The United States responds to the Petitioners' Protective Motion for Remedies, arguing that the motion should be denied as it is not cognizable under the Crime Victims Rights Act or any court rules, and lacks a supporting memorandum of law. The United States denies that Petitioners are entitled to the remedies they seek, incorporating arguments from its Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
documents/EFTA01098083.pdf
{}