Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 oppose Jeffrey Epstein's motion for 'limited' intervention in their case under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). They argue that Epstein's motion is untimely, improperly seeks limited intervention to avoid legal obligations, and is barred by the 'law of the case' regarding confidentiality of plea discussions. The document details the procedural history and legal arguments against Epstein's intervention.
documents/EFTA00614086.pdf
{}