Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the court's order requiring disclosure of correspondence related to plea negotiations. They argue Epstein cannot take an interlocutory appeal and that his appeal lacks merit. The response discusses the inapplicability of the Perlman doctrine and the lack of irreparable harm to Epstein, while highlighting the prejudice to the victims and public interest in denying the stay.
documents/EFTA01098146.pdf
{}