The Supreme Court of Florida reviewed a statute requiring judges to impose conditions of probation on sexual offenders, specifically whether it prohibits possession of any pornographic material or only material relevant to the offender's deviant behavior. The court found the statute ambiguous and applied the rule of lenity, holding that the prohibition applies only to material relevant to the offender's deviant behavior. The decision quashed the Third District's ruling and approved the Second District's decision in Taylor.
documents/EFTA00731431.pdf
{}