This document is a legal response filed by intervenors Roy Black and Martin G. Weinberg in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The response opposes the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the interlocutory appeal concerning the disclosure of privileged and confidential correspondence related to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the government. The intervenors argue that the correspondence is protected under various legal privileges and that the court has jurisdiction to hear their appeal under the Perlman doctrine. The document also discusses the implications of the Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter case and the Perlman doctrine's applicability beyond the grand jury context.
documents/EFTA01072169.pdf
{}