Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, moves to dismiss the Amended Counterclaim filed by Bradley Edwards. Epstein argues that Edwards' claims for abuse of process and malicious prosecution are legally insufficient. The motion outlines the failure of Edwards to state a valid claim for abuse of process due to lack of illegal use of process, ulterior motive, and damages. It also argues that Edwards' malicious prosecution claim is invalid as there has been no bona fide termination of the original proceeding in Edwards' favor. The motion further criticizes the commingling of claims in Edwards' counterclaim.
documents/EFTA01112592.pdf
{}