This document is a memorandum in opposition to a letter motion filed by Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. requesting the withdrawal of an order permitting alternative service on Ghislaine Maxwell. The plaintiff, Jane Doe 43, argues that the court's decision to allow alternative service through Haddon Morgan was appropriate given Maxwell's evasion of service. The memorandum details the procedural background, the lack of standing by Haddon Morgan to oppose the service, and the untimeliness of their motion for reconsideration. It also addresses the factual and legal foundations for the alternative service motion, asserting that Maxwell was evading service and that Haddon Morgan's objections are unfounded.
documents/EFTA00792797.pdf
{}