The United States opposes the motion by Jane Does #1 and #2 to have their 'Statement of Undisputed Material Facts' accepted as true. The opposition argues that the statement contains irrelevant, incomplete, or false facts and that agreeing to it would violate legal and ethical standards. The document discusses the procedural history, the irrelevance of the 'undisputed facts,' and the legal obligations regarding grand jury secrecy and due process.
documents/EFTA00208091.pdf
{}