Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 respond to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for limited intervention at the remedy stage of the proceedings. They do not oppose the intervention but note three consequences: Epstein would be subject to the law of the case, potential discovery requests, and his intervention would be limited to the rescission of the non-prosecution agreement. The response also references previous interventions by Epstein and the court's siding with the victims on the rescission of the non-prosecution agreement as a remedy for CVRA violations.
documents/EFTA01081823.pdf
{}