This document is a legal reply filed by the proposed intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz in support of their supplemental briefing. The reply argues against the plaintiffs' request for disclosure of plea negotiation letters and emails, asserting that such disclosure is not warranted under constitutional law, Rule 410, and common-law privilege. The document discusses the non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, the plaintiffs' claims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), and the legal principles of collateral estoppel and privilege. The intervenors argue that the plea negotiations are protected by attorney work-product privilege and common-law privilege, and that the plaintiffs' request for disclosure is based on misrepresentations and an abuse of the discovery process.
documents/EFTA01098060.pdf
{}