This document is a response to Jeffrey Epstein's appeal against the denial of his motion for a protective order. Epstein sought to block the use of certain correspondence in a state proceeding against Bradley J. Edwards, Jane Doe's attorney. The Magistrate Judge had denied Epstein's motion, suggesting he file in the appropriate state court instead. The response argues against Epstein's appeal, stating it lacks merit and should be denied. It discusses Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards, the Crime Victims Rights Act case, and the Magistrate Judge's ruling. The response also addresses Epstein's objections and argues for the denial of his appeal.
documents/EFTA00724457.pdf
{}