The document discusses the adequacy of representation and typicality requirements for a class action lawsuit involving alleged defects in Class Vehicles. The court finds that the typicality and adequacy requirements are satisfied, and that the class action is a superior method for adjudicating the controversy. The claims are based on the installation of a defective timing chain tensioner in all N14 Class Vehicles.
documents/vol00010-efta01371357-pdf.pdf
{"key_people":["Named Plaintiffs"],"document_date":"2016","document_type":"legal","key_locations":["D.N.J."],"document_subtype":"court filing","key_organizations":["Schering Plough Corp.","DB Investments, Inc."],"reference_numbers":["ECF No. 70","2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8543","2015 WL 333465"]}