Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the court's order requiring disclosure of correspondence related to plea negotiations. They argue that Epstein cannot take an interlocutory appeal and that his appeal lacks merit. The response discusses the applicability of the Perlman doctrine and recent Supreme Court decisions, asserting that Epstein cannot demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or meet the requirements for a stay pending appeal.
documents/EFTA00209600.pdf
{}