Jeffrey Epstein replies to the Intervenors' response regarding his motion to take their depositions and compel mental examinations. Epstein argues that the Intervenors' claims of significant emotional distress are unfounded and that their past sexual abuse claims were settled in 2010. The current issue is whether Epstein or his former law firm should be held in contempt for allegedly violating a 2010 court order related to documents on a disc. Epstein seeks discovery to defend against the emotional distress claims and argues that the Intervenors have placed their mental states in controversy, justifying the need for depositions and mental examinations.
documents/EFTA00808426.pdf
{}