The paper explores zero-determinant (ZD) strategies in multiplayer social dilemmas, highlighting how individuals can exert control and form alliances to influence outcomes. It distinguishes between fair, extortionate, and generous strategies, and discusses their implications in public goods games and volunteer's dilemmas. The study shows that alliances can enhance strategic options, reduce inequality, or increase welfare, depending on their size and strategy type.
documents/EFTA01074265.pdf
{}