Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 reply to the Government's response to their motion to use correspondence to prove violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and to have their unredacted pleadings unsealed. The Government does not contest the use of correspondence but argues against public disclosure due to grand jury secrecy and constitutional concerns. The victims argue against these claims, stating that the correspondence does not disclose grand jury matters and that Epstein has not contested the allegations. The document discusses legal arguments related to grand jury secrecy, constitutional rights, and public interest in the case.
documents/EFTA00207967.pdf
{}