Bradley J. Edwards, the appellant, responds to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for leave to file supplemental argument. Edwards argues that Epstein's motion is an attempt to introduce new issues at a late stage, which is unfair to both Edwards and the court. The response details why supplemental briefing is unnecessary and improper, citing legal precedents and procedural rules. Edwards requests the court to deny Epstein's motion and proceed with the oral argument based on the existing briefs.
documents/EFTA01200578.pdf
{}