for the petitioners' reply deadline to September 30, 2013, if the motion is granted.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 respond to the motion for protective orders filed by defense attorneys Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz, and intervenor Jeffrey Epstein. The response argues against the application of Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and a proposed 'common law privilege' to protect plea bargaining correspondence from discovery. The document also addresses the Government's claim of work product protection over the correspondence.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 filed a notice in response to the administrative order closing their case under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) against the U.S. Attorney's Office. They allege their rights were violated by not being informed of a plea agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. They request the case be reopened and a scheduling conference be set.


document_description: A packing bill from Camard Packers Shippers for services provided to Jeffrey Epstein, including packing, insurance, and airfreight to New York. The total amount in Euros is 2,133.00.


document_description: A detailed cleaning task sheet outlining the cleaning process for a room, including time allocations and products used for each task.


document_description: This document is a legal notice filed by Bradley J. Edwards, through his counsel, indicating that answers to Jeffrey Epstein's third set of interrogatories have been provided. The document includes detailed responses to the interrogatories, objections based on work-product privilege, and mentions of damages claimed by Edwards due to Epstein's actions. It also includes a certification of service to all counsel involved.


document_description: This document is a title commitment for a property located at 1986 Tigris Dr, West Palm Beach, FL 33411. It outlines the requirements and exceptions for insuring the title, including payment of consideration, recording of mortgage/deed, discharge of liens, and submission of a satisfactory survey. It also lists exceptions related to defects, liens, encumbrances, and rights not shown by public records. The document includes a legal description of the property and notes on potential revenue bond charges and arbitration clauses.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal response to Bradley J. Edwards' request for production of documents, highlighting objections and referencing related exhibits and motions.


document_description: The court denied the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Bradley J. Edwards against Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, citing that summary judgment is premature due to incomplete discovery and pending issues regarding work product and privilege.


document_description: The court addressed various motions related to the deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, including a request for an update deposition and motions to impose sanctions. The court allowed the deposition on specific issues but denied the motion to compel and impose sanctions. The court also discussed the distinction between different types of work product in discovery.


document_description: The document is a legal notice for a Rule 2004 examination of the corporate representative of Qtask, Inc. by Herbert Stettin, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. The examination will cover financial affairs, investments, and money transfers related to Qtask. The examination is scheduled for September 20, 2011, and documents must be produced by September 16, 2011.


document_description: Promotional document for Midnight Express boats, showcasing different boat types and optional equipment.


document_description: The document is a floor plan with dimensions, detailing the layout of a room. It includes the overall dimensions of the room, key areas such as the entry door, windows, and bed location, as well as a highlighted area with specific measurements.


document_description: The document is a floor plan with dimensions and features of a room. It includes an entry door, two wardrobes with specified dimensions, and windows along one side.


document_description: This document is a legal notice from Jeffrey Epstein propounding his third set of interrogatories to Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case. It includes detailed instructions and definitions for answering the interrogatories, which cover topics such as damages, reputation, professional relationships, legal fees, and more. The document also includes a certificate of service and a section for notarization.


document_description: This document is a legal notice for the deposition of several individuals, including Ghislaine Maxwell, Howard Rubenstein, Ava Cordero, and Alan Dershowitz, as part of the case Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and others. The depositions are scheduled to take place in New York City, NY, on January 23-24, 2012. The notice is certified by Jack Scarola, attorney for Bradley J. Edwards.


document_description: The affidavit details the attempts by investigators from Alpha Group Investigations to serve subpoenas on Jeffrey Epstein and others at various New York addresses. The document outlines the dates, times, and outcomes of each attempt, including interactions with doormen and other individuals at the locations. Despite multiple attempts, the subpoenas were often left with doormen or taped to doors when the individuals were not present.


document_description: The document is an attachment to Jeffrey Epstein's sexual offender registration form, listing his automobiles, boats, aircraft, telephone numbers, email addresses, and internet accounts. It includes detailed information about his vehicles, boats, aircraft tail numbers, and associated airports. It also lists various email addresses and internet accounts related to Jeffrey Epstein and his foundation.


document_description: A letter from Financial Trust Company, Inc. and Jeepers, Inc. requesting an order to compel the Zwirn Entities to produce documents related to internal investigations and tax opinions. The letter argues the relevance of these documents to FTC's breach of fiduciary duty claims and discusses the waiver of privilege by the Zwirn Entities.


document_description: This document is a settlement agreement and release between Fancelli Paneling, Inc., Jean Pierre Fancelli, L.S.J., LLC, and Jeffrey Epstein. It resolves disputes related to cabinetry work on Little St. James Island and a lawsuit pending in the Virgin Islands. The agreement outlines the obligations of Fancelli to complete certain work to Epstein's satisfaction, after which all claims related to the disputes and lawsuit will be released. The agreement includes confidentiality clauses and stipulates that it does not constitute an admission of liability by any party.


document_description: A letter from Darren K. Indyke addressing issues with the construction of pools on Little St. James Island, demanding compensation for defective work and threatening legal action.


document_description: This document is a settlement agreement and release between Fancelli Paneling, Inc., Jean Pierre Fancelli, L.S.J., LLC, and Jeffrey Epstein. It addresses disputes related to cabinetry work on Little St. James Island and a lawsuit pending in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The agreement outlines the terms for settling the disputes and the lawsuit, including obligations for Fancelli to complete certain work and mutual releases of claims. The agreement also includes confidentiality provisions and stipulates that it does not constitute an admission of liability by any party.


document_description: This document is a notice of hearing and a motion to compel in the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards. The hearing is set before Judge David F. Crow in Palm Beach County, Florida. The motion seeks to compel the production of documents and determine if privilege claims by Edwards are waived. The document outlines various requests for production and objections raised by Edwards, including claims of attorney-client privilege and relevance objections.


document_description: This letter agreement outlines the terms under which Jeffrey Epstein, on behalf of Southern Trust Company, Inc., will provide financial estate planning and structuring services to Leon Black. The agreement specifies the services to be provided, the annual fees, additional considerations, confidentiality clauses, and other legal terms. It includes provisions for the event of death or conviction of either party and details the proprietary rights and indemnification clauses.


document_description: A letter from Lankler Siffert & Wohl LLP to Judge Anthony J. Carpinello regarding the case Fortress VRF I LLC & Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC v. Jeepers, Inc. The letter requests permission to question Jeffrey Epstein about his sexual misconduct during a deposition and to compel him to produce related documents. The letter cites Epstein's recent statements and ongoing investigations as reasons for the request.


document_description: Summary of the Judah 2009 Investment Trust Agreement dated August 13, 2009, creating the Judah 2009-A Investment Trust (2009 GRAT). The document outlines the terms, dispositive provisions, trustees, grantor trust status, and governing law of the 2009 GRAT. It includes details on annuity payments, property distribution, and trustee roles.


document_description: A letter from Lankler Siffert & Wohl LLP to Judge Anthony J. Carpinello regarding the deposition of Glenn Dubin in the case Fortress VRF I LLC and Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC v. Jeepers, Inc. The letter discusses the need for Mr. Dubin's deposition and the refusal of Jeepers to produce him, despite his involvement in the case through an affidavit. The letter requests an order to compel Jeepers to produce Mr. Dubin for deposition.


document_description: This document provides the specifications for a 40' LSJ boat model proposed for Mr. Epstein by the manufacturer Novurania. It includes dimensions, engine details, and layout views.


document_description: Invoice for various marketing courses and materials from Cambridge Professional Academy, including seminars and modules with a 10% discount applied. Payment by instalments is available.


document_description: The document outlines the proposed protocols for the second deposition of Scott Rothstein in the bankruptcy case of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler. It addresses administrative issues, pre-deposition preparations, and the use of the first deposition transcript. The protocols include the appointment of defense lawyers, formulation of universal deposition questions, cost responsibilities, and rules for conducting the deposition. It also specifies the handling of transcripts and media access.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, seeks an order to compel Bradley Edwards to produce documents listed in a privilege log, or alternatively, to provide a compliant privilege log. Epstein argues that Edwards' privilege log fails to meet legal requirements, resulting in a waiver of claimed privileges. The motion also requests attorney's fees and costs.


document_description: The document contains a reference number 'EFTA01082255' but lacks additional context or content to classify it into a specific category or extract further information.


document_description: The document contains a reference number 'EFTA01082256'. No additional context or content is provided.


document_description: This document is a Motion for Protective Order filed in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and another individual. The motion seeks to prevent the depositions of private investigators involved in the case against Epstein, citing work-product privilege. The motion details the background of the case, including Epstein's previous guilty plea to felony charges related to sexual abuse of minors, and the subsequent civil complaints filed against him. It also discusses the dissolution of the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and the allegations against Scott Rothstein.


document_description: This document is a legal filing in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. It involves a case where Jeffrey Epstein is the plaintiff against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards. The document is a supplement to Bradley Edwards' proffer in support of a motion for leave to amend to assert a claim for punitive damages. It includes responses to requests for production and objections based on work product privilege.


document_description: The court granted Jeffrey Epstein's motion for leave to use documents produced under a confidentiality agreement. The order was issued by Circuit Judge David F. Crow and signed by Judge Meenu T. Sasser.


document_description: The court denied Jeffrey Epstein's amended motion for a protective order relating to extra judicial statements, served on May 2, 2011, without prejudice.


document_description: The document is an interim report filed by Special Master Robert B. Carney in the bankruptcy case of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. It discusses the progress made in the case, including issues with the Privilege Log and recommendations for future actions. The report highlights the need for an in camera inspection of documents and suggests involving state court Judge Crow to avoid conflicting orders between state and bankruptcy courts.


document_description: The court denied Bradley J. Edwards' motion for leave to assert a claim for punitive damages without prejudice.


document_description: The court granted Bradley J. Edwards' motion to dismiss Jeffrey Epstein's amended complaint. Epstein has 30 days to serve another amended complaint.


document_description: This document is a combined closing statement for a property transaction involving Great Saint Jim, LLC as the buyer. The settlement was conducted by Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC in St. Thomas, VI. The contract sales price was $22,500,000.00, with additional buyer's expenses totaling $443,600.00. The seller's expenses were $381,250.00. The buyer's total cash at settlement was $20,693,600.00, and the seller received $19,868,750.00 after deductions. The document includes details of commissions, title charges, and government recording and transfer charges.


document_description: The document is an investor redemption schedule for D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P., detailing various investors, their current capital balance, and fund ownership percentages. It includes confidential information and redacted sections.


document_description: The document is a promotional description of a Bell 427 VFR helicopter available from Aero Toy Store. It includes details about the helicopter's serial number, total time, landings, engines, avionics, additional equipment, and interior features. The document emphasizes that the specifications are introductory and not warranties, advising potential buyers to conduct their own inspections. It also mentions that any transaction is subject to contract execution.


document_description: This document includes a letter from Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. to Jack Scarola requesting an extension to serve the Second Amended Complaint in the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards. It also contains a Notice of Hearing, a Motion for Enlargement of Time, and an Agreed Order granting the extension.


document_description: A table listing various tools with their respective numbers and descriptions.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, filed a motion to compel the production of documents from Bradley J. Edwards and to amend a protective order related to a subpoena to the Bankruptcy Trustee. The motion outlines Epstein's requests for documents, objections raised by Edwards, and the need for discovery to address claims made by Edwards in his Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion seeks to obtain communications involving Epstein and various legal and governmental entities, arguing that these documents are necessary for Epstein's defense.


document_description: This document is a re-notice for the deposition of Donnie Ingram, scheduled for September 7, 2011, at Atlantic Reporting in Port St. Lucie, FL. The deposition is related to services rendered at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL, for Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger. The document includes a duces tecum request for documents related to the services performed.


document_description: This document is a legal notice for the deposition of representatives from The Wackenhut Corporation regarding services rendered at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL, for Jeffrey Epstein and/or Jack Goldberger. The deposition is scheduled for September 6, 2011, at 10:00 AM. The notice includes a request for documents related to the services provided.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards alleging abuse of process and conspiracy related to a Ponzi scheme and legal actions against Epstein. The complaint details the misuse of civil process, including unreasonable discovery and unfounded allegations, to further a Ponzi scheme and obtain investments. It also mentions the involvement of numerous attorneys and investigators in the Epstein Actions and the improper use of legal processes to pressure settlements.


document_description: The document contains notes to the consolidated financial statements of Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC as of December 31, 2010. It discusses tax positions, withdrawals and distributions, use of estimates, and accounting pronouncements. The document also includes a consolidated statement of assets, liabilities, and members' equity.


document_description: This document is a deposition transcript involving Daniel B. Zwirn, discussing various emails and financial issues related to his management company. The deposition covers topics such as early withdrawal of management fees, interfund transfers, and the purchase of a condo at 50 Central Park South. It also touches on the involvement of legal counsel and internal investigations.


document_description: The court grants motions for a second deposition of Scott Rothstein, involving multiple parties including Jeffrey Epstein. The deposition will be conducted via video conference over ten days, without videotaping. The court addresses objections regarding participation and time limits for questioning Rothstein.


document_description: A series of invoices from Mahler Enterprises, Inc. to Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities for various billable expenses related to searches and advertising. The invoices cover expenses for personal assistant searches, ranch couple searches, and ranch manager searches, with advertising on platforms like LinkedIn, Experience.com, and various job boards. The invoices are dated between June and August 2013, with amounts ranging from $571.65 to $3,231.91.


document_description: Notice of Unavailability filed by attorney Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. for Jeffrey Epstein, indicating unavailability from August 20, 2011, to September 1, 2011, and requesting no actions requiring responses during this period.


document_description: Letter from Dominick D. Barbieri of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP to Daniel E. Reynolds of Lankier Siffert & Wohl LLP, enclosing documents in response to a subpoena related to the case Fortress VRF I LLC v. Jeepers, Inc. The documents are designated as 'Confidential' under a confidentiality agreement.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys, including Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, and Martin G. Weinberg, filed a motion to prevent the release of correspondence between the defense team and federal prosecutors regarding a nonprosecution agreement. The motion argues that releasing these documents would undermine plea negotiations. The alleged victims, Jane Doe I and II, claim they were not informed of the agreement and seek to invalidate it under the Crimes Victims Rights Act. The U.S. attorney's office contends the law does not apply as no federal charges were filed. The article also discusses the involvement of Prince Andrew and the actions of former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta.


document_description: Bradley J. Edwards supplements his previously filed Motion to Dismiss Jeffrey Epstein's Second Amended Complaint and Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages. The document discusses the application of absolute immunity and litigation privilege in judicial proceedings.


document_description: This document is a HUD-1 Settlement Statement detailing the financial transactions involved in a property settlement in Palm Beach. It includes the gross amounts due from the borrower and to the seller, adjustments for taxes, and various settlement charges. The document is signed by representatives of Palm Springs of the Palm Beaches, LLC and Hardman Development Corp, and prepared by Lighthouse Title Services, Inc.


document_description: Four former associates of Scott Rothstein have been charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with Rothstein's $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme. The defendants, Howard Kusnick, Stephen Caputi, William Corte, and Curtis Renie, allegedly helped further the scheme through various fraudulent activities, including creating fake bank statements and websites. If convicted, they face up to five years in prison.


document_description: The document discusses the reasons DBZ initially decided not to disclose management fee and plane expense issues to investors. It outlines the internal discovery of these issues, the immateriality of the amounts involved, and the corrective actions taken, including personnel changes.


document_description: The document is a permit application for renewing an existing dock on Great St. James Island, USVI. It includes details about the applicant, property owner, and proposed activities to bring the dock into compliance. The application is for a minor coastal zone permit, and the document includes various forms, affidavits, and approvals from the Department of Planning and Natural Resources.


document_description: This document is an Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated February 4, 2016, between Erika Kellerhals and Poplar, Inc. Kellerhals assigns her 100% Membership Interest in Great Saint Jim, LLC to Poplar, Inc. The agreement includes the transfer of rights, title, and interest, and the assumption of duties and obligations by Poplar, Inc. Jeffrey Epstein signs as President of Poplar, Inc.


document_description: A motion filed by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 seeking a finding of violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and requesting a hearing on appropriate remedies.


document_description: A letter from Brad Edwards and Jay Howell to Ann Marie C. Villafana, AUSA, urging the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein for his crimes against underage girls. The letter emphasizes the inadequacy of Epstein's state court sentence and the need for federal prosecution to prevent further abuse.


document_description: The letter from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida notifies Brad Edwards, Esq. about the identified victim in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It discusses Epstein's guilty plea to state charges and the deferral of federal prosecution. The letter outlines the rights of victims under Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and provides instructions for filing a claim against Epstein.


document_description: This document is a Mutual Nondisclosure Agreement between Coinbase Global, Inc. and an unnamed Investor, effective November 10, 2014. It outlines the terms under which both parties agree to share confidential information for a business opportunity, including definitions of confidential information, exceptions, nonuse and nondisclosure obligations, maintenance of confidentiality, and other legal provisions. The agreement is governed by the laws of the State of California and includes arbitration clauses for dispute resolution.


document_description: This document includes a court order and subpoena related to the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L. M. The order, issued by the Supreme Court of the State of New York, directs A.J. DiScala to appear and testify in a deposition on February 22, 2011, at the law offices of Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP in New York. The subpoena is part of a legal action pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida.


document_description: The document is a preliminary prospectus supplement for The Gabelli Utility Trust, detailing an offering of % Series C Cumulative Preferred Shares with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. The prospectus outlines the terms of the preferred shares, including dividend rates, redemption options, and investment objectives. It also discusses the risks associated with investing in the Fund, including market price risk, liquidity risk, and interest rate risk. The document provides information on the Fund's investment strategy, management, and financial highlights, as well as legal and tax considerations for potential investors.


document_description: The document is a letter to the Limited Partners of D.B. Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, L.P., detailing proposed amendments to the Partnership Agreement and Confidential Memorandum. It outlines changes requiring consent, such as investment program updates, withdrawal request adjustments, management fees, and tax allocations. It also lists changes made by the General Partner that do not require consent, including updates to reflect a name change, management fee changes, and tax obligations. The letter requests partners to review the amendments and return a consent form by May 27, 2005.


document_description: The letter provides an overview of Boothbay Absolute Return Strategies Fund's performance for Q4 2014, reporting a net return of 1.88%. It discusses the fund's strategy of maintaining a low-risk profile while building a diversified portfolio with non-correlated teams. The letter highlights the fund's performance against market indices, the onboarding of new trading teams, and operational changes including a switch in administrators. It also mentions an upcoming networking event for emerging managers.


document_description: The petition for writ of certiorari filed on January 15, 2013, is denied on the merits by the court.


document_description: Proposal from Michael J. Glidden to Gary Kerney of LSJ, LLC for electrical services related to a heli-pad and 5-Palms project. The proposal includes labor and installation details, with costs broken down for each project.


document_description: This document is a sales analysis for Freedom Air International Inc. regarding the S-76C+ helicopter with Tail # N162AD. It details the purchase and sale amounts, expenses paid by Freedom Air International and George, and the net gain on sale. The document includes specific expenses such as pilot services, legal expenses, maintenance, and insurance costs.


document_description: A letter of intent from JEGE, Inc. to sell a Boeing 727-31 aircraft to Jetran, LLC for $1,500,000. The letter outlines the terms of the sale, including a refundable deposit, inspection rights, and conditions for closing the sale. The aircraft is identified by its serial number and registration number N908JE.


document_description: A letter from Darren K. Indyke on behalf of JEGE, LLC to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Private Aircraft Support, requesting clarification on clearance and arrival procedures for private aircraft N212JE owned by JEGE, LLC. The letter seeks a standing letter from DHS to ensure compliance with procedures for flights between the continental U.S. and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as from foreign airports.


document_description: This document is a transcript of a court hearing held on May 25, 2010, in the 15th Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. The hearing was presided over by Honorable Donald Hafele and involved two cases against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs, represented by Bradley J. Edwards, filed a motion to compel responses to their first request to produce documents. The defense, represented by Michael J. Pike, argued against the motion citing work-product privilege and Fifth Amendment rights. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs for certain documents, while upholding the work-product privilege for others.


document_description: A letter from Darren K. Indyke regarding the registration of Jeffrey Epstein as a sex offender in New York. It informs about the issuance of a new U.S. passport to Epstein and includes a confirmation section for Epstein to sign.


document_description: This document provides detailed specifications and inspection status for a 1997 Gulfstream V aircraft, S/N 507, N507DW. It includes information on the aircraft's total time and landings, engine details, avionics, options, exterior and interior features, and inspection status.


document_description: This letter agreement outlines the terms under which Jeffrey Epstein, on behalf of Southern Trust Company, Inc., will provide proprietary financial estate planning and structuring services to Leon Black. The agreement specifies the services to be provided, the fee structure, confidentiality clauses, and conditions related to the death or conviction of either party. It also includes indemnification clauses and proprietary rights related to the services.


document_description: A letter from Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to Hon. Anthony J. Carpinello regarding a legal dispute involving VRF I LLC and Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC against Financial Trust Company, Inc. and Jeepers, Inc. The letter argues against FTC's requests for documents related to internal investigations and a tax opinion, citing privilege and irrelevance.


document_description: This document is a Departure Progress Billing from Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation for services accomplished at their facility. It includes details of estimated costs for freight, labor, material, and services, along with the total amount due. Payment terms and conditions are outlined, including progress payment schedules and interest on past due amounts.


document_description: The document is a special resolution for the change of company name from Aviation Environmental Recycling Company Limited to AERCO Logistics Limited, signed by directors J R Barrett-Jolley and M H A Canne.


document_description: A document listing various influential families and organizations associated with the Illuminati, as well as members of the Trilateral Commission. It includes references to the Rockefeller family's influence and other related topics.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, files a motion for attorneys' fees against Bradley Edwards, citing §57.105 of the Florida Statutes. Epstein argues that Edwards's counterclaims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution are meritless and warrant sanctions. The motion references Florida's litigation privilege, which provides absolute immunity for actions related to judicial proceedings, and argues that Edwards's claims are not supported by material facts or existing law. The motion includes legal precedents and asserts that Edwards failed to withdraw his claims despite being given a chance to do so.


document_description: A motion filed by the defendant seeking sanctions against the plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, and his counsel, arguing that the claims were not supported by material facts or existing law.


document_description: This document is a sale listing for a Gulfstream G-V aircraft with registration number N521HN. The aircraft was delivered in 1999 and is maintained under FAR Part 135. It is listed for sale with immediate status as of July 7, 2011. The aircraft features include a Collins Pro Line 4 avionics suite, entertainment system, and various business equipment. The aircraft is managed by EU C Aircraft Management Company and is not leased.


document_description: A fax from Bill W. Whaley, Vice President of HydroGeologic Services, Inc., to Brice at Cypress, Inc. The document is a request for bids for a production well with a 6-inch casing. It includes a detailed table of bid items with estimated quantities, unit prices, and total prices.


document_description: The document contains subpoenas issued to various entities associated with Jeffrey Epstein, including J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc., J. Epstein & Company, Inc., Epstein Interests, and Financial Trust Company, Inc. The subpoenas request the production of documents and electronic information related to appointments, communications, and financial transactions from January 1, 2003, to the present. The subpoenas are part of a grand jury investigation and are issued by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida.


document_description: Invoice for expert work performed by Daniel Strachman for the case Fortress Verf I LLC and Fortress Value Recovery vs. Jeepers Inc. Total amount due is $10,312.50 after retainer.


document_description: This letter from Troutman Sanders LLP, representing Jeffrey Epstein, objects to an arbitration demand by Sitrick and Company. The letter argues that the arbitration demand is based on a 2005 Consulting Agreement that has long since expired and does not cover the 2011 publicity work Sitrick claims to have performed. The letter requests the dismissal or stay of the arbitration until a court rules on its validity.


document_description: Notice of hearing for arbitration between Sitrick and Company, a division of Sitrick Brincko Group, LLC, and Jeffrey Epstein. Scheduled for August 20, 2012, at the American Arbitration Association before Hon. James M. Slater.


document_description: Acknowledgment of receipt of a letter from Mr. Rinehart and request for comments from Mr. Green regarding the arbitration case between Sitrick and Company and Jeffrey Epstein. Confirmation of preliminary hearing and scheduling order, with details on deposit payments and administrative fees.


document_description: The American Arbitration Association acknowledges receipt of a letter from Vincent S. Green regarding the case between Sitrick and Company and Jeffrey Epstein. The matter is placed in abeyance pending a Court Order.


document_description: A letter from Darren K. Indyke, representing Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC, to Warwick Wicksman of Gensler. The letter addresses the failure of Gensler to perform contracted architectural and design services for projects on Little St. James Island, despite receiving substantial payments. Indyke demands a refund of $100,000 and threatens legal action if not repaid within ten days.


document_description: Invoice for expert work in the case Fortress Vert I LLC and Fortress Value Recovery vs. Jeepers Inc. JAMS Ref. No: 1425006537, billed to Harry Susman of Susman & Godfre.


document_description: This document is a deposition of Scott Rothstein taken in the case of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Case Number 09-34791-BKC-RBR. The deposition covers Rothstein's involvement in a Ponzi scheme, the structure and operations of his law firm RRA, and his interactions with various individuals and entities. Rothstein discusses the formation and management of RRA, the Ponzi scheme's operations, and his cooperation with authorities. He also addresses his criminal activities, the involvement of others, and his motivations for returning from Morocco to face charges.


document_description: The document outlines the amended and restated bylaws of AliphCom, a California corporation. It includes details on the corporation's offices, corporate seal, shareholders' meetings and voting rights, board of directors, officers, contracts, loans, bank accounts, checks, drafts, certificates for shares, inspection of corporate records, indemnification, right of first refusal, loans of officers, and restrictions on transfer. The bylaws were adopted on April 30, 1998, and have been amended multiple times, with the latest amendment approved by shareholders on February 14, 2014, changing the authorized number of directors to a minimum of five and a maximum of nine.


document_description: This letter is submitted on behalf of Third-Party Respondents Daniel Zwirn and Zwirn Entities opposing the application of Financial Trust Company, Inc. and Jeepers to take the hearing testimony of Chris Suan before the scheduled hearing date. The letter argues that advancing the deposition would create an undue burden and that FTC has not shown good cause for this request.


document_description: The document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, regarding the case of United States of America v. Donald J. McGuire. McGuire, a Jesuit priest, was convicted of traveling in interstate and foreign commerce for the purpose of having sex with a minor and was sentenced to 25 years in prison. The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the purpose of McGuire's travel was to engage in illegal sexual conduct. The opinion discusses the admissibility of testimony from adult witnesses concerning their childhood abuse by McGuire as evidence of his modus operandi and propensity to commit such crimes.


document_description: This is a technical drawing of an aircraft cabin layout, including three views: right side elevation, top-down plan view, and left side elevation. Key features include cockpit, vestibule, cabin with seating arrangements, galley, lavatories, storage areas, emergency exits, electrical equipment racks, therapeutic oxygen outlets, VIP panel, fire extinguishers, and various electrical outlets. Dimensions are provided for components and cabin sections.


document_description: John and Ginger Sall confirm their plans to pledge the majority of their wealth to philanthropy, mentioning their current philanthropic practices through private giving and their family foundation.


document_description: The document contains a reference number 'EFTA01082908' but lacks additional context or content to classify it further.


document_description: The court grants Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's unopposed motion for a two-week extension and permission to file an overlength reply to government responses to their motions. The replies are due by May 2, 2011, and may not exceed 27 pages.


document_description: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 request a two-week extension to reply to the Government's responses to their motions, including a motion for summary judgment regarding violations of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. They also seek permission to file an overlength reply brief. The Government does not oppose the motion.


document_description: A formal request under the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act submitted by Martin G. Weinberg on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, seeking disclosure of records related to Epstein from the CIA.


document_description: This document is a deposition taken on behalf of the plaintiff in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The deposition includes numerous questions regarding the sexual abuse of minors, the involvement of Ghislaine Maxwell, and the use of a modeling agency to traffic minors. The deponent frequently invokes the Fifth Amendment in response to questions about their involvement and knowledge of Epstein's activities. The deposition also references flights taken by Epstein and mentions public figures such as Alan Dershowitz and Les Wexner.


document_description: This document is a transcript of a court hearing in the case of Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. The hearing was presided over by Honorable David F. Crow and took place on July 13, 2011. The hearing addressed various motions, including a motion to dismiss the complaint, a motion for punitive damages, and issues related to discovery and privilege. The discussion also covered the potential abuse of process by Epstein and the involvement of Rothstein in a Ponzi scheme. The court considered the relevance of certain documents and the applicability of privileges. The hearing also touched on the issue of pre-trial publicity and the potential impact on a fair trial.


document_description: The document is an attachment to Jeffrey Epstein's sexual offender registration form, listing his automobiles, boats, aircraft, telephone numbers, email addresses, Twitter and other internet accounts. It includes detailed information about his vehicles, boats, aircraft tail numbers, and various internet accounts associated with him or his foundation.


document_description: A letter from Darren K. Indyke to the Santa Fe County Sheriff regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender registration status. The letter discusses Epstein's efforts to comply with federal SORNA requirements and includes a summary sheet of Epstein's information provided to the Virgin Islands Sex Offender Registry.


document_description: Quotation from Advantage Golf Cars, Inc. for the purchase of two E-Z-GO Express S4 Electric golf cars and accessories, addressed to Brice Gordon/LS1 for delivery to Little St. James Island. The total cost is $17,925.00 with no sales tax applied.


document_description: This Settlement Agreement, effective August 1, 2011, involves multiple parties including Fortress VRF I LLC, Jeffrey Epstein, Jeepers, Inc., Financial Trust Company, Inc., D.B. Zwim Partners, LLC, and Glenn Dubin. It resolves disputes related to investments and withdrawal requests from a fund managed by the Zwim Entities. The agreement includes financial arrangements for withdrawal payments to Jeepers and the transfer of interests from Glenn Dubin to Jeepers. It also includes mutual releases of claims among the parties and confidentiality provisions.


document_description: This document is an application submitted by Cypress, Inc. to the New Mexico Office of the State Engineer to change the place of use and point of diversion of an existing water right. The application includes details about the current and proposed use of water, the location of the points of diversion, and the legal description of the land involved. The application is approved, provided it does not harm existing rights or public welfare.


document_description: Cypress, Inc. seeks to modify its existing water rights under Permit No. E-7871 et al. to use well E-6478-52 as a supplemental well, allowing diversion from multiple points. The application highlights cost savings and improved water quality by using an already drilled well, E-6478-52, instead of drilling a new well, E-7871-S, which may not yield sufficient or quality water. The permit allows for multiple uses of water across the ranch property.


document_description: This document provides an estimated summary of the operational costs and potential revenue for a Challenger 850 aircraft operated by XYZ Aviation. It includes details on flight hours, crew assumptions, and various cost breakdowns such as fixed costs, direct operating costs, and variable costs. The document also outlines the commercial summary, indicating no third-party charter revenue and a net annual cost to the owner of $5,730,540.


document_description: This document is a quote for a hydraulic door from Schweiss Doors, ordered by Buck Steel. It includes specifications for the door, pricing, terms of payment, and additional notes on installation and responsibilities. The total contract amount is $31,834.00, with a deposit of $7,959.00 required. The document outlines the responsibilities of the customer and the supplier, Schweiss Doors.


document_description: This document contains preliminary specifications for a Schweiss hydraulic door, including dimensions, design criteria, and installation instructions. It outlines the responsibilities of the building manufacturer, contractor, and owner in ensuring the building structure can handle the imposed loads. The document also includes diagrams illustrating structural components and load calculations.


document_description: This document is an Assignment and Assumption Agreement where Leon D. Black, as Trustee of the APOI GRAT, assigns a portion of his limited partnership interest in Black Family Partners, L.P. to himself as the Assignee. The agreement outlines the terms of the assignment, including the Annuity Amount, Cash Distribution, and In-Kind Annuity Amount. It is governed by the laws of the State of New York.


document_description: The document contains excerpts from legal depositions involving Jeffrey Epstein as the defendant. The depositions took place on March 24, 2010, and involved multiple cases in Florida courts. The witness repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment right on the advice of their lawyer. The deposition includes questions about Epstein's properties, planes, and alleged activities involving underage girls. The document also mentions Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean-Luc Brunel.


document_description: This document is a Transition and Release Agreement dated August 2013, involving bgC3 LLC, William H. Gates, Melinda F. Gates, Watermark Estate Management Services, LLC, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Dr. Boris Nikolic. It outlines the terms for the transition and termination of Dr. Nikolic's employment, including a waiver and release of claims, property return, restrictive covenants, and indemnification clauses. The agreement also includes provisions for severance payment and investment opportunities for Dr. Nikolic, contingent upon compliance with the agreement's terms.


document_description: The American Arbitration Association (AAA) informs the parties involved in the arbitration case between Sitrick and Company and Jeffrey Epstein that due to inactivity since June 28, 2012, the case is assumed to be settled and will be withdrawn from arbitration unless advised otherwise by August 31, 2012.


document_description: This letter outlines the agreement between bgC3 LLC and Dr. Boris Nikolic regarding the purchase by bgC3 of Dr. Nikolic's interest in a $30 Million to $50 Million Investment Entity. It details the termination of Dr. Nikolic's employment and financial relationships with bgC3 and related entities, the sale and purchase terms of the investment interest, advance payments, and the handling of investments in Foundation Medicine, Inc. and ResearchGate GmbH. The agreement includes provisions for Investment Entity Payment Demands, fair market value calculations, and payment terms.


document_description: A draft counter-proposal for resolving open matters between IGY, Andrew Farkas and their affiliates, and Jeffrey Epstein and his affiliates regarding American Yacht Harbor. The proposal outlines terms for office lease, management fees, cash payments, dock space, slip rental discounts, fuel discounts, financial controls, and mutual releases.


document_description: This Settlement Agreement, effective August 1, 2011, involves multiple parties including Fortress VRF I LLC, Jeffrey Epstein, and others. It resolves disputes related to investments and withdrawal requests from the Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC. The agreement includes financial arrangements for withdrawals and releases of claims among the parties. The agreement also outlines confidentiality, dispute resolution, and other general provisions.


document_description: A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding plea negotiations for Jeffrey Epstein. The letter emphasizes that a two-year state imprisonment term is the minimum acceptable to avoid federal prosecution and clarifies that a plea to two federal misdemeanors was never offered. The letter also notes that the agreement to Section 2255 liability applies to all minor girls identified during the federal investigation.


document_description: Invoice detailing professional services and reimbursable costs for Jeffrey Epstein in the case against Scott Rothstein and Bradley Edwards. The total amount due is $5,695.27, with a past due amount of $3,815.13. The invoice includes various reimbursable costs such as parking, courier services, and research charges.


document_description: Notice of cancellation for the deposition of Christopher J. Schmidt scheduled for July 7, 2011, in the case involving Jeffrey Epstein as the plaintiff and Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and another individual as defendants.


document_description: Notice of cancellation of the deposition of Donnie Ingram scheduled for July 6, 2011, at 10:30 am. The notice is certified by Jack Scarola, attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, and sent to all counsel on the attached list.


document_description: The document contains diagrams illustrating various trust structures and options for jurisdiction and governing law. It includes a 'Basic option - multiple trusts' diagram showing funds from Families A, B, and C flowing into a Foundation, which acts as the settlor for multiple HK Trusts. Another diagram presents a 'sub-trusts' option with a Trustee overseeing a Trust and three Sub-Funds, highlighting the choice of governing law. A 'Private Trust Company model' is also depicted, where a Foundation acts as settlor and owns private trust companies for each trust. Lastly, a 'Regulated fund option' is shown, with Trusts A, B, and C investing in a regulated fund with segregated cells.


document_description: Invoice for updating TCAS Processor to 7.1 for aircraft with registration N908JE. Total cost is $41,966.72.


document_description: This document is a draft of a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated November 26, 2012, between Financial Trust Company, Inc. (Seller) and Black Family Partners, L.P. (Purchaser). The Seller agrees to sell 13,350,205 shares of Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and interests in AP SHL Investors, LLC and AP Technology Partners LLC to the Purchaser for $5,500,000. The agreement outlines the terms and conditions of the sale, including representations and warranties, closing conditions, and other legal provisions.


document_description: The document includes a consent by John J. Hannan, Manager of AP Technology Partners LLC, to the transfer of Financial Trust Company, Inc.'s interest in the company to Black Family Partners, L.P. It also includes an Assignment and Assumption Agreement where Financial Trust Company, Inc. assigns its interest to Black Family Partners, L.P., with Jeffrey E. Epstein and Leon Black as signatories.


document_description: The document includes a consent by John J. Hannan, the Managing Member of AP SHL Investors, LLC, for the transfer of Financial Trust Company, Inc.'s interest in the company to Black Family Partners, L.P. It also includes an Assignment and Assumption Agreement where FTC assigns its 40% interest in the company to Black Family Partners, L.P., with Leon Black as the Managing Member. The agreement outlines the terms of the transfer and the responsibilities of the new member.


document_description: This document is an Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated November 2012 between Financial Trust Company, Inc. (FTC) and Black Family Partners, L.P. (Assignee). FTC assigns its 5.834262% interest in AP Technology Partners LLC to the Assignee, who accepts the assignment and assumes all related duties and obligations. The agreement is governed by New York law.


document_description: This document is an Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated November 2012 between Financial Trust Company, Inc. (FTC) and Black Family Partners, L.P. (Assignee). FTC assigns its 40% interest in AP SHL Investors, LLC to the Assignee, who accepts the assignment and assumes all related duties and obligations. The agreement includes provisions for the transfer of the ESWW Shares and the AP Tech Interest, and is governed by New York law.


document_description: Agreement for Black Family Partners, L.P. to become a member of AP SHL Investors, LLC, replacing Financial Trust Company, Inc. Leon Black signs as Managing Member.


document_description: A financial schedule listing shares and interests with their respective amounts.


document_description: Invoice for professional services rendered by Troutman Sanders LLP for Jeffrey Epstein, related to the Zwirn/Dubin dispute. The total amount of the invoice is $1,403.50, with detailed descriptions of services provided and time spent by attorneys. Additional outstanding invoices are summarized.