This document is a legal reply to the response filed by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's motion for limited intervention in a case involving grand jury materials. Epstein argues that his motion is timely and necessary to protect his privacy interests under Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The document discusses the timeliness of the motion, potential prejudice to plaintiffs, and Epstein's interest in the confidentiality of grand jury materials.
documents/EFTA00583886.pdf
{}