The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of certain provisions of the International Megan's Law (IML). The plaintiffs challenged the notification and passport identifier provisions of the IML, arguing they violated constitutional rights. The court found that the plaintiffs did not establish a likelihood of success on the merits or standing to challenge the notification provision, and that the passport identifier claim was not ripe for resolution.
documents/EFTA01130803.pdf
{}