This document is a legal response to Jeffrey Epstein's petition for a writ of certiorari, arguing against the trial court's decision to sever claims in a case involving Epstein, Scott Rothstein, and Bradley J. Edwards. The response contends that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law and that Epstein will not suffer irreparable harm if the claims are tried separately. The document includes arguments about the lack of risk for inconsistent verdicts, the necessity of bifurcation to ensure a fair proceeding, and the absence of prejudice to Epstein.
documents/EFTA00808816.pdf
{}