Bruce E. Reinhart replies to the plaintiffs' response to his motion to intervene or for a sua sponte Rule 11 order. He argues that the plaintiffs' allegations against him are irrelevant and seeks sanctions for these claims. Reinhart asserts that his intervention is justified under Rule 24(b) due to the attack on his reputation and that the plaintiffs' arguments against his standing are incorrect. He also addresses the plaintiffs' claims of untimeliness and their request for his deposition as premature.
documents/EFTA01081814.pdf
{}