The United States, as the respondent, argues for a stay of discovery pending a ruling on its motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The respondent contends that the petitioners' discovery requests are overly broad and burdensome, and that discovery should not proceed until the court rules on the motion to dismiss. The respondent also opposes the petitioners' motion to compel discovery, citing legal precedents that support resolving dispositive motions before discovery.
documents/EFTA00205477.pdf
{}