Bruce E. Reinhart replies to the plaintiffs' response to his motion to intervene or for a sua sponte Rule 11 order. He argues that the plaintiffs' allegations against him are irrelevant and seeks sanctions for these claims. Reinhart asserts that his intervention is justified under Rule 24(b) due to the attack on his reputation and the lack of undue prejudice to the plaintiffs. He refutes the plaintiffs' arguments against his standing and timeliness, and requests the court to permit intervention or convene a sanctions hearing.
documents/EFTA01134776.pdf
{}