Jeffrey Epstein opposes Bradley J. Edwards' motion for summary judgment and moves to strike unauthenticated exhibits and attachments. Epstein argues that the motion is premature due to incomplete discovery, particularly documents from the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler firm involved in a Ponzi scheme. Epstein also challenges the legal sufficiency of Edwards' motion and the application of the 'sword and shield' doctrine. The document includes procedural history, legal standards for summary judgment, and arguments against the motion's validity.
documents/EFTA01103302.pdf
{}