This document is a legal reply in support of a motion to dismiss Jeffrey Epstein's interlocutory appeal regarding a district court discovery order. The plaintiffs argue that the court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal and that Epstein has not provided evidence to support his claims of confidentiality and privilege. The document references the Supreme Court's decision in Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, which limits interlocutory appeals. The reply emphasizes that Epstein has not made a sufficient record in the district court to support his appeal and that any potential injury can be addressed at the conclusion of the proceedings.
documents/EFTA00209494.pdf
{}