This document is the Defendant's amended reply to the Plaintiffs' opposition to a motion to dismiss in the case of Jeffrey Epstein et al. v. Fancelli Paneling, Inc. The Defendant argues against the jurisdiction of the Virgin Islands court, improper service of the summons, lack of personal jurisdiction, and insufficient cause of action for breach of contract and negligence. The Defendant also contends that the case should be heard in New York due to the contractual agreements being made there. The document includes references to various legal standards and precedents, and concludes with a request for dismissal with prejudice and costs.
documents/EFTA01099088.pdf
{}