The court reviewed whether the Trust had standing to foreclose on the Olsak Note. The trial court concluded the Trust never acquired an interest in the Note, based on Kahn's testimony. Citibank appealed, arguing the Trust had possession of the Note with a blank endorsement. The appellate court examined the legal standards for standing and the admissibility of expert testimony.
doj/DataSet10/EFTA01372153.pdf
{"title":"Citibank v. Trust - Standing in Foreclosure Case","key_people":["Kahn"],"document_date":"2016","document_type":"legal","key_locations":["Florida"],"document_subtype":"court opinion","key_organizations":["Citibank","Trust","Wells Fargo","Orion Bank"],"reference_numbers":["208 So. 3d 227","2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17683","41 Fla. L. Weekly D 2658"]}