Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the court's order requiring disclosure of correspondence related to plea negotiations. The response argues that Epstein cannot take an interlocutory appeal and that the appeal lacks merit. The document discusses legal precedents and the Crime Victims' Rights Act, emphasizing that Epstein's claims of privilege and confidentiality are unfounded. The response also highlights the public interest in resolving the case without delay.
documents/EFTA01143529.pdf
{}