The document discusses the concept of 'expressive overdetermination' in public health regulation and corporate governance. It references various legal scholars and their views on how expressive overdetermination can reconcile conflicting worldviews in policy-making. The document also explores the potential for incorporating religious language in corporate boardrooms to enrich discourse and suggests legislative changes to support multi-stakeholder corporate governance.
doj/DataSet10/EFTA01379767.pdf
{"key_people":["Kahan","Douglas Kysar","David G. Yosifon","Lyman Johnson","Stephen Bainbridge"],"document_type":"legal","key_locations":["Delaware"],"document_subtype":"legal analysis","key_organizations":["Harvard Law Review","Catholic University Law Review","George Mason Law Review"],"reference_numbers":["DB-SDNY-0077559","SDNY_GM_00223743","EFTA01379767"]}