Petitioners Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, along with movants Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, respond to the court's request for justification of Epstein's unopposed motion for a protective order. They argue against the motion, emphasizing the importance of public access to correspondence related to the non-prosecution agreement. The document discusses previous court rulings on the confidentiality of such correspondence and argues that Epstein has not shown good cause for keeping it under seal.
documents/EFTA00592714.pdf
{}