The court addresses the Defendant's motion to exclude evidence related to Witness-3, arguing it is not direct evidence of the charged conspiracies and is inadmissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403. The court concludes that some of the anticipated testimony may serve as direct evidence of the Mann Act counts and permissible purposes under Rule 404(b). The court limits the testimony to minimize prejudice and proposes limiting instructions for the jury.
documents/EFTA00090200.pdf
{}