The court reviews the dismissal of RICO and RICO conspiracy claims, affirming the decision due to lack of properly alleged predicate acts of fraud. The plaintiffs' theory on consent in an ECPA claim was unsupported, leading to summary judgment for the defendants.
documents/vol00010-efta01358950-pdf.pdf
{"key_people":["Schlessinger","Valspar Corp.","Moss","Morgan Stanley, Inc.","Sessa","Trilegiant","Autuori","O'Donnell","Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.","Warshak","Van Dyke"],"document_date":"2018","document_type":"legal","key_locations":["Second Circuit"],"document_subtype":"court opinion","key_organizations":["United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit"],"reference_numbers":["18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)","18 U.S.C. § 1962(a)-(c)","18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343"]}