Jeffrey Epstein's legal team replies to Jane Doe's opposition to Epstein's motion for summary judgment. The document argues that the version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 applicable to the case is the one effective from 1999 to 2006, and that Jane Doe cannot establish the necessary elements to state a claim under this statute. The reply also discusses the non-retroactivity of the amended statute and argues against the multiplication of damages based on the number of violations. Epstein's team requests the court to grant summary judgment and award attorney's fees and costs.
documents/EFTA01116559.pdf
{}