The United States opposes Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's motion to supplement authorities, arguing that a letter from the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility does not constitute authority to compel the U.S. Attorney's Office to provide evidence in their CVRA lawsuit. The letter from OPR declined to investigate claims of improper influences in the non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, stating that such issues should be addressed in court. The opposition argues that the court is not the platform to review the Executive Branch's discretion in the agreement.
documents/EFTA01081638.pdf
{}