Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, responds in opposition to Bradley Edwards' motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Epstein argues that Edwards' motion is perfunctory, lacks supporting authorities, and fails to demonstrate any deficiencies in the abuse of process claim. Epstein contends that the amended complaint satisfies all elements of a cause of action for abuse of process and that Edwards has not met the burden to dismiss it. The response addresses various arguments made by Edwards, including the sufficiency of the complaint's allegations and the applicability of litigation privilege.
documents/EFTA01103321.pdf
{}