The document is a legal reply filed by the defendants in the case Better Markets, Inc. v. United States Department of Justice, et al., supporting their motion to dismiss the case. The defendants argue that the court lacks jurisdiction because the plaintiff lacks standing, and that the DOJ's decision to enter into a settlement agreement is immune from judicial review. The document discusses various legal principles and precedents to support the defendants' position, including the presumption of nonreviewability of agency enforcement decisions and the Attorney General's plenary power to settle claims. The document also addresses the plaintiff's claims of procedural and informational standing, and argues that the plaintiff's separation of powers claim is not colorable.
documents/EFTA01202344.pdf
{}