document_description: The document is an attachment to a subpoena related to Jeffrey Epstein's interests. It requests various records from January 1, 2003, to the present, including calendars, address books, electronic communications, and financial documents related to Epstein's properties and employees.


source: doj

document_description: The document is an attachment to a subpoena directed at Financial Trust Company, Inc. It requests various records related to Jeffrey Epstein and others, including calendars, address books, electronic communications, and financial transactions from January 1, 2003, to the present. It also seeks information on employees and corporate directors.


document_description: The document is an attachment to a subpoena directed at Darren Indyke, Esq., requesting various records and documents from January 1, 2003, to the present. It seeks calendars, agendas, emails, instant messages, contracts, and financial records related to Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities.


document_description: The document is an attachment to a subpoena directed at J. Epstein & Company, Inc. It requests various records from January 1, 2003, to the present, including calendars, address books, electronic communications, and financial documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and others. It also seeks information on fund transfers related to a property in Palm Beach, Florida, and employee records.


document_description: The document is an attachment to a subpoena related to the J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc. It requests various records from January 1, 2003, to the present, including calendars, address books, electronic communications, and financial documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and others. It also seeks information on fund transfers and employee records.


document_description: A subpoena requesting the recipient to bring various documents and information related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and their associates to a grand jury appearance. This includes notes, letters, photographs, emails, contact information, and billing statements.


document_description: A subpoena issued to Live Nation Theatrical/Broadway Across America requesting documents related to performances of David Copperfield and ticket/reservation records for specific individuals, including Jeffrey Epstein, during 2004-2005.


document_description: A subpoena requesting records related to performances of David Copperfield at the Broward Center for the Performing Arts and ticket/reservation information for specific individuals, including Jeffrey Epstein, during 2004-2005.


document_description: The document is an attachment to a subpoena requesting various records related to Jeffrey Epstein and NES, LLC from January 1, 2003 to the present. It seeks calendars, contact lists, electronic communications, financial records, employee information, and document retention policies.


document_description: Subpoena requesting various records related to Jeffrey Epstein and NES, LLC from January 1, 2003 to the present. The request includes calendars, contact lists, electronic communications, and financial documents related to fund transfers and employee information.


document_description: A grand jury subpoena issued to the Custodian of Records at New York Strategy Group, LLC, requesting various documents and information related to Jeffrey Epstein and his associates from January 1, 2003, to the present. The requests include calendars, contact lists, correspondence, financial transactions, employee records, document retention policies, and contracts with entities associated with Epstein.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on January 12, 2007. The individual is also required to bring records related to employment with Jeffrey Epstein, including contact information and appointment details for massages performed on Epstein.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on January 26, 2007. The individual is also required to bring records related to employment with Jeffrey Epstein, including contact information and appointment details for massages.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on December 1, 2006. The individual is also required to bring records related to employment with Jeffrey Epstein, including contact information and appointment details for massages.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on April 15, 2008. The individual is also required to bring any notes, letters, cards, gifts, payments, photographs, emails, instant messages, chats, text messages, voicemails, or telephone messages received from Jeffrey Epstein or his employees.


document_description: Subpoena commanding Anthony Figueroa to testify before the Grand Jury and bring documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on March 13, 2007, at 1:00 PM. The individual is also required to bring any notes, letters, cards, gifts, payments, photographs, emails, instant messages, chats, text messages, voicemails, or telephone messages related to Jeffrey Epstein and other redacted individuals.


document_description: Subpoena commanding Bill Hammond to testify before the Grand Jury and bring documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, Gulfstream Aircraft N909JE, and Boeing Aircraft N908JE. It includes a request for employment records and contact information for Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 1, 2006, at 9:00 am. The individual is also required to bring any and all documents or objects requested. The subpoena is issued by the Assistant U.S. Attorney and requires coordination with a Special Agent from the FBI.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on August 25, 2006. The individual is also required to bring any notes, letters, cards, gifts, payments, photographs, emails, instant messages, chats, text messages, voicemails, or telephone messages received from or sent to Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: Facsimile cover sheet for a grand jury subpoena sent by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of Florida.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on April 15, 2008, at 1:00 PM. The individual is also required to bring any notes, letters, cards, gifts, payments, photographs, emails, instant messages, chats, text messages, voicemails, or telephone messages related to Jeffrey Epstein and others.


document_description: Facsimile cover sheet from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Jim Eisenberg, Esq. regarding a subpoena. The document confirms the preparation and signing of a subpoena by AUSA and discusses scheduling for a grand jury appearance.


document_description: A certification document related to a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena OLY-53, declaring the authenticity and regularity of business records maintained by an unspecified entity. The document is incomplete with several fields left empty, including the declarant's name, position, and place of execution.


document_description: A subpoena issued to Eric Gany of NES, LLC to testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida on September 11, 2007. The subpoena also commands the recipient to bring certain documents or objects. The subpoena remains in effect until granted leave to depart by the court.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida commanding the custodian of records to appear and testify before the Grand Jury regarding transactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The subpoena also requests records related to a purchase on or about January 20, 2005.


document_description: Subpoena issued to Harry Beller of NES, LLC to testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida on September 11, 2007. The subpoena also commands the recipient to bring certain documents or objects and to coordinate compliance with FBI S/A Nesbitt Kuyrkendall.


document_description: A subpoena issued to Darren Indyke, Esq. to testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida on July 10, 2007. The subpoena also commands the recipient to bring certain documents or objects as specified in Attachment A. The recipient is instructed to coordinate compliance with the subpoena with the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on January 12, 2007. The individual is also required to bring employment records and contact information related to Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: Subpoena commanding Janusz Banasiak to testify before the Grand Jury and bring employment records related to Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: Subpoena commanding Janusz Banasiak to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida, on December 1, 2006. The subpoena also requires Banasiak to bring employment records and contact information related to Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: Facsimile cover sheet for a grand jury subpoena sent by an Assistant U.S. Attorney to an undisclosed recipient.


document_description: Subpoena issued to Larry Visoski to testify before the Grand Jury and provide documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, Gulfstream Aircraft N909JE, and Boeing Aircraft N908JE. The subpoena requests flight records, maintenance records, passenger manifests, employment records, and contact information for Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury, and to bring specified documents or objects. The subpoena is related to case FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Tues. No. OLY-85/1, with a scheduled appearance on July 1, 2008, at 10:30 am.


document_description: A sealed order compelling a witness to testify and provide information before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, despite invoking the privilege against self-incrimination. The order ensures that the compelled testimony cannot be used against the witness in any criminal case, except for perjury or false statements.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on June 26, 2007. The individual is also required to bring any notes, letters, cards, gifts, payments, photographs, emails, instant messages, chats, text messages, voicemails, or telephone messages received from or sent to Jeffrey Epstein or any of his employees.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida commanding the Custodian of Records to appear and testify before the Grand Jury on September 11, 2007, at the United States District Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. The subpoena also requires the custodian to bring specific documents or objects listed in Attachment A.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida commanding the Custodian of Records to appear and testify before the Grand Jury on July 10, 2007, at the United States District Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. The subpoena also requires the custodian to bring specific documents or objects listed in Attachment A.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on August 25, 2006, at 9:00 am. The individual is also required to bring certain documents or objects as specified. The subpoena is issued by the Assistant U.S. Attorney.


document_description: This document is a multi-purpose form used by the U.S. Department of Justice for authorization, purchase orders, itemized invoices, receiving reports, and payment vouchers related to requests for information under the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978. It includes sections for authorization and purchase order, invoice, and receiving report, with instructions for completion and compliance with the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, commanding the Evidence Custodian of the City of Palm Beach Police Department to appear and testify before the Grand Jury. The subpoena also requires the custodian to bring any and all evidence related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and his associates.


document_description: Subpoena issued to Paul A. Lavery to testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on June 19, 2007. The subpoena requires the recipient to bring documents or objects listed on Attachment A. The subpoena remains in effect until granted leave to depart by the court or an officer acting on behalf of the court.


document_description: Subpoena issued to Paul A. Lavery to testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on June 19, 2007. The subpoena also commands the production of documents or objects listed on Attachment A. Compliance is to be coordinated with the FBI.


document_description: A subpoena commanding appearance and testimony before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on May 29, 2007, at 1:00 pm. The subpoena also requires the production of all computer equipment and electronic storage media from Jeffrey Epstein's residence and any that belonged to him.


document_description: A subpoena commanding the custodian of records to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 1, 2006. The subpoena also requires the production of any and all records related to Jeffrey Epstein and/or Ghislaine Maxwell, including personnel records, records of payments, and client profiles.


document_description: A sealed order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, compelling a witness to testify and provide information before a Grand Jury, despite invoking the privilege against self-incrimination. The order ensures that the compelled testimony cannot be used against the witness in criminal cases, except for perjury or false statements.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida commanding NES, LLC to appear and testify before the Grand Jury. The subpoena requires the production of documents and objects related to Jeffrey Epstein, including calendars, contact lists, electronic communications, and financial records from January 1, 2003, to the present. It also requests information on fund transfers involving NES, LLC and various entities associated with Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida commanding the recipient to appear and testify before the Grand Jury, and to bring specified documents and information related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.


document_description: A subpoena commanding the recipient to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on July 1, 2008, at 10:30 am. The recipient is also required to bring documents and information related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and their associates.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, commanding the Custodian of Records at the State Attorney's Office, 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Palm Beach County, to appear and testify before the Grand Jury. The subpoena also requires the production of tapes or transcripts of proceedings before the Grand Jury on July 19, 2006, related to Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, commanding the Custodian of Records to appear and testify before the Grand Jury. The subpoena also requires the production of tapes or transcripts of proceedings before the Grand Jury related to certain targets.


document_description: A subpoena commanding the Custodian of Records to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on August 18, 2006, at 9:00 am. The subpoena also requires the production of tapes or transcripts of proceedings before the Grand Jury on July 19, 2006, related to Jeffrey Epstein and others.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 1, 2006. The individual is also required to bring any notes, letters, cards, gifts, payments, photographs, emails, instant messages, chats, text messages, voicemails, or telephone messages related to Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: A subpoena commanding an individual to appear and testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, on October 27, 2006. The individual is also required to bring any notes, letters, cards, gifts, payments, photographs, emails, instant messages, chats, text messages, voicemails, or telephone messages related to Jeffrey Epstein and other redacted individuals.


document_description: A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to James Eisenberg, Esq., outlining the terms of a debriefing agreement for his client. The letter specifies the conditions under which the client's statements during the debriefing will be treated under Rule 11(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8(a). It details the use of information provided during the debriefing, the conditions for its protection, and the consequences of providing false information.


document_description: The document is a placeholder indicating that no images were produced for the specified EFTA ID.


document_description: The document is a placeholder indicating that no images were produced. It includes a reference number EFTA00221038.


document_description: The document is a placeholder indicating that no images were produced. It includes a reference number EFTA00221041.


document_description: The document is a placeholder indicating that no images were produced. It includes a reference number EFTA00221045.


document_description: The document is a placeholder indicating that no images were produced. It includes a reference number EFTA00221046.


document_description: The document is a placeholder indicating that no images were produced. It includes a reference number EFTA00221053.


document_description: The document indicates that no images were produced, possibly referring to a request or requirement for images that was not fulfilled.


document_description: A letter from R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney, to Guy A. Lewis, Esq. regarding Jeffrey Epstein, delivered by United States Mail.


document_description: A letter from the U.S. Attorney to Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, requesting various documents and information related to Epstein's properties, aircraft, financial accounts, communication devices, and travel records.


document_description: A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, requesting documents or information before presenting the case to the Grand Jury.


document_description: A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The letter discusses the refusal to produce requested documents and the conditions under which a pre-indictment meeting could be rescheduled.


document_description: A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding the production of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The letter emphasizes the need for document review before a scheduled meeting and mentions a previous agreement to provide the documents.


document_description: A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Michael E. Dutko, Esq., requesting an interview with his client, who is a critical witness in a federal investigation. The letter suggests meeting at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach and includes a 'queen for a day' letter for review.


document_description: A form with headings 'Student Name' and 'Date of Birth', with blank spaces for information.


document_description: A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, commanding Capital One to appear and testify before the Grand Jury and to bring documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, Janusz Banasiak, Alfredo Rodriguez, and a specific Mastercard account. The subpoena specifies the date and location for appearance and includes instructions for compliance coordination with the FBI.


document_description: A subpoena issued to Colonial Bank to testify before the Grand Jury and provide documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, Janusz Banasiak, and Alfredo Rodriguez, including VISA account details and related financial records.


document_description: A contact list for Operation Leap Year, including legal counsel for Jeffrey Epstein and others, a private detective, an FBI analyst, and a chiropractor.


document_description: Contact list for legal counsel associated with Jeffrey Epstein, including names, firms, and email addresses.


document_description: Subpoena issued to David Neville Rodgers to testify before the Grand Jury and bring documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, Gulfstream Aircraft N909JE, and Boeing Aircraft N908JE.


document_description: A table listing subpoenas issued to various parties, including banks, airlines, and other entities, seeking records such as account information, flight data, car rental agreements, and student records. The appearance date on the subpoenas is August 18, 2006, but the actual return dates are not provided.


document_description: A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to Michael E. Dutko, Esq., outlining the terms of an interview with his client, who is a victim/witness in an investigation. The letter clarifies that the client is not a target of the investigation and provides conditions under which the client's statements during the interview will be protected from being used against her, except in cases of false information or perjury.


document_description: A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to Michael Salnick, clarifying the terms of an interview with Janusz Banasiak. The letter outlines the conditions under which Banasiak's statements during the interview will be protected from use against him, provided they are truthful and complete. It also details the consequences of providing false information.


document_description: A series of blog posts by John Carney on DealBreaker discussing various aspects of the Jeffrey Epstein case, including media coverage, political donations, legal strategies, and connections to public figures. The posts critique the media's handling of the story, highlight political figures returning Epstein's donations, and discuss the legal defense strategies employed by Epstein's team.


document_description: A subpoena issued to JEGE Inc to testify before the Grand Jury at the United States District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida. The subpoena commands the production of flight data records, passenger manifests, and ownership records for Boeing Aircraft N908JE, as well as records related to JEGE Inc.'s incorporation and management.


document_description: This document outlines the penalties for charges under 18 USC § 2423(b) and 18 USC § 1591(a)(1), including maximum imprisonment, supervised release, and fines.


document_description: This document outlines the charges and potential penalties for an unnamed defendant in the Southern District of Florida. The charges include conspiracy to entice minors to engage in sexual activity, conspiracy to travel in interstate commerce to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking, enticement of a minor, and travel to engage in illicit sexual conduct. The penalties range from 5 years to 40 years of imprisonment, with lifetime supervised release and fines up to $250,000.


document_description: Penalty sheet outlining charges and maximum penalties for a defendant in the Southern District of Florida. Charges include travel to engage in illicit sexual conduct and sex trafficking.


document_description: The United States moves to seal its Motion for Order of Disclosure under 18 U.S.C. § 2703, citing potential risks such as evidence tampering or flight from prosecution. The court orders the motion and order to be sealed until further notice.


document_description: The United States of America, represented by the Assistant United States Attorney, filed a motion to seal its Motion for Order of Disclosure under 18 U.S.C. § 2703. The motion argues that disclosure could lead to tampering with evidence or flight from prosecution. The court ordered the motion and order to be sealed until the arrest of the investigation's target or further court order.


document_description: The United States moves to seal its Motion for Order of Disclosure under 18 U.S.C. § 2703 and to delay disclosure to the target of the Motion and Order. The delay is requested to prevent endangering individuals, flight from prosecution, destruction of evidence, intimidation of witnesses, or jeopardizing an investigation. The target is suspected of harming a child and may have critical evidence on computers.


document_description: The United States of America, represented by the Assistant United States Attorney, requests the court to order the production of transcripts from the State Grand Jury proceedings on July 19, 2006, related to Jeffrey Epstein. The motion also seeks to seal all related proceedings and documents.


document_description: The United States, represented by Assistant United States Attorney, requests the production of transcripts from the State Grand Jury proceedings on July 19, 2006, related to Jeffrey Epstein. The motion seeks to seal all related proceedings and documents.


document_description: The document is a DOJ/OIG document related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It includes federal grand jury subpoenas for financial records from various banks and credit card companies, as well as flight data records for Epstein's aircraft. The document also mentions rental agreements and Western Union transactions associated with Epstein.


document_description: A list of document requests related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, including information provided to the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office, subscriber information for communication devices, computer media removed from Epstein's residence, calendars and address books, contact information for massage service providers, employment details for workers at Epstein's residence, and bank account information for petty cash expenses.


document_description: The article discusses the lifestyle and influence of billionaires, highlighting their freedom and power. It mentions various billionaires like Jeffrey Epstein, Ron Burkle, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, and others, detailing their social activities, investments, and controversies.


document_description: This document outlines the charges and potential penalties for a defendant in a case in the Southern District of Florida. The charges include conspiracy to entice minors, conspiracy to travel for illicit conduct, facilitation of unlawful travel, sex trafficking, and enticement of a minor. Each count lists the relevant U.S. Code and the maximum penalties, including imprisonment, supervised release, and fines.


document_description: Facsimile cover sheet from the U.S. Attorney's office to Lilly Ann Sanchez regarding Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: A sealed document tracking form filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida related to records of the electronic communications service known as Cingular Wireless. The document is filed on behalf of the plaintiff and is to remain sealed until the time for production of discovery or further order of the court. Upon expiration of the sealing period, the document is requested to be unsealed and placed in the public portion of the court file.


document_description: A sealed document tracking form filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida related to records of the electronic communications service known as Cingular Wireless. The document is to remain sealed until the time for production of discovery or further order of the court. Upon expiration, it is requested to be unsealed and placed in the public portion of the court file.


document_description: A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to James L. Eisenberg, Esq., outlining the terms of an interview with his client, who is a victim/witness in an investigation. The letter clarifies that the client is not a target of the investigation and provides conditions under which the client's statements during the interview will be protected from being used against her, except in cases of false statements or perjury.


document_description: A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to James Eisenberg, Esq., outlining the terms of a debriefing agreement for Eisenberg's client. The letter specifies the conditions under which the client's statements during the debriefing will be treated, including protections and potential uses of the information provided. It also details the consequences of providing false information and the presence of government attorneys during the debriefing.


document_description: This letter confirms the agreement between the recipient and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida regarding the recipient's obligation to provide truthful information and testimony in a federal investigation. It outlines the conditions under which the recipient's statements may be used and the consequences of violating the agreement.


document_description: The court denied Jeffrey Epstein's motion to file a Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action under seal, citing the public's right to access court records. The court found Epstein's justification for sealing the document insufficient, as similar information was already public. The court ordered the unsealing of docket entries 25 and 26 and required Epstein to serve a copy of his Notice on the plaintiff.


document_description: This document is a civil docket for the case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida. The case involves Jane Doe No. 4 as the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein as the defendant. The docket includes various motions, orders, and notices filed between April 14, 2008, and July 16, 2008. Key events include the filing of the complaint, issuance of summons, entry of default, and motions to set aside default.


document_description: The court reviewed Jeffrey Epstein's motion to set aside the clerk's default in a case filed by Jane Doe No. 4, alleging sexual assault and emotional distress. The court denied the motion without prejudice, allowing Epstein to file a second motion addressing 'good cause.'


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's motion to file a Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action ex parte and under seal, citing a confidential agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The motion is related to a pending federal criminal action and is material to the court's consideration of a motion to stay.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein notifies the court of the continued pendency of a federal criminal action against him. A deferred-prosecution agreement was entered with the USAO, which remains confidential. The federal action remains pending for 33 months from June 30, 2008, with the USAO retaining the right to reactivate the grand jury if Epstein breaches the agreement.


document_description: This is a legal complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 7 against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422. The complaint details Epstein's alleged scheme to recruit and sexually abuse underage girls, including the plaintiff, at his Palm Beach mansion. The plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages.


document_description: This document is a memorandum of law filed by Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motions to dismiss their claims. The memorandum argues that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged claims of sexual assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422. The document contends that Epstein's motions to dismiss are without merit and should be denied.


document_description: The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida notifies Jeffrey Herman, Esq. that his client is identified as a victim in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Epstein entered a guilty plea to state charges and federal prosecution is deferred. Victims have rights under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 as if Epstein had been federally tried and convicted.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's legal team files a reply to the plaintiffs' opposition to motions to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiffs have not sufficiently pleaded the elements required for their claims. The document emphasizes the need for each case to be treated as separate and distinct, and requests the court to grant the motion to dismiss.


document_description: This is an amended complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 7 against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault and abuse of a minor. The complaint details Epstein's scheme to recruit and abuse underage girls, including the plaintiff, at his Palm Beach mansion. It includes counts of sexual assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422. The plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, responds to the Second Amended Complaint by Jane Doe No. 7, asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for most allegations. Epstein also presents affirmative defenses, including claims of consent and statute of limitations.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a motion to compel the identification of Jane Doe #7 in the case style and third-party subpoenas for discovery purposes, or alternatively, to dismiss the case. The motion argues that Epstein's due process rights are being hindered by the anonymity of the plaintiff, which prevents him from conducting necessary discovery to defend against allegations of sexual assault, emotional distress, and coercion. The motion cites the need for subpoenas to medical providers and other third parties to gather evidence related to the plaintiff's claims of psychological and physical damages.


document_description: This document contains the responses of Plaintiff Jane Doe 7 to the first set of interrogatories from Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. It includes general objections, specific answers to questions about the plaintiff's condition and actions at the time of the incidents, and a verification statement. The document also includes a certificate of service for the legal representatives involved.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, filed a motion to dismiss and for a more definite statement regarding the complaint by Jane Doe No. 7. The motion argues that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, particularly concerning allegations of sexual assault and coercion under 18 U.S.C. §2422. The motion references previous similar motions filed in related cases involving other Jane Does.


document_description: This document is Jeffrey Epstein's first amended answer and affirmative defenses to the amended complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 7. Epstein, through his attorneys, denies the allegations and asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The document outlines various affirmative defenses, including claims of consent, statute of limitations, and challenges to the applicability of certain statutes.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, files his First Amended Answer to the Second Amended Complaint by Jane Doe No. 3. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for many allegations and provides several affirmative defenses, including claims of consent and statute of limitations. The document also addresses issues related to punitive damages and jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. §2255.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a motion to amend affirmative defenses in response to Jane Doe No. 3's second amended complaint. The motion is unopposed, with written consent from the plaintiff's counsel. The amendment addresses constitutional issues related to claims under 18 U.S.C. §2255 and punitive damages. The court is requested to grant the motion to amend.


document_description: This document is Jeffrey Epstein's legal response to the amended complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 6. Epstein, through his attorneys, denies the allegations and asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for many of the claims. The document outlines several affirmative defenses, including consent, statute of limitations, and challenges to the applicability of 18 U.S.C. §2255. It also argues against the claims for punitive damages and raises constitutional challenges to the statute.


document_description: This document is a plea agreement between the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein agrees to plead guilty to charges of harassment to prevent reporting of a federal offense. The agreement outlines the terms of the plea, including potential sentencing, restitution, and conditions for state charges. It also includes waivers of appeal rights and conditions under which the agreement may be voided.


document_description: The document outlines a non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Attorney's Office. Epstein agrees to plead guilty to charges filed by the State Attorney's Office, including solicitation of minors for prostitution, and to serve a sentence. In return, the U.S. Attorney's Office agrees to defer prosecution of federal charges, provided Epstein complies with the agreement's terms. The agreement includes conditions for Epstein's plea, sentencing, and potential civil suits by victims.


document_description: This document outlines a non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. It details the conditions under which Epstein agrees to plead guilty to state charges and the deferral of federal prosecution. The agreement includes terms for Epstein's sentencing, waiver of rights, and conditions for potential civil suits by victims. It also specifies the suspension of federal grand jury investigations and subpoenas, contingent on Epstein's compliance with the agreement.


document_description: Kenneth W. Starr, representing Jeffrey Epstein, requests a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher to discuss concerns about the Deferred Prosecution Agreement Epstein entered with the USAO. The letter raises issues about the use of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in the agreement, potential compromise of witness testimony, lack of information on claims, and the role of an attorney representative in civil settlements.


document_description: A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Jay P. Lefkowitz regarding dissatisfaction with a legal agreement related to Jeffrey Epstein's case. The letter mentions several attorneys involved in Epstein's defense team and addresses concerns about the agreement.


document_description: This letter from the U.S. Attorney addresses issues related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, including victim notification, plea and sentencing delays, and compliance with the agreement. It also responds to allegations of misconduct and clarifies legal obligations regarding victim rights and notifications.


document_description: This letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta addresses issues related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, including victim notification, plea and sentencing delays, and compliance with the agreement's terms. It also responds to accusations of misconduct and clarifies the obligations under the agreement and relevant statutes.


document_description: A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Kenneth W. Starr addressing concerns about the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. The letter discusses the Section 2255 provision, identity of victims, restitution fund, attorney representative selection, and the finality of the agreement. Acosta emphasizes the intent to place victims in the same position as if Epstein had been convicted at trial and addresses the defense's tactics and concerns about the agreement's legality.


document_description: A letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to Honorable R. Alexander Acosta, addressing questions related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The letter discusses objections to the notification of alleged victims under 18 U.S.C. § 3771 and concerns about the implementation of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in the deferred-prosecution agreement. It also requests a review of notifications before they are sent and highlights issues with the civil component of the case due to pending criminal actions.


document_description: A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to attorneys Jack A. Goldberger and Roy Black regarding the status of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The letter emphasizes the need for Epstein to enter his plea, be sentenced, and begin serving his sentence by June 30, 2008, and requests a copy of the plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office.


document_description: This document is a Second Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein. It clarifies the terms of Epstein's imprisonment and his participation in the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office's work release program. The addendum outlines specific conditions for Epstein's imprisonment and participation in the work release program, including electronic monitoring and weekly documentation requirements.


document_description: The document contains a fax transmittal from Fowler White Burnett to Alex Acosta, discussing the Non-Prosecution Agreement for Jeffrey Epstein. It includes an affirmation by Epstein, a notice of hearing, and correspondence from Kenneth W. Starr and others regarding legal opinions and concerns about the agreement and federal involvement in the case.


document_description: Letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Judge Edward B. regarding the appointment of a Special Master to assist in selecting an attorney representative for victims in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The letter outlines the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein, including the selection and payment of the attorney representative, and criteria for selecting the representative.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, files a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 101, or alternatively, for a more definite statement. The motion argues that the complaint fails to meet the necessary legal standards, as it does not establish that Epstein was convicted of a predicate criminal offense, and that the plaintiff was not a minor at the time of filing, which is a requirement under the applicable version of 18 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion also argues against the retroactive application of Masha's Law and challenges the sufficiency of the allegations under various statutes.


document_description: This document is a court order from the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court in Palm Beach County, Florida, regarding the case against Jeffrey E. Epstein. Epstein entered a plea of guilty to procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution. The court adjudged him guilty and imposed a sentence of six months in county jail followed by twelve months of community control. The order includes various conditions of supervision, such as registration as a sexual offender, electronic monitoring, and restrictions on contact with minors. The document also outlines mandatory court costs and fines.


document_description: This document is a transcript of a plea conference held in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, presided over by Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo. Jeffrey Epstein, represented by attorney Jack Goldberger, entered a guilty plea to charges of felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. The plea agreement included a sentence of 18 months in the Palm Beach County detention facility followed by 12 months of community control with specific conditions, including registration as a sexual offender. The plea was influenced by a nonprosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, files a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 101. The motion argues that the complaint fails to meet the pleading standards required under federal law, particularly under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, as the plaintiff was not a minor at the time of filing and Epstein has not been convicted of a predicate offense. The motion also challenges the applicability of Masha's Law retroactively and argues against the multiplicity of counts for a single recovery under § 2255.


document_description: This document is a court order for Jeffrey E. Epstein, adjudging him guilty of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution. The order outlines the terms of his probation and community control, including a six-month jail term followed by twelve months of community control. Special conditions include registration as a sexual offender, no unsupervised contact with minors, and electronic monitoring. The document also details mandatory court costs and conditions of supervision.


document_description: Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 filed a motion for leave to file under seal their response in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay proceedings. The motion is based on the need to comply with a protective order regarding the non-prosecution agreement. The plaintiffs also request the court to unseal the agreement if their motion is denied.


document_description: This is a legal complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault and abuse of a minor. The complaint details Epstein's systematic exploitation of underage girls, including the use of his wealth and influence to coerce minors into sexual acts. It outlines multiple counts of legal violations, including coercion and enticement of minors, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sexual exploitation of children, and transport of child pornography. The document also mentions Epstein's guilty plea to related state crimes in 2008.


document_description: This document is a legal response from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys to a motion filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 101 and 102. The motion requests an order for the preservation of evidence. Epstein's response addresses the mischaracterization of his guilty pleas, objections to the preservation order, and asserts constitutional privileges against self-incrimination. The response also discusses the legal implications of producing documents and the Fifth Amendment rights.


document_description: This document is a joint scheduling and discovery report filed in the case involving multiple Jane Doe plaintiffs against Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the proposed discovery and pre-trial deadlines, subjects of discovery, issues about electronically-stored information, claims of privilege or confidentiality, and other procedural matters. The document also discusses the likelihood of settlement, the appearance of additional parties, and proposals for the formulation and simplification of issues. The report includes positions from both the plaintiffs and the defendant on various matters, including anonymity and discovery limitations.


document_description: This is a legal complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 102 against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault and abuse when she was a minor. The complaint details Epstein's systematic exploitation of underage girls, facilitated by his wealth and influence, and aided by associates including Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines multiple counts of coercion, enticement, transportation for illegal sexual activity, and exploitation of minors, seeking damages under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein requests a mandatory stay of the civil action under 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) due to two pending parallel criminal actions in Palm Beach state court and Miami federal court. The motion argues that the civil case should be stayed until the criminal actions are resolved, as they arise from the same allegations involving a minor victim, Jane Doe No. 2.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein requests an enlargement of time to respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a mandatory stay is decided. The motion is based on the ongoing criminal actions related to the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. The court granted the motion for enlargement of time.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein files two exhibits to his Reply in Support of Motion to Stay, filed under seal on July 28, 2008. Exhibit A is a Declaration of Assistant United States Attorney, and Exhibit B is a copy of Title 18, United States Code, section 1595. These exhibits were omitted from the reply memorandum.


document_description: The document is a declaration by an Assistant United States Attorney in support of the United States' response to a victim's emergency petition for enforcement of the Crime Victim Rights Act. It details the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the involvement of the FBI, victim notifications, and the plea agreement reached with Epstein. The declaration also addresses the concerns of victims and the legal proceedings related to the case.


document_description: This document is a motion filed by non-party witness Jane Doe No. 3 to seek a protective order and quash a subpoena for her deposition in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The motion argues against multiple depositions of Jane Doe No. 3, citing undue trauma and burden. It also seeks to consolidate related cases for discovery purposes to avoid repetitive depositions and promote judicial efficiency.


document_description: Plaintiff Jane Doe 3 responds to Jeffrey Epstein's first set of interrogatories, objecting to certain questions on the grounds of privilege and relevance. She details her interactions with law enforcement and mentions other females brought to Epstein's home.


document_description: Notice of deposition via video for Jane Doe #3, scheduled for April 14, 2008, at U.S. Legal Support in West Palm Beach, FL. The deposition is for discovery and trial purposes. The notice is signed by Robert D. Critton, Jr., attorney for Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, filed a motion to compel Jane Doe No. 2 to respond to specific production requests and to overrule her objections. The motion also seeks an award for reasonable expenses related to the motion. The document discusses the relevance of the requested information, including tax returns and documents related to sexual activity, to the plaintiff's claims of damages. The motion argues that the information is necessary to assess the plaintiff's claims of emotional and psychological damages and loss of earning capacity.


document_description: Plaintiffs Kimberly Balas and Teresa Shumate filed a lawsuit against Marjorie A. Ruzzo and Exec., Inc., alleging coercion into prostitution, battery, false imprisonment, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of civil rights, and racketeering. The court denied their petition for writ of certiorari, allowing discovery of their past prostitution activities and earnings, as it was relevant to the multiple causes of action filed.


document_description: This document is a legal response from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team to a motion filed by the plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2. The response addresses the plaintiff's request for a protective order and to quash a subpoena for the deposition of Jane Doe No. 3. It also discusses the motion to consolidate cases for discovery purposes. The defense argues against the consolidation and supports the right to depose Jane Doe No. 3 both as a witness and as a party plaintiff in separate cases. The document includes legal references and argues that the depositions are necessary and permissible under federal rules.


document_description: This document contains the responses of Plaintiff Jane Doe 3 to the first set of interrogatories from Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. It includes general objections to the interrogatories, responses to specific questions about criminal convictions, knowledge of facts related to the case, and medical treatment. The document also notes ongoing discovery and the intention to supplement responses as needed.


document_description: The document is a reply memorandum filed by the plaintiff's counsel in support of a motion to compel defendant Jeffrey Epstein to answer interrogatories and produce documents. The plaintiff argues against Epstein's blanket assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege and other objections to discovery requests. The memorandum addresses various legal arguments, including the insufficiency of Epstein's privilege claims, the potential for adverse inferences in civil cases, and the relevance of health care information. The plaintiff requests an order compelling Epstein to comply with discovery requests.


document_description: The document is a legal reply memorandum filed by the plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. It supports a motion for a protective order, to quash a subpoena, and to consolidate cases for discovery purposes. The plaintiff argues that the defendant has not shown any prejudice or confusion that would prevent consolidation for discovery. The memorandum also requests limiting the defendant to a single deposition of each plaintiff to avoid unnecessary burden and harassment.


document_description: The court grants the Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order against piecemeal depositions and consolidates several cases for discovery purposes. The Defendant is limited to a single deposition of each Plaintiff, and additional cases may require court approval for further depositions. The court also orders parties in other related cases to show cause for not consolidating all cases for discovery.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a response opposing the consolidation of multiple cases for discovery purposes, arguing that it would confuse individual discovery issues and increase legal and judicial resources. The response also seeks clarification on the court's order regarding consolidation and requests that each case maintain its individual style in pleadings and orders.


document_description: Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 responds to Jeffrey Epstein's first set of interrogatories, detailing psychological and emotional injuries and claiming damages for pain and suffering, psychological care, and loss of earning capacity. The document includes general objections to the interrogatories and a verification statement by the plaintiff.


document_description: Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 responds to Jeffrey Epstein's first set of interrogatories, detailing psychological and emotional injuries claimed, objections to certain interrogatories, and verification of responses. The document includes a certificate of service to co-counsel for Jeffrey Epstein.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, filed a motion to strike several cases from the current trial docket, continue the trials, or modify the trial schedule to allow for additional time for discovery and pretrial motions. The motion argues that the plaintiffs have delayed discovery, preventing Epstein from preparing his defense. Epstein requests an extension of deadlines and trial dates to ensure fair trial preparation.


document_description: Affidavit by Michael J. Pike, attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, regarding the Motion to Strike Cases from Current Trial Dockets. The affidavit outlines the difficulties faced in obtaining discovery due to plaintiffs' delays and objections, and requests a continuance or modification of trial schedules to ensure Epstein's due process rights.


document_description: Lewis Tein, P.L. filed a motion to withdraw as co-counsel for Jeffrey Epstein, requesting a formal order from the court to be removed from the case representation.


document_description: The document is a legal notice filed by Plaintiff C.M.A. withdrawing previously raised objections to Jeffrey Epstein's motion to compel and/or identify in the style of the case and in third-party subpoenas for discovery purposes. The notice includes a certificate of compliance with local rules and a certificate of service.


document_description: This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs argue against the defendant's motion to compel the identification of plaintiffs in the case and the use of their real names in third-party subpoenas. The response emphasizes the sensitive nature of the allegations involving childhood sexual abuse and the potential psychological harm that could result from public disclosure of the plaintiffs' identities. The document includes a memorandum of law supporting the plaintiffs' right to proceed anonymously and suggests alternative methods for obtaining necessary records without revealing the plaintiffs' identities.


document_description: Dr. Gilbert Kliman provides a declaration regarding the potential harm of disclosing the identities of plaintiffs in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. He argues that public disclosure would lead to revictimization, stigmatization, and retraumatization of the plaintiffs, who have already suffered from sexual abuse. The declaration discusses the psychological impact of such exposure, including PTSD, depression, and other long-term effects.


document_description: This document provides a detailed professional biography of Dr. Gilbert Kliman, highlighting his extensive work in child psychiatry, psychoanalysis, and preventive psychiatry. It includes his professional positions, grants awarded, published works, presentations, and major court forensic activities. Dr. Kliman has been involved in numerous projects and initiatives aimed at improving mental health services for children, particularly those affected by trauma and in foster care. The document also mentions his involvement in high-profile legal cases and his contributions to public health through various therapeutic projects.


document_description: This document is a legal response filed by plaintiff Jane Doe, opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to strike her trial date from the current trial docket. The response argues against the delay of the trial date, highlighting that Epstein has been responsible for numerous delays and that Jane Doe has not requested any extensions. The document emphasizes the harm that a delay would cause to Jane Doe, including the potential for Epstein to hide assets and the psychological stress of unresolved allegations of sexual abuse of minors. The response also notes that Epstein has taken the Fifth Amendment in response to discovery requests.


document_description: The document is a legal response filed by the plaintiff, C.M.A., against Jeffrey Epstein's motion to strike cases from the current trial docket or to continue the case. The plaintiff agrees to some modifications of the pretrial schedule but opposes the delay of the trial. The response argues that Epstein's attempts to delay the trial are unwarranted and highlights the plaintiff's compliance with discovery requests, while criticizing Epstein's lack of action in pursuing discovery.


document_description: This document is a notice of serving answers to interrogatories in the case of C.M.A. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. It includes answers to various interrogatories posed by the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, regarding the plaintiff's personal information, employment history, criminal record, and interactions with Epstein. The document also lists individuals with knowledge of the case, including victims and associates of Epstein, and details the plaintiff's claims of damages and interactions with law enforcement.


document_description: The document is the Plaintiff's Initial Disclosure in the case of C.M.A. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. It lists individuals likely to have discoverable information, including victims and associates of Epstein, and outlines the subject matter of their potential testimony. It also describes categories of documents and evidence that may be used to support the claims, as well as potential damages and insurance information.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, files a First Amended Answer to the Second Amended Complaint by Jane Doe No. 2. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in response to various allegations. The document includes multiple affirmative defenses, such as consent, statute of limitations, and challenges to the applicability of 18 U.S.C. §2255. The document concludes with a request for the court to deny the relief sought by the plaintiff.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a motion to amend his affirmative defenses in response to Jane Doe No. 2's second amended complaint. The motion is unopposed as the plaintiff's counsel has consented in writing. The amendment seeks to address constitutional issues related to 18 U.S.C. §2255 and punitive damages claims. The court is requested to grant the motion to amend, with no prejudice to the plaintiff.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein notifies the court about the resolution of a state court action and the pending status of a federal criminal proceeding.


document_description: This document details court proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein, including charges of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution. Epstein entered a guilty plea and was adjudicated guilty. The document outlines various legal proceedings, conditions, and sentences related to the case.


document_description: Plaintiff Jane Doe filed a motion to compel Jeffrey Epstein to answer her first requests for admissions, challenging his invocation of the Fifth Amendment. The motion lists 23 specific requests for admission, including questions about Epstein's net worth, real estate holdings, financial asset movements, and allegations of sexual misconduct and trafficking. The motion argues that Epstein's blanket Fifth Amendment invocation is improper and requests the court to compel answers or justify the privilege claim.


document_description: Plaintiff Jane Doe filed a motion to compel Jeffrey Epstein to answer interrogatories related to his financial assets, travel, and other matters. Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment rights and objected to the interrogatories as overbroad. The motion argues that Epstein's blanket invocation of privilege is improper and requests the court to compel answers or provide a privilege log.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team opposes Jane Doe's motion for an injunction to restrain asset transfers, appoint a receiver, and post a $15 million bond. The memorandum argues that Jane Doe's claims are speculative, lack evidence of fraudulent transfers, and do not meet the legal standards for injunctive relief. The document also challenges the admissibility of evidence presented by Jane Doe, including hearsay and speculative statements from a Vanity Fair article.


document_description: The court denied Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the civil action filed by Jane Doe No. 2. Epstein argued for a stay based on a pending criminal action, citing a deferred-prosecution agreement. The court found no pending criminal action as no indictment or information was filed. The court also denied a discretionary stay and emphasized that Epstein controls his compliance with the plea agreement.


document_description: The court denied Jeffrey Epstein's motion to file documents under seal, emphasizing the public's right to access court records. The court found no justification to keep the documents sealed as the details were already largely public.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves to file his reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay under seal, citing a confidential agreement with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The motion seeks to avoid disclosure of confidential material and requests leave to file under seal until directed otherwise by the Court.


document_description: This document is a legal reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in support of a motion to stay civil proceedings. The motion is based on a deferred-prosecution agreement between Epstein and the United States Attorney's Office, which defers federal prosecution in favor of state prosecution. The document discusses the implications of this agreement on the pending federal criminal action and argues for a stay of civil cases under 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) due to the ongoing federal investigation. It also addresses procedural issues related to the motion to stay and the applicability of the stay to plaintiffs who have turned 18.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein files a motion to dismiss Count I of the plaintiff's complaint, arguing that the allegations do not support a claim for sexual assault under Florida law. The motion contends that Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes does not provide a private right of action and that the plaintiff's age places her outside the statute's protection. The motion also argues that the complaint fails to establish a common-law assault claim.


document_description: The document is a legal memorandum filed by Jane Doe No. 2 in response to Jeffrey Epstein's motion to dismiss Count I of the complaint, which alleges sexual assault. The memorandum argues that the complaint sufficiently alleges a claim for sexual assault and battery, and that the motion to dismiss is moot due to an amended complaint. The amended complaint adds a federal claim under 18 U.S.C. §§2422 and 2255.


document_description: The document is a court order from the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, setting trial dates and discovery deadlines for multiple cases involving Jeffrey Epstein as the defendant. It outlines the trial schedule, motion practices, pretrial procedures, mediation requirements, and discovery referrals to a magistrate judge. The order emphasizes compliance with local rules and sets specific deadlines for various pretrial activities.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a motion to dismiss and for a more definite statement regarding the amended complaint by Jane Doe No. 2. The motion argues that the complaint lacks sufficient factual allegations and relies on labels and conclusions. It challenges the claims of sexual assault and battery, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity, citing a lack of detailed allegations and improper statutory references.


document_description: This document is a memorandum of law filed by Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motions to dismiss their claims. The memorandum argues that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged claims of sexual assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422. The document contends that the defendant's motions are without merit and should be denied.


document_description: The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida notifies Jeffrey Herman, Esq. that his client is identified as a victim in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Epstein entered a guilty plea to state charges and agreed to certain conditions, including deferring federal prosecution. Victims have rights under Section 2255 as if Epstein had been federally tried and convicted.


document_description: The court reviewed Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's motion to dismiss and motion for a more definite statement regarding Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2's Amended Complaint. The complaint includes allegations of sexual assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. The court denied the motion to dismiss Count I and required a more definite statement for Count III. The motion to strike the citation to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was granted and replaced with 18 U.S.C. § 2255.


document_description: This is a legal complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 2 against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity. The complaint details Epstein's scheme of recruiting underage girls for sexual acts under the guise of providing massages, and seeks damages in excess of $50 million.


document_description: This document contains Jeffrey Epstein's legal responses and objections to the plaintiff's amended first set of interrogatories in the case Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein asserts his constitutional rights and objects to the interrogatories on various grounds, including overbreadth and irrelevance. The document includes a certificate of service and a notary public acknowledgment.


document_description: This document contains Jeffrey Epstein's legal responses and objections to the plaintiff's amended first request for production in a civil case. Epstein asserts his constitutional rights and privileges in response to various requests for documents related to his criminal cases, communications, and other personal records. The document includes objections based on constitutional rights, attorney-client privilege, and confidentiality agreements.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal response to a request for production of documents related to insurance policies for his residence. The response includes objections based on relevance, materiality, and privacy concerns.


document_description: This document is a legal response from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team to a motion filed by Jane Doe No. 2, seeking to compel Epstein to answer interrogatories and produce documents. Epstein's defense argues that answering these requests would violate his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments, as he is under threat of criminal prosecution. The document discusses the legal basis for asserting these privileges and objections to the discovery requests, including the potential for self-incrimination and the protection of third-party privacy rights. The response also addresses specific interrogatories and production requests, arguing that they are overbroad, irrelevant, or protected by privilege.


document_description: Affidavit by Jack A. Goldberger, attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, detailing his representation of Epstein in negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the USAO for the Southern District of Florida. The affidavit outlines the terms of the NPA, its effectivity, and potential breaches as perceived by the USAO. It also mentions a denied FOIA request to the FBI regarding ongoing investigations.


document_description: This is a legal complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 2 against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity. The complaint details Epstein's scheme of recruiting underage girls for sexual activities under the guise of providing massages, and the psychological and emotional harm suffered by the plaintiff as a result. The complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages.


document_description: The court addressed Defendant Epstein's motions to compel responses to requests for production and interrogatories, overruling some of the plaintiff's objections and granting others. Responses are to be served within 10 days.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a motion to compel Jane Doe No. 2 to answer interrogatories and overrule objections related to her sexual history and claims of sexual misconduct by others. The motion argues that the information is relevant to the damages claimed by the plaintiff and seeks an award for reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion.


document_description: Plaintiffs Kimberly Balas and Teresa Shumate filed a lawsuit against Marjorie A. Ruzzo and Exec., Inc., alleging coercion into prostitution, battery, false imprisonment, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of civil rights, and racketeering. The court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, allowing discovery of plaintiffs' past prostitution activities and earnings, as it may be relevant to the case.


document_description: The court addressed Defendant Epstein's motions to compel responses to requests for production and interrogatories, overruling some of the plaintiff's objections and granting/denying specific requests. Responses are to be served within 10 days.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, files an answer to the Second Amended Complaint by Jane Doe No. 2, asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for most allegations. Epstein also presents affirmative defenses, including claims of consent and statute of limitations.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a motion to compel the identification of Jane Doe in the case style and third-party subpoenas for discovery purposes, or alternatively, to dismiss the case. The motion argues that Epstein's due process rights are being hindered by the anonymity of the plaintiff, which prevents him from conducting necessary discovery to defend against allegations of sexual assault, emotional distress, and coercion. The motion cites legal precedents and argues for the necessity of identifying the plaintiff to ensure a fair trial.


document_description: Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion to compel answers to interrogatories seeking detailed sexual history and contact information of individuals involved in alleged sexual conduct. The memorandum argues that such discovery is irrelevant and intrusive, citing Federal Rule of Evidence 412, which limits discovery of a victim's sexual history. The document requests denial of Epstein's motion and his request for attorney's fees.


document_description: Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion to compel responses to requests for production, arguing that the requests are overly broad, harassing, and not relevant to the case. They argue that Epstein's requests for sexual history and tax returns are inappropriate and protected under Rule 412, which limits discovery of a victim's sexual history. The memorandum also opposes Epstein's request for attorney's fees and costs.


document_description: This letter addresses matters raised in a previous letter regarding the case involving Jane Does 2-7 and Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses the withdrawal of general objections, the specificity of damages claimed, objections to certain interrogatories and document requests, and the relevance of tax returns. The letter also references Rule 412 regarding the protection of victims in legal proceedings.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, filed a motion requesting the court to order the plaintiff to use the proper case style in all filings. The motion argues that the plaintiff's inclusion of multiple Jane Does in the case style is misleading and confusing, as the cases have not been consolidated and each has different facts. The motion seeks to ensure that only the parties to the specific action are included in the caption.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein opposes plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2's motion for order compelling clerk to enter default, or alternatively, for enlargement of time to serve process. The response argues that service was effective under New York procedure, not federal or Florida procedure, and thus the response to the complaint is not due until June 23, 2008.


document_description: Affidavit by Richard Barnett stating he received summons and complaints in four lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein and confirming he has never resided at 9 East 71st Street, New York.


document_description: The United States, represented by Assistant United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, files a notice of limited appearance to respond to the Court's order regarding Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay proceedings. The United States clarifies that it does not become a party to the litigation nor takes a position on the civil suits' outcomes.


document_description: The United States filed a response to the court's order regarding Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay proceedings. The response argues against the necessity of a stay, stating that no special circumstances warrant it. The document discusses the standards for imposing a discretionary stay, the assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege, and the balancing of equities. It concludes that the United States is not aware of any special circumstances that justify staying the civil cases pending the expiration of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).


document_description: The document is a court order setting a hearing for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay on June 12, 2009. The hearing will address whether Epstein's defense in civil actions violates a non-prosecution agreement with the United States. The court requests the United States' presence at the hearing.


document_description: This document is a legal response from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys to a motion filed by Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 requesting a no contact order. Epstein's attorneys argue that the motion is unnecessary and a waste of resources, claiming no contact has been made with the plaintiffs. They also address issues related to the plaintiffs' backgrounds and the conditions of Epstein's plea agreement.


document_description: The document is a notice filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys, providing supplemental authority in connection with motions to compel and replies. It references the case Doe v. Evans, which denied a protective order for an alleged sexual assault victim. The document includes a certificate of service listing various attorneys involved in related cases.


document_description: The document is a notice filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys, providing supplemental authority in connection with motions to compel and replies. It references the case Doe v. Evans, which denied a protective order for a sexual assault victim. The document includes a certificate of service listing various attorneys involved in related cases.


document_description: Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 join in the motion for a no-contact order against Jeffrey Epstein, citing harassment and threats from individuals associated with Epstein, including Bayley Robson. The motion seeks to prevent Epstein and his agents from contacting the plaintiffs directly or indirectly.


document_description: This document is a transcript of a deposition taken on February 20, 2008, in the case of the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The deposition was conducted at the Palm Beach County Courthouse and involved questioning by attorneys including Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The witness was questioned about their interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, their personal history, and their family dynamics. The deposition also covered topics such as the witness's MySpace activity, previous legal encounters, and family relationships. There were frequent objections by Mr. Leopold, and the deposition included discussions about the witness's credibility and past statements to law enforcement.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein files the redacted deposition of Jane Doe #1 in support of his motion to stay the action. The deposition is attached as Exhibit A.


document_description: This document is a legal response from Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys opposing the plaintiffs' motion to file a response under seal or to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The response argues that the NPA should remain confidential as per previous court orders and agreements with the United States Attorney's Office. The document includes references to previous court orders and the stance of the United States Attorney's Office on maintaining the confidentiality of the NPA.


document_description: This document is a legal reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in response to Plaintiff Carolyn Margaret Andriano's opposition to Epstein's motion to strike cases from the current trial docket and to continue the case or modify trial and scheduling order deadlines. The document outlines the background of the case, arguments regarding discovery delays, and requests for modifications to the trial schedule. It highlights issues with discovery, including the plaintiff's refusal to allow identification in subpoenas and protective orders filed to prevent access to medical records. The document argues that these actions delay the trial and prejudice Epstein's defense.


document_description: The court requests that Plaintiffs file a copy of the Non-Prosecution Agreement under seal for in camera review to avoid undue delay in deciding the motions to stay pending in this Court.


document_description: This is a legal complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 2 against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The complaint details Epstein's scheme of recruiting underage girls for sexual acts under the guise of providing massages, and the psychological and emotional harm suffered by the plaintiff as a result.


document_description: The court addresses Jeffrey Epstein's motion for a protective order regarding the disclosure of certain documents. The motion is granted in part and denied in part. The court requires that any correspondence intended for public disclosure be filed under seal and a ruling obtained before disclosure. The court denies Epstein's request to declare the correspondence privileged and prohibit its disclosure in two proceedings.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a motion to submit a Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action ex parte and under seal, citing a confidential agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The motion was not served on the plaintiff's counsel pending a court ruling.


document_description: The document is a legal memorandum filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 in response to Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the civil action. The memorandum argues against the stay, stating that there are no pending criminal actions against Epstein that would justify a stay under 28 U.S.C. §3509(k). It also argues that the statute does not apply as the plaintiff is not a minor. The memorandum highlights procedural defects in Epstein's motion and requests denial of the stay and attorney's fees for non-compliance with local rules.


document_description: The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida notifies Jeffrey Herman, Esq. about a client identified as a victim in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges and agreed to defer federal prosecution. Victims have rights under Section 2255 as if Epstein had been federally tried and convicted. The letter advises on potential civil claims against Epstein.


document_description: Jeffrey M. Herman, counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2, submits a declaration to correct a factual error in the Court's Order to Show Cause regarding service of process on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The error, which was in Plaintiff's favor, involved a misstatement about mailing the summons and complaint to Epstein's New York address.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requests oral argument for a motion to stay the civil action until the resolution of a pending criminal action. The request is made under Rule 7.1(B)(1) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The estimated time for the argument is one hour.


document_description: The court denied the plaintiff's motion to compel the clerk to enter default against Jeffrey Epstein due to improper service of the summons and complaint under New York law. The plaintiff has 45 days to properly serve the defendant, or the case will be dismissed.


document_description: The document is a declaration by an Assistant United States Attorney involved in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the investigation process, victim notifications, and the plea agreement reached with Epstein. The declaration also addresses the concerns of victims and the legal proceedings related to the Crime Victim Rights Act.


document_description: This document is an exhibit in a court case, detailing the civil remedy available under 18 U.S.C.A. § 1595 for victims of violations of sections 1589, 1590, or 1591, allowing them to bring a civil action against perpetrators and recover damages and attorney fees. It also notes that civil actions are stayed during related criminal proceedings.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein files two exhibits to his Reply in Support of Motion to Stay, filed under seal on July 28, 2008. Exhibit A is a Declaration of Assistant United States Attorney, and Exhibit B is a copy of Title 18, United States Code, section 1595. These exhibits were inadvertently omitted from the reply memorandum.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein waives formal service of a summons and complaint, agreeing to accept delivery by mail or hand through his counsel, Lewis Tein, P.L. The document includes a certificate of service indicating electronic filing and service to all counsel of record.


document_description: The court denies Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the civil action, arguing that there is no pending criminal action as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k). The court rejects Epstein's interpretation of a 'pending criminal action' and denies the motion for a discretionary stay.


document_description: The court denied Jeffrey Epstein's motion to file documents under seal, emphasizing the public's right to access court records. The court found no justification to keep the documents sealed as the details were already largely public.


document_description: Plaintiff Jane Doe notifies the court of additional evidence of Jeffrey Epstein's fraudulent asset transfers and requests the court to consider materials in Docket Numbers 282 and 283 in determining the motion for appointment of a receiver to restrain fraudulent asset transfers. The document details the deposition of Epstein's pilot, Larry Visoski, who testified about asset transfers to his name.


document_description: This document is a joint motion filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe 2-5 and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, requesting the court to approve a stipulation for acceptance of service of process and an agreed date for the defendant's responses to complaints. The stipulation allows Epstein's counsel to waive formal service of process and accept service on his behalf, with a response deadline set for September 4, 2008.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein requests to file his reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay under seal, citing a confidential agreement with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The motion is filed in an abundance of caution to comply with the confidentiality clause in the agreement.


document_description: This document is a legal filing in the case of Jane Doe Nos. 2-5 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, discussing Epstein's motion to stay civil proceedings due to a pending federal criminal action. It details the deferred-prosecution agreement between Epstein and the USAO, which defers federal prosecution in favor of state prosecution, and argues for a stay of civil cases under 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) during the pendency of the federal investigation. The document also addresses procedural issues related to the motion to stay.


document_description: Defendant Jeffrey Epstein files a motion to dismiss Count I of the plaintiff's complaint, arguing that the allegations do not support a claim for sexual assault under Florida law. The motion contends that there is no private right of action under Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes and that the plaintiff's age places her outside the statute's protection. The motion also argues that the complaint fails to state a cause of action for common-law assault.


document_description: The court addresses several motions to compel filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The motions seek to compel answers to requests for production, admissions, and interrogatories. The court grants in part and denies in part the motion for production, denies the motion for admissions, and denies the motion for interrogatories, primarily upholding Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, files a motion for reconsideration and/or request for Rule 4 review and appeal of portions of the Magistrate's order dated February 4, 2010. The motion argues against the production of certain documents and information, citing Fifth Amendment rights, privacy concerns, and the confidentiality of plea negotiations. The motion also addresses the relevance and necessity of producing Epstein's personal tax returns and travel documents, asserting constitutional protections and the lack of compelling need for such disclosures.


document_description: This document is a memorandum of law filed by Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motions to dismiss their claims. The memorandum argues that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged claims of sexual assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422. The document contends that the defendant's motions are without merit and should be denied.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team files a reply to the plaintiffs' opposition to motions to dismiss and for a more definite statement. The reply argues that the plaintiffs have not sufficiently pleaded the elements required for their claims of 'Sexual Assault and Battery' and 'Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity.' The document references legal standards from Twombly and Watts cases and requests the court to grant the motion to dismiss.


document_description: Lewis Tein, PL withdraws as co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the case 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON.


document_description: The court reviewed Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's motion to dismiss and motion for a more definite statement regarding Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2's Amended Complaint. The complaint includes allegations of sexual assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity. The court denied the motion to dismiss Count I and required a more definite statement for Count III. The motion to strike a citation error was granted.


document_description: This is a legal complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 2 against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual assault and abuse upon a minor. The complaint details Epstein's scheme of recruiting underage girls for sexual activities under the guise of providing massages, and the psychological and emotional harm caused to the plaintiff. The complaint seeks damages in excess of $50 million and includes counts of sexual assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422.


document_description: The document is a motion filed by the plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, against Jeffrey Epstein, seeking to compel answers to interrogatories and production of documents. The defendant has refused to provide information, citing Fifth Amendment privilege. The motion argues that the blanket assertion of privilege is insufficient and requests the court to order the defendant to comply with discovery requests.


document_description: The court reviewed and denied Jeffrey Epstein's appeal against Magistrate Judge Johnson's discovery orders, requiring Epstein to produce documents within three business days, with specific redactions and confidentiality conditions.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a motion requesting an extension of time to respond to Jane Doe No. 2's Second Amended Complaint. The motion cites multiple amended complaints, discovery issues, and personal circumstances of the defense counsel as reasons for the extension. The court granted the extension, allowing Epstein until April 3, 2009, to respond.


document_description: Jeffrey Epstein, through his attorneys, filed a motion to stay or continue the civil action against him until late 2010, when the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) expires. The motion argues that the ongoing parallel criminal proceedings and the undefined terms of the NPA place Epstein at risk of self-incrimination, violating his Fifth Amendment rights. The motion highlights the USAO's discretion in determining breaches of the NPA and the potential for criminal prosecution if Epstein defends himself in civil cases. The motion requests a stay to avoid forcing Epstein to choose between waiving his Fifth Amendment rights or losing the civil case.


document_description: This document includes a service of process affidavit by Harry Torres, detailing the delivery of summons and complaint to Jeffrey Epstein's assistant at his New York residence. It also contains a non-military affidavit by Adam D. Horowitz, Esq., confirming that Jeffrey Epstein is not on active military duty.


document_description: Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 files a motion for entry of default against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for failing to respond to the complaint served on May 7, 2008. The motion is filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) as Epstein has not answered or filed a response by the required date of May 27, 2008.


document_description: This document is a legal memorandum filed by Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay or continue the civil action. The Plaintiffs argue that Epstein has not demonstrated the necessity of a stay due to a parallel criminal proceeding, as there is no such proceeding pending. They assert that a stay would prejudice the Plaintiffs by delaying their civil remedies and complicating discovery. The memorandum references previous court decisions and argues that the Defendant's motion is premature and unsupported by changed circumstances.


document_description: The affidavit by Jeffrey M. Herman, attorney for Jane Doe No. 2, outlines the allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, including sexual assault of young teenage girls. It details the legal proceedings, including attempts to serve Epstein and the press coverage of the case. The affidavit also mentions Epstein's residences and his attorney, Jack A. Goldberger.


document_description: The court order consolidates multiple cases involving Jeffrey Epstein for discovery and procedural motions. It specifies that all related motions and filings should be styled with all case names and numbers and filed only in the lowest-numbered case. The order also outlines rules for depositions and document production.


document_description: The court is addressing motions filed by Jeffrey Epstein to stay or continue civil actions against him due to parallel civil and criminal proceedings. Epstein argues that defending the civil actions may violate a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the USAO. The court requests the United States to provide its position on the matter within 15 days.


document_description: Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 filed a motion to compel the Clerk to enter a default against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for failing to respond to the complaint by the deadline. Alternatively, the plaintiff seeks an extension of time to serve process. The motion details the attempts made to serve Epstein and argues that he had actual notice of the lawsuit.


document_description: A list of relevant pleadings in the Jane Doe I v. Jeffrey Epstein litigation, detailing various motions, orders, and responses filed between June 2008 and May 2009.


document_description: The court denied Jeffrey Epstein's motion to file a notice of continued pendency of federal criminal action under seal. The court emphasized the public's right to access judicial records and found Epstein's justification for sealing insufficient. The court ordered the unsealing of docket entries 14 and 15.