This document is a court opinion regarding an antitrust case involving Warner Brothers and other film distributors. The plaintiffs, NITE, Patterson, and SAFFCO, alleged that the defendants conspired to destroy SAFFCO by discouraging screen advertising programs, violating the Sherman Act. The court granted summary judgment for the defendants, concluding they were not responsible for SAFFCO's alleged injury. SAFFCO and Patterson appealed, challenging the court's decisions on standing, substitution of parties, and procedural matters.
documents/vol00010-efta01363302-pdf.pdf
{}