The document discusses the response rate and objections related to a class action settlement involving N14 Class members. Of the 186,031 members, 5,310 submitted claims, 123 opted out, and 23 submitted objections. The objections primarily concern the adequacy of the settlement's warranty extension and the documentation required for repair reimbursements. The court addresses these objections, particularly focusing on the objection by Kunal A. Mirchandani, who argues that the documentation requirement is burdensome for used vehicle owners. The court finds the requirement reasonable, noting that mechanics can access service history databases.
documents/vol00010-efta01371360-pdf.pdf
{"key_people":["Kunal A. Mirchandani","Richard Ellenbogen","Timothy Fitzgerald","Donald Mann","Shirtey M. Stipe-Zendle","Marika Hamilton","Gerald Maloney","Sarah H. Beeby"],"document_date":"2016","document_type":"legal","document_subtype":"court filing","reference_numbers":["ECF No. 107-1","ECF No. 78","ECF No. 92-5 Ex. 11","ECF No. 104","ECF No. 102","ECF No. 107-2 Ex. 11","ECF No. 107-1 Ex. B","ECF No. 75","ECF No. 92"]}