This document is a response to Jeffrey Epstein's appeal against the denial of his motion for a protective order. Epstein sought to block the use of certain correspondence in a state proceeding against Bradley J. Edwards, Jane Doe's attorney. The Magistrate Judge denied Epstein's motion, suggesting he file in the appropriate state court. Epstein appealed, but the response argues that his appeal lacks merit and should be denied. The document discusses Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards, the Crime Victims Rights Act case, and the Magistrate Judge's ruling. It argues against federal court intervention in state matters and highlights Epstein's attempt to relitigate issues already decided by the court.
documents/EFTA01101051.pdf
{}