The document discusses the limitations of attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine in the context of physical evidence, specifically computers, in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It argues that pre-existing documents on computers are not protected by these privileges and references several legal precedents to support this position. The document also critiques the removal of computers from Epstein's home as not constituting 'selection and compilation of documents' that would disclose attorney thought processes.
documents/EFTA00222960.pdf
{}