Jeffrey Epstein opposes Bradley J. Edwards' Motion in Limine regarding admissible evidence, arguing that evidence of Epstein's past sexual conduct is irrelevant to the malicious prosecution claim. Epstein contends that the focus should be on whether he had probable cause to file the civil proceeding against Edwards, not on his past criminal or civil cases. The document argues against the admissibility of evidence related to Epstein's sexual contact with minors, citing Florida statutes and case law to support the exclusion of such evidence due to its potential to unfairly prejudice the jury.
documents/EFTA00801498.pdf
{}