The document discusses a court's decision regarding the appeal of a bankruptcy court's confirmation order. The appeal was considered equitably moot due to the substantial consummation of the reorganization plan. The court outlines the conditions under which an appeal can overcome the mootness presumption, emphasizing the importance of seeking a stay of confirmation. The appellants had diligently sought a stay, and the court ordered a limited remand to re-evaluate interest on replacement notes, dismissing concerns about the plan's viability.
documents/vol00010-efta01358969-pdf.pdf
{"key_people":["Debtors","Appellants"],"document_type":"legal","document_subtype":"court opinion","key_organizations":["Bankruptcy Court"],"reference_numbers":["15-1682","15-1771"]}