Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, opposes the damages claimed by Bradley Edwards in his Second Amended Counterclaim. Epstein argues that the damages sought by Edwards for alleged abuse of process and malicious prosecution are not recoverable under Florida law. The memorandum outlines several legal arguments against Edwards' claims, including the lack of specificity in damages, the non-recoverability of certain compensatory damages, and the absolute privilege of statements made in litigation. Epstein also contends that Edwards' claims for damages related to reputation and litigation costs are unfounded.
documents/EFTA01111213.pdf
{}