Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 filed a supplemental authority to support their motion to deny the Government's motion to dismiss their case. They argue that the Government's motion lacks merit and that the court has the power to provide remedies for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The document discusses the procedural history, including the Government's sealed motion to dismiss and the victims' responses. It also addresses the Government's new arguments raised in a reply memorandum and requests the court to deny the motion to dismiss or allow a sur-reply.
documents/EFTA01098102.pdf
{}