The document discusses the concept of 'expressive overdetermination' in public health regulation and corporate governance. It references the work of Kahan and others on how worldview conflicts have historically impacted policy development, particularly in environmental and corporate contexts. The document also explores the potential for incorporating religious language into corporate boardroom discussions to enrich discourse and address multiple stakeholder interests. It suggests that legislative action may be necessary to shift corporate governance towards a multi-stakeholder approach, moving away from the current shareholder primacy model.
doj/DataSet10/EFTA01378463.pdf
{"key_people":["Kahan","Douglas Kysar","David G. Yosifon","Lyman Johnson","Stephen Bainbridge"],"document_type":"legal","key_locations":["Delaware"],"document_subtype":"legal analysis","key_organizations":["Harvard Law Review","Catholic University Law Review","George Mason Law Review"],"reference_numbers":["DB-SDNY-0075642","SDNY_GM_00221826","EFTA01378463"]}