Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, opposes Bradley Edwards' motion to amend his counterclaim to include punitive damages. Epstein argues that Edwards' motion is frivolous, lacks a reasonable basis, and is premature as it is not directed at a pending complaint. The response outlines the legal standards for punitive damages under Florida law and argues that Edwards has not met these standards. Epstein's response also contends that dropping certain claims does not justify punitive damages and that Edwards' inability to prove abuse of process does not support such damages.
documents/EFTA00582880.pdf
{}