Stuart S. Mermelstein responds to Robert D. Critton, Jr.'s letter regarding non-party subpoenas on employers and medical records in the case of Jane Does 2-7 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Mermelstein argues against serving formal subpoenas to employers and emphasizes the need for a HIPAA compliant protective order for medical records. He also disagrees with the proposal to limit depositions and supports consolidation for discovery purposes.
documents/EFTA00722725.pdf
{}