The document discusses Jeffrey Epstein's motion to quash subpoenas by asserting blanket Fifth Amendment, attorney-client, and work product privileges. The court argues that such blanket assertions are unenforceable and that each claim must be evaluated individually. The document cites various legal precedents to support the need for specific privilege claims and criticizes Epstein's failure to provide a privilege log, which could result in waiving the privilege claims. The document also argues that Epstein has not proven that the attorney-client privilege applies to the computers in question.
documents/EFTA00222938.pdf
{}