Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 filed a reply in support of their motion to amend their petition to conform to evidence and add Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 as petitioners. The motion argues that the amendment is timely and necessary to reflect the evidence and that the Government has not shown any prejudice. The document discusses legal arguments regarding the applicability of statutes of limitations and the relation back of amendments.
documents/EFTA01158909.pdf
{}