Jeffrey Epstein's legal team filed a reply supporting his motion for limited intervention in a case involving Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 against the United States. The document argues that Epstein's intervention is timely and necessary to protect privileged communications related to plea negotiations. The reply addresses claims made by the plaintiffs and the government, emphasizing the importance of protecting plea negotiations under Rule 410 and the potential impact on the criminal justice system. The document also discusses the timeliness of the intervention and the adequacy of representation by existing parties.
documents/EFTA01098037.pdf
{}