Jeffrey Epstein opposes Bradley Edwards's motion for a protective order, arguing that Edwards's claims of overbroad and irrelevant discovery requests are unfounded. Epstein asserts that Edwards's financial information is relevant due to his own claims of damages, including injury to reputation and mental anguish. The memorandum argues that Edwards's objections are legally insufficient and that his financial privacy claims are invalid as he put his financial status at issue.
documents/EFTA01107639.pdf
{}