Jeffrey Epstein opposes Bradley Edwards' motion regarding the admissibility of a New York Post article as evidence. Epstein argues the article is irrelevant, prejudicial, and constitutes hearsay. The article quotes Epstein differentiating between being a 'sexual predator' and an 'offender,' which Epstein's counsel argues is inflammatory and not pertinent to the case. The response also discusses previous legal actions involving Edwards and Alan Dershowitz.
documents/EFTA00808738.pdf
{}