The document discusses the interlocutory nature of an August 17th order that did not dispose of all claims against all parties and lacked Rule 54(b) certification, making it non-appealable. It references several cases to support this position and explains why the denial of a motion to amend a complaint is not a final decision under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The document also notes the lack of jurisdiction for appeal under § 1292(b) as the district court did not certify the order for immediate appeal.
documents/vol00010-efta01363298-pdf.pdf
{}