The document discusses the inadmissibility of a May 2005 Offering Memorandum as evidence in a legal case. The memorandum was issued five months after a 2005 Letter Agreement and is considered extrinsic evidence that does not reflect the parties' intent at the time of the contract. The document references Delaware Supreme Court rulings on the parol evidence rule and argues that the memorandum's language is not relevant to the FTC's investment, which was not subject to the three-year lock-up described in the memorandum.
documents/EFTA01074684.pdf
{}