This document is an amended response filed by Bradley J. Edwards opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to continue a hearing and/or extend time to file motions related to collateral quasi-criminal cases. Edwards argues that Epstein's request is a last-ditch effort to avoid trial and that Epstein had previously waived any argument related to the Doe v. United States proceeding. The response also discusses the principles of waiver and equitable estoppel, asserting that Epstein's actions have led to a disadvantageous legal position for Edwards.
documents/EFTA00808568.pdf
{}