Intervenors argue for a stay pending appeal, asserting that the Eleventh Circuit has jurisdiction under the Perlman Doctrine. They contend that the Mohawk Industries precedent does not apply as they are not parties to the litigation. The document discusses the applicability of the Perlman Doctrine, the irreparable injury to intervenors if confidential communications are disclosed, and the lack of prejudice to plaintiffs. It also addresses the public interest in maintaining confidentiality in plea negotiations.
documents/EFTA00583780.pdf
{}